topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday June 23, 2025, 7:52 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 80 81 82 83 84 [85] 86 87 88 89 90 ... 127next
2101
I thought the key bit was from cthorpe's post:

I then associated jpg, png, and gif with ChoiceEditor

I wouldn't have thought of that myself...

2102
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows editors - do they have to be so bad?
« Last post by rjbull on February 03, 2009, 09:50 AM »
I don't see how [most] Windows (oh..text) editors [that you had tried] not having the features you specifically wanted are so bad. Your requirements are  not really cattered to from your findings so far .. no?

Correct.  And the customer is always right   ;D ;D ;D

Actually, I like TED Notepad, enough to donate; I like Crimson Editor too.  But neither of them has all the features I want in one place.


2103
Coding Snacks / Re: Open files and rename or save as with new file name
« Last post by rjbull on February 03, 2009, 09:47 AM »
XPDF contains a command-line tool called PDFtoText that can do what it says, provided the PDFs aren't image scans, and that they aren't locked.  You might try it, with an AWK script or, if you're lucky, something like Horst Schaeffer's LMOD to extract the relevant text, and use a batch file to do the renaming.

2104
I have an old DOS version of Parse-O-Matic and still use it for one small job, but it's ages since I tried to do anything new with it.  I'm not a coder, and I have to say I found it hard to get to grips with.  Probably easier than full-fledged programming languages, e.g has native support for dBase files.  You are right to try the demo first.
2105
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows editors - do they have to be so bad?
« Last post by rjbull on February 03, 2009, 05:47 AM »
Just curious.  How did Windows spoil VDE?  It's advertised as running fine on Windows systems up to and including XP.

Windows spoiled everything, arriving on my desktop not long after I'd finally got the most productive system I ever had, DOS, NDOS, QEMM, and DESQview.  But that assumes that a) you don't need graphics (I didn't, and still don't do much with them) and b) you don't need the Internet, where everything now is graphics-heavy.  At the time, everything I did was text.

VDE works well under Windows up to XP.  I don't have anything later, and understand that 64-bit Windows doesn't support 16-bit programs.  VDE even has limited LFN support, and can communicate with the clipboard via a macro that uses a free third-party tool, Horst Schaeffer's ClipText.  But when I have to do a LOT of clipboard access, and keep swapping between Windows programs, a native Windows editor is usually easier.

Besides, I very nearly have Darwin's Disease - grab every software in sight   :(

2106
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows editors - do they have to be so bad?
« Last post by rjbull on February 02, 2009, 09:49 AM »
[quote author=jack99999 link=topic=16622.msg149276#msg149276 date=1233573958]
just to make you certain that you'd hate the scripting in my emacs, here's a short function to load many files:

I appreciate you can make emacs do just about anything you want to that can be done with a computer, give or take a dishwasher interface, but yes, I wouldn't want to tangle with that level of scripting to do it.  Just need to get the job done with tools as ready-made as possible, even if I have to paper over the cracks eventually.
2107
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows editors - do they have to be so bad?
« Last post by rjbull on February 02, 2009, 03:39 AM »
i think that you should invest the time in learning an editor that is flexible enough to do whatever you want.

I already did.  It's VDE, my DOS editor.  Then Windows came along and spoiled everything 

you can go round thousands of editors and there will always be some feature missing. my personal editing environment is flexible enough to change to match the different things i want to do, so i've been using it for many years.

I realise I'll probably have to implement some things by macros, but would like to have everything pretty much on a plate before I start having to wrestle with yet another scripting language.

2108
Not sure it's what you want, but have you looked at FileTypesManager, freeware by by Nir Sofer?



FileTypesMan is an alternative to the 'File Types' tab in the 'Folder Options' of Windows. It displays the list of all file extensions and types registered on your computer. For each file type, the following information is displayed: Type Name, Description, MIME Type, Perceived Type, Flags, Browser Flags, and more.
FileTypesMan also allows you to easily edit the properties and flags of each file type, as well as it allows you to add, edit, and remove actions in a file type.


