topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 13, 2025, 6:34 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 91 92 93 94 95 [96] 97 98 99 100 101 ... 261next
2376
Well... after a weird situation last night wherein Maxthon froze and I could not terminate the process because my system had apparently locked it, I disabled my wireless receiver, rebooted and ran a Deep scan with Webroot overnight - I have no idea how long it took, but typically these scans take about 2 hours (I run them once a week over dinner). It found one trojan in a very old e-mail attachment (from 2000! It was a file that allowed me to run Combat Flight Simulator without the CD in the drive) and I let it quarantine it (in the past I'd just directed my AV to ignore it). Because I was paranoid, I then installed VIPRE and set up my preferences for it and rebooted. I let VIPRE update its definitions and then disabled Webroot while I set VIPRE to deep scan my system. After an hour and a half of watching it trawl through my C drive (hadn't even gotten to My Documents, which are on E:) I killed it and looked at the one issue it had found. It had identified Check&Get.exe as a keylogger. I investigated, and also scanned the file with Webroot, and as far as I can tell, it's clean. Anyway, I was disappointed with the speed of VIPRE and with the false positive. My assumption is that it gets quicker with each run (this was my experience with Win2k, before that machine gave up the ghost). For my needs, Webroot is rock solid. If you are happy with VIPRE and you've been runing it for a while you're probably beyond that break in period and it's probably very quick. I'd stick with it. The price is significantly cheaper than Webroot at the moment and I WAS impressed with how responsive my computer was even when running the deep scan. Webroot is more resource intensive during scanning, but it is quick. EDIT: Also, I followed up the aborted deep scan with VIPRE with a Quick Scan with VIPRE and it took about 10 minutes or so - not bad! It also didn't turn up the keylogger false-positive, which I thought rather odd...

NB my wife is running VIPRE Enterprise on my work provided notebook and it is amazingly quick and non-intrusive on that machine (WinXP Pro Sp-3, 2GB RAM). If I didn't have just under two years remaining on my Webroot licence I'd probably stick with VIPRE to get a better idea of how it would perform on this machine in the long run.

Bottom line: I think Webroot is great, but many disagree. Carol, for example, has had negative experiences with it WRT resource utilization. VIPRE is impressive considering it's still only about two months old. I am sure that it will get better. If you are determined to give something else a shot before you commit, do give Webroot a try. Otherwise, I'd take advantage of the great price on VIPRE...

[Darwin returns to gazing at his navel while sitting on the fence!]

EDITED: for clarity.
2377
General Software Discussion / Re: How do you manage your email?
« Last post by Darwin on September 05, 2008, 07:53 AM »
Ah yes - forgot about the Unread Messages view. Indispensible  :Thmbsup: I have it set to display my messages organized by folders...
2378
General Software Discussion / Re: How do you manage your email?
« Last post by Darwin on September 04, 2008, 09:42 PM »
Just to clarify, my inbox is organized into Folders by e-mail address for "general" e-mail (like the imaginary one from my imaginary friend above) and into specific folders for different categories. Thus, I have a folder called Software that contains subfolders for receipts, registration keys, newsletters and so on. Any relevant e-mail gets shunted in here (wherever it belongs) regardless of what e-mail account it is received through... Whatever is left over in the Inbox after the "specific" rules have run gets shifted to the e-mail specific folders at the end of the rule filtering "cycle".

What can I say? It works and I am comfortable with it. It's pretty simplistic, though!
2379
Living Room / Re: What are your favorite gadgets and gizmos?
« Last post by Darwin on September 04, 2008, 09:04 PM »
I hate AC Adapters so I'm a big fan of "Power Liberators."
...
Wow! And those are cheap too!
I've made close to 20 or so of those things out of dead appliance cords and replacement plugs from the hardware store. The heavy duty plugs cost more than one of those little gadgets you mentioned.
Thanks for the link! :Thmbsup:


Yeah, I'm hoping to find a source for these in the Great White North, eh?
2380
General Software Discussion / Re: How do you manage your email?
« Last post by Darwin on September 04, 2008, 08:18 PM »
Sorry about introducing the S*** topic  :-[ It was meant as an aside (and I should have labelled it as such).

Anyway, I organize the e-mail from my 8 e-mail addresses first into folders by subject/category and then into folders by e-mail account. I have rules that do this for me. Note, though, that Outlook applies the rules in order (and of course, as far as I can tell, won't let you rearrange the order that the rules are applied in  >:() so I have all of my "category" rules set to run before my E-mail account specific rules. Thus, I might get an e-mail to my Yahoo! account that relates to UltraEdit and another that is from a friend. The "UltraEdit" rule moves the Ultraedit mail to my Ultraedit folder (which is a subfolder of my "Software" folder) but leaves the e-mail from my friend. Outlook goes through the rest of the rules and when it gets to "Yahoo" moves my friend's e-mail into my Yahoo folder.

