20701
Living Room / Re: Why do so many micropayment systems fail?
« Last post by mouser on February 12, 2009, 05:13 PM »app, i think the approach is a smart one.
i've actually suggested the same basic idea for music sites.
the idea can be boiled down to this central idea:
1. Users pay a monthly subscription price, and then have access to all conent.
2. The system then keeps track of what actual content they view.
3. The system then divides up their monthly subscription poportionately to the authors of the content the user viewed.
The site mentioned in the article (Kachingle) extends this idea to distributed sites by letting site authors put a medalion on their site that users can click to mark that site as one that the user wishes to have their funds contributed to. (They also let the user decide how much to put in per month, unlike a fixed monthly subscription fee.
I think it makes a huge amount of sense -- it makes it really easy for the user, which makes all the difference.
i've actually suggested the same basic idea for music sites.
the idea can be boiled down to this central idea:
1. Users pay a monthly subscription price, and then have access to all conent.
2. The system then keeps track of what actual content they view.
3. The system then divides up their monthly subscription poportionately to the authors of the content the user viewed.
The site mentioned in the article (Kachingle) extends this idea to distributed sites by letting site authors put a medalion on their site that users can click to mark that site as one that the user wishes to have their funds contributed to. (They also let the user decide how much to put in per month, unlike a fixed monthly subscription fee.
I think it makes a huge amount of sense -- it makes it really easy for the user, which makes all the difference.

Recent Posts