2109
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows editors - do they have to be so bad?
« Last post by rjbull on February 01, 2009, 04:34 PM »
All:

Thanks for the tips and pointers.  I haven't had time for exhaustive testing, and haven't yet found an editor I'm completely happy with, but here's an interim report. 

First, I don't think I can face trying to learn emacs, nor vi, despite Howard Schwartz's kind words about the latter and learning it here.  Likewise, I think Kedit+REXX would be beyond me.  Cash-strapped fans of Kedit might like to look at The Hessling Editor (THE):


THE is a powerful text editor modelled on the VM/CMS text editor XEDIT with the best features of Mansfield Software's Kedit.

THE is freeware, distributed under the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE and is available for various Unix platforms (either a text-mode application or as a native X11 application), QNX, OS/2, DOS, Amiga and Win9x/Me/NT/2k/XP.

Like its relatives, THE uses Rexx as its macro language, which means that THE is a highly configurable and versatile editor. Since Version 3.0, THE also has user-configurable syntax highlighting. 


Things were made more difficult when I realised I had two other criteria.

Item: a desire for a hotkey that would mark the word the cursor was on, or at least the rest of it.  This is common but apparently not universal.  TED Notepad and Crimson Editor both have it on Ctrl-D, and much extra kudos to TED Notepad for making Shift-Ctrl-D extend the selection to the next word.  EmEditor has it on Alt-F8, but I couldn't see such a feature in EditPad Pro on short acquaintance.

Item: bookmarks that behave in a particular manner.  I prefer the sort where you have just two hotkeys, one of which toggles a bookmark on the line the cursor is on, and the other of which jumps to the next bookmark in a circular queue.  Crimson Editor has this, and makes the whole line coloured, which makes bookmarks really stand out from the rest of the   text.  Some editors seem to use separate hotkeys for each bookmark, which tends to limit them to ten on the number keys.  That's what EditPad looked like, but I admit I need to look at it again.  Boxer has a hybrid; it uses toggles for the bookmarks, hotkeys, but numbers them, and only allows ten bookmarks per file.  However, I was interested to see it allows ten bookmarks per file for apparently as many files as you have open, and gives you a popup bookmark manager to keep track of them all.  I'd still prefer more than ten, but admit that if I really had to had that, I might be in the kind of trouble that would be better approached by cutting the task into smaller parts.

On the matter of non-volatile marked text, I found a kludge in Crimson Editor.  It has a command to mark a block of text between two brackets.  This only works in code, not plain text (unless I write a custom pseudo-colour highlighting file, I suppose) so I temporarily re-named the file .C, and put brackets where I needed them.  This approximates to the F8-F8 dance that Abterix mentions in PSPad and that f0dder offered to make for Notepad++  (thanks for the offer!)

I tried a few editors on my Win98SE laptop (even I will have to upgrade soon!).  During installation, EmEditor primly told me to update my Windows.  Not realistic in this case, but at least it was a sensible warning.  UltraEdit installed without comment and crashed when I tried to load it.  At this late stage I don't really mind if programs don't run on Win98, but I do like them not to install if they don't.  Fortunately I had installed UE via Total Uninstall, which was just as well, as UE had set a zillion Registry keys.  A 10Mb editor that does that fails to appeal to me...

The author of Boxer said that my desire for filters wouldn't work as originally expected because Boxer doesn't run a command shell when it invokes user tools, so it has no access to STDIN/STDOUT, but, one could run then via a batch file, which does.  In my case, with SED or AWK scripts, I was able to write a simple wrapper that should work for a large number of filters.  This should work for other editors too.  A serious drawback is that it means processing the entire file, whereas I would usually prefer to just process a marked block.  Plus points for EditPad Pro which has such functionality built in.

