topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 13, 2025, 7:03 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 ... 252next
2351
Developer's Corner / Re: Any wordpress coders here available for hire?
« Last post by superboyac on September 13, 2011, 03:30 PM »
Few points:
- Looking at your spec you're more inline with a custom Theme then you are with a Plugin.  Plugin is to modify existing functionality that works into a theme, a custom theme is what changes the look and feel of the website.
- Shortcodes and functions can be easily incorporated in from a Theme install
- Page Templates are also available through a Theme (see how the twnetyeleven Theme works)
- File Upload: You should use the Media Manager that comes with Wordpress.  I wouldn't recommending disconnecting any part from Wordpress as it would make interacting, from a code standpoint, more difficult
- Its very important when developing in Wordpress to do it the 'Wordpress' way as it gives way more flexibility to add functionality with existing plugins
- CSS modification is already available in Wordpress for Themes (another reason to use a custom Theme)

I would like to help but fear that budget would be an issue.  With all the customizations and work I would expect a project like this to be in the $3.5K - $7.5K range (rough ballpark).  What is your budget (a range is fine)?
Yeah, that's definitely outside our range.  I don't know what our budget is right now.  It's something we'll be able to answer after we get an idea of what to expect.  I was hoping it wouldn't be that much.
2352
Developer's Corner / Re: Any wordpress coders here available for hire?
« Last post by superboyac on September 13, 2011, 03:10 PM »
I've added the requirements to the top post.  I'll modify them as things become more clear.
2353
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 8 Fast boot time ? Check this out...
« Last post by superboyac on September 13, 2011, 03:03 PM »
I don't think the appeal is about the boot times specifically.  I think the appeal is that it's a WINDOWS system with a fast boot time.
2354
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on September 13, 2011, 03:01 PM »
I'm liking this.  Here's a question about the cabling:
1) If I do a SATA to SAS thing, can I get away with just one cable connecting the storage tower to the desktop?

2)  Let's say I want to put the DAS in another room.  How would I connect the DAS to my desktop?  The SAS or SATA or eSATA cables are only a few feet maximum.  So would I have to connect the tower to my router, which would bring it to my desktop?  Or does that change the whole setup into a NAS and now I need to have a motherboard, OS, etc. on the tower?
2355
Developer's Corner / Re: Any wordpress coders here available for hire?
« Last post by superboyac on September 13, 2011, 09:40 AM »
Are you able to post any further details?
I'm working on it.  I have a detailed list of requirements, and I'll post it soon.
2356
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 8 Fast boot time ? Check this out...
« Last post by superboyac on September 12, 2011, 05:57 PM »
That is bad ass!  That's what I'm talking about!  Cmon Windows...do me right on the tablet stuff.  Man, a windows tablet hooked up to my desktop headquarters would give me all sorts of cool ideas.  It's all about unfettered access to files and folders.  That's what it all comes down to for me.  I'll take any OS that is designed for that.  It's how I would break down my complaint about Apple if I had to do it in one sentance.
2357
Developer's Corner / Any wordpress coders here available for hire?
« Last post by superboyac on September 12, 2011, 04:44 PM »
Our business is going to need someone who is familiar with wordpress coding.  We need to pay someone who can make a custom plugin to allow some cool layout options for the website content.  It needs to be a plugin and not a one-time website design because we are programmatically challenged, and need to tweak things and add content using some kind of GUI from the admin control panel.

I would be interested in anyone here, or even if you know of someone.  I am currently writing my design requirements and will sent it to anyone interested.  Thank you.
Design requirements (last modified 9-20-2011)
wordpress-plugin-request.png
(click on the thumbnail to enlarge the image, or download it to zoom in on the details if necessary.  A pdf is attached as well.)
2358
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on September 12, 2011, 12:06 PM »
4wd has inspired me to create a similar list of things to do before my project can be ready for purchasing.  I'm now thinking more clearly about these things, thanks to everyone's help here.  So my list is posted below, and I'll continue to update it as I progress.  I'm not going to tally any price totals right now because too many things are up in the air.  My first task is to figure out what my "x" and "y" numbers are so I know how much space I need to get.  But anything with a question mark needs to be resolved before I'm done with this.
DAS

Storage estimate:
2TB currently
x TB stored on discs
y TB stored on spare drives

Total space CURRENT = 2+x+y
Future space needed = (current total x 2)
Backup --> two backup copies
total space to build for = [(2+x+y)x2]x3 (yikes!, I know)

<<Equipment to purchase>>
Storage Unit:
istarUSA storage tower
http://www.istarusa....amp;model=DAGE840-ES
8-bay
2TB x 8 = 16TB
additional internal cables?
additional external cables?
additional controllers or cards for current desktop?

