topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday November 11, 2025, 12:03 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 ... 106next
2301
Living Room / Re: Psychology of Cyberspace - Article Index
« Last post by JavaJones on August 01, 2006, 09:05 PM »
:o Wow, that's quite a lot of stuff. Well, I've added it to my "reading list" - stuff that I read when I have nothing more compelling to do. ;) Not that it doesn't seem interesting just, er, daunting.

- Oshyan
2302
Haha, woah, that messes with ya. :D

- Oshyan
2303
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: Control Freak - living in the game
« Last post by JavaJones on August 01, 2006, 08:49 PM »
This idea sounds pretty cool.

For some reason it reminds me of an approach I read about quite a while ago where people work in pairs or teams to motivate to get things done in their own lives. Like you and a friend both agree that you have things you want to work on. You have a meeting and talk and figure out what those things are - maybe pursuing a life-long dream of learning the piano, or maybe as simple as getting more done during the week. You each have your outlined goals and you meet once a week to talk about your progress and see how you can help the other person achieve their goals. It's all about support. It's definitely different than the competition approach, but I think the common element is essentially accountability and outside consequence. If you don't get something done you have to tell your support partner about it, or in this case in the game you'll get a lower score.

I frankly think the personal element is probably most likely to be effective, provided you can find someone who will hold you to your goals, and to whom you can do the same. The game sounds like it could work too, but since there's no real reward, and no way to actually measure (it's all the honor system) it's a bit iffy. It's "just for fun", of course, and "the only person who loses is the player" if they cheat, but that's pretty much the same argument that people give themselves when they procrastinate, so I'm not sure it's a reliable assumption that people wouldn't cheat, or that their cheating wouldn't matter. I guess ultimately in any case it's all about the quality of people you have involved.

The other thing is, even assuming people would be honest, adequately matching up people's task lists and effort with other people to actually arrive at a meaningful competitive score would be hard. You wouldn't so much be necessarily competing against others as against yourself, your previous scores or perhaps your expected score, or the score you think you *should* have. That might be better, really.

Trying to match up people's score could only really be done if you measured tasks in terms of hours, I think. That inherently limits the scores, for one thing, and it also gives you some rough equivalency between tasks. So a task's "score" would maybe be the number of hours it takes. Perhaps a "difficulty" or "effort" rating could also be assigned. If you wanted to make that fair though you'd have to compose it of standard elements, like "data entry = 1 point, solving a complex problem = 3 points, moving heavy objects = 3 points, light outdoor manual labor = 2 points". You'd want to make the tasks as non-specific as possible while still being able to safely encompass the intended tasks and reasonably assign a common value to them. You'd give examples of each general category, like "light outdoor manual labor, for example pulling weeds or mowing the lawn". Perhaps that would be modulated then by a "profile" - someone could fill out a profile indicating how adept or inclined they are to mental vs. physical effort, what kind of shape they're in maybe even (for physical tasks), etc. Another possibly useful thing would be to have people score their distaste for the task at hand - if someone *really* doesn't want to do something and they end up doing it anyway they get more points. But again this would be hard to keep fair.

Maybe all that is going a bit far, and of course this could still be cheated too, but I think it gets us closer to a true "system" rather than an informal and thus largely meaningless simplistic approach. The simple approach is a lot easier and faster, and *could* work, but I just think if you have people involved who are prone to procrastination it's not really going to work unless the system is a bit smarter in comparing people's tasks and doesn't let people totally control task specifics so that they can remain somewhat comparable. You want it so that the competition really feels meaningful. Ideally there'd even be prizes or some kind of reward, but you'd only want to do that if you could get the system to be smart and fair enough.

I think there are calendar components out there ready-made and free/open source (for PHP and other web languages). There are probably components to handle most of the parts of this sort of system, at least the basic idea originally outliend. It seems fairly simple, really.

Anyway I'd probably give this a shot, whatever form it takes. Just to see how it goes.

- Oshyan
2304
General Software Discussion / SQL-based replacement for Filemaker Pro?
« Last post by JavaJones on August 01, 2006, 12:52 AM »
Hi everyone, about 6 months ago I took a job as Technical Coordinator for a small nutrition education institution in Northern California. We currently use a fairly large and complex Filemaker Pro database to manage most of our info on students and other contacts. We have about 20,000 records, 15 or so active layouts (30 or so total) and several hundred database fields, including about 15-20 calculated fields. We use this database over our LAN as well as hosted to the outside world for remote use by our 2 other campuses.

We are soon to be embarking on a massive effort to move much of our business online. As part of that process we would very much like to sever our ties to running our own server for Filemaker, licensing Filemaker (we will need to pay for a costly upgrade soon if we want to expand to host more simultaneous users), and hopefully also end up with a greater ability to integrate our database with other parts of our business. We would like to work on automating a lot of things based on database info and changes.

