topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday November 11, 2025, 10:36 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 ... 106next
2126
Living Room / Re: Buying New PC. Suggestions?
« Last post by JavaJones on October 07, 2006, 01:47 AM »
Oh I heartily agree Mouser. But Dell is very, very glad that you use *them* as the example to represent that option, and I think it's a bad idea to do so. It's playing right into their marketing plan, really. It just doesn't jive with what I know of how you approach most things - focusing on good free or cheap alternatives in software, for example. Dell is the Corel of the PC world. ;)

Fortunately there are lots of decent alternatives with way better ratings and reviews and overall reputations. Puget Custom Computers, ABS, MonarchPC, etc.

- Oshyan
2127
Looks like an interesting experiment. One to keep an eye on I think and see how they do. I didn't take the time to fully read up on their system though, and on the surface I'm not sure quite how it is supposed to be effective at its claimed goals...

- Oshyan
2128
Living Room / Re: Buying New PC. Suggestions?
« Last post by JavaJones on October 07, 2006, 12:42 AM »
Wow, I stayed out of this thread because I knew I'd have to run off at the mouth if I got in here. But now I'm here, so here I go. ;)

I'm really dismayed to see so many people recommending Dell, quite frankly. I dunno, maybe you all have good personal experience with them - that counts for something. But from my own experience as a computer consultant having worked with at least 20 customer's Dells systems, as well as reading many articles, forums, reviews, and other opinions online I have to say I think Dell is crap. Their prices are decent *if* you're not building your own system, but that's about where the advantages end. They bundle a ridiculous amount of awful, awful software on their machines, which is near impossible to totally get rid of without reformatting. If you do reformat most of the time you're given an OS disk or restore partition that includes the software installed by default and no option to not install it on restore. If you format and install with your own OS disk *it will not be supported*. They may still support the hardware, but if they ever get wind you're using a non-factory OS forget about software support. All this is not to mention their attrocious reputation for support. There are stories littered all around the 'net on how bad it is, and sites like ResellerRatings.com (Dell ratings link) also paint a fairly dismal picture. Here's some articles and other links for ya:
http://www.computerw...10801,103959,00.html
http://www.short-med...endednews.php?n=5280

So, shame on you people. ;) Fortunately it looks like your options are limited anyway, lol.

I'd also like to speak up on CRT vs. LCD. LCD's are good for most people, but they're not for everyone. I am really surprised serious gamers can deal with them, even now at 2-5ms. I have seen 2ms in person and *there is still ghosting*. I compared a 21" 5ms LCD alongside a 21" CRT and the difference was definitely noticeable. My roommate bought the 21" LCD and used it for a week full time with game playing and although it was a lot better than we'd seen before, he ultimately had to take it back because the ghosting was still too much. It's close to being *ok*, but it's still far from great.

And that's not the only problem. Excessive brightness is another, to where many people actually turn down the brightness on their LCD's to near 0 just so they're not blinded (manufacturers use really high brightness numbers to seem impressive, but really it's *not* a good thing). Also LCD's *can't* reproduce true black, so if you're a graphics person they can really be crappy and throw off your perception of dark images and scenes. And despite big advances in this area LCD's still have viewing angle problems too. They look ok from non-ideal angles, not all color distorted like they used to be, but they still have a noticeable loss in brightness and contrast. Finally there is the resolution issue. They are just not good at non-native resolutions, not compared to CRT anyway. So unless you like the native resolution of the panel you get, you might not be happy with the overall experience. They do try to aim the native resolution at fairly average levels, but if you like particularly high or low you're out of luck unless you can find a really high-end (or low-end) LCD. Good luck finding a reasonably priced 19" that does 1600x1200!

That being said the space and power advantages are great. So if none of that stuff really matters to you, if it's just a PC to surf the 'net, edit documents, watch movies, etc. then no worries. Go for LCD for sure because the slimmer size alone will be worth it.

