topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday November 10, 2025, 3:55 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 [88] 89 90 91 92 93 ... 109next
2176
General Software Discussion / Re: Acronis charging customers for bug fixes
« Last post by Armando on September 26, 2007, 05:31 PM »
Although I've never had problems, I think that Zaine too went through serious annoyances... He started to recommend BootIt NG instead -- if I remember correctly...
2177
General Software Discussion / Re: How do you launch stuff?
« Last post by Armando on September 26, 2007, 04:53 PM »
I'd never trade my farr for keybreeze.  ;)
2178
General Software Discussion / Re: Is the Windows start menu dead?
« Last post by Armando on September 24, 2007, 10:24 AM »
Thanks for the clarifications, Josh!
2179
Tom,
I still have to evaluate biblioscape but, in the mean time, I've managed to install Chapter by Chapter, and have started using it. I like it! Looks like it's going to help me to work on my thesis.
By any chance, are you able to have Chapter by Chapter appear in the taskbar rather than the tray?
I've also seen (at your website http://becoming-a-writer-seriously.com/ ) that you tried yWriter. Did you like it?
Thanks
2180
Living Room / Re: Update on member KenR health status: Surgery went well
« Last post by Armando on September 23, 2007, 11:44 PM »
that's a really great news!!!!!   :)
2181
General Software Discussion / Re: Check&Get support blows chunks
« Last post by Armando on September 23, 2007, 11:40 PM »
I'm just sitting here watching the tumbleweeds tumble by... little eddies of wind pick up dust and redistribute it around town...
Darwin, was it not for you being frustrated over the whole matter, the verse above is actually quite poetic.. :)

Yes, Darwin is poet hidden in an specialist of Neanderthals' evolution, ecology and morphology...
2182
General Software Discussion / Re: Is the Windows start menu dead?
« Last post by Armando on September 23, 2007, 10:52 PM »
Josh, when you say that Vista's start menu is totally independen of WDS, do you mean that it has its own indexer? (Sorry, I don't use vista...) [edit : removed the first useless part of the sentence)

BTW, i've never found XP's indexer reliable (Vista is obviously a  different beast with its tight integration of Windows Desktop Search). So, in XP, at least, I find the Locate32-farr combination (+X1/Archivarius for deeper search) a pretty handy thing to have.

A year agp I’ve also tested Windows Desktop Search against X1, Copernic, YDS and Archivarius and it was definitely less accurate, slower and offered less features. It might have improved though (especially in Vista)! It’S been a year… Have you extensively compared Vista’s search capabilities (in terms of accuracy, speed, features…) to other solutions?
2183
General Software Discussion / Re: Is the Windows start menu dead?
« Last post by Armando on September 23, 2007, 06:41 PM »
Farr with locate32 is nice, however, I've found that the need to have two separate programs doesnt really justify resource usage when the start menu functions just as well for me, if not quicker, and uses resources already being utilized by the OS. Resource usage is my prime concern when it comes to choosing a solution.

I agree, to sme extent... And I do like the idea of the vista start menu.

But I'd need farr anyway (and locate is only 6.5 mb running): the vista start menu is not as feature rich. Also for me it's more coherent to use only one interface (farr) for all that app-file switching-launching-searching, etc.

In addition, I find X1 or Archivarius better than WDS... So if I was running vista, I'd probably have to ditch wds anyway. Would the vista start memu work without wds?

edit : oups was abit slow on the keyboard..Darwin and jgpaiva were quicker! As usual.
2184
General Software Discussion / Re: System drivers
« Last post by Armando on September 23, 2007, 06:03 PM »
I don't bother either. Only if I run into problems. Or if I'm trying to squeeze more performance out of a device for very specific reasons.
2185
Living Room / Re: A new technology for optical discs
« Last post by Armando on September 23, 2007, 05:58 PM »
You wouldn't/shouldn't use optical discs for a massive data collection, imho... better to use a massively redundant RAID.

I agree!
Optical media : good for multiple backup of archives, maybe (and only if it's cost effective)
I've opted for Hard Drives ONLY after having too many problems (speed + data loss) with optical media.
2186
General Software Discussion / Re: Is the Windows start menu dead?
« Last post by Armando on September 23, 2007, 05:43 PM »
[off-topic]Personally, if you give me the choice between Vista Start Meny and farr... especially with the new locate32 plug in...[/off-topic]  :P
2187
FARR Plugins and Aliases / Locate32 Plugin for FARR by Okke
« Last post by Armando on September 23, 2007, 05:35 PM »
It works perfectly well here (and I've specified 37 results in the farr window -- nice)! Thanks a lot Okke.

This plug in is really adding power to an already very powerful app. Now all I have to do is get out my laziness and learn locate’s syntax! i do use locate a lot when searching my C drive and other folders I haven't set farr to look into.

