topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 13, 2025, 8:43 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 105 ... 252next
2476
Living Room / Re: anonplus: new, uncensored social network coming soon?
« Last post by superboyac on July 18, 2011, 11:49 AM »
4chan...ugh...see, that's the problem with anarchy.  I love the idea of it, but I hate the ugliness that results.  yet another indication that I'm an irrational idealist.
2477
Living Room / anonplus: new, uncensored social network coming soon?
« Last post by superboyac on July 18, 2011, 09:42 AM »
I just read this article:
http://www.telegraph...gle-alternative.html

An uncensored social network?  I wouldn't mind at all.  The only problem I really see is that most people will probably not want to use a "hackers" tool instead of facebook or google+.  It's not like your mom is going to switch from facebook to anonplus.

But...I like the idea very much.  Sort of the Linux of social networks.  No advertising, no crazy layouts or anything.  We'll see, I'll be interested.  I hate facebook not because I feel "too cool" for it but I find the interface really really annoying.  It's just too much.  I haven't tried google+, but google's app never really hit a home run with me.  They are always pretty good and of top quality, just never makes me too excited.  I like gmail the best, of course, but even that, I don't get the boner everyone else gets with it.  I have a feeling that my mind just doesn't work the way google models things, even though it seems to resonate very well with a lot of people.

Ah...I probably won't use any of these things, come to think about it.  I never have.  I went through the same thing with every new communication technology.  I use it a lot in the beginning, then it quickly dies.
2478
http://www.yawcam.com/
Yawcam features:
 .: Video streaming
 .: Image snapshots
 .: Built-in webserver
 .: Motion detection
 .: Ftp-upload
 .: Text and image overlays
 .: Password protection
 .: Online announcements for communities
 .: Scheduler for online time
 .: Time lapse movies
 .: Run as a Windows service
 .: Multi languages
Nice!
2479
General Software Discussion / Re: Virtual cd/dvd drive software (2011)
« Last post by superboyac on July 15, 2011, 11:43 AM »
MagicISO gets bashed a lot around the internet.  However, hardly anyone says why it's so bad.  They just say it sucks.  And I'm like, "But why??"  Anyway...this WinCDemu is working well.  I'll check out DVDFab, I had never heard of that one.  I've tried MagicISO...I don't remember how it was.  I think it was fine, but I went with PowerISO for some reason.  Geez...these names...MagicISO, PowerISO, UltraISO...I need to do a Super(boyac)ISO.
In my case, it's because MagicDisc blew up Disk Manager on my old XP machine and I couldn't even uninstall it.
Yes, I also remember odd things like this when I used MagicDisc, I just don't remember the details.  I liked the functionality of the software very much, but it did have these weird behavior issues.  Just like Daemon, I thought it worked great functionally, but it felt like it got its fingers into too many things on my computer.
WindCDEmu is a really great one so far.  I've used it for a couple of days now, no problem.  I just wish it had some tray features and a general settings dialog.
2480
Pigeonhole is nice.  But unlike the other two I mentioned, I don't really see it as having a lot of future potential.  It's a good, simple application for holding some notes.  With IQ and TS, they have this ability to really grow with the application, and they are flexible enough to transform according to your personal mindset.  I really hope the developers continue to fine tune and work on these applications.

I was thinking Pigeonhole would be ideal for a quick reference manual. I'm imagining setting it up for all the major commands in a given piece of software. Might be fun to do it for bash for example.
 :)
Yes!  It would be great for something like that.  But also consider this, with treesheets you can setup a very similar situation rather easily.  The only thing you might miss is the popup window.  But you gain the ability to have a couple of extra hierarchical levels, and a more flexible layout.  What's common in both is the grid structure, but in Pigeonhole, you are limited to the default setup.  In treesheets, you can tweak the grid to your heart's content.

You know what feature would dramatically improve treesheets?  If you could merge/split cells on an independant basis (i.e. not affecting adjacent cells in the row or column).  That would be quite a powerful addition.
2481
Pigeonhole is nice.  But unlike the other two I mentioned, I don't really see it as having a lot of future potential.  It's a good, simple application for holding some notes.  With IQ and TS, they have this ability to really grow with the application, and they are flexible enough to transform according to your personal mindset.  I really hope the developers continue to fine tune and work on these applications.
2482
As many of you know, my obsession with information managers has been going on for many years now.  Lately, the two that I have the most high hopes for are InfoQube and TreeSheets.  Infoqube has the potential to be the most "workhorse" type of PIM.  If done right, it should be able to destroy UltraRecall, Zoot, OneNote, AskSam...its potential is very impressive.  Then there's TreeSheets which has impressed me on another level.  It's not the workhorse that IQ is or other serious information managers, but it's take on information management is by far the most intriguing of any I've seen.