Now, Miles I do think you arrived at a pretty good system and good budget after all that. I agree that the bigger power supplies are not necessarily better, but given an assumption of equal quality/brand, the higher wattage one is probably better (just gives you more headroom). It also looks like you fixed all the previous problems, including adding a DVD writer and getting rid of the separate DVD and CD-ROM (this drive will take care of all your optical disc needs), going for PCI-E, and getting a decent low-end card. So bravo! The price is even decent. I think you've found a good deal and you will surely be happy with that machine. And you'll be saved from all the nasty software Dell "gives" you. ;)

- Oshyan
2129
General Software Discussion / Re: Screensaver Maker Recommendations?
« Last post by JavaJones on October 06, 2006, 10:39 PM »
Well, I don't know about multimonitor, but 2Flyer was the best "reasonable" (not excessively complicated) and cheap/free solution I found. Maybe you can take a hit on the multi-mon support. ;)

- Oshyan
2130
General Software Discussion / Re: Things We Could Do Without: Software Patents
« Last post by JavaJones on October 06, 2006, 09:19 PM »
This seems like the extension of the basic ability to copyright any method of doing something, which has always seemed a tad ridiculous to me as well. But then what about manufacturing process improvements that give people an edge? I don't know, it's a tough issue. It does seem ridiculous though that this same system also provides for patents on things like Sideways Swinging or Cat Toy Using A Laser Pointer (or any one of a number of other insane things). :D

Personally I think massive copyright and patent reform is the only good way out of the mess, but we'll probably have to make do with small victories, if any.

- Oshyan
2131
General Software Discussion / Re: What's wrong with XP's built-in firewall?
« Last post by JavaJones on October 06, 2006, 09:12 PM »
Can we get some numbers? :D

- Oshyan
2132
Living Room / Re: Not Quite Social Bookmarking...
« Last post by JavaJones on October 06, 2006, 09:05 PM »
I find some interesting story that links to Everything2 every once in a while and it always reminds me how interesting that place is. I never stick around long, but I suspect this may be a self-defense mechanism, realizing I would probably get lost there forever reading everything. :D

Oh, anyway, but categorizing it, um... Yeah I have a "Really cool stuff" folder I put things like that under. Either that or "News and Info". No place really suits it, eh?

- Oshyan
2133
General Software Discussion / Re: SPAMPAL replacement
« Last post by JavaJones on October 06, 2006, 09:02 PM »
A bit off-topic, but Edvard, what are you doing exchanging large graphics files through email? Email is about the worst Internet file transfer system that exists. There are a lot of easy (and secure, if necessary) alternatives. Granted email is a tad easier than even the easiest of the alternatives, generally speaking, but it also bloats file size about 30% and the simple fact is that it was never meant to be used as a file transfer system. That means that every tool you're using with your email or that ever looks at your email, from the client itself to your antivirus and antispam software, has to deal with unusually large, burdensome emails. Sure they shouldn't bog down when dealing with that stuff, but you're also using the system in a way it wasn't intended for so it's not really a surprise to me that performance isn't optimal.

There are at least 3 major counts against email as a file transfer system:
Larger file size - about 30% bigger on average
Inability to resume downloads in most cases
Email system not designed for attachments, negatively affects any program that interacts with it

Given that I think it makes sense to look for alternatives, as a separate issue from your spam filtering of course. You might find it helps with that too though. ;)

I don't know what your specific needs are, whether there is any possibility for a central FTP repository or anything, but I definitely suggest looking into alternatives for file transfer. Something like HFS may work very well, depending on your needs (I love it personally, and I do use it in similar situations).

Sorry I've nothing to contribute on the original topic though. :D

- Oshyan
2134
General Software Discussion / Re: Screensaver Maker Recommendations?
« Last post by JavaJones on October 06, 2006, 08:33 PM »
I've used the free version of 2Flyer (older version is the only one that's free, I think) and it works pretty well. Decent range of options, uses images, can set music, transitions, etc. It doesn't do animation as far as I know, so it may not be able to do what you want.

I think first explaining the kind of screensaver you want to make - the requirements of the actual "show" - would be good so people can make better recommendations as there are really a ton of these kinds of apps. Are you going to include animation or just stills? Audio? Video? Why is multi-monitor support required, and do you want it to just duplicate onto the 2nd monitor, stretch, or just blank it out? What other features might be needed besides those mentioned?