Hard drives:
SATA III
5-year warranty desired
model = ?
capacity = 2TB (will consider 3TB depending on price)
store = ? (wherever a good deal for bulk orders can be found)
2359
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on September 11, 2011, 06:37 PM »
4wd, thanks for your posts above.  I have to study them this week.  But I have a question, maybe you or lotus can help:
I've read that if I get a sas controller card for whatever box I end up using, that the controller is compatible with sata drives.  Is this true, and are there any bad side effects of doing this?  I like the sas controller with sata drives because the sas controller will allow me to have fewer cables, and the sata drives are way more convenient to buy and use vs sas drives, which i'm not really interested in.  Also, the total cost in the end is not that different.  So I like the sas way, and you've posted addonics' clever sata setup.  I've always like addonics, but you're setup seems to be a little more complicated and more cable-y than what I'm picturing in a sas setup.  Any thoughts on that?
2360
General Software Discussion / Re: Building Windows 8: I need longer arms!
« Last post by superboyac on September 09, 2011, 04:59 PM »
I have high hopes for Windows 8.  I'm not necessarily in the camp that thinks MS is caving to Apple pressure.  I think they realize they have to have touchscreen capabilities that are better than the win7 version.  But there is a bug difference between an ipad and a Windows tablet even if everything looks exactly the same superficially.  With Windows, we'll have unfettered access to files and folders, which will change the tablet game dramatically in a way Apple will never do.  We'll have tight integration with our desktop software for that reason alone.  And that just means we'll be able to do a whole lot of cool things with it.  I'm really looking forward to it.
2361
This is the future right here, I'm loving it!
2362
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on September 08, 2011, 12:40 PM »
OK, I went back and reread this thread (ping-pong is exactly the correct term!).  But that's how I work, sorry if it's frustrating.  Believe it or not, all of this helps me a lot, and I appreciate everyone's assistance.  Good will come of this, I promise!

So I went back to some of the previous links, and the product I'm really liking is this one:
15bayfront-large.jpg
This will be my box of drives.  This box will be directly connected to my current workstation through these SAS cables (which I don't know much about right now).  But it sounds perfect.  I'll need to buy a SAS controller for that box, which are relatively expensive.  I think this is the item that a few of you here have talked about to make sure I get a business grade quality, which I want to do.  If you have any advice as to which manufacturer/model I should get, please let me know.

Next is the connection to my computer.  My computer doesn't have any SAS stuff right now, so I'm guessing I need to buy a card or something for it.  Any direction on suggested models would be appreciated.  Same goes for any cables involved, in case I have to be careful about it.

So that gets mucho storage attached to my desktop.  After that, I can experiment to my hearts content.  I'll try doing some server stuff with VM's.  But mostly I'll just use the storage directly from the desktop.

How is that?  I can't really see much overkill in this one, and it's relatively cheap.  The box and related items will run me about $1500, and then I'll just hunt around for good hard drive deals.  The ones with 5 -year warranties are my fav.
2363
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on September 08, 2011, 11:51 AM »
What is the deal with DAS?  It sounds like something I can connect directly to my workstation, without any OS in between.  If I want to avoid all the complications from my previous setups, this is where I would start.  I understand now what NAS is, and I like SANS but even I can tell that's overkill for me at this point.  So it sounds like DAS is what I want.

Here's where I'm confused...let's say I find some box that is a DAS that will connect to my workstation.  I don't understand how it connects.  Right now, I have an external box connected with two hard drives in it.  The connection is esata.  What's annoying is that each drive needs its own esata cable.  I only have so many esata ports on my workstation, and they are currently full.  How can I put 10 drives in an external box and connect it?  I don't, nor will I ever, have 10 esata ports.  Nor do I want it.  Isn't there a way of doing this with just a cable or two?

I like DAS because it's directly attached, with no middle man OS or anything.  I'll do all my file management through my main workstation anyway, so that's fine.  As far as access from remote places, that's negligible at this point, and I've already figured out how to cleverly avoid those kinds of complications.

So my two questions right now is:
1) What is a box that is NOT a rackmount thing that will hold 10+ drives?
2) How do I connect this box to my PC using fewer cables than the number of drives (ideally one cable)?

I will absolutely not consider USB as the connection, nor will I consider firewire.  I like esata very much.  I'm hoping there's a better way with some kind of card that plugs into a PCI bus or something. 
2364
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on September 08, 2011, 09:39 AM »
I think one thing has become abundantly clear from this thread: if you want to implement an "ideal" solution for yourself, you need to understand both your own needs (comprehensively) *and* the technology available to meet your needs.