That's it.  Just thought I'd share that.
2483
General Software Discussion / Re: Virtual cd/dvd drive software (2011)
« Last post by superboyac on July 13, 2011, 04:50 PM »
MagicISO gets bashed a lot around the internet.  However, hardly anyone says why it's so bad.  They just say it sucks.  And I'm like, "But why??"  Anyway...this WinCDemu is working well.  I'll check out DVDFab, I had never heard of that one.  I've tried MagicISO...I don't remember how it was.  I think it was fine, but I went with PowerISO for some reason.  Geez...these names...MagicISO, PowerISO, UltraISO...I need to do a Super(boyac)ISO.
2484
General Software Discussion / Re: Virtual cd/dvd drive software (2011)
« Last post by superboyac on July 13, 2011, 03:25 PM »
WinCDEmu is what I use.  Double click an .iso to mount. I can even use my Tray app.  When I "open" the CD tray for that drive, it unmounts it.  Neat. :)

Glad to hear.  I'm also happy with it so far (5 minutes using it!).  As long as it doesn't disconnect on bootup, or bug out, I'm fine.  I know Daemon is very reliable and all, but it has one of those installations that are very complicated and makes you wonder why such a little program has such an involved install/uninstall process.
2485
General Software Discussion / Virtual cd/dvd drive software (2011)
« Last post by superboyac on July 13, 2011, 03:03 PM »
Every couple of years or so, it comes time for me to look into getting a different virtual cd/dvd software.  I used to always use Daemon tools lite, but at some point, it gave me problems.  Sometimes because of it's intrusive installation process, rebooting and all that.  it feels like it's installing in a more complicated way than necessary.  Then, it couldn't read certain images (this is years ago, to be fair).  So I moved to PowerISO's virtual drives, which I was happy with.  But that isn't free, so I eventually needed another one.  So I got Elby's Virtual Clone Drive.  I've been using it for a couple of weeks, and I find it not very stable.  It will often sort of disconnect the loaded image, even though it still shows it as mounted.  Then I remount it or reboot, and it works fine again.  but it's annoying.

Now, I'm going to try this free WinCDEmu, which may or may not be good.  If all these don't work, I'll go back to Daemon or PowerISO.
2486
General Software Discussion / Re: Grid Layout software? Does it exist?
« Last post by superboyac on July 12, 2011, 02:40 PM »
I'm sure not too many people are terribly interested in it.

That one's new to me -- and I'm definitely interested. I've never found a good planning tool that worked the way my mind does. Not sure this is it but it looks like it's well worth a try -- so thanks, Mahesh2k!
I felt the same way when I saw it.  It really has something great going on.  Another awesome thing about it is how small, fast, responsive it is.
2487
General Software Discussion / Re: Google+
« Last post by superboyac on July 12, 2011, 10:54 AM »
The more I read about G+ heavy-handedness, the more I think I'm gonna build my own if I ever feel the desperate need to be part of a "social" network.  ;D

I agree 100% with this.  I'm starting to look into ways to use the internet as a connection only, but have private networks setup for myself and friends.  That is, all the content is on our own servers, and it's private and just meant for us.  Chatting, everything included.  I just see no reason why we have to continue to push for having all our software run in browsers.  It was so much better (in my opinion) when we had servers and clients for all this stuff.  I'm going to go back to that.
2488
General Software Discussion / Re: Grid Layout software? Does it exist?
« Last post by superboyac on July 12, 2011, 10:26 AM »
I think mahesh2k is right.  Treesheets does this pretty much.  I have a couple of extremely minor issues with it, but nothing significant.  It's going to be really interesting to see how this software develops.  It's definitely being developed at a "hobby" pace, which makes sense, I'm sure not too many people are terribly interested in it.
2489
Living Room / Re: Windows Live Skydrive: Tried Anyone?
« Last post by superboyac on July 11, 2011, 03:49 PM »
Nightly backups churned on for months until somebody needed one of the year X records that weren't there anymore.

