I personally found it amazing how quickly Prez-O backed off on almost everything he said about transparency and accountability and repairing some of the damage caused by the excesses in the name of 9/11. Politicians don't usually betray everything they say, or do a complete 180, without fairly good reasons. And I don't think this guy was that good a liar that he had everybody conned right up front.
So what happened?
Compare the early days of this administration with the sudden change in its behavior and attitude about almost everything related to "national security" less than two years later.
I'm guessing "somebody" got cautioned. And in no uncertain terms.

-40hz
This is an important side-point to go into for a few minutes. Of course we're all jaded/cynical, but it's important to at least "keep our assumptions correct." So of course, we have to briefly ask ourselves if we felt "conned".
Have we forgotten so fast that the other ticket was *McCain-Palin*?!!
Does anyone want to speculate what *they* would have done, once in power?!!
So yeah, going back to Prez O's early first term, maybe he did really try to do a few things, then discovered that this is a particularly vicious "stonewall" Republican congress. You can do lots of "strange and miscellaneous" things as President, but I think we're discovering that then it becomes a bit of a waiting game playing ping pong with Congress and maybe the Supreme Court.
Meanwhile having watched a few James Bond movies, if this Ed Snowden critter basically did one of the "top five worst acts of treason" ever, why is it this hard to take him down? What am I not getting that a nice infiltrator team with a $25 million budget including some payoffs can't get done in a week? Or does *that* create the "Game Changer" martyr they're desperately trying to avoid? Why all this prancing around with the spin campaign?!