topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday December 19, 2025, 5:55 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 ... 364next
2151
Living Room / Re: Desktop Linux: The dream is dead
« Last post by f0dder on October 22, 2010, 02:21 PM »
5 years is a long long time in Linux land. Things really have improved.
You mean I should try again ?  I still have the old computer.
Perhaps - just don't expect miracles, the current slick and easy-to-use distributions are heavier than the distributions 5 years ago... so if the hardware is really old, you'll probably still be limited to some of the "techier" and not-so-pretty but more lightweight distros. I tried both Ubuntu and Mint (which is Ubuntu-based) on a p4-celeron 1.4GHz with... uh... "some amount" (>512meg) of RAM, and it's a clusterfsck disaster. But hey, you wouldn't expect running Vista or Win7 on that hardware (interesting idea, though, if the GPU is capable enough to get CPU work offloaded - it would make a big difference on that slow box). Even XP has a pretty hefty footprint, unless you're running a really old service pack.

The right OS for the job, and the right hardware for the OS :)
2152
Living Room / Re: Interesting Emoticons
« Last post by f0dder on October 22, 2010, 02:15 PM »
Unicode characters can make some pretty cute graphics, but I dunno if those should qualify as "normal" emoticons... they surely can't be used in every situation where "normal" (ASCII-based) emoticons can :)
2153
Living Room / Re: build/upgrade or buy/build a new one?
« Last post by f0dder on October 22, 2010, 02:12 PM »
@Mouser: but doesn't 32-bit Win7 only recognize 4GB max?
EDIT: yes, 4GB is the max. Google is my friend! Win7-64bit can use 8GB.
-Jammo
4GB is max for client/desktop Windows versions, server editions can handle a lot more (8GB for Home Basic and below, 16GB for Home Premium, 192GB for the rest of the non-server versions).

E6550 CPU has dual-channel memory controller, so go by pairs of memory (N-channel means striping memory requests over N ram blocks, increasing throughput). Keep in mind that memory speed is lowest common denominator of all sticks. Also, go for N blocks of ram (two in your dual-channel case), stuff doesn't go faster above the channel count - so in general, get as big blocks as you can afford, and leave the unused slots for possible future expansion.

That said, it's not a *problem* adding faster ram, it'll just run at the slower speed - worth keeping in mind since slower memory can often be more expensive because it's older. And as others have mentioned, you won't be upgrading this system much more, so go for two additional 1GB sticks.

I personally enjoy 8GB in my workstation, it has enabled me to turn off pagefile (with no problems for any app) and use a decent-size ramdisk at the same time - YMMV. Never ever going to pagefile can be a big speed improvement; SSDs are fast, but RAM is still a lot faster. If I was to upgrade to a new system, that would probably mean triple-channel memory and DDR3 rather than DDR2... I'd be in serious doubt whether to go for 3x2GB or 3x4GB sticks.

+1 for TrueCrypt, it rocks - unless there's some corporate demands, I can't see why you'd use BitLocker instead.

You might find that 32bit is better because you have hardware that has no 64bit drivers, eg. scanner, printer, etc that you can't afford to replace at the moment.  Later when you've updated/replaced them, then you can reinstall with Win7 x64.
-4wd
Was an issue in the past, especially with 64bit XP, and a bit with Vista... not so much with Win7. If you can't find a working win7-64 driver, there's a good chance you won't find a 32bit driver that'll work either.

Get a SSD now - yes, they're ridiculously expensive, but they're well worth it. Use it just for your system files (OS install + apps) and if you have some data that benefits a lot from fast random I/O access (I keep my sourcecode on my SSD). Which size you'll be able to live with depends on your uses, but most people will need an additional disk for "bulk storage". You need to closely study SSD performance, as some of the drives out there work WORSE in practice than mechanical drives. The intel SSDs are overall pretty darn decent, but there's faster (at least for some workloads) drives around that are cheaper. Haven't followed the market so I don't know what the current trends are, but I really enjoy my 64GB X25-E, and it's plenty big for the stuff a SSD is useful for. Some of the smaller SSDs also seem to be slower, so caveat emptor! - you should probably look around the 64GB or 80GB range to keep it affordable and still get great performance.

