topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 20, 2025, 9:54 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 74 75 76 77 78 [79] 80 81 82 83 84 ... 438next
1951
Living Room / [GAME] Find something beautiful on Google Maps
« Last post by Renegade on June 08, 2014, 09:34 AM »
I was checking out some news related geography, and got sidetracked, then thought this might be a fun game...

Browse Google Maps somewhere and find a particularly beautiful scene -- a) post the URL, b) post a screenshot (JPG).

You'll need to use Earth view and zoom in to see the photos in the lower panel.

I'll go first:

https://www.google.c...!1s23243230!2e1!3e10

Super_Simple_resized_Screenshot - 2014_06_09 , 12_31_21 AM_1240x783.jpg

You can pan around and find more gorgeous scenes there.

1952
Living Room / Re: Movies or films you've seen lately
« Last post by Renegade on June 08, 2014, 12:21 AM »
I love those plays on words. 

I am such an idiot sometimes. I started downloading it a while ago when I read Wraith's & your posts. I was wondering what you meant there, but shrugged it off. I just went back to check to see if the download was done and... DOH! And now I have this going through my head...
1953
Living Room / Re: Movies or films you've seen lately
« Last post by Renegade on June 07, 2014, 11:21 PM »
Monsters
...
Reccomended. :Thmbsup:

+1 -- It's a fun flick.
1954
Living Room / Re: Movies or films you've seen lately
« Last post by Renegade on June 07, 2014, 09:20 PM »
Back in the old days when they installed governments to get the oil.  ;)

Oh man... I remember those days fondly... 2014... What a year! ;)  :-*
1955
Living Room / Re: Stuff We Feel Like Bitching About
« Last post by Renegade on June 07, 2014, 09:12 PM »
But on this particular one, they called him out for calling someone... well a *sucker, which is apparently an anti-gay slur (who knew?  I didn't). 

PC crap drives me nuts.

The South Park episode "The 'F' Word" is really good. All the kids run around calling a bunch of loud bikers "faggots". I remember when I was a kid before I had any idea what sex was, much less any idea about homosexuality, that everyone said "fag" and it was pretty much the same as "jerk" or "spaz".

What I see quite often is a bunch of thin-skinned candy-ass pansies that are just looking for a reason to be "offended".

Here's a good example of a bunch of whiny &*%^*&^s (check the cartoon at the link):

http://www.huffingto...o-sun_n_5454325.html

The Toronto Sun sparked controversy Thursday with a controversial cartoon mocking Ontario Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne.

The illustration by longtime Sun cartoonist Andy Donato — showing broken glasses, bloody teeth and a Wynne pin — ran just two days after the provincial leaders' debate.

Polls from both Ipsos and Forum Research suggest PC Leader Tim Hudak was seen as the night's winner.

While it's not clear if the illustration was making a point about the debate, it nonetheless left more than a few people with the impression the newspaper was making light of violence against women.

The perpetual victims look for any opportunity to turn any situation into some "social issue".

The fact there is that the Premiere of Ontario had her ass handed to her in the debate. The fact that she's a woman has zero to do with it. But... you know the whiners... MUST.FIND.VICTIMIZATION.IN.EVERYTHING!

What I've found, in general, is that these kinds of people cannot be reasoned with. At all. Ever. They are incapable of trying to understand what anyone is saying unless it's just one massive circle jerk. You can point out that the skies are particularly clear today and they'll accuse you of saying it's raining. (Go on Reddit and you'll see a lot of this - I'm not exaggerating - people will accuse you of saying the exact opposite of what you said.) They have no ability to give anything a charitable read and only hear what they want to hear, which is invariably that you're a racist/sexist/homophobic/elitist/child-beating/whatever SOB.

1956
Living Room / Re: Stuff We Feel Like Bitching About
« Last post by Renegade on June 07, 2014, 10:31 AM »
You start a thread about bitching... That's just an open invitation for me to rant! ;D

Since this isn't the basement I suggest the amplitude be kept below a rant and above a stupor.

My rant is actually pretty tame. I don't say what I really think. So... tame. But, perhaps "rant" for candy-ass pansies that hate reality. :P

Rant

As my first bitch I select guns.  Not should or should not the populous be allowed to carry concealed or revealed, but as in why are there so many around me all the time?


More and more government workers are being armed. In a Canadian court the other day there was a jackboot with a fully automatic rifle. In court. Huh? In Canada? Seriously?

