topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday November 17, 2025, 11:29 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 75 76 77 78 79 [80] 81 82 83 84 85 ... 230next
1976
General Software Discussion / Re: Mint 12 introducing DuckDuckGo ...
« Last post by app103 on November 25, 2011, 06:15 AM »
The truth is that any operating system is going to suck for those that do not have even the small amount of intelligence and expertise required to make the most basic of customizations, such as changing the default search engine. Makes me wonder how they even managed to install the OS.
1977
Have you checked any of the tools listed here? There are some free/open source stuff mentioned. http://stackoverflow...oint-2007-log-viewer
1978
Living Room / Re: FUNNY~! Drinking Water DOES NOT Hydrate!
« Last post by app103 on November 23, 2011, 08:58 AM »
Unless Coca Cola can make matching health claims on their product, they don't want anyone else to state the obvious. To claim that water can prevent or treat dehydration on the packaging of your product is to say that water is better for you than sugar-loaded soda pop...

And we can't have that, because people will start drinking water instead of soda pop, and Coca Cola will unfairly suffer an economic loss.

I'm not sure I believe that conspiracy theory, since Coca-Cola actually owns at least one bottled water company.

How's this for scary? List of Coca-Cola brandsw

I didn't mean for it to sound like a conspiracy theory, at all. I only meant to explain the fairness and logic of the decision to disallow bottled water producers from making health claims, thereby leading consumers to believe that only water or only bottled water, or only their bottled water can do what they claim.
1979
Living Room / Re: FUNNY~! Drinking Water DOES NOT Hydrate!
« Last post by app103 on November 22, 2011, 01:38 AM »
Actually it has more to do with sugar loaded soft drinks than water itself. Soft drink manufacturers do not want bottled water producers to make claims that they can not legally put on their own bottles. Unless Coca Cola can make matching health claims on their product, they don't want anyone else to state the obvious. To claim that water can prevent or treat dehydration on the packaging of your product is to say that water is better for you than sugar-loaded soda pop...

And we can't have that, because people will start drinking water instead of soda pop, and Coca Cola will unfairly suffer an economic loss. If a soft drink manufacturer can not make the same claim, based on the water content of their product (almost every beverage can prevent dehydration in the same way that water can, because most contain water) then it is an unfair advantage given to the bottled water producers. So, they have to punish the bottled water producers, disallow them to make the claim, and thereby preventing soda pop manufacturers to make the same claim, fooling the public into thinking that sugar-loaded soda pop is actually good for you and they should drink more of it without any guilt.

It also might lead people to believe that bottled water works better at preventing/treating dehydration than tap water, that somehow the water in the bottle has some sort of magical properties that tap water does not. After all, where is the label with the same health claims on your faucet? There is none.

I'm happy that the EU did this ruling, I don't think it'd be nice for us to have the packing of french fries saying they cure cancer.

Very true, except for the fact that no French fry producer ever has, or is ever likely, to make such a claim.

But if they allow bottled water producers to claim it can prevent dehydration, what would stop the french fry maker from claiming their product can prevent low blood sugar, and then the ignorant consumer saying to themselves "Oh, I don't want low blood sugar to happen to me, so I better eat more french fries" and then eating themselves right into a case of Type 2 Diabetes, all the while thinking they were doing something healthy to themselves?.

Don't think that a french fry manufacturer wouldn't do that. Back in the 80's when everybody got cholesterol crazy and it was determined that liquid soybean oil didn't raise your cholesterol level the same as animal fats, butter, or margarine, the place where my husband worked, that deep fried everything, hung up a big sign advertising how their product was good for your heart, cooked in cholesterol-free soybean oil. And something like this should NEVER have a claim attached to it intended to try to fool the public into thinking that it is healthy and good for you!
1980
Living Room / Re: New Consumer Protection for Broadband Customers (FUNNY!)
« Last post by app103 on November 17, 2011, 03:38 AM »
The worst part is, you just know that the way they are going to choose which 10% get the advertised maximum speed is by determining which users never actually use their internet connection more than once a month...