PS : Assigning locate + parameters to a hotkey (with farr’s hotkey system) is one quick way I'm looking into to find stuff without typing too much…
2188
FARR Plugins and Aliases / Re: Use locate32 with Farr
« Last post by Armando on September 22, 2007, 10:23 PM »
i modified justice's alias a bit but now i seem to have a problem but lack the know-how to correct it. the alias' syntax is "loc <keyword>" but now if i want to search for something that's say "local" then it's broken into "loc al".. so i'm posting here in the hope that some regex expert can help me out.. :)

here is the alias:
1000>>>locate32>->locate $$1 |C:\Program Files\Locate\Locate32.exe -r $$1>n>locate $$1 with filetype $$2 |C:\Program Files\Locate\Locate32.exe -t $$2 -r $$1>+>^loc(?:\s|)([^\s]*)(?:\s|)([^\s]*)(?:\s|)([^\s]*)(?:\s|)([^\s]*)
(see attachment in previous post)

By the way, Lanux, I'm no expert but this is what I'd do:

Group Alias Name: "locate32" (I use quotes in all my custom aliases names to avoid triggering them by their name)
RegEx Pattern (optional) : ^loc (.*)
(with a space after ^loc)
Wouldn't that work???
2189
FARR Plugins and Aliases / Re: Use locate32 with Farr
« Last post by Armando on September 22, 2007, 10:16 PM »
This is great!!! And I wonder who this "someone" is...
2190
General Software Discussion / Re: GemX - missing in action
« Last post by Armando on September 22, 2007, 07:59 PM »

Nighthawk looks really nice!
Thanks for the feedback!

2191
General Software Discussion / Re: GemX - missing in action
« Last post by Armando on September 22, 2007, 05:46 PM »
Sigh... - have you found your perfect "multi-calendar PIM" ?
2192
General Software Discussion / Re: Help with finding accurate software.
« Last post by Armando on September 20, 2007, 11:06 PM »
Yes you can start a fresh free trial at any time by following the instructions "Can I restart my free trial period?" on our FAQ page. Note that you probably also need to do the following:
- Start|Run|Regedit
- Go to: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Soft As It Gets\Surfulater and delete same. ie. The Surfulater section.

If you haven't looked at Surfulater for a while you should browse or read the What's New section of my blog.

Great! Thanks a lot!
2193
General Software Discussion / Re: Help with finding accurate software.
« Last post by Armando on September 20, 2007, 09:36 PM »
Our program Surfulater is definitely worth spending time evaluating to see if it fits your needs. Surfulater enables you to quickly and easily capture content from Web sites and from any Windows application. It lets you organize your information in a tree, add links between articles to build a web of related information, edit the content, add notes and attachments and much more. It is under continual development and our users think very highly of it.

Version 2.20 has recently been released, which you can read about on our blog.

If you have any questions ask away, either here or on our support forums.

Nice Work Neville!
Is it possible to trial that new version considering I've already trialed a previous version ?
Just wondering...
Thanks!
2194
yeah, urlwolf seems to have gone into hibernation mode himself.. :)

Or probably just a very long standby...
2195
General Software Discussion / Re: What linux needs?
« Last post by Armando on September 20, 2007, 09:28 PM »
I just lost my post — refreshed the screen by mistake!!!! Damn!!! I hate that soooooo much.

So… qickly, some clarifications : when I said I didn’t encounter many hardware problems with Linux, I was specifically thinking about the actual computers (the box ad the screen), not all the possible peripherals (printers, scanners, cameras, Ipods...). But I should’ve been more specific, and shouldn’t have used the term “normal” hardware. That was misleading.

In fact I just don’t think we should expect Linux to be compatible with everything.  Why should we? Mac (almost by definition…) isn’t. A few brands and models should be enough. And why not making sure the hardware is compatible with Linux before trying it (and expecting it will just work)?

Anyway… of course, you're right, there are tons if unsupported hardware, and I obviously had more luck than you did. And, ok, let’s say it was luck. A few examples: I only fiddled with my Samsung ML-2010 printer (my only printer, and it works) and my ATI (x1400 — works well too). My wireless (intel 3945ABG), scanner (canon lide 60), etc. worked well. My dad has an old Lexmark Optra E+ (works), + an old Mustek scanner I think (works too). Oh well...

Of course I won’t say that Linux is generally comparable to Windows (and when I said that it’s “not much worse than installing windows”, I was talking about my experience — it wasn’t clear). I’d use it if that was the case. I just said it got much better and that the usability difference shrank A LOT in the last 10 years.