I use EZDetach to get rid of large attachments and thus have stopped archiving my messages. I"m going to go back to doing so, though. NB DetachPipe is probably a better choice for detaching attachments but I found that out AFTER I bougth a licence for EZDetach. The one feature that makes DetachPipe more attractive to me is its ability to remove an attachment and recognize it, so that the next time the same attachment is "seen" it is simply deleted and a link to the previously saved attachment is inserted into the e-mail. EZDetach simply renames the duplicate attachemts resulting in much larger archives. I've written to the developer to request the DetachPipe solution be adopted but nothing has happened so far (though I did get a response indicating that it was "going on the list"). Otherwise, EZDetach is brilliant. I opted for it over DetachPipe initially because of licensing policy differences...

Not sure what else to include here, but will add more as it occurs to me...
2381
General Software Discussion / Re: How do you manage your email?
« Last post by Darwin on September 04, 2008, 06:38 PM »
I use Outlook 2007 (and before that 2003 and before that 2000...) and organize my mail into folders using Rules. If you're by any chance looking for a Spam solution, I can recommend Spambayes... I love it and it's free!
2382
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: And... The Ultimate Steal makes a comeback
« Last post by Darwin on September 04, 2008, 05:44 PM »
Has anyone taken advantage of this already (in places where it is offered?). I'm wondering what kind of documentation is required for eligibility? I am a student at an English University but live in Canada (long story)...
2383
Living Room / Re: What is a mouser? What does it mean to mouser someone?
« Last post by Darwin on September 04, 2008, 04:57 PM »
I noticed it doesn't exist as an Urbandictionary term yet!

You looked up the wrong word. You should have searched for "mousered"

DC member hollowlife1987 submitted it about a year ago.  :D

1. mousered    
   
1.) When a mouser gets distracted and goes off to do something else.
That mouser got distracted by the ball of yawn and mousered us.

Well yes and no... the problem is that the definition of "mousered" applies to the actions of a "mouser", which is defined as either:

1.    Mouser   
one who has relations with a person of the opposite sex, who is at least 6-12 inches shorter.
Casey became a mouser when she hooked up with Paul S the wrester.

or


2.    Mouser   
Mouser(n) or (adj): Any person who kisses ass persistently.
On Police Academy 1 & 2, The ranking officer that always hated Mahoney; his side-kick Proctor was always kissing this Lt. ass...constantly.

Our mouser has never struck me as being a persistent kiss-ass and I have no idea about his personal life...
2384
General Software Discussion / Re: Outlook 2007 isn't so bad
« Last post by Darwin on September 04, 2008, 04:47 PM »
Just to note - when I bought Office 2003 Pro I installed BCM... Lasted about 3 hours - it made Outlook impossible to use (slowed it down, it crashed often, etc.). I removed it and have been blissfully happy with Outlook ever since (now on Outlook 2007; didn't install BCM when I upgraded).

YMMV
2385
From that blog post, things sounds quite reasonable.

If there aren't other "privacy issues" than that, and there aren't going to be, then imho there's nothing to fuzz about. And since it's opensores, people can keep watch... but oh yeah, <tinfoilhat>google could do different builds than from the publicly available source</tinfoilhat>

Very true. The tinfoil hat wearing side of me is adopting a wait and see approach - just being prudent. I just want to give Google time to clean up the EULA and smarter people than me time to determine what is, or what is not, being done with the data that Google may or may not be mining...
2386
General Software Discussion / Re: Google Chrome -- key reasons for its debut
« Last post by Darwin on September 03, 2008, 07:45 PM »
Wow! Well said Kartal! Time will tell, I suppose how justified our paranoia is, but I'm erring on the side of caution.
2387
Ah... just checked with Process Explorer and USBDLM is using 2620 K Private Bytes. VM in Task Manager is roughly equivalent to Private Bytes in USBDLM.
2388
I'm running an old Centrino (1.4Ghz) with 2GB of 266Mhz RAM... I *think* that's the explanation, though I could be wrong. Very wrong (it's happened before. !enoyna llet t'noD)
2389
Not bad, actually. USBDLM is using 2.5 MB Virtual Memory and 26 MB RAM on my machine after about 7 hours uptime.
2390
General Software Discussion / Re: Easy remote access to my home pc?
« Last post by Darwin on September 03, 2008, 06:54 PM »
Wow! I actually expected the answer to be "Yeah, right!". Thanks, wr975  :-*
2391
General Software Discussion / Re: Easy remote access to my home pc?
« Last post by Darwin on September 03, 2008, 06:28 PM »
This is a great thread... However, anyone know of a way to access a G5 iMac from a Windows based machine? All this talk of helping dear old mum with her computer has me thinking about my mum and dad... Being able to troubleshoot issues remotely would be a lot more convenient for them and for me than having to wait until I can get across town to sit in front of their computer.
2392
General Software Discussion / Re: Google Chrome -- key reasons for its debut
« Last post by Darwin on September 03, 2008, 06:21 PM »
You know most evil things can also be blamed on sloppiness as well. That is not an excuse. Google thought that they had a free pass (They generally have ) . And because of people like us who are the people with tinfoil hats, crazy paranoids, conspiracy theorist, now they will need to write a proper policy statement.