To this end we are now looking at solutions for online databases and, more importantly, database management and front-ends. I know SQL can handle pretty much everything our Filemaker DB is doing as far as back-end storage is concerned. What we need - and what I am not yet aware of - is a replacement for the incredibly easy and powerful Filemaker Pro front end database manager and layout system. For those of you not familiar with Filemaker, it's basically like a more accessible version of Access. ;) The underlying structure is normal database fields, which are basically containers for data of a (possibly) specified type, or in some cases calculated values based on other fields. You enter data through fields, you can control how data is entered, data validation, etc. For our purposes it's also extremely important that there is powerful layout and visual formatting support. You can easily and fully control font, color, size, embossing, borders, text wrapping, draw boxes and lines, create buttons that lead to other layouts, etc, etc. For the low-end DB admin it's basically a dream come true. You can do many of the powerful things high-end DB's can do, but through a really simple interface.

So basically what we need is Filemaker but web-based and using SQL as the storage engine. This could be realized through any one of many different ways, but I know of none yet that is really an adequate solution. It may even be possible to make a local install of Filemaker interact with a remote SQL DB and use Filemaker as the front end - that would be great, but if that's possible to do well and seamlessly I'm not aware of it. Preferably we would find a tool that basically allowed everything Filemaker does, either totally online, or using a local management tool that interacted with the remote DB (like Drupal, or is it Plone?).

Is anyone aware of anything even remotely like this? If no such application exists it seems like there's probably a good market for it! I'll help fund development if someone wants to create it. ;) Basically combine an SQL management front end with a WYSIWYG web editor. :D

Any help is greatly appreciated and will be rewarded with credits!

- Oshyan
2305
So where is the 2nd server being hosted?

- Oshyan
2306
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows vista upgrade path
« Last post by JavaJones on July 31, 2006, 10:11 PM »
SP2 largely consists of patches, many of which have been issued separately for 2000, and the upgraded security center, which is little more than a system-integrated security app which could be 3rd party as much as 1st party in terms of its integration (generally speaking). In other words Security Center, with its current level of integration, could just as easily have been made by a 3rd party (see: Norton Control panels and firewall integration). So there's nothing proprietary and deeply integrated there IMO. The rest is upgrades to IE and I don't think there's much good reason that couldn't be applied to 2k if they wanted it to be. As for DEP, the fact that it could even *be* applied as a patch pretty much guarantees it's not *that* deeply entrenched and influential on the core of the OS.

If you can upgrade from Windows 98 to Windows 2000 (and you could), then I see no reason the same can't be done from 2k to Vista. I really don't think this has much to do with technical reasons.

- Oshyan
2307
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows vista upgrade path
« Last post by JavaJones on July 31, 2006, 09:43 PM »
Except that Windows 2000 is almost universally compatible with XP. Any program that is "XP-only" is usually by choice. XP was *heavily* based on 2000 and even drivers are essentially the same in most cases. So I don't buy that.

- Oshyan
2308
Mmhmm. That's why I wanted the name: to avoid. ;)

I recently got a quote from Rackspace - pricey, yes indeed...

- Oshyan
2309
Living Room / Re: Passwords for networking Win XP and 2000
« Last post by JavaJones on July 31, 2006, 09:01 PM »
Add accounts on the XP machine that have the same login credentials as the XP machines then give those users permissions on the shared folders. If both XP machines are running as Administrator with no password, you're a bad person. ;)

- Oshyan
2310
Who is the host? Dedicated server?

- Oshyan
2311
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows vista upgrade path
« Last post by JavaJones on July 31, 2006, 08:36 PM »
Frankly I wouldn't mind if there was no upgrade path whatsoever. Upgraded OS's always feel a little flakey to me. Clean install is usually the best bet. And hey if doing a clean install forces someone to buy or learn how to use a backup program and backup all their data, *all the better*! I'm sure MS's reasons are selfish here, but I for one don't mind the consequences one bit.

- Oshyan
2312
Living Room / Re: Only one way to beat the summer heat: Fla-vor-ice
« Last post by JavaJones on July 31, 2006, 02:05 AM »
Oho! Do tell then. :D

- Oshyan
2313
Living Room / Re: Only one way to beat the summer heat: Fla-vor-ice
« Last post by JavaJones on July 31, 2006, 12:36 AM »
Hopefully these are better than "Otter Pops". http://www.mybrandsi...mp;ss=OTTE&p=644

- Oshyan
2314
Living Room / Re: What godaddy recommends when...
« Last post by JavaJones on July 30, 2006, 11:11 PM »
Haha! That's excellent.

- Oshyan
2315
Living Room / Re: A Scanner Darkly
« Last post by JavaJones on July 30, 2006, 09:23 PM »
I don't think it will be viable for a lot of films to get processed this way - it'll end up feeling cheesy in the "bah, be original" way.