One of the reasons why I try never to do incremental backups any more. I'll do full backups, image snapshots - or sync directories. But no incrementals. All they ever seem to do is increase the potential points of failure along with the likelihood of not being able to restore a backup.

re: your client

Eek! indeed...

One more reason why it's so important to actually look very carefully at those backup logs each day. (Not that I or anybody else I know ever seems to do it religiously. :-\ ;D )


OK...I'm going to have to pick your brain on your preferred backup procedure one day...
2490
General Software Discussion / Re: Grid Layout software? Does it exist?
« Last post by superboyac on July 11, 2011, 12:19 PM »
Treesheets allow grid format, merging of cells for notes. I hope i got your question right.
Yeah, I thought Treesheets would be the answer initially also.  But while it's great for outlining, it can't do grid layouts at the moment.  Grid layouts would mean being able to merge and split cells in a pure, direct manner.  Treesheets is still all about hierarchies and nesting, more so that merging and splitting.  I still think it can do the job, but not as easily as I'd like.  But yeah, I think it comes closest.
2491
General Software Discussion / Grid Layout software? Does it exist?
« Last post by superboyac on July 11, 2011, 11:55 AM »
Hi everyone, I was wondering if anyone knows about grid layout software?  Not specifically for the purposes of website design or anything web related, just a general layout tool.  Meaning, I'm looking for a windows standalone program.  It's something that Excel can do, but I wanted to know if there's something designed specifically for this.

Grid layout, as I imagine it, would allow me to create a layout governed by merging and splitting cells.  It's a really cool way to lay things out, and it's sort of how my mind naturally works.  I know Excel can do this, but it's not truly meant for it.  Thoughts?
2492
General Software Discussion / Re: Automatic document creation. How?
« Last post by superboyac on July 06, 2011, 11:49 AM »
There's also another software called EasyCatalog.  I'm very happy to see these out there, for a while I felt like I was the first person to ask for such a thing, and I knew that was crazy.
2493
NZBMatrix subscription = $10 for 10 years of nzb listings that are monitored and moderated which gets rid of many of the viruses and password protected nonsense
Binsearch for stuff that doesn't meet nzbmatrix's standards if necessary
cthorpe, how do you feel NZBMatrix compares to Newzbin?
2494
i like newsbin pro, great deal.  The interface is a little techie, but not as much as Usenet Explorer which is the most techie interface.  Both are really good for newsgroups.  Newsleecher is definitely the slickest of all of them, but I eventually settled on Newsbin, no doubt helped by it being the only one offering a lifetime license.  If money didn't matter, my preference order would be: Newsleecher, Newsbin, Usenet Explorer.  My newsgroup habits actually went from Forte Agent, to Xnews, to newsleecher, and finally Newsbin.
2495
General Software Discussion / Re: Automatic document creation. How?
« Last post by superboyac on July 05, 2011, 09:25 AM »
Came across this list of InDesign/InCopy plugins earlier today and I thought it might help solve some of these issues:

http://www.adobe.com...end.displayTab3.html
In particular Em Software with their product InCatalog (DB integration with InDesign):
http://emsoftware.co.../products/emcatalog/

- Oshyan
Thanks Oshyan!  That emcatalog sounds just right.  Boy, it's expensive ($800), but may be well worth it.
2496
This is going to sound waaaay out of left field...

I think the biggest problem with all of these information managers is none of them offer the user a good way to customize how they want to SEE the information.  Look, storing information is easy.  Even without any special programs, it's easy to just use a good file manager to organize a bunch of files and folders.  What a lot of these programs do is focus on the STORAGE of information, which to me is not a big deal.  That's why i always struggle with that part.  I'm fine with basic file management, I don't need a new way to manage files.

The presentation is where it gets bad.  All of these programs either want you to view your data in  THEIR way, which usually only resonates with a specific group of people.  But you don't have the ability to tweak it to what you need.  Just to prove my point further, most of these information managers have really awful printing support.  Most of them are very basic, maybe the default IE type print preview thing.

The reason why this is bad is because why am I going to spend all this time importing/creating the database, if I'm not going to see or get out the end result of what I want?

Which is why I think my ultimate idea for a program like this would be awesome, but I don't have the talent to create it:

The ultimate information management program:
First, it should be able to import content in easily.  Especially content that is "very normal".  text files, ms office files, pictures, popular database formats.  That takes care of bringing things in.