I was interested to read DC's Text Editor review, but it's badly out of date now.  I was surprised to find that Wikipedia's list of text editors was a bit thin in places, like having a blank page for Boxer, and also that the TextEditors.org was similarly rather light in places.  Still, it's a BIG subject.

My own search goes on, if in a desultory manner.  I'm getting a little more used to Boxer (hmmm - need to look at word wrap), and the most obvious other thing to do next is to take another look at EditPad Pro, which seems to be a big favourite with many.

Thanks again...
2110
PowerPro ... I find it's scripting language hideous!

I use PowerPro and find its scripting hard work, but that goes for other programs as well.  E.g., AutoHotKey is very popular on DC, but not being a programmer, AHK scripts look gibberish to me...  I just wish PPro had a learn-by-example script recorder and editor, like Macro Express.
2111
Developer's Corner / Re: Emergence Basic Freeware
« Last post by rjbull on January 21, 2009, 03:50 AM »
If you like Basic and end up having to pay for one, you might look at PureBasic.  It's the one Horst Schaeffer uses for programs like MemPad.

2112
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: SlickRun
« Last post by rjbull on January 20, 2009, 03:55 AM »
SR ... has a "JOT" command ... all of my notes were immediately trashed.

You might want to look at Horst Schaeffer's MemPad with "Pages locked by default" in Settings.  You'd probably want to set up an SR alias to run it, and it wouldn't be quite as seamless,  but it should keep your notes more securely.  And make sure you back everything up...  :(
2113
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: SlickRun
« Last post by rjbull on January 20, 2009, 03:51 AM »
You can check here a review about quick launch apps.

A list of just five apps with one screenshot apiece and no comments scarcely qualifies as a review...  Doesn't even mention Colibri, Executor or MCL, to name but three more.
2114
General Software Discussion / Windows editors - do they have to be so bad?
« Last post by rjbull on January 16, 2009, 08:32 AM »
I've just been looking at a few more Windows editors.  Originally, I was looking for these features:

  • Automatic back-ups
  • Bookmarks
  • Edit multiple files (tabbed interface?)
  • Ability to specify filters as external user tools (most seem to unable to cope with redirection symbols)

I looked at (freeware) Metapad, TED Notepad (great little editor), Crimson Editor (nice), PSPad, Notetab Light, PFE, Editor2, ConTEXT, and briefly at (payware) Boxer.  I have a copy of Notepad++ to try.  I'd be interested in further recommendations, but (correct me if I'm wrong) none of those I've seen so far seemed to have all the features I wanted.  Worse, another very serious lack became obvious: the Windows-Notepad idea of marking text is a feeble, crippled thing.  In almost all the Windows editors I've seen, you have to use the mouse, or Shift-arrow keys, to mark text.  If you press almost any other key, you lose the marked area and have to start again.  That means that if you want to mark a long piece of text, you have to keep tediously scrolling down and just hope you don't overshoot your target.

Compare this with WordStar-style editors.  You drop a Start Block marker with Control-K,B (^KB).  You can use ^QF Find to locate a target point, or ^QM/^Q1 to go to a bookmark - and the Start Block marker is unaffected while you do so.  When you've marked what you want, you drop an End Block marker with ^KK and the block is locked as a unit.  You can still whizz around the file without affecting your marked area.  It only becomes unmarked when you make a deliberate action to unmark it.  That's a far more efficient way than Notepad-style for handling text.  True, I believe Boxer and TED Notepad both have limited work-arounds, but not as good.

Do Windows editors really have to be so bad?  So much worse than my favourite WordStar-style DOS editor, VDE, at handling text?

Of course, WordStar is One True True Way for writers: here's author Robert Sawyer's manifesto on the subject.






2115
Ability to permanently delete entries from the "Show new replies to your posts" list, for threads one is no longer interested in.