I actually get the advertised speed. I get every bit of the speed that I am paying for. Actually I get just slightly above that...

But anyone that has been in the DC IRC channel can tell you that I have one of the worst connections, ever, in the sense of stability. What good is speed if you can't stay connected long enough to use it? I might as well be back on dialup. All the time I waste reconnecting on DSL would even itself out with the waiting time to download files on dialup.

So that is who will get all the speed...the 10% of customers that have the most unstable connections.

Meaning, even when they don't screw you one way, they have others. That guy on their payroll whose job it is to stay awake every night and think up new ways to screw the customers (and their employees) earns every dollar he is paid.
1981
Notes all over the desktop works for some people, and any really good sticky note app will do that, but what I find useful is one that will remind me to actually read the notes, and includes some way for me to make some notes always visible on the desktop, while others are hidden away on memo boards organized in a nice tree structure.

Notezilla is the perfect app for that, for me. I get the best of all worlds with it. There is no shortage of features and is adaptable to many styles of note taking. (there is also a very generous discount for DC members)
1982
I read of URL Snooper appears to usefull to capture the dl link of somethings, but as I read it, it appears it captures (only?) URL's of DL streams in current bandwidth (maybe? links on an open www page).
URL Snooper should really be usefull for some URL's, (but I did not see anything yet that says URL Snooper will spider 1 or more pages deep)

URL Snooper is not designed to spider sites. It is for obtaining the real URLs of streaming media content, such as a video or audio that might be playing in a flash player where the URL of the actual media file might be hidden, not obvious or obtainable any other way. You start playing it and URL Snooper tells you the website's secrets so you can download the file.  ;)
1983
How about something like HTTrack? It can filter by file type, so you can point it at a website and have it download just the pdf files, if that is all you want. And it can update your local copy, downloading only what is new since the last time you downloaded the site.
1984
Living Room / Re: silly humor - post 'em here! [warning some NSFW and adult content]
« Last post by app103 on November 06, 2011, 06:55 PM »
Even if you don't like rap music, this is worth watching/listening to. It's a real lolwtf.



It's the original vocals with the music replaced. It's not a regular remix where someone mashes up multiple songs. The guy that does these actually plays the replacement music himself. He's quite talented.

Here are some other particularly good ones he has done:

Megadeth-Symphony of Destruction(Reggae Version)
Ozzy Osbourne - Crazy Train (Smooth Jazz Version)
Metallica-Enter Sandman (Smooth Jazz Version)
Kiss-Detroit Rock City(Reggae Version)
1985
Living Room / Re: I don't understand relative volume on a PC at all.
« Last post by app103 on November 03, 2011, 02:26 AM »
There are 3 volume controls I have to mess with to get everything just right for most uses.

On here, I set the first 2 to half volume, then mess with the controls on the actual speakers to get it right.

Screenshot - 11_3_2011 , 3_23_20 AM.png

Now, if it needs to be made louder/softer, I can mess with just the knob on my keyboard, which messes with the first control shown in the screenshot above.
1986
Living Room / Re: Products designed to fail, a documentary
« Last post by app103 on November 03, 2011, 02:07 AM »
From a post I made on Friendfeed over a year ago:

This is why "they don't make them like they used to"...