 ;D
2393
So... wr975, what's the resource "hit" like when using USB Safely Remove? Thanks for clarifying the licence policy, BTW. Lifetime licences are always a welcome touch...
2394
Doh! I'll have to go digging around to get rid of the updater - I hate automatic updaters and I sense that I really don't want this one on my system!

Thanks ehtyar  :Thmbsup:
2395
Living Room / Re: Mythbusters Silenced by Credit Card Companies
« Last post by Darwin on September 03, 2008, 05:56 PM »
If you have time


http://itc.conversat...shows/detail210.html

RFID -- Radio Frequency Identification -- is transforming the way companies track inventory, artwork and even law briefs, but some fear it could be used for more "Orwellian" pursuits. A panel of leading technology developers and pioneer end-user corporations explores this promising and yet maligned emerging technology that both empowers consumers and raises privacy issues.

I'm going to have to hunting for this, but there was a Danish graduate student who invented some sort of a "firewall" to protect against this... Read about it a year or two ago. I'll post a link when I can find it.

EDIT: That was easier than I thought, though it's not the same article I read back then: http://arstechnica.c...re/rfid-guardian.ars
2396
Living Room / Re: Mythbusters Silenced by Credit Card Companies
« Last post by Darwin on September 03, 2008, 05:55 PM »
Bastards.

Well said. Exactly how I feel. Once again profits trump public safety. Identity theft made possible at this level is a public safety issue and ignoring it while making billions off it is immoral. Hold on... This is eerily familiar, isn't it?
2397
Living Room / Re: Mythbusters Silenced by Credit Card Companies
« Last post by Darwin on September 03, 2008, 05:52 PM »
I'm surprised by Discovery backing down, but at least controversy like this means the story will get more publicity than it could ever have hoped for.

I hope you're right. This is quite frightening and really needs to be addressed. We've got people talking in general terms about RFID (as implanted in credit cards, cell phones, car key remote fobs, etc.) being used to identify us and our shopping habits/preferences and stream targeted advertising to us in stores so the technology either needs to be made much more secure or scrapped. Right now there is a lot of excitement over it so I doubt that it's going to be scrapped...
2398
P.S. Sorry for cutting you off, I guess we forgot that other people are upset about Chrome too

No worries!

2Darwin
Be sure to cleanup completely, especially:
HKCU\Software\Google\Update\UsageStats\
-fenixproductions (September 03, 2008, 05:45 PM)

Thanks for the heads up - I didn't know about that one. My comfort level is not improved by seeing the kinds of info that that contained. I should have read it more clearly and written some of it down before deleting, but didn't... Stuff that I remember includes "User has UAC enabled"
2399
General Software Discussion / Re: USBDLM -- deserves a thread!
« Last post by Darwin on September 03, 2008, 05:45 PM »
BTW - the commercial licence for http://www.uwe-siebe.../usbdlm_e.htmlUSBDLM is $14.40 (USD) so I suppose that makes more sense than donating. I also note that there isn't any "Make a donation" link on the web page...

[Off-topic]When did the new URL pasting thingy (that's a technical term) get implemented? Pretty slick![/Off-topic]
2400
General Software Discussion / Re: USBDLM -- deserves a thread!
« Last post by Darwin on September 03, 2008, 05:41 PM »
Might be an idea, particularly if you can add a poll. Make "C" 'Other' and ask posters to report what they're using...

I hadn't noticed that USB Safely Remove is shareware... Not that the functionality is not worth it, but it's another mark in the "con" column for me. Having said that, I should probably donate to the USBDLM developer. Haven't done so yet and it is an oversight.
Pages: prev1 ... 91 92 93 94 95 [96] 97 98 99 100 101 ... 261next