topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday March 14, 2026, 1:34 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 [78] 79 80 81 82 83 ... 101next
1926
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 31, 2010, 06:22 PM »
IMHO "GNU/Linux" doesn't mean "GNU-only" - then you wouldn't have a very large distro, anyway. Since it doesn't mean GNU-only, it doesn't mean opensores-only either.
Well, it MEANS GNU-compatible only.
1927
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 31, 2010, 10:26 AM »
Normal people don't care about "GNU" or "not GNU". I just wanted to clarify why this is not about "GNU/Linux".
1928
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 31, 2010, 10:06 AM »
I'm not familiar with what you're referring to.
Debian's apt repositories have a "non-free" trunk. In Debian's kernel are some binary blobs for common drivers. Both are incompatible with the term "GNU/Linux".
1929
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 30, 2010, 10:51 PM »
Did you mean, 'Yep, so "Linux" is the wrong term'?

And did you mean, 'Tell me one major GNU/Linux distribution with a "non-free" repository or blobs in the kernel'?
Debian. It has both.

So "GNU/Linux" I S plain wrong. "Linux" is the right term here.
1930
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 30, 2010, 10:01 PM »
To be absolutely clear, the reasons/motivations behind GNU/Linux are entirely political/philosophical, and NOT financial.
Yep, so "GNU/Linux" is the wrong term. Tell me one major GNU/Linux distribution without a "non-free" repository or blobs in the kernel.
1931
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 30, 2010, 09:41 PM »
Well, that's Ubuntu, Debian's criminal cousin...  :)
1932
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 30, 2010, 09:22 PM »
- wtf is a patch tuesday?
Microsoft decided to patch once a month only. I wonder how people can be tired of that but not of the daily Linux distro fixes...
1933
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 30, 2010, 09:09 PM »
The title is misleading. All the items listed have nothing to do with GNU.  :)

BTW:
Of course Linux has bars similar to Windows. Or, in case of Ubuntu, OSX. Anyway, the whole thread leads into the wrong direction. Why switch when Windows fits my needs?
1934
General Software Discussion / Re: VLC Coming to Android
« Last post by Tuxman on December 29, 2010, 09:23 PM »
Random rant:

VLC was - technically - never an outstandingly good player. The cumulative video quality with the "built-in" codecs - ffdshow IIRC? - is rather bad, visible artifacts and all that. Whenever I have to use VLC for anything, I choose "use system codecs" - also ffdshow for me -, and for some weird reason it has a significantly better quality then; but what's the point to use VLC then?

Oh, and its "200% volume" feature is ridiculous. Take the worst meaning of "loudness" you can imagine; VLC will make it even worse.
1935
Developer's Corner / Re: Tabbed Plaintext: Good or not-so-good idea?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 26, 2010, 11:54 AM »
As the separator is user-defined and might as well be changed globally, depending on the implementation, it's OK.
But I do like 13, too.  8)
1936
Developer's Corner / Re: Tabbed Plaintext: Good or not-so-good idea?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 26, 2010, 10:48 AM »
If anyone cares, theory is done. Now we'll head over to the actually complicated part.
1937
General Software Discussion / Re: Word Lens goes viral
« Last post by Tuxman on December 22, 2010, 09:34 AM »
Waiting for an Android port ...  ;D
1938
Living Room / Re: iPod - tell me why I should buy one
« Last post by Tuxman on December 17, 2010, 09:04 AM »
Battery life is not its strong suit, however...
Battery life is one of the most important issues with smartphones, as they are made for mobility, right?
1939
Living Room / Re: iPod - tell me why I should buy one
« Last post by Tuxman on December 17, 2010, 08:15 AM »
Apple is a good brand.
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

But still I think that HTC is much better.
So we're talking about smartphones then? Well, the Galaxy S is way better than all these HTC thingies will ever be with their tiny batteries.
1940
Living Room / Re: DDOS Ethics
« Last post by Tuxman on December 16, 2010, 12:30 PM »
Haha, I love RMS' reaction to all these DDOS thingies. "DDOS is bad because the application which does them is not open source".  ;D
1941
Living Room / Re: Can we compare file transfer protocols?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 16, 2010, 12:29 PM »
"File transfer protocols" is not exactly defined here, so I'd like to throw in decentral P2P (like eMule) as an alternative.
1942
Developer's Corner / Re: Tabbed Plaintext: Good or not-so-good idea?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 14, 2010, 04:33 AM »
I was just using ASCII to demonstrate what I wanted. Too lazy to do some GUI mockups.

Because they don't allow me to have multiple "pages" in only 1 file.  :P

I found it pointless to have one separate text file per format
1943
Developer's Corner / Re: Tabbed Plaintext: Good or not-so-good idea?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 13, 2010, 11:02 AM »
Well, I like penguins :) but I don't target a specific OS.
It is similar indeed, but it works differently and does a lot of stuff that I don't need, like assigning “text types“, pairs of keys and values etc.

What I want to do is nothing more than, basically, a tabbed Notepad.
1944
Developer's Corner / Tabbed Plaintext: Good or not-so-good idea?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 13, 2010, 09:27 AM »
Sometimes I need the same text a few times with only a few modifications, like: for posting in my WordPress and in discussion boards. As I found it pointless to have one separate text file per format, I usually write it pseudo-formatted and do some regex search and replace on the fly.

Some days ago I had an idea how to optimize handling such things:
"Multi-paged" plaintext.

My approach:
I define a "separator" as a page-break symbol and split the text into multiple tabs then.

Raw draft:

This is text on page 1. Some more text. Yay!

==========================

This is text on page 2. Look how funny it is. Dance, joy.

--->

________________________________________
| Tabbed Plaintext Editor            |_|X|
|________________________________________|
|        |________                       |
| Page 1 | Page 2 |                      |
|________|________|______________________|
|                                        |
| This is text on page 1. (...)          |
|                                        |
|________________________________________|

Pro:
* The "tabbed" text files are still plaintext, so they can be edited even with Notepad.
* No bells & whistles, only splitting.

Con:
Well, name them. I wanted to start coding it in January or something, so if there is something wrong with my thoughts, it would be fine if I knew it in time.

 :)
1945
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Stylizer 5.1 - a sophisticated CSS editor
« Last post by Tuxman on December 13, 2010, 07:08 AM »
That's what I wrote, right?
1946
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Stylizer 5.1 - a sophisticated CSS editor
« Last post by Tuxman on December 08, 2010, 09:08 PM »
Firebug still does its job when it comes to more advanced page analysis, but regarding CSS Stylizer is better. :-)
1947
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Stylizer 5.1 - a sophisticated CSS editor
« Last post by Tuxman on December 07, 2010, 06:14 PM »
A pity. I would have bitten my ass if there still were, though. Thank you for making it clear.
1948
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Stylizer 5.1 - a sophisticated CSS editor
« Last post by Tuxman on December 07, 2010, 05:25 PM »
AFAICS they don't have "lifetime licenses" anymore?
1949
Are you sure it isn't just familiarity with existing tools that's "convincing" you, against the effort to change?
I am, I changed my used applications several times within the last two years. So, basically, yep, I am.
There is always that "features ./. handling" comparison done in someone's mind.
1950
General Software Discussion / Re: Command line tools - Console apps heaven
« Last post by Tuxman on December 07, 2010, 02:42 PM »
TC is not a console application, so does not fit here.
Pages: prev1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 [78] 79 80 81 82 83 ... 101next