Bastard didn't even say he was sorry! :P


I have no grappling hook to scale the wall but I feel it's only a matter of time before the gun turrets are added to "ordinary" government buildings, business establishments, schools, airports and picnic areas.  Tourists at The Grand Canyon will pay extra to see The Grand Cannon fired at noon taking out a section of canyon wall.  The conductors on trains no longer perform a service to the public.  Instead they dress as prison guards and pack pistols.  I'm afraid to find out what the grammar school Hall Monitor is packing these days.  Got to protect that milk money!


It's actually much, much worse in the US. The police forces are being militarized with armoured vehicles and military weaponry. Regular government workers for agencies like the Department of Agriculture are also being armed.

Hollow point ammunition is illegal to use in war, but that's what they are ordering by the BILLIONS!

For domestic use. i.e. Against civilians.

If you've ever seen what hollow point ammunition does, it's devastating. Tiny hole in front. Massive hole where it exits followed by a trail of guts and blood everywhere.

When people talk about "stopping power" of a round, that doesn't apply to hollow points - they have only 1 thing - killing power.

But things really do get worse.

Think I'm exaggerating? Ask the 18 month old who got a flash bang grenade thrown at him. It exploded in his face and ripped open his face & chest. I would strongly caution about searching for more on that story as many news stories have pictures and they are graphic. It's pretty disturbing to see an infant that horribly disfigured by police.

But, y'know... F**k the kid because he was resisting and posed a threat to the officers...  :-\

Ever see a video where a cop is putting someone quietly into handcuffs and then the cop says, "Stop resisting?" A beating ensues. Usually with about a half dozen cops on top of the handcuffed "criminal". Sometimes the "criminal" dies. For crimes like walking down the street, etc.

Cops break into wrong house. Shoot dog. That's not a unique story -- there are many like that.

I could go on virtually forever about this with countless examples. They happen every single day. Every day. Non stop.

Enjoy your remaining freedoms while they last. You'll have a great time telling your grandchildren about them as they stare at you in disbelief.



So, what do I want to bitch about? The increasing and accelerating loss of freedom. You touched on a symptom of it.

1957
Living Room / Re: Call to arms on net neutrailty
« Last post by Renegade on June 05, 2014, 08:36 PM »
So many people tried to post comments on the FCC Web site after watching John Oliver's very funny rant on net neutrality a few days ago that the site crashed.

There have been some complaints from the usual suspects that Oliver doesn't understand net neutrality, but IMHO, he has done all of us a great favor by bringing the debate to the masses in a way that the masses can actually understand.

That was hilarious! :)  :Thmbsup:

Thanks for posting that! ;D

I'm not sure which is scarier, the fox guarding the hen house at the FCC,

That's normal and exactly how [the US] government works - vested interests are inserted into the regulatory bodies to ensure their polices are made law. It's not just the FCC though. It's the entire government.

Here are 18 venn diagrams showing how that works. (It's 2 years old, but who cares if the names change a bit - the corporations control the government.)

http://www.activistp...g-how-corrupted.html

Here's the one pertaining to Comcast.

comcast venn.jpg

Comment
That is not capitalism. It is corporatism. It is plutocracy. Oligarchy. Monopoly. Cartels. But it sure as hell isn't capitalism when corporations run the government and create monopolies and keep out potential competitors. We have monopolistic cartels - not competition.


Do visit that link. If you think "Net Neutrality" is an important issue, the exact same kinds things are going on in every industry. They are carving out empires protected by legislation and enforced by jack-booted thugs.

"Net Neutrality" is just the tip of the iceberg. But... that's a Basement discussion... ;)
1958
Living Room / Net Neutrality argument contest - win BTC
« Last post by Renegade on June 03, 2014, 06:51 AM »
There's a contest for the best ancap arguments about Net Neutrality here:

http://www.reddit.co..._contest_this_weeks/

There are 2 sections: <= 100 words and > 100 words.

The winners get bitcoins.

If nothing else though, it may be interesting to read some of the arguments.
1959
Living Room / Re: Apple now allowing apps to transmit Bitcoin?
« Last post by Renegade on June 02, 2014, 09:59 PM »
And who's in a better position than Apple to provide that information to them?

Samsung.