pcs.jpg

There is a slider bar that goes from "lasts forever" to "breaks immediately" and companies try to find that sweet spot that is as close to "breaks immediately" as they can get away with. Both extreme ends will put you out of business. If your product lasts forever, then once everyone has bought one, since they never need to replace it, you have no more customers unless you invest money in R&D to come out with something better with more features. If your product breaks immediately, then it is percieved as complete crap, and nobody wants it. If you find the sweet spot, you make more profit by keeping the production expenses down, you won't need to spend as much on R&D as often to force repeat buying, and lasting just long enough to keep people happy, so they are willing to buy another when theirs breaks, even though the new will be exactly the same as the old (unless the company has moved just a tad closer to the "breaks immediately" end of the bar, which all companies do as time goes on). This is why all that old stuff in Grandma's house, made by companies that don't even exist any more, still works, but you have piles of broken stuff made by some of the most profitable companies in the world, which you bought within the last 5 years.
http://friendfeed.co...ke-them-like-used-to
1987
Living Room / Re: Hard drive shortage
« Last post by app103 on November 01, 2011, 06:48 PM »
Wow! Even Geeks.com only has one 3.5" Internal SATA drive listed, and it's a 300G refurbed Seagate for $70.  http://www.geeks.com...CE-NDW-R&cat=HDD
1988
Living Room / Re: Getting your radiation RDA with your technology.
« Last post by app103 on October 24, 2011, 01:49 AM »
Following @mahesh2k's comment, and on reflection, there may be some truth to what @app103 and @40hz suggested in what I hope was jest

Yes, I was kidding, but as they say, there is no such thing as a truly original thought, so if I thought of it then somewhere someone else already has too, and maybe he wasn't joking. And I suspect that every big company (and many small ones) all have on their payroll a guy whose job it is to stay awake all night and think up ways to screw over both customers and employees to maximize profits. And this guy keeps his job by thinking up things we will accept without too much grumbling, and may even like....at least long enough to allow ourselves to be willingly exploited. And by the time we figure out what is going on, it's too late...they have all our money and we have misery wrapped in shiny paper with a bow and a corporate logo.
1989
Living Room / Re: Getting your radiation RDA with your technology.
« Last post by app103 on October 23, 2011, 05:00 AM »
So, if we get a lot more technology into the hands of people living in overpopulated 3rd world countries, we may be able to raise their quality of life and reduce their populations all in one shot?  :huh:
1990
Living Room / Re: no power on Dell desktop
« Last post by app103 on October 22, 2011, 05:57 AM »
I have had similar problems with my 3 year old Dell and tracked down the problem. Make sure you have nothing plugged into the USB ports in the front panel before attempting to start the PC.

If that works for you, then you know that component needs fixing/replacing.
1991
Living Room / Re: Post Your Funny Videos Here [NSFW]
« Last post by app103 on October 20, 2011, 03:55 PM »
Apparently it's made of around a ton of gold, so it might be hard to get it out down the stairs/elevator and out the door. ;)

- Oshyan

Sounds like fodder for a Jackie Chan comedy.  :D
1992
Living Room / Re: Post Your Funny Videos Here [NSFW]
« Last post by app103 on October 20, 2011, 12:40 PM »
Not funny, but interesting... am I the only one who thinks this would make for an awesome locale for a heist movie?

Yeah, they should steal the golden cow!

- Oshyan

Ok, so I am not the only one that thought that.  8)
1993
Screenshot Captor / Re: Improving Region Select Capture Mode
« Last post by app103 on October 15, 2011, 12:06 PM »
I like the guide lines!  :)
1994
General Software Discussion / Re: Suggestions for maximum-lockdown XP system
« Last post by app103 on October 13, 2011, 09:56 PM »
Another vote for SteadyState, since you plan on installing XP and are looking for something free. Microsoft took it off their website last year, though.

If you have any troubles finding a copy of it, let me know. I am pretty sure I have it, downloaded for a reason very similar to your situation.
1995
General Software Discussion / Re: Can anyone help me related to antivirus problem?
« Last post by app103 on October 13, 2011, 09:21 PM »
When you say that IE isn't working right, what exactly does that mean?

  • Can you view any web pages?
  • Can you only view some web pages?
  • Are you having trouble logging into websites?
  • Are you having trouble staying logged in?
  • Do websites just look messed up?
  • Something else?