Then, it should offer a flexible way to establish relationships among all these items.  Hierarchies should be easy to make, like in infoqube, ecco pro.  Hierarchies are essential.  I don't care if you call it tagging or outlining, but relating content needs to be easy.

Now for the best part.  I should be able to take all these content elements and like a desktop publishing program, specify how they should be laid out and so forth.  So I can print it, export it to an image or html file, etc.  This is what most programs lack big time.

Once you like a certain layout, you should be able to save that layout as a template or something and reuse it easily with other data.


That's an idea worth exploring, I think.  We spend too much time designing how to bring content into the application.  There are tons of programs that do this. Any program like MS Word is going to be better at writing stuff than an information manager, yet they all go through the whole exercise of giving us a Word-lite editor, that people keep requesting more features to make it more like Word.  Then they don't have this feature or that feature, like image resizing, rotating, etc...but all this stuff is done better with programs specific for that.  This is what most developers spend their time doing.

What is consistently neglected: printing features, export/import features, interface improvements.  No.  we keep doing the same mistake everyone else in this world does: make it bigger, bigger, more stuff, more stuff...yet never go back and fine-tune or fix things that we have now had a chance to use and improve.  Just like google, it used to be awesome, now there's so much crap on it that it's 99% crap, 1% useful.  So you might argue it's still worth it for that 1%, but after a while, you give up because your tired...you're tired of wading through all the crap to find that one thing.

I'm on a big fix with elegance lately, since I see so little of it in my life.  granted, I'm an engineer in los Angeles (how ugly and boring can it get?!) but I still see very few examples of it around.  Plus, I'm super cynical now.
2497
Living Room / Re: Do it yourself dropbox
« Last post by superboyac on June 22, 2011, 09:38 AM »
We'll see how Apple deals with getting more and more users and becoming bigger and bigger.  Their entire business model is based on having a tightly controlled and restricted ecosystem, and that will just get harder and harder to maintain as they get bigger.  But they're getting bigger.  It's going to be interesting.  More people will jailbreak.  More people will find the workarounds to the restrictions.  Then what?  Then again, it seems like most users are less and less aware about how tightly they are being controlled.  Or maybe I'm just cynical as usual (man that latest South Park episode was a doozy!).
2498
Here's the Oops!Backup  link :
I re-read parts of the thread again and it certainly didn't convince me to try oops again. They'd really need to work on some of the mentioned problems... For smallerish files, it should be okay though.

===

It's interesting for me to see how I tried so many options during the last few years and just went back to my original "no fuss" solution -- full proof, simple, efficient. The only I added to the mix are online syncing ingredients like SpiderOak (not always completely reliable unfortunately...).

I don't think I'll come back to that "backup struggle" until next summer, when I'll need extra storage... Way too time consuming... Need to get some stuff done!!!!  :'(
Thanks Armando, I'll have to read that.  Yeah, I'm struggling with the same issues.  I'm surprised about Oops because it seems like they have good customer support and are diligent with addressing issues.  But I trust you more than the other stuff I read!
2499
^If you combine text, XML, and a database haven't you just created another wiki? ;D
have I?  I don't know!  I've never understood how the wiki works.  What I was picturing was inputting all the elements (text, graphics) in the database, then export it to xml and tag it with the appropriate styles.  Then, import that into Indesign and fine-tune it while being able to preview it.  I really feel this is the best method for the way I work.  if wiki does this easily, I'm all for it!
2500
Yeah, I'm really interested in learning a new way to write and publish stuff.  As some of you know, I've created several threads related to Indesign, Word, typography, etc.  Last year, I really learned about Word's styles which made me like Word a little better.  But I still can't shake the feeling with Word that something bad can happen at any given time.
After reading Zaine's word processor review, I'm interested in going back and checking out Wordperfect.  It was my preferred program back in the 90's.  I also like Softmaker, but never got around to using it regularly, but it's portable!  I'm not that big a fan of OpenOffice, although for no real good reason.  I like Atlantis as a simple alternative for quick n dirty work.

But for me, I like the idea of styles so much, that I'm in the middle of figuring out a good workflow involving database, xml, and indesign.  Indesign will give me the frontend preview and fine tuning ability that we expect from our word processors today, but xml and a database will give me a powerful way to organize content and keep the idea of "styles" and structure without all the issues Word has with such things.
Pages: prev1 ... 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 105 ... 252next