topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday December 12, 2025, 4:29 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 89 90 91 92 93 [94] 95 96 97 98 99 ... 101next
2326
General Software Discussion / Re: How to manage Firefox Smart Location Bar?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 24, 2009, 07:56 AM »
in a rare sense of vanity, the location bar in Firefox 3 is called the 'awesomebar' so do a search on that as well.
The only extension listed there is "Omnibar" AFAIK which is fine but not everything.  8)
2327
General Software Discussion / Re: How to manage Firefox Smart Location Bar?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 23, 2009, 10:54 PM »
You might try "location bar" instead which is still valid for Firefox 3.  :)
2328
General Software Discussion / Re: Good google toolbar (for Firefox) alternative?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 23, 2009, 10:51 PM »
Wide screen does not matter here, as toolbars are mostly horizontal.  :P

I don't expect you to be one of us  ;D, but I thought you actually had a reason to use a separate bar for something you can do well without it.
2329
General Software Discussion / Re: Good google toolbar (for Firefox) alternative?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 23, 2009, 10:18 PM »
Why do you want to use screenspace-wasting bars for trivial tasks at all?
2330
General Software Discussion / Re: How to manage Firefox Smart Location Bar?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 23, 2009, 10:17 PM »
It would be nice if there's was a smart location bar "manager" out there, but i couldn't find one.
There is a bunch of extensions changing the smart location bar in every possible way, depending on what exactly you want...
2331
Living Room / Re: Google's Eric Schmidt has a stupid moment on privacy
« Last post by Tuxman on December 23, 2009, 08:17 PM »
1) Its slow compared to Google
Depends on how you measure it.  ;D

2) The quality of the results is not as good.
I wouldn't actually call Google's search results "good". Clusty.com is "good" in terms of quality, Google, at least, in terms of quantity.

3) There are no extensions for it. (e.g. Optimize Google for Firefox, or the numerous Greasemonkey scripts)
;D now that is a criterion I had never thought about.

I strongly advise against using Google for anything. Privacy should be our most important property. I don't want a commercial company to know anything about my personality. (And I don't want it to drive around in cars, taking pictures of me without asking me for permission first.)
2332
Developer's Corner / Re: Forum suggestion
« Last post by Tuxman on December 23, 2009, 08:12 PM »
I've seen it abused a lot less...
This might be because there are a lot less SMF installations, right?
2333
General Software Discussion / Re: The Five Distros That Changed Linux
« Last post by Tuxman on December 23, 2009, 08:11 PM »
What's wrong?  8)
2334
General Software Discussion / Re: Must-have Windows Programs
« Last post by Tuxman on December 23, 2009, 08:11 PM »
Applications I couldn't live without:

Web browser: Mozilla Firefox
File sharing: eMule AnalyZZUL
Instant Messaging: Miranda IM
IRC client: Gamers.IRC (well, I'm in the team, so I actually should use it, too)
Audio player: Winamp
Image viewer: IrfanView

All the other stuff I use, including my mail client and my chosen text editors, are not an actual "must-have" for me, I could easily go with alternatives...

 :Thmbsup:

Well, just for completion, these are my beloved other ones:

Text editors: Notepad++, Vim  :-*
E-Mail: Mozilla Thunderbird (unless I manage to know The Bat! better)
Video player: Media Player Classic Home Cinema
Writing documents and stuff: OpenOffice.org
Controlling Windows: ac'tivAid
Task manager: Process Explorer
Version control: TortoiseSVN, CommitMonitor

Not much platform-independent stuff, I know... but this is not a criterion for me.  :D

I use a real bunch of other applications not fitting into any of the categories above. I just think "must-have" is not "I always had it and it is quite useless for my typical PC usage but I love it".

