2126
General Software Discussion / Re: Chrome Portable in a RamDisk = decadence?
« Last post by MilesAhead on April 29, 2015, 07:41 AM »^^ what your analysis neglects is the case where the HD is busy. Often a browser will not get off the dime if the HD is doing something non trivial. That's the main reason for the RamDisk. FF portable with cache set to 0 uses ram. Like about 2 GB on my system. That's where it gets its speed. It seems like with each version increase the speed and responsiveness decreases though. But it's a dog off the HD even when the HD is quiet. If the HD is busy and you like FF it is better to just minimize it to tray if you don't like Ram drives.
Chrome is faster because it launches about 8 instances to do about:blank.
As soon as a page is there it's rendered.
Chrome is faster because it launches about 8 instances to do about:blank.
As soon as a page is there it's rendered.

Recent Posts