;D

Then "Others". :)

But here's perhaps a better table:

http://mobithinking....ts/a#phone-shipments

1960
Living Room / Apple now allowing apps to transmit Bitcoin?
« Last post by Renegade on June 02, 2014, 09:19 PM »
HUH!?!

https://developer.ap...oval/guidelines.html

11.17 Apps may facilitate transmission of approved virtual currencies provided that they do so in compliance with all state and federal laws for the territories in which the app functions

This is a pretty big turn around for Apple. Has the massive negative publicity they got from Bitcoiners has worn them down?

However, the wording there says "approved", so... what does that mean? There's no further mention there, so it could mean anything.

I'm skeptical for now... Apple doesn't have a good track record for being transparent, etc. etc.
1961
Living Room / We Drove a Car While It Was Being Hacked
« Last post by Renegade on May 31, 2014, 08:11 AM »
Interesting...

http://motherboard.v...d?trk_source=popular

As I drove to the top of the parking lot ramp, the car's engine suddenly shut off, and I started to roll backward. I expected this to happen, but it still left me wide-eyed.

I felt as though someone had just performed a magic trick on me. What ought to have triggered panic actually elicited a dumbfounded surprise in me. However, as the car slowly began to roll back down the ramp, surprise turned to alarm as the task of steering backwards without power brakes finally sank in.

This wasn't some glitch triggered by a defective ignition switch, but rather an orchestrated attack performed wirelessly, from the other side of the parking lot, by a security researcher.

Looking to upgrade your 2013 Cadillac to a 1977 Chevy? ;D


1962
Living Room / Google Search Results Removal
« Last post by Renegade on May 31, 2014, 07:43 AM »
Depending on how you take this, it could send shivers down your spine.

http://pando.com/201...from-search-results/

In the middle of January, Vivint, the Utah based home automation company that also produces smart thermostats, found itself with a surprising new rival. Google bought Nest and by virtue of acquisition Vivint was suddenly competing head to head with the Silicon Valley search giant.

But Vivint — which was purchased by Blackstone in 2012 — certainly didn’t expect what happened next. Just two weeks later, Vivint was delisted from Google’s search results.

Coincidence? Hmm...

1963
Living Room / Re: Movies or films you've seen lately
« Last post by Renegade on May 29, 2014, 09:39 PM »
I tried to get through it on three separate occasions. My GF and I both fell asleep each time.

You're lucky... I think I read about a few suicides of people trying to watch it more than once... ;)

Thank goodness it wasn't an updated version of Polydeus. :tellme:

At least that was short. (And a lot better.)

This is short:

https://www.youtube..../watch?v=VHttM2pzWPY

And funny! :) In a dark way...
1964
Interview is here:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNhMXyAdjp8[/youtube]


Download it now. It might not be up for long. Other versions are down.

thanks :up: (I see it's gone now).
well worth listening to. Another copy here.

That's 5 minutes longer than the one I saw. Commercials?

I noticed that in the interview there were some pretty brutal cuts. Completely WTF!?! cuts. Seems a lot of juicy stuff was left out. :(
1965
Living Room / Re: TrueCrypt is Now Abandonware?!
« Last post by Renegade on May 29, 2014, 01:12 PM »
^I think it's less it's being seen as terrifying and more as a nasty and serious problem that needs to be solved. And pronto. At least on the part of the people with sufficient mathematical and technical chops to pull it off.

Unfortunately, finding that new encryption algorithm may prove trickier than originally thought. Look here.

And what if Glenn Greenwald's partner had TrueCrypt info when he was intercepted in London? 

In that case, this is all just theatre, and we're being played like a fiddle. What then? What agenda?

These are terrifying thoughts.
1966
Living Room / Re: Movies or films you've seen lately
« Last post by Renegade on May 29, 2014, 01:08 PM »
I tried to get through it on three separate occasions. My GF and I both fell asleep each time.

You're lucky... I think I read about a few suicides of people trying to watch it more than once... ;)
1967
Living Room / Re: TrueCrypt is Now Abandonware?!
« Last post by Renegade on May 29, 2014, 12:37 PM »
Has just how terrifying this is sunk in for anyone yet?

This is truly one of the most horrifying things and is way up there with Heartbleed.

1968
Interview is here:



Download it now. It might not be up for long. Other versions are down.
1969
Living Room / Re: Movies or films you've seen lately
« Last post by Renegade on May 29, 2014, 08:55 AM »
Just saw Melancholia...

http://www.imdb.com/...527186/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Don't.

It's painful.

2 hours of boredom.