- Oshyan
2135
I'm not a coder but it seems to me you wouldn't necessarily need to use the whole data set to prototype and see if your results net reasonable gains. I presume they are supporting this to a reasonable degree by providing a good amount of info about their current system (if not source code). If that's the case it should be reasonable to extrapolate results for your test data set size/range and work against that. If you can show significant potential in a new approach I would think they will work with you to scale it up and see if it's really practical. It only makes sense from their end to do so.

- Oshyan
2136
General Software Discussion / Re: What's wrong with XP's built-in firewall?
« Last post by JavaJones on October 06, 2006, 06:43 PM »
I'm on 6000/768, so maybe I just don't notice these subtleties. ;)

- Oshyan
2137
General Software Discussion / Re: What's wrong with XP's built-in firewall?
« Last post by JavaJones on October 06, 2006, 06:23 PM »
kimmchii, are there any benchmarks of web browsing showing the speed difference? This is the first potentially compelling reason I've heard. It's actually something I've been told before but have never seen proof of. Most ad-blocking components I've seen really don't seem to speed things up much, at least in loading. Once the page loads if you block Flash ads in particular it can make things a bit faster, but you can do that quite easily on non-Flash (UI) sites just by turning off Flash (any decent browser can do this).

- Oshyan
2138
General Software Discussion / Re: What's wrong with XP's built-in firewall?
« Last post by JavaJones on October 06, 2006, 03:54 PM »
I know there are a ton of ways to deal with cookie management, some easy, some harder and/or more in-depth. What I'm asking is *why bother*? No one has yet said why anyone should really care, or talked about a bad experience or example of badness related to cookies. It seems to just sort of be accepted that "it's bad, mmmkay?" and so everyone uses all these products to handle it. I don't get it. I don't bother and have never had a problem.

- Oshyan
2139
Developer's Corner / Re: To Limit Or Not To Limit
« Last post by JavaJones on October 06, 2006, 03:48 PM »
Definitely an interesting article. The two examples provided were particularly insightful, although I'd like to see a larger sampling of that kind of statistics.

- Oshyan
2140
Developer's Corner / Re: Let's Make us some Games!
« Last post by JavaJones on October 06, 2006, 01:09 AM »
Back when I worked for a game publisher I really enjoyed taking totally ludicrous game ideas (or just names for games) and trying to make a functional game concept out of them. I'm not sure it's really a good idea to actually make those games, but it's fun to think about. A couple examples were a BBQ game, a bartending game, and one called "rock fight". The "rock fight" one is particularly funny.

The story goes that way back in the heyday of Atari, when they were pumping out success after success, the marketing department wanted to get in on the action. So they got together and came up with a list of like 7 "game concepts" that they then gave to the development department to make into games. Except what they gave them was just a list of titles - no concepts, just names - and the names were really, really bad... like "Rock Fight" and "Laser Gun". Yes, they expected the development department to make a marketable, successful game starting with "Laser Gun".

Now I don't know if the story is true - it was told to me by some co-workers who had been in the business a while - but judging by my own experiences with marketing in places like that I would not be a bit surprised. :D But I took it as a challenge. I liked the idea of taking a ridiculous game concept and trying to build a game out of it. So what I came up with was an RTS where rocks are the only resource - they are both currency and weapon and raw material. You find rocks around the map, different rocks in different places. You can buy things with rocks, build things with rocks, and use rocks as weapons. Of course different rocks (conglomerate, shale, marble, limestone, granite, etc.) have different qualities and are more or less valuable and better or worse for different purposes. You are not told ahead of time what is what so you have to guess and experiment. Also different combinations of rocks can create different products. Using one rock with an obsidian might allow you to make sharp objects, for example. Using another rock type to grind others would give you blinding powder, etc.

So, Rock Fight. Let's make it! :D

- Oshyan
2141
I've looked at a lot of these tools and have yet to find the "perfect" one. This is another class of app I'd love to do a review of though. If only I could find the time. :D Btw latest version of Winamp has an "Orbitz Powered" streaming system in it, apparently.