While most computer components don't carry over well to a new system, you definitely will be able to carry over a SSD you buy now even if you build a completely new machine... and while newer & faster & cheaper SSDs might be around then, one you buy now will still effortlessly beat mechanical disks, and be comfortable. The first SSDs sucked, the ones around now aren't that bad investments :)
2154
Mouser, when will you build your first house? :P
2155
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: crack tracker
« Last post by f0dder on October 22, 2010, 01:49 PM »
Hi gurus, Pls can u help me 2 crack macromedia fireworks software&send me d hint thanks
DoCo is getting indexed pretty well by google, is it? ;P

As for how warez and countermeasures affects software sales - gosh that's a big and complex debate, and it depends extremely much on your product, target market, competitors, et cetera. Personally I believe in making non-draconian licenses, and not over-doing the anti-piracy measures; a lot of the time, you end up penalizing the legitimate users while not being much of a burden for pirates. Put a few locks on to keep the honest people honest, but don't think you can ever win the battle - because you can't. Even übercomplex solutions which implement part of program functionality in hardware dongles, and do complex mathematical transformations of your program code into finite state machines, have been broken. The more interesting the task is (and of course the higher profile your product is), the more talented reverse engineers will be driven towards your product.

IMHO a really nice idea is using "partially validated keys", where your app will accept a "range" of valid keys - later revisions can do more refined checks, or use a webservice/whatever at a later point, to do a full key check (either using a full algorithm online, or verifying particular license through customer database lookup). The trick, then, is to let the user play around with his pirate copy and get "attached" to the program... then a few weeks later, throw up a nag screen every now and then telling the user that he's using a pirated copy, and that he might want to consider registering the application - but don't crashbomb the application, leave it fully working. For some products, that has given additional sales. Of course some crackers will also remove that part of the protection, but oh well.

You can't really do anything to completely fend off crackers, until we're all running on heavily locked-down Trusted Computing systems - and even then, there might be backdoors. But for now, even if you can generate per-user custom-built executables with code reorganizing and embedded watermarks, protection code in signed Windows drivers, encrypted code sections delivered by license-checking webservices, and parts running on custom hardware dongles... your system will be broken - so don't overdo it :)
2156
General Software Discussion / Re: Best Executable Compressor Programs
« Last post by f0dder on October 22, 2010, 01:30 PM »
Anyone know of a freeware .NET packer for 32/64-bit .NET applications?  I found, and downloaded, MPress 1.27, but AVG says it's infected with 2 virii.
Don't bother. Really, don't bother. The false A/V positives is reason enough (damn those bastards!), and the gains usually aren't worth it. I wonder about the penalties, though... I suspect you already get some "pessimization" wrt. multiple instances not sharing code in .NET because of the JIT'ed nature, but there's other potential pessimization as well, like reflecting over assemblies.

What's your perceived need of executable compression anyway?

Hypocrisy? - While I'm generally pretty much against executable compression, I do employ it on fSekrit. I'm defending it with "people might need to store their password file online as a single file, and grab it over slow links", but I've been considering whether to keep compressing for future releases.
2157
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: LogMeIn Hamachi²
« Last post by f0dder on October 22, 2010, 01:19 PM »
How does it affect TCP/IP routing? Specifically, I'm wondering what happens if I try to use this to connect from work to home. If I have a connection open to my home computer, will my network stack still know that work-internal traffic should not travel through the Hamachi VPN, but stay within work?
Haven't tested this, but computers participating in a hamachi VLAN get a separate IP (using a virtual network adapter? can't remember!) in a relatively crazy range - like 5.122.21.181 (random IP from google images result) - so normal traffic should be routed normally, and only VLAN related traffic should go through the hamachi tunnel.