That could be true, but people make the choice to make an animated movie all the time, so clearly alternative styles of presentation or "film" creation are acceptable. Entirely computer generated films are now commonplace and widely accepted. Although this isn't directly reflective of any other style or technique that has already been accepted, I do think people can get past a presentation style as being representative of one movie or genre if it's used enough. That seems clear from the CG example, starting perhaps with Toy Story (not being the first to do entirely CG, but being one of the most popular early ones).

The early adopters might have a tough time with it as far as public reception, I don't know. On the other hand novelty could get people to go see an otherwise unremarkable film. I'd be willing to bet a lot saw ASD because of the look, not knowing who Philip K. Dick is.

- Oshyan
2316
Living Room / Re: A Scanner Darkly
« Last post by JavaJones on July 30, 2006, 08:16 PM »
Yeah, the key is getting it accepted by the general audience in a major film like this. So ASD may be ground-breaking for that reason if no other. Waking Life did similar stuff with the "rotoscoping", but it had less stars than ASD - not sure if ASD will end up more popular though.

- Oshyan
2317
Living Room / Re: Internet Explorer 7 Beta 3 - nothing but problems
« Last post by JavaJones on July 30, 2006, 06:35 PM »
Gah, what is this damn "advanced text services" and why do I want it? Why is it installed by seemingly every MS app these days? Why not make it an optional and separate package that hooks into all these apps rather than bundling and auto-activating it with every one? Gah!

- Oshyan
2318
That looks super cool. I will join my voice to the call for a new maintainer. :)

- Oshyan
2319
Living Room / Re: A Scanner Darkly
« Last post by JavaJones on July 30, 2006, 06:26 PM »
Well, if you've seen the movie you'll also notice that a lot of stuff seems explicitly, intentionally changed - objects grow or shrink, perspective is skewed, etc. That was surely all done with the guidance of an art director or perhaps even the director himself at times. So yes beaurocracy or who knows what could be factored in. But I tend to agree with f0dder - generally speaking if an "amateur", fairly simple and *freely available* filter can get results that immediately close to the movie, surely with some tuning it would require very little human intervention. In other words I find myself wondering if a coder couldn't just take that existing filter, tune it a bit more, and then work on a low budget film project and whether the audience could really tell the difference.

What's particularly interesting about that is the processing would tend to reduce or all but eliminate the traditional cues that something is shot on film vs. DV/digital or even traditional video or hell a frickin digital camera movie capture. If that's true and the audience accepts this as a valid visual style for mainstream work, or at least with particular thematic qualities, it might be a very interesting option for lower-budget film makers...

- Oshyan
2320
Image Manager Shootout / Re: keywords and image management thoughts
« Last post by JavaJones on July 30, 2006, 06:21 PM »
Yeah.  :( Where's my *sob* emitocon?  :'( just looks silly. ;)

- Oshyan
2321
Veeery nice! You know, I think this will help tremendously. Keeping all the stuff necessary for a review straight in your head and applying a consistent formatting to it across reviews is hard to do from scratch every time. If I got serious about writing mini-reviews I'm sure I would eventually have created a template like this for myself so all the better that this can be available for all. We already have a lot of great mini-reviews - this should help make them even better. Now if only I could get to my PDF tool review, and my media player review, and... :D

- Oshyan
2322
Living Room / Re: Netiquette website
« Last post by JavaJones on July 30, 2006, 06:15 PM »
Yay, 10 of 10 on the quiz! :D This is mostly pretty basic stuff but definitely worth being aware of and striving to comply with. I was afraid it would be stuff like "top posting is bad!" which is hugely contentious, but instead it's truly universal stuff, which is good.

- Oshyan
2323
There are some really terrific and amazing Processing projects. I think some were a part of an unrelated posting here a while back about cool online graphics toys.

A friend of mine has been really into this for some time now. He first showed it to me a year or two ago. This reminds me there are probably a lot of cool things like this that I know and might be of interest here but that I never post. I'll have to dig through my bookmarks more and find some gems. :D

- Oshyan
2324
Interesting idea to be sure. What makes it particularly interesting though is the lengthy, often apparently somewhat expert (or at least well-informed) explanations of each bet. Good examples include "No self-aware computers by 2050" and "no explanation for the shroud of Turin by 2012". Great discussion boards, too. Far too much stuff for me to dive into, much as I'd like to. But a great place to wander when you're bored, if nothing else. For anyone seriously into these ideas it's a heavenly playground. A large group of serious futurists and predictors, with very well thought out and interesting explanations for their stances. And hey, it all goes to benefit charity in what appears to be a very solidly structured long-term funding arrangement, so you can feel good about it too. :D

- Oshyan
2325
Living Room / Re: Spamradio: turning spam into a radio show
« Last post by JavaJones on July 30, 2006, 05:52 PM »
Ah, yes, I was afraid it'd be using some crappy text-to-speech and so it is. It'd be much more listenable if it were being read by that guy who announces movies. ;) At the least it'd be nice to have a more pleasant auto-reader voice. Interesting idea though.

- Oshyan
Pages: prev1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 ... 106next