Use a player that can speed up the video if you watch it.

Spoilers, if you can call it that, & commentary
This is a "drama/sci-fi" that is an uber sappy chick-flick.

Nothing happens. And then the world ends.

The beginning of the movie shows the entire thing in a couple minutes, and even that's boring as watching a large log being flushed. But that's actually more entertaining and not a waste of time like this.

Really. Nothing happens. Then the world ends. That's the movie.

It has a 7.1 rating at IMDB... There are a lot of bizarre people rating movies.

It will bore you to tears, then the world ends. A planet crashes into Earth. Nothing of any interest happens during the 2 hours of the movie except for that.

You will want to jump into the movie part way through and stab everyone in the neck and watch them bleed to death so that the movie can end. If you're a pacifist.

You can COMPLETELY skip the first hour of the movie. Only the last 20 seconds are worth watching. Seriously.

Then there's a dramatic black screen that drags on like the movie before they roll the credits.

You'll want to stab the director in the neck at this point.

Then in the credits the "Danish Film Institute" is cited for support... You'll want to kill every Dane on the planet for that. And the Swedish Film Institute. Don't forget to kill the Swedes for it.

The people that rated this movie highly are seriously evil bastards.

The music in the film absolutely adds to the homicidal rage that this movie breeds.

If you check the credits further, you'll see France and Germany mentioned... You'll want to nuke them for this kind of atrocity.

You'll hate Tom Cruz forever. The director's list of thanks lists Penelope Cruz at the top.


And that is as kind as I can possibly be about this abomination.
1970
Living Room / Re: Silk Road Seized - Dread Pirate Roberts Arrested
« Last post by Renegade on May 29, 2014, 12:56 AM »
It will be hard for the prosecutors to get through that

Assuming they don't get a sympathetic judge... ;)

Yup. Like I said, we already know how it's going to end. It's a foregone conclusion. The question is whether he'll survive long enough for an appeal in the dark hole he'll be thrown into.
1971
And the usual bogus counterpoint commentary has started.

Love those self-styled pundits...

As long as those implicated can have their CNN lapdogs keep the public's attention focused on Snowden the man - and not what he revealed - abuse of executive power will continue to be 'business as usual.'

It's not just executive power... Case in point:



"...faith in the US justice system..."

Really? Seriously? Is he:

  • High
  • Mentally challenged
  • Drinking WAAAAY too much kool-aid

Or perhaps all 3?
1972
Looks like you can watch it live online here:

http://www.nbcnews.c...ysis-special-n116871

Well, it's pre-recorded... so, well... when they air it.
1973
NBC News is supposed to air their interview with Snowden tonight.  In the meantime, the network has posted an excerpt in which he states that he was not a low level technician, but was in fact trained as a spy and did undercover work for the CIA and NSA.


Excerpts from it:



And the pundits already out and screaming that he's a liar:



 :-\ Please tell us more...  Because CNN is just oh so incredibly credible! Pfft. Care to purchase a bridge or beachfront property? ;)
1974
Living Room / Re: Silk Road Seized - Dread Pirate Roberts Arrested
« Last post by Renegade on May 28, 2014, 07:19 PM »
And the case heats up...

http://freeross.org/...of-reply-memorandum/

Ross Ulbricht’s attorney Joshua Dratel submitted a reply to the prosecution on May 27 (full document below) supporting his pretrial motions and illustrating the fundamental deficiencies in the government’s arguments. Here are some key points.

More at the link.

The defence has a very strong case there. It will be hard for the prosecutors to get through that, but, we all know what will still happen...


1975
Living Room / Re: Appeals court nukes the copyright troll business-model
« Last post by Renegade on May 28, 2014, 05:44 PM »
Hmmm... how well will this fare in the Supreme Court?  (You know it's coming...)

Long, but relevant:

http://faculty.msb.e...TWebSite/MythWeb.htm

It's an essay I read a couple weeks ago on the "rule of law". It goes through reasons why the rule of law is a sick joke.

BTW - If anyone does read that, make sure to have a barf-bag ready for when it finally clicks and you realise that you've been suckered. You WILL feel sick to your stomach.

So... yeah... Expect the worst from the SCOTUS. (I always want to spell that SCROTUM for some reason... I think it has something to do with Latin singulars and plurals... :P )

Pages: prev1 ... 74 75 76 77 78 [79] 80 81 82 83 84 ... 438next