The real interesting question would be how it cooperates with other VPN solutions - you're probably SOL if you use Cisco :)
2158
Developer's Corner / Re: Web Debate: Give Us Simplicity So We Can Ignore You
« Last post by f0dder on October 22, 2010, 01:14 PM »
There is no better term. And they should be mandatory as tests. Form Follows Function - I don't give a damn if it's shiny, does it work?!?
Function comes first, but form is still important - even considering functionally equivalent user interfaces (ie, the exact same types of widgets, menu items and toolbars), I'd prefer the "prettier" of two GUIs (as long as it didn't mean insanely higher system requirements, of course). I'm not talking about a lot of glitzy effects (even though a few touches can be "sexy"), but things like "Win9x" look (ugly bitmaps & icons, toolbars where items have button borders, et cetera) vs. prettier & cleaner XP (or even Vista+) looks. While I'm not a fan of Apple's oversimplification and the-user-must-be-a-moron attitude, I do think they get a lot of things right in their interface design :)
2159
Living Room / Re: Why do support people never answer questions?
« Last post by f0dder on October 22, 2010, 01:08 PM »
The point is that while it is true that people don't like to hear I-Don't-Know ... They hate to be jerked around even more.
Indeed. Glad to hear that your honesty had positive results - it doesn't always >_<
2160
General Software Discussion / Re: Opera to support extensions in V11
« Last post by f0dder on October 22, 2010, 01:07 PM »
I don't use opera much but looks like it is good news for those who want to use extension like in firefox.
Yeah, except that Opera is probably too late to hop onto the bandwagon - FireFox probably has the majority of the devs, and unless Opera have been pretty clever about their implementation, there's probably too much effort involved in supporting both browsers for a plugin writer (disclaimer: I haven't looked at either browser's plugin/extension implementation, all I know is firefox uses javascript/XUL).
2161
Living Room / Re: Texting on the rise
« Last post by f0dder on October 22, 2010, 01:05 PM »
One of my problems with texting is the single ring. The phone beeps once, then that's it. If you're in a subway, or on a busy street, you're not going to hear it. Unless you are already an addict, you're unlikely to see the SMS for some time.
-Renegade
My phone (and the last few phones I've had for a lot of years) have supported ringtones for incoming SMS - and yes, including MP3 support. Pretty nice having the "Oh wah-ha-ha-ha" from Disturbed's "Down With The Sickness" as sms-tone, and Dimmu Borgir's "Sympozium" for morning-alarmclock & ring-tone - I don't miss a call ;)

You're more likely to go to voicemail and still not know whether they got the message :D
-4wd
+1 - I usually forget everything about voicemail messages, and might not hear them for several weeks; I should figure out how to disable the damn thing :)

But is the "Received Report" based on the carrier receiving it (server) or the person's phone receiving it (client)? For email, it's the server.
-Renegade
Delivery reports are handled by the phone - which means you'll sometimes know when people get out of bed and turn on their phone :p

It is sent directly from the recipitants phone (client), and I am unsure whether phone companies outside the UK support these options.
-Stephen66515
Delivery reports and read-confirmation are supported in .dk as well - and yeah, read-confirmation has to be handled by the recipient phone, and fortunately the phone I've owned that supported it had an option not to send them.

Btw, depending on your carrier, it delivery reports might cost per report - afaik only the person requesting the delivery report will be billed, though, and for the providers I've had delivery reports were free. Iirc p3lb0x's carrier charged, though, which came as somewhat of a surprise - and bill :P
2162
Living Room / Re: Texting on the rise
« Last post by f0dder on October 16, 2010, 09:41 AM »
I can't help but think that constantly holding each-other at arms length with an electronic bushing will damage our society. If I have a need for human interaction, I'll walk up to one and interact with them. Zipping x word blurbs back and forth constantly is just absurd. It makes everyone faceless and surreal.
Depends on how you use it, really.

I use texting to coordinate stuff - visiting family or friends, people visiting me, organizing parties, checking with my better half if we need groceries, and small bits of keeping in touch - not as a substitute for other means of communication, but an addition.
2163
Living Room / Re: Texting on the rise
« Last post by f0dder on October 16, 2010, 07:27 AM »
Swype does look nice, but I'd have a hard time without the tactile feedback of physical buttons (there's work in progress, which might be very interesting if it works out!) - especially since I'm often texting without looking at the phone.
2164
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: LogMeIn Hamachi²
« Last post by f0dder on October 16, 2010, 06:26 AM »
Gothic: iirc, hamachi uses STUN to punch UDP NAT holes - so, their server is necessary while establishing a connection, but not afterwards.
2165
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: LogMeIn Hamachi²
« Last post by f0dder on October 16, 2010, 04:29 AM »
Games Developers would find this application very usefull as it allows them to test out LAN gaming, without the need for all the testers to be in the same building.
Not very useful to test LAN gaming, really - since the programming model for LAN and WAN is pretty much the same, if you want LAN to be handled differently from WAN it would be to take advantage of the lower latency or the higher bandwidth... you don't get that when emulating a LAN over WAN :)
2166
Living Room / Re: Texting on the rise
« Last post by f0dder on October 16, 2010, 04:27 AM »
When I think of texting, I think of using the stupidest input device for human language ever devised, and even stupider in light of the telegraph, which was invented in the common sense in 1837 (Samuel Morse's version). From 1 button to 10 (11, 1 to send) buttons in well over 150 years is pretty pathetic. They had an excuse in 1837. There's no excuse now.
I personally find that a mobile keypad coupled with T9 predicting dictionary works pretty darn well for typing - definitely faster than one of the crammed "mobile keyboards" (which are all but unsuable, and result in oversized phones), stylus pens, or touch devices. No, they're not suitable for writing novels or PhD's, but it's a comfortable input device for me - and that's without resorting to the gross "sms language" that kiddos are using.