 ;D
2335
General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone still using WordPerfect?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 23, 2009, 08:35 AM »
Who needs a mouse when he has a keyboard?
2336
General Software Discussion / Re: Alternatives to Daemon Tools?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 22, 2009, 07:27 PM »
+1 vote for Alcohol 52%.  :Thmbsup:
2337
General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone still using WordPerfect?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 22, 2009, 07:26 PM »
We could as well start a new topic, as a similar discussion ("what is a programming language?") was quite successful recently.  :D
2338
General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone still using WordPerfect?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 22, 2009, 06:56 PM »
I would when it's being used to 'process' words.
Editing text is processing words.

Same goes for EMACS.
Pah, Emacs.

(We're starting to get seriously off topic here BTW! :tellme:)
You started by proposing a text editor. :P
2339
General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone still using WordPerfect?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 22, 2009, 06:29 PM »
I didn't know it wasn't made for writing letters though.
From the WriteMonkey website:
Zenware for full screen distraction free creative writing.

Made for writing contests AFAIK. Of course you can edit every kind of text in it...

Would you say Vim is a word processor then, too?

Wikipedia:
Word processing typically implies the presence of text manipulation functions that extend beyond a basic ability to enter and change text (...)
2340
General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone still using WordPerfect?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 22, 2009, 06:13 PM »
WriteMonkey is a text editor. Made for editing texts, not for writing letters.  8)
2341
General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone still using WordPerfect?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 22, 2009, 03:22 PM »
WriteMonkey is not a word processor.
2342
Developer's Corner / Re: Forum suggestion
« Last post by Tuxman on December 22, 2009, 01:56 PM »
Stay away from phpBB, it's had too many exploits.
phpBB 3 doesn't have too many of them. milw0rm.com lists a few for SMF, too, so what?

I like phpBB. :)
2343
General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone still using WordPerfect?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 22, 2009, 01:52 PM »
Oh well, MS Office is not cheap either, and it has a, uhm ..., not too well designed GUI.
2344
General Software Discussion / Re: The Five Distros That Changed Linux
« Last post by Tuxman on December 22, 2009, 08:31 AM »
Ubuntu is not "Linux for everyone", SuSE is ... Ubuntu is more like "Debian for hype machinists"...
2345
General Software Discussion / Re: Eudora 8.0b7
« Last post by Tuxman on December 17, 2009, 11:17 AM »
Thank you for the hint.  :)
2346
General Software Discussion / Re: Eudora 8.0b7
« Last post by Tuxman on December 16, 2009, 10:37 PM »
The Bat! displays unread folders & messages in bold by default.
Hm, you are obviously right. Weird that I missed this.  :o
Thanks.

And for those who want to buy The Bat!...don't forget the discount link here in the forum will save you approx. 50%.
Yet another thanks. I'll wait for the end of the trial period and make a decision then ...  :D

(Getting a bit off-topic here, sorry for that.)
2347
General Software Discussion / Re: Eudora 8.0b7
« Last post by Tuxman on December 16, 2009, 06:20 PM »
The Bat! is, at least, more resource-friendly than Thunderbird. However I haven't managed to find out yet how (if?) to display unread folders in bold... the only thing that keeps me away from replacing Thunderbird 3 as my default mail client.
(Thunderbird 3 rocks, anyway. So probably does Eudora... but who needs another Postbox?)
2348
General Software Discussion / Re: Eudora 8.0b7
« Last post by Tuxman on December 16, 2009, 05:55 PM »
I am currently trying some mail clients (currently being stuck between Thunderbird 3, The Bat! and re-alpine), but Eudora was never my client of choice. Don't know why...  :)
2349
General Software Discussion / Re: Eudora 8.0b7
« Last post by Tuxman on December 16, 2009, 05:32 PM »
I wonder if it actually makes sense to further develop this one.  :)
2350
General Software Discussion / Re: Google creates a URL shortener, but it's limited
« Last post by Tuxman on December 15, 2009, 07:30 AM »
Now who needs that?
Pages: prev1 ... 89 90 91 92 93 [94] 95 96 97 98 99 ... 101next