Recent Posts
so on startup the window is blank.Yes - and I also just noticed that it DOES show the name of the last image beneath the empty space, so it seems it really tries to load that image but fails.-mouser (October 08, 2005, 04:52 AM)
i should increase middle version occasionally and use last version for builds instead of every update.Ah, ok! You should release 2.1 as soon as this bug is fixed
the reason i dont update the release page when doing tests is that
it gets picked up by sites like fileforum and announced.-mouser (October 08, 2005, 04:27 AM)
ok new version up, see if it works. if so then i still need help testing why the old code wasnt working.. if it doesnt work then its a dif bug we need to fix. ps check your about box, it should say 2.00.18 now (i think previous version should have said 2.00.17 btw unless i messed up).It shows .18 but it's still not working
Btw, the download page says the latest version is "Screenshot Captor 2.00.14", the "about" info says it's .16 - a bit confusing...I understand why you don't want to change "Screenshot Captor 2.00.14" on the download page.-brotherS (October 08, 2005, 03:30 AM)
if it does then we can try a version where i disable this new code and see if that fixes it.The new version didn't fix it, lets try with disabled new code.-mouser (October 08, 2005, 03:53 AM)
ok, let me finish some more changes and then reupload a new version to test.Great!-mouser (October 08, 2005, 03:12 AM)
Thanks, that really worked 2 of 3 times when I just tested it"... after running Ghoster" is a problem. I should really clean up before exiting, but the quick solution is to activate the task bar before quitting.
-skrommel (October 07, 2005, 05:20 PM)
3) so if you click on another, and then back on last, it displays it, is that right?that's right!
if this bug happens reliably for you brotherS, please don't do anything like delete any files or change any settings -I tried - but that installer was *exactly* the same size as the installer I downloaded yesterday and has the same problem.
can you try the new version i just uploaded (normal download link) and see if the problem is still there?
did you happen to use the Tool command in Screenshot Captor to launch and edit the image file with an external program?No.-mouser (October 07, 2005, 12:17 PM)
what format is the file?The background was a JPG file, the image I added in the foreground (using "Edit/Copy image to clipboard" and "Edit/Past clipboard image as new object") PNG.
download on normal releases page:Idea: make a sticky thread with THAT info as first post, then lock it. Always update THAT new thread when a new version comes up, changing the topic of the original post and adding a post with the added features and fixed bugs.
https://www.donation...ftware/releases.html-mouser (October 07, 2005, 04:26 AM)
Maybe the friendly AHK guys could help there? If it's even possible at all? Or the author maybe might add this as a new feature?-skrommel (October 07, 2005, 04:08 AM)
The speed is the limited by AutoHotkey, so I can only recommend you buy a faster PC.hehe, it's not brandnew, but not too old
It does, but it has some problems:
Skrommel-skrommel (October 06, 2005, 07:29 PM)
Would be great if you could improve itjust a teaser imageWow! Looks great, have to play with it myself to have more suggestions though
[..]
I'm also going to add some commands for easily combining screenshots by placing them side by side, etc.
any more suggestions along this line?-mouser (October 07, 2005, 01:10 AM)
Ah, nice, I will try that with the next version you release-skrommel (October 05, 2005, 05:33 PM)
What's the problem with tabbed windows?See above please, the first two posts. Just ask if you need more details, I'm more than willing to give them to you.
I like the idea of Process Tamer but can't use it for the problem I have: one program that I run 24/7 sometimes acts up and then uses almost ~100% CPU. It won't react *anymore* so Process Tamer isn't able to reduce it's CPU loadIt would be even better if one could decide for specific tasks how long they are allowed to use more than X % CPU before they are killed. That way one could set a higher value for critical tasks and lower for non-critical. Also, a line that covers all the not named processes would be great... I hope you understand what I'm trying to say
This is why I would like a "kill process when CPU usage is more than (X) % for more than (Y) minutes" option. Maybe even with an additional "(XX) minutes after killing process (YY), start up .exe (ZZ)" option?-brotherS (September 13, 2005, 02:14 AM)
GDI Objects and User Objects are columns in the table.Ah, ok, I had to enable those columns. I didn't find any >1000 but some with quite high numbers... (scroll to the very right) Comments?
Youd want to look for any program with insane numbers like > 1000-mouser (October 05, 2005, 09:22 AM)
@ "WTF IS LEERLAUFPROZESS AND WHY IS IT EATING UP ALL OF THE CPU!@$$@@#"