If you have NO potential market, why spend more resources on drivers, software, etc. ? There could be good reasons... but I'm raising the question because I believe that when we’ll see more events like the “French parliament picks Ubuntu” I’m sure it’ll create more pressure/incentive on hardware/software manufacturers. But both go hand in hand. Again, I didn’t say we didn’t need more drivers,  fancy software, etc.,. We do. But IMO these alone are not enough, and we always focus on them. It’s a question of synergy between individuals with strong visions, potential/active user pools, specific socio-political situations and dynamics, economy, etc. (And BTW, the fact that Sun and Novel have an axe to grind is a good thing. :) )

Sorry, my English is awkward and I know it.  :-[
2196
General Software Discussion / Re: Help with finding accurate software.
« Last post by Armando on September 20, 2007, 04:08 PM »
[BTW : instead of going through the whole "note Taking" thread, you could read SuperboyAC's summary and review : https://www.donation...Archive/NoteTakers1/ ; it's not entirely up to date anymore (many apps have added new features since then) but still an excellent read ]

Yes, I think  : Evernote, Surfulater or OneNote. Of course there are many other great possible solutions like Zoot, MyBase, AM-Notebook, ndxCards, Textnotes Pro (GemX : be carefull... possibly dying soon), TiddlyWiki, Ultra Recall, etc. Depending on how your needs will evolve.

I use Evernote. Fire it up with ctrl+alt+N. Paste selected text with win+a (or "right click" --> add to evernote). etc. the good thing with evernote is you can start typing as soon as the window appears -- your note will have a date, a title, and even a category.

I'm not sure what you find bloated about EverNote : it's quick, stable, and does what it's supposed to do well.
EverNote's forum is pretty active too, and lots of good advices and knowledgeable people there.  :)
2197
so, urlwolf , what happened?  :)
 
 
2198
General Software Discussion / Re: What linux needs?
« Last post by Armando on September 20, 2007, 02:19 PM »
I don't feel that today’s Linux trend is characterized by a commitment to “geekdom”.

I might not be able to throw in fancy developers arguments in the discussion, but has anybody tried the last PCLinuxOS or the last Ubuntu on "normal" hardware (not the latest hotest thing)... and then connected with wifi,  browsed the web with firefox, opened media files, used OpenOffice, print something, scanned something, entered some contacts in evolution, etc.... All fairly normal stuff (and some more… all for free)? I mean, I've been able to install PCLinuxOS without touching anything on 4 different machines (2 laptops, 2 Desktops). The most I had to do was to look for binaries for an ATI (X1400) card. Experiences will vary, of course., but that was not much worse than installing windows.

As for everyday normal and non geeky use, my father who’s not exactly a geek, uses Ubuntu. He writes, browses, receives emails, etc. He updates his system when the little “tool tip” tells him to do it, etc. He’s not a geek, he doesn’t use anything else. That’s real life true experience. N=1, sure, but at least, it’s first hand experience.

“Linux” (let’s say Ubuntu, PCLinuxOS) is NOT perfect, far from it. I couldn’t use it everyday. But I can see myself using it one day... if-when I can use my windows apps or even convert to different apps without loosing too much in the process, and if I don’t have to sacrifice an exaggerate “amount” of hardware compatibility. Linux has gone a long way since 1998 (1997??), when I first tried it. A long long way. Isn't that obvious? The fact that people have been saying for ever “this year is Linux year”, “Linux is ready for the desktop”, etc. means nothing. People just dream. But one fact is there: Linux is getting better and the distance between its usability and Windows usability is shrinking.

What does Linux need? IMO: time, patience, work, more big corporations’ commitment (e.g. : Novel, IBM) and also countries-governments’ involvement (Turkey, China, India, France… you name it : http://www.news.com/...166347.html?tag=item ).  Seems obvious, maybe, but I don’t see how better drivers, better software, etc. ALONE can really make any difference… they now have to be backed by strong leadership (important and influential figures), big money and big populations. Yes, Michael Shuttleworth is in it for the money, So is Novel and Sun, and since they’ve been involved with Linux, it has progressed more quickly.


[edit : corrected the link]
2199
General Software Discussion / Re: GemX - missing in action
« Last post by Armando on September 20, 2007, 02:15 PM »
I mistakenly posted a reply to PPlandry (post above) in the  General brainstorming for Note-taking software ... Sorry about that. In some ways, it might be a better place to  pursue the discussion anyway  ;D
2200
General Software Discussion / Re: General brainstorming for Note-taking software
« Last post by Armando on September 20, 2007, 02:12 PM »
Armando, I see that you've downloaded SQLNotes. Did it install correctly? Were you able to explore its features? Version 0.9.16 will be out in a few days, fixing bugs and improving many aspects, including outline fonts and charts

Yes it did [install correctly]!
I didn't have enough time to get familiar with SQLNotes to make intelligent comments about it, but I will...
Probably during the weekend!
Let's just say that I'm impressed with what I saw. I'm eager to see the calendar functionnality when it's integrated.

Thanks for joining the discussion PPLandry! (and... my last post -- #661 --was supposed to be posted in the other thread... a mistake.  :-[ But not all that bad, after all...)
Pages: prev1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 [88] 89 90 91 92 93 ... 109next