2116
Boxer Text Editor - see Complete Feature List - is on discount at Bits du Jour today, Wednesday, 14th January 2009. 

Deal Price: $29.00
You Save: 52%
List Price: $59.99
2117
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: AZZ Cardfile version 4 released
« Last post by rjbull on January 12, 2009, 04:48 AM »
The latter, I'm no coder.  Sorry, mouser, I didn't make that clear.  AZZ Cardfile has been mentioned on DC before including this thread, Looking for Notes / Database Software

2118
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / AZZ Cardfile version 4 released
« Last post by rjbull on January 12, 2009, 04:19 AM »
AZZ Cardfile version 4 has been released; free to try, $10 upgrade fee for registered users.  Updated features include:


These are the additional features, implemented since version 4.0.00

    * Groups within List of cards
    * Improved security - program settings now held in .ini files instead of Windows registry
    * Improved security - creating temporary files is no longer part of the process
    * Easier for Vista OS - data files .azz stored inside Documents
    * Assign icons to cards
    * Card window editor has more options
    * Card header formatting, also for printing
    * File format changed to XML - easier restore of damaged files
    * Dialing option includes modem configuration
    * New hyperlinks dial: and card:
    * Advanced search
    * USB flash drive support and wizard for easy transfer
    * Text import wizard
    * Style templates for cards

2119
General Software Discussion / Re: Looking for Notes / Database Software
« Last post by rjbull on January 12, 2009, 04:17 AM »
Finally, I found a program, AZZCardfile, that is almost what I need and want. Almost. But those two sticking points are driving me nuts. First, it saves all notes in a proprietary format. I hate that; I like open formats that are easily readable by half the stuff out there.

AZZ Cardfile version 4 is just out for testing, $10 upgrade fee.  Updated features (my emphasis):


These are the additional features, implemented since version 4.0.00

    * Groups within List of cards
    * Improved security - program settings now held in .ini files instead of Windows registry
    * Improved security - creating temporary files is no longer part of the process
    * Easier for Vista OS - data files .azz stored inside Documents
    * Assign icons to cards
    * Card window editor has more options
    * Card header formatting, also for printing
    * File format changed to XML - easier restore of damaged files
    * Dialing option includes modem configuration
    * New hyperlinks dial: and card:
    * Advanced search
    * USB flash drive support and wizard for easy transfer
    * Text import wizard
    * Style templates for cards
2120
General Software Discussion / Re: Large Text File Viewer
« Last post by rjbull on January 09, 2009, 04:40 AM »
PSPad's Help file says it works with files of unlimited length.
2121
Coding Snacks / Re: Create Multiple Empty Numbered Folders
« Last post by rjbull on January 09, 2009, 04:27 AM »
Here's a quick way of making 100:

$1.bat:
for %%a in (0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9) do call $2.bat %%a

$2.bat:
for %%a in (0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9) do md %1%%a

Put them both in the same directory, and just run $1.bat.  Easy enough to generalise if you want more directories.




2122
It isn't quite like the OP says, at least not in terms of tickable tags, but how about ScrapBook?  Small, free, portable, registry green, looks easy to use.

If you like the same things in a tree-style notes keeper, try MemPad.

2123
Living Room / Re: boardgamegeek - all things boardgame site
« Last post by rjbull on January 07, 2009, 10:05 AM »
Maybe some people might like Tantrix?
UK site: Tantrix UK

2124
It wouldn't be the Web app blist, would it?

2125
Clipboard Help+Spell / Re: Clipboard_Viewer_Ignore/Security
« Last post by rjbull on January 07, 2009, 04:59 AM »
I don't think CHS can stop other applications seeing new clips, but it has a feature to ignore clips coming from certain applications, if that's what you mean.  Bring up the main window and go View -> Options and select the tab Capture Options.  You then find a box labelled "Ignore these applications (just filename, each on separate line, e.g. notepad.exe)" and enter the names of the programs you want ignored.  Mine contains, inter alia, keepass.exe, pins.exe, etc.

HTH.

Pages: prev1 ... 80 81 82 83 84 [85] 86 87 88 89 90 ... 127next