Now obviously you've been trying to learn about the tech by asking for options here, but the key point is this is just a *starting* point. We can point out possible options - and now there seem to be 3 or 4 on the table - but we can't really pick one "best" one for you. Even you can't do that right now, and that's because you don't fully understand the underlying tech.

I suspect that, even if you were to go with one of our recommended solutions, there would be some caveat in it, or lack of understanding of some feature of it, that would end up being an issue for you. The best way is for you to really understand all this stuff. That will take a lot of time but if you're willing to invest a lot of *money* into it, I think it only sensible to invest a similarly significant amount of *time* into learning the technology so you can make your own well informed decision.

What we've got here in this thread is a starting point for much, much more further research. When you can look at all this stuff and say confidently for yourself something like "I feel RAID is the best solution", and be saying that from a position of understanding and knowledge of the technology underlying the options, then you'll be making your best decision. Until/unless that happens, I suspect you'll keep flip flopping until you make a decision, maybe even one made more or less on a "coin toss", and so - not being fully aware of the limitations through your own deeper understanding - you may well be disappointed in what you end up with.

That being said I hope that's not the case. I hope you settle on a solution and it does everything you want it to. But I do frankly suspect this will just be the beginning and that whatever you go with, you will spend a lot of time trying to make it do exactly what you want.

That's my last "2 cents" input on the matter. ;)

- Oshyan
I agree Oshyan!  Thanks for your input so far, it's been very helpful.  What I really want to do is find someone who has already done this, go to their house, and just check out their setup.  That one guy I posted about lives in Redondo beach, which is just a few minutes away.  I'm very tempted to ask him to show me his setup, but that's "weird" in this day and age for some reason.
2365
N.A.N.Y. 2012 / Re: NANY 2012 Pledge & Early Beta: Ethervane Echo
« Last post by superboyac on September 07, 2011, 06:02 PM »
1. The clip list context menu: too small? Too large? Any important commands missing? Or could the order of commands be improved? (For example, I tried to keep the Delete command away from other most commonly used commands such as Sticky and Edit, to avoid situations where you might accidentally delete a clip by a slip of the mouse. Any comments are welcome.)
I strongly feel that the navigation commands should be buttons on the toolbar. However, I feel these navigation commands are largely trivial.  Between using the mouse and keyboard and the simplicity of this app, anything more is pretty small in importance.

2. The "Navigate" section in the main menu doesn't seem to be pulling its weight. Perhaps the menu could be done away with entirely, and the commands distributed under other sections of the menu?
Sure, the simpler the better, especially when you lose nothing in the process.

3. The editor (Shift+F2): apart from spell-check, which is coming, is there anything else that could be useful? This isn't meant to be a fully-featured editor, but I can do a few things there. Is the context menu enough, or would anyone prefer a toolbar?
I would prefer a toolbar where I can customize it.  This is a very simple application, and having access to a few buttons is better and easier than right-click stuff.  one-click vs two-clicks.  A very cool feature to add to the editor is the ability to highlight search terms.  It's already awesome how the non-matches disappear (like evernote), but to make it perfect, the search terms would be highlighted individually.  And if there are multiple search terms, they would have different colors (just like evernote).  This, by the way, would turn this into one of my favorite applications ever.

4. Do you think it's a good idea to suspend capturing clips while the editor is active? Any scenario under which you would want to capture text copied from the Shift+F2 editor?
I can see of one use: trying to copy a portion of a clip already in the program.  In the regular view, you can't highlight a portion of the note without opening the external editor.  In fact, if you made the stuff in the regular view selectable, you wouldn't even need an external editor.  But then how would you edit a clip?  Well, two ways: either have a small button next to each clip which, when clicked, would allow you to edit it (like Surfulator) or you can add an option about what to do with mouse clicks.  I might set it up so that double-clicking allows me to edit a note.  So you can have customizable options for mouse clicks (like KMPlayer).  But I'd really like to be able to select and copy a portion of a clip without having to double-click on it first, or open up an editor, or any extra steps.  And when I copy that subclip, I'd like the option in the preferences to record or ignore copied subclips.  i would set it to record everything including subclips.

Another feature I'd love to have (as in CHS and Arsclip) is a quickpaste menu for pasting stuff.  So with CHS and ARSclip, with a hotkey, you can have a quickpaste menu appear right under your mouse pointer which is awesome.