- Oshyan
2142
So zridling, that ladder actually surpasses the infomercial? Because of course I've seen that, and thought to myself "It can't be that cool". If it's actually *more* cool than that, maybe I have to have one. :D

- Oshyan
2143
General Software Discussion / Re: What's wrong with XP's built-in firewall?
« Last post by JavaJones on October 05, 2006, 07:19 PM »
What do I do if my Windows Firewall has been asking me about allowing outgoing connections? ;)

I used to recommend Sygate, but after it stopped being free I took a more serious look at the built-in XP firewall and you know, I kind of liked what I saw. It doesn't ask about things excessively, it provides reasonable protection, and as others have mentioned A: lots of routers and even cable/DSL modems provide firewalls these days and B: a lot of the stuff an outbound protecting firewall supposedly handles could and probably should be handled (on a different level) by something like Windows Defender.

Personally I think most firewall apps are really going waaay overboard. There are very, very few firewalls compatible with the needs of "Average Joe". All the added script blocking, ad blocking, redirect blocking, cookie blocking, etc. is just stupid IMO. As a computer consultant I have just had waaay too many people complain about this stuff. You put them back on the Windows firewall and hey, presto, no security problems and no annoyances. Good lord, if *Microsoft* can do it, why can't anyone else? :P

Speaking of excessive paranoia and cookies, has anyone ever actually had a problem with them? Tons and tons of applications detect and warn you about them, lots of people have things set to block them, etc, etc. and yet I've only found annoyance and less functional sites in doing that, and never had a problem just allowing them. I'm all for protecting privacy, but this stuff has never seemed like a major invasion to me. Maybe it's just because I'm not surfing naughty sites though. ;)

- Oshyan
2144
General Software Discussion / Re: What IRC client do you use?
« Last post by JavaJones on October 05, 2006, 01:38 PM »
I use Miranda normally because I am not a heavy IRC user at all. However for stand-alone clients I'm surprised no one has mentioned HydraIRC. If you want a free, attractive, light(er), but still very functional multi-server IRC app, it's a great option.

- Oshyan
2145
Living Room / Re: How Digg Gets Everything Backwards.. And How to Fix It
« Last post by JavaJones on October 04, 2006, 03:04 PM »
Agreed. Removing the incentives isn't always easy, of course. Especially as in the case of Google where money is involved. It should be fairly easy for Digg though. But I would guess they realize a good part of their popularity seems to stem from the very same things that make gaming such a problem: social incentives, status, etc.

Btw interesting that the Shmula post essentially recommends commodifying Digg for a similar reason to that which I think is at work here with the DonationCredit system. I still intend to post more on that one day...

- Oshyan
2146
Developer's Corner / Re: A little laugh for coders
« Last post by JavaJones on October 04, 2006, 01:49 PM »
Hehe, even as a non-programmer I found some of those to be excellent. Having wrestled with setting up a Perl-based Wiki recently, I found the Perl one quite poigniant. There are also some great ones in the comments, for example:

XML:

After describing the pistol, the bullets, and your foot in minute detail, you find out that you can’t actually get to shoot your foot. So you begin describing your disappointment instead.

- Oshyan
2147
Living Room / Re: How Digg Gets Everything Backwards.. And How to Fix It
« Last post by JavaJones on October 03, 2006, 05:52 PM »
Note: all of these previous replies of mine were made without having actually read a lot of the stuff above because I was looking at an older version of the post/thread. :D

Anyway, interesting Mouser, the more I read about this stuff, the less I think agree with you. :D In fact I think the simplest fix for Digg is just to remove the reward for "Power Diggers". In this case, since there's no financial incentive (generally speaking), the reward is notoriety. So take away their fame, their profiles, etc. What matters (or should matter) there is not *who* Dugg something but *that it was Dugg* by enough people to get it to the front page. I grant that this doesn't address the problem of people being attracted to good headlines alone, or sensationalism, but I think a much more fundamental issue is the "elite" problem discussed a great deal in these articles. I think the Shmula.com "Digg as a game" article has some very good stuff to say on this which also happens to agree with me:
My Proposal

If Digg were to be relevant again, it must tackle the problems of GroupThink, Conformity, Paradigm Shift and Information Cascades.
To tackle Groupthink, make it truly democratic again — do not profile Top Diggers or elevate anybody higher than anyone else. This includes no special weights on previous digging history, etc. — level playing ground for everyone, no monarchies or philosopher-kings.
To tackle the problem of conformity, do not show profile or # of votes for up-and-coming dugg articles. Just show the article link, with no profiles or votes attached to it. As a compromise, only show the profiles and votes on the articles that make the digg front page, but make them un-diggable from the front page.