I'm well below insane text levels, though.
2167
Developer's Corner / Re: Programming Ennui, Anyone?
« Last post by f0dder on October 15, 2010, 05:19 AM »
Glad to hear it's not just me who suffer from programming ennui - I've had it on almost every project I've worked on.

... for me i sometimes i have the hardest time pulling the trigger and starting coding on a project, and feel like i am locked into the research+plan stage where i am evaluating options.

isn't this called the Duke Nukem effect?
Naaah, the actually did a lot of programming - if they had done some planning, and locked themselves on a feature set and 3D engine, they might have been able to finish the game :)
2168
General Software Discussion / Re: Opera to support extensions in V11
« Last post by f0dder on October 14, 2010, 03:20 PM »
"You don't need anything more, opera has everything built in"
Which is one of the reasons I stopped using it - wasn't all that fast anymore, crashed too often, and I really didn't want ftp, mail, torrents and whatnot built into my browser: I had more suitable apps for that.
2169
DC Website Help and Extras / Re: What's "leet" got to do with posts?
« Last post by f0dder on October 14, 2010, 03:17 PM »
haha, that's a cool little easter egg, never noticed it before. Is it part of standard SMF, or something custom-added for DC? :)
2170
General Software Discussion / Re: Opera to support extensions in V11
« Last post by f0dder on October 14, 2010, 03:13 PM »
Oh wauw.

In other news:
hell.freezes.over.jpg
2171
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Bejeweled 2 free today
« Last post by f0dder on October 11, 2010, 06:02 PM »
 :(
2172
General Software Discussion / Re: Help needed to alter partitions
« Last post by f0dder on October 11, 2010, 05:47 PM »
Promise (and others) have had onboard for ages. I had it on my non-dualcore P4... MSI chipset, when maxxed out it would give slight data corruption. Lovely story.

Anyway, for RAID5, CPUs are so fast today that you need real high-end cards in order to not get a speed hit. For other modes, the CPU hit has always been negligible, and as I wrote earlier: you need battery-backed cache to get a real advantage. For normal use, the only thing """hardware""" raid buys you is the ability to boot from it :)
2173
General Software Discussion / Re: Help needed to alter partitions
« Last post by f0dder on October 11, 2010, 12:01 PM »
Huhhh ? I used to run a striped System disk - thought that was the whole point of striping to make the system go faster.
Was that using built-in Windows RAID striping, though? A promise card or the like is a completely different story. And yes, the idea of striping is to make the system go faster, but you mainly gain on sequential read/write, whereas random IO usually doesn't gain much and can even become a bit slower... and Windows boottime and (normal) application performance has more to do with random-IO than sequential performance.
2174
General Software Discussion / Re: Help needed to alter partitions
« Last post by f0dder on October 11, 2010, 11:27 AM »
Correct, however the only thing it is "required" for is the conversion to Dynamic Disk, which is fairly pointless on a workstation/desktop.
Unless you're going to run software raid-striping :)
You gotta want it real bad to go that route - Maybe 2% of folks could justify the trade-off. Not to mention it can't be done on the system/boot partition.
Which trade-off?

I wouldn't do stripe for the system partition, that's just asking for trouble. But for a data partition where speed is more important than keeping that data alive, it works pretty well. And if you go hardware, you need *expensive* hardware before it's better than softstripe anyway :) (there's almost no CPU overhead, so you'll only gain something by getting a card with on-board battery-backed cache).
2175
General Software Discussion / Re: Help needed to alter partitions
« Last post by f0dder on October 11, 2010, 09:07 AM »
Correct, however the only thing it is "required" for is the conversion to Dynamic Disk, which is fairly pointless on a workstation/desktop.
Unless you're going to run software raid-striping :)
Pages: prev1 ... 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 ... 364next