An exact description of the problem might give a good hint to the solution. It might be how you have the antivirus configured.
1996
General Software Discussion / Re: What makes Neflix streaming tick?
« Last post by app103 on October 11, 2011, 08:34 PM »
Without knowing what browser he is using, it could be difficult.

First, whatever browser he is using he should clear the cache and check to see if 3rd party cookies is turned on. If he is using an older version of a browser, upgrade it.

If he is using Firefox, I would suggest checking to see if he has the silverlight plugin installed in his browser and that it is activated.

If it is, I would then see if he has an ad blocker or noscript installed and see if you can set it to allow the netflix site in the exceptions list.

Finally, I'd check the firewall if he is using something other than or in addition to the Windows firewall. Some of them block all kinds of stuff. What initially made me switch to Firefox was when Zone Alarm's script blocking locked me out of GMail and I had no idea that was the problem. (this was back when gmail was still in beta and you needed an invite to have an account)
1997
General Software Discussion / Re: Dart Programming Language
« Last post by app103 on October 11, 2011, 05:21 AM »
Maybe Google will bully JS out of the picture. . . or maybe there'll be one more technology web developers will be forced to commit to their arsenal.

Does every language in existence suck so badly that none of them could replace JavaScript and we need a new one?  :huh:

Does Dart offer any advantage over VBScript? We know how that one went...

From what I understand, it won't really replace javascript, since to get it to run in a browser one would have to translate it to js (tools provided). It wouldn't be like VBScript at all. Server side, it would be like any other of the server side scripting languages that already exist (php, python, perl, ruby, etc.), requiring one to install it on their server, first.

While I understand that it might make things easier, with one scripting language for both server side and client side coding, in actual use that whole translation to js for client side could lead to a big mess somewhere down the road.
1998
Living Room / Re: Angry birds in the wild
« Last post by app103 on October 11, 2011, 05:04 AM »
And how they where created:

http://i.imgur.com/s7xb9.jpg

The last one looks more like a cross with Grover and not Cookie Monster.

grover_sesame_street.jpg
1999
Living Room / Re: work bathroom story
« Last post by app103 on October 08, 2011, 05:34 PM »
Reading the original post, I can not help but keep thinking of this episode of How I Met Your Mother.  ;D

2000
Living Room / Re: The Life-Changing $20 Rightward-Facing Cow
« Last post by app103 on October 07, 2011, 10:35 PM »
Fascinating! I'm quite interested in the philosophy behind, yet totally repulsed by the reality of addictive, mindless gaming a la Facebook and Zynga. I'm curious to see what Bogost makes of all this after some more thought.

- Oshyan

Yes, this is also a topic of interest of mine and I did some "research" into facebook games last year, the most popular ones, who they appeal to, what personality traits they were exploiting, what it would take to make a successful game, etc.

I had hoped to possibly develop my own facebook game, but in the end I abandoned the idea after learning that you can't be successful unless you are going to become a slimeball that exploits players for profit. With the sheer number of players you will end up with even for a moderately popular game, regardless of how you decide to handle paying for the overhead that keeps the game running, if you don't become a scammer or peddler of malware you will never make enough money to keep it running.

I got to know a number of developers of facebook games...the small ones that most people never heard of. I watched them struggle with paying the bills that kept their games going. I watched them try all kinds of things to cut costs without cutting quality. I watched a bunch of them sell their games and walk away...many more just pull the plug and give up. I watched great games rapidly devolve into a complete mess after being sold to people that just wanted quick easy money. I watched players protest and complain, and even had my blog hit with comments by disgruntled players after one developer gave up and sold his game, one I had previously written a game guide for in its very early days. I even had one player leave a bad review of my blog on Entrecard because she thought she was supposed to leave a review of the game.

I gave up on any ideas of facebook game development after all of this. I am not cut out for it.
Pages: prev1 ... 75 76 77 78 79 [80] 81 82 83 84 85 ... 230next