Also, how about an option to show the entire note in the normal view, regardless of the length.  I know we can set it to a big value, but how about just a "always show entire note" setting?
2366
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on September 07, 2011, 04:12 PM »
OK, forget the unraid thing.  I'll just go with a normal windows server.  I'm close guys, I'm close!!
2367
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on September 07, 2011, 12:17 PM »
OK, I'm now backtracking big time.  I'm going to nix the whole server thing right now.  The fundamental need here is just massive amounts of storage.  I found the xbmc forum discussions about this stuff, and I was very happy to find out that a lot of people have already gone around this wheel already.

There's an OS out there made specifically for this sort of thing, called unRAID.  That seems to be what most of the xbmc guys are using, with a Norco box.  I'll take that, connect it to my router, and manage it from my current desktop.  And it's pretty cheap, won't cost me more than $1500 (minus the drives).  So I'm going to settle on that.

My business will soon be changing locations anyway, this server thing is too confusing for me right now to deal with.  I just want the storage right now.
2368
This is totally awesome, nudone.
2369
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on September 04, 2011, 01:04 AM »
OK...this is all very good advice.  I really am not sure what to do again.

My my basic need in all of this is this:
What is the easiest way to add 10+ hard drives to my current setup?  And I want access to those hard drives in exactly the same way I use my regular hard drives now.  That is, no kind of restrictions like 40hz brought up above.

I don't know if I need a NAS, or a server, or what.  But I don't want something that is not meant to easily deal with a lot of hard drives.  I don't want like 4 or 6 or even 10 hard drives to be the maximum.  I want it to be something that can easily take in 20 drives if necessary, once everything is set up.  And I definitely don't want any difficulty with access to any of them.  I don't want it to become something like where the drives need to be "mounted" to a client pc in any sort of special way, and the connection can be unstable and disconnect occassionally.  I don't want anything like that.  i don't want transfer speeds any different than my regular sata drives I use right now.  I don't want speeds like a dorky USB stick.  So this is kind of what I want.
2370
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on September 03, 2011, 08:18 PM »
I don't understand how this is different than the configuration I posted on the previous page.  I don't mean technically, I mean conceptually.  Isn't this a rack/server type setup just like the one I posted from Stallard?

It's not. I think SJ was arguing for going with a standard server as opposed to a NAS device and worked up this configuration as an example of what could be gotten for similar money. (Hope so anyway - because that's why I was agreeing with him. ;D )

re: high-speed backbone

I think what's being said here is that a NAS is usually strictly a storage device. You can't log onto it and do things to the files stored there. So any file manipulation operations (i.e. conversions, ripping, directory management, etc.) need to be done on a PC and pushed/pulled over the network as opposed to being done directly on the server. Same with directory management and moving files. So with huge files, the speed of the network can become a bottleneck. And since a standard Windows server is also a workstation, you could further avoid network overhead by running things like a DVD rip directly on the server.
 :)

Oh wow!  This is very enlightening to me.  I most definitely DO want to do a bunch of work on the server drives themselves.  I absolutely don't want to do the work on my desktop and push/pull it from the storage.  No way.  I have some big plans for this server.  I want to create some really nice interactive stuff for myself on it.  I'm getting a server, that's it.  No NAS.  Thanks 40, always a big help.

superboyac, if you are able to configure NIC teaming (with your switch) or proper load-balancing it should work out fine.

If the plan is to rely on single Gig link to the backbone switch please be very patient during file operations. :o
-lotusrootstarch (September 03, 2011, 01:19 AM)
I'm not trying to be funny, but I have no idea what in the world you are talking about.  I don't know what you think I know, but it sounds to me like I don't know jack about this stuff.  Let me break down my thoughts on your two sentances there:
This is the very first time I've heard of NIC teaming.
What switch?
I don't know what load I'm balancing.  I wouldn't know what the "proper" way to do it is, nor would I know what the improper way of doing it would be.
I don't know what  Gig link is.  I still don't know what a backbone switch is.  I definitely am lost on what I'm being patient about when the single gig link is doing whatever to the backbone switch while I'm trying to do file operations.  You could have said the following and it would have made just as much sense to me:
superboyac, if you are able to configure TRB tomfoolery (with your blanket) or proper angularizing it should work out fine.

If the plan is to rely on single Lop link to the hardnose pulley please be very patient during file operations. ohmy
2371
N.A.N.Y. 2012 / Re: NANY 2012 Pledge & Early Beta: Ethervane Echo
« Last post by superboyac on September 03, 2011, 08:00 PM »
Wow, I am very much looking forward to this.  Tranglos is easily one of my favorite programmers; great ideas, great implementation, and my favorite adjective "elegant".  I'm going to compare this to two offerings from my other favorite programmers: CHS and AceText.
2372
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on September 03, 2011, 01:05 AM »
Scampering back on topic...