Doing the above 2 items will most likely fix the Paradigm Shift and Information Cascade problem.

That is coming from someone versed in game theory, and as he shows Digg can be very well visualized using game theory principles. So it stands to reason it could be fixed using similar analysis.

The idea of a representative voting system for the experts means that users can vote on (or rate) experts in much the same way they currently rate stories has a number of benefits.  Voting on experts based on their long term editing choices seems more rational and likely to lead to considered decisions as opposed to instantaneous mass voting based on a glimpse at headline titles.

This is interesting - who is to say people won't just positively rate bad reviewers? This just makes the choice of reviewers as big a problem as the choice and voting of stories, IMO. It shifts but does not solve the problem. The problem, at least beyond the "elite" issue discussed above, is that people are basically stupid and easily influenced. They like vapid entertainment and are headline driven. In fact isn't this almost how Digg works already, just more formalized? How else do people become "elite" except by implicit "votes" of support? How can you know the same flawed social dynamics will not govern the influence of your "elite editing body"?

You are trying to solve a fundamental problem of humanity with a rearrangement of the pieces, while still maintaining some semblance of democracy. I say if the people are the problem (and they are :D) then forget about it, just make it a benevolent dictatorship: problem solved! :mrgreen:

Meanwhile StumbleUpon doesn't really seem to be trying to do the same thing at all. It operates on the same fundamental principles, but - aside the "buzz.stumbleupon" page linked above, which is acknowledged to be "not the point" - it is focused more on suggesting things based on user history and predicted preference while browsing. It essentially takes the direct user element out of the equation in terms of choosing stories to look at. Obviously you can choose to look at something else if it suggests something you don't like, but without a "front page of headlines" it's really trying for something much different than any traditional media. Much more like viral marketing in that the majority of it happens person-to-person and behind the scenes rather than collected on some aggregator ("front page") like most news outlets. So while there may be lessons to be learned from SU (don't let users vote from front page, for example), the goals are different so a direct comparison isn't really useful IMO.

I must say I'm very interested in the influence on popularity of each of these sites' various approaches to these things. Is Digg popular because of these problems? I see it as a distinct possibility.

- Oshyan
2148
Living Room / Re: digg rigging?
« Last post by JavaJones on October 03, 2006, 03:30 PM »
Haha, that's priceless. It had to happen eventually. I just love how blatant it is. :D

- Oshyan
2149
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: Tabbed interface for Microsoft Word
« Last post by JavaJones on October 02, 2006, 02:37 PM »
I definitely see the benefit and I'm frankly surprised no such freeware extenders/apps exist. I didn't even find any Word-compatible freeware editors that do this! That surprised me perhaps even more. I would expect for example OpenOffice to do this. As memory size increases and dual core CPU's become more prevalent, more and more people are multi-tasking and becoming "power users". This clutters up our task bars. Our work processes also tend to be "modal" - if we're editing documents, we probably want access to all the documents we're editing at a given time; they don't likely need to be individually accessible in our increasingly cluttered task bar. Tabbing may not make sense for all apps, but I definitely think it does in this and many other multi-document workflow cases.

- Oshyan
2150
Living Room / Re: DonationCoder.com wallpapers (set 02)
« Last post by JavaJones on October 02, 2006, 02:31 PM »
These are really cute! Great work nudone. I particularly like Pirate Cody. :D Also yes, definitely bring back the dalmation snake. One of my favorite supporting characters ever. ;)

Oh yes, and a screensaver would be great, because I don't use wallpapers, hehe.

- Oshyan
Pages: prev1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 ... 106next