Only issue I foresee with the Uber NAS is that without some manner of high speed backbone connecting the NAS to something that can manipulate the files on it. File maintenance could be agonizingly slow. And if you gotta buy something to run it (eek!) cost with no real return.

If you got your heart set on a rack system, that's fine. But best bang-for-the-buck would IMO be one of the 2U 6 slot rack servers. That way you always can go in and manipulate the files locally instead on over the wire.

2U PowerEdge 2950 with 6 hot-swap bays
3 3TB drives
4GB RAM
Dual Xeon  5150 processors
and a legally licensed copy of Win Server 2003 (32 or 64 bit)

Came out to $1,934 from the site configurator.

You get plenty of room for expansion, and the convenience of local file access. Then if the project really gets huge you can easily add the uber NAS to the rack and let the server handle it.
I don't understand how this is different than the configuration I posted on the previous page.  I don't mean technically, I mean conceptually.  Isn't this a rack/server type setup just like the one I posted from Stallard?

Only issue I foresee with the Uber NAS is that without some manner of high speed backbone connecting the NAS to something that can manipulate the files on it. File maintenance could be agonizingly slow. And if you gotta buy something to run it (eek!) cost with no real return.
i am not following this at all, please explain.  What is a high speed backbone?  Why would file maintenance be slow?  What's the point of something like this if file maintenance is agonizingly slow?  Also, is there a high speed backbone missing on the configuration I posted?  You're obviously seeing some issue that is totally transparent to me.
2373
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on September 02, 2011, 02:15 PM »
The setup I posted above is not that expensive (~$1500).  A Q-NAP or Synology NAS that can hold 10 drives would cost me $1500-2000.  So the price is not really an issue.  Now, I still like having commercial grade stuff, so I'm not sold on the NAS yet.  What I want to add to that quote is some kind of rack that can hold at least 10 drives.  Something like a Dell PowerVault:


If I add that to my setup, buy all the hard drives, and find a nice 4-foot tall cabinet for it, I think I'm set.  Right?
2374
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on September 01, 2011, 12:02 PM »
...what makes something more serious than another thing?

The desire to still have it available after something goes wrong.

95% of the businesses that lose their data go out of business within 3 years. <-That was critical information going poof!)


Can you redefine the actual requirements for the project for us? I keep thinking you are wanting to get like 13+TB of data stored in a (long term) stable environment. But I could be off in the weeds a bit. :)
Sure, I'll redefine it.  I think you are still correct: I basically want to store anywhere from 4-10 TB of data is a long-term, stable, etc. environment.  The reason for the huge range is because I don't know how quickly it can expand.  Right now, I have about 4TB of stuff, a lot of it on external drives and discs.  I want to centralize everything.  I don't know why the amount of data bothers people.  The knee-jerk reaction is always "Why do you need so much data??  What's the matter with you??"  and I really don't get why it's such a crazy thing.  First, hard drives are super cheap: 10 TB of hard drives is like $500, so what?  Is that really that expensive and crazy?

The other thing that's a headache for me right now is backing stuff up.  i want triple redundancy, which to me just means more hard drives.  No big deal.  I ain't losing my shit if I can help it.  I've lost it once before, and I never want it to happen again unless there's an Act of God.

I just want a box that will store tons of data and will be expandable if I need to add drives.  That's my only real requirement.  Everything else will be dictated by how nice it is and how expensive it is.  I like nice things and will pay for them...to a point.  bang for the buck is what I do.

This is not the end of it.  My master plan is to really tie down all of my file/folder access needs.  I've been using Dropbox which is nice, but the 2GB limit is now an issue.  I don't like cloud services, and I have have way too much data for cheap cloud services.  I'm against paying monthly bills for anything if I can help it.  So I will go to great lengths to create my own dropbox, and I've figured out a way to do it and it's awesome.  I can't wait to try it out.  You guys will think it's crazy, but believe me, it's awesome.  It's a bit of an expensive project for something people would consider a luxury or a hobby, but it's important to me. 
2375
Living Room / Re: I found a home theater configuration expert!
« Last post by superboyac on September 01, 2011, 11:38 AM »
I've never understood how a software player can downgrade the quality of a loaded video for playback.  Can anyone explain this?  I remember hearing about this when Win7 came out, and people were saying if you don't have the right licensing, the hardware will downsample stuff.  Where is this all controlled in the OS or software?  What settings do I look at?  What are the key vocabulary terms?  Let's take KMP for example: where is all this happening?

I'm curious because if I spend top dollar on a nice rig, I want to set everything up for maximum quality playback.  I don't want any desampling or loss in quality.  I have wondered about this for a long time.
Pages: prev1 ... 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 ... 252next