topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday March 14, 2026, 1:34 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 ... 101next
1901
General Software Discussion / Re: Bulk Creating Folders
« Last post by Tuxman on February 21, 2011, 11:34 AM »
BTW ac'tivAid can also do that :)
1902
I'm quite happy with DuckDuckGo and - sometimes - Yippy right now. Tried blekko, found its basic ideas interesting, but wasn't convinced of its search results. That said, I defined some slashtags for every now and then.
1903
General Software Discussion / Re: subline text: some innovative text editor!
« Last post by Tuxman on January 28, 2011, 12:20 PM »
The guys are working on Sublime Text 2 now. The "GoTo Anything" thingy seems to be hard to beat yet.  :o

A pity it is so pricey..
1904
Living Room / Re: What books are you reading?
« Last post by Tuxman on January 27, 2011, 10:52 AM »
I'm done now with the German edition of that one:



"Delete" looks at the surprising phenomenon of perfect remembering in the digital age, and reveals why we must reintroduce our capacity to forget. Digital technology empowers us as never before, yet it has unforeseen consequences as well. Potentially humiliating content on Facebook is enshrined in cyberspace for future employers to see. Google remembers everything we've searched for and when. The digital realm remembers what is sometimes better forgotten, and this has profound implications for us all. In "Delete", Viktor Mayer-Schonberger traces the important role that forgetting has played throughout human history, from the ability to make sound decisions unencumbered by the past to the possibility of second chances. The written word made it possible for humans to remember across generations and time, yet now digital technology and global networks are overriding our natural ability to forget - the past is ever present, ready to be called up at the click of a mouse. Mayer-Schonberger examines the technology that's facilitating the end of forgetting - digitization, cheap storage and easy retrieval, global access, and increasingly powerful software - and describes the dangers of everlasting digital memory, whether it's outdated information taken out of context or compromising photos the Web won't let us forget. He explains why information privacy rights and other fixes can't help us, and proposes an ingeniously simple solution - expiration dates on information - that may. "Delete" is an eye-opening book that will help us remember how to forget in the digital age.

 :)
1905
General Software Discussion / Re: LibreOffice UI Mockups (with sidebar)
« Last post by Tuxman on January 18, 2011, 02:06 PM »
Yeh, "looking nice" FAIL @ most of the "modern approaches"...
1906
General Software Discussion / Re: LibreOffice UI Mockups (with sidebar)
« Last post by Tuxman on January 18, 2011, 12:46 PM »
I wonder what all that "drop UIs users are used to" stuff is about. There are several good reasons that the current UI has been consistent for so long...
1907
Living Room / Re: Link: Why Google does not qualify for searching the web anymore
« Last post by Tuxman on January 11, 2011, 02:08 PM »
Yeah but it only grey out domains, make them non-clickable right?
Right.
1908
Living Room / Re: Link: Why Google does not qualify for searching the web anymore
« Last post by Tuxman on January 11, 2011, 01:54 PM »
A Firefox alternative is CustomizeGoogle or, as a successor, OptimizeGoogle, but they can only filter by domain or wildcard, so "random" domains are still there.
1909
Living Room / Re: Link: Why Google does not qualify for searching the web anymore
« Last post by Tuxman on January 08, 2011, 02:04 PM »
Another point of view is internet has ALWAYS been full of noise, crap, copy-writing crap, attempts to get on top of any list, not just Googles.
Early "top lists" were manually generated, so they required a certain level of worthy contents. Google's don't.

I would never ever expect perfect results even when doing an advanced search.
So you arranged with Google's inability to provide good search results. That is your fault, not theirs.

Not solution but another amazing experience is when you see results pages as autoloading in 2+ columns. Suddenly you are no more victim to top 10, 20, 30 and can evaluate way better.
You still are, but it takes less time.
1910
Living Room / Re: Link: Why Google does not qualify for searching the web anymore
« Last post by Tuxman on January 07, 2011, 01:46 AM »
These sites change their domains and contents quite twice a day. Once they are reported, they have a new name again and again and again. Seems to be a good business.
1911
Living Room / Re: Link: Why Google does not qualify for searching the web anymore
« Last post by Tuxman on January 07, 2011, 12:05 AM »
I could use YaCy for that, but I'm not speaking about search engines here but about the splog market.
1912
Living Room / Link: Why Google does not qualify for searching the web anymore
« Last post by Tuxman on January 06, 2011, 11:52 PM »
Marco Arment wrote:

Now, massive amounts of technically-not-spam sites are generated by penny-hungry affiliate marketers and sleazy web “content” startups to target long-tail Google queries en masse, scraping content from others or paying low-wage workers to churn out formulaic, minimally nutritious pages to answer them.

Searching Google is now like asking a question in a crowded flea market of hungry, desperate, sleazy salesmen who all claim to have the answer to every question you ask.

(...)

And none of them actually know a damn thing about what you’re asking, of course — they’re just offering meaningless, valueless words that seem to form sentences until you actually try to make use of them.

They call this “content”. But it’s not, really — it’s filler. And by a more common-sense definition, it’s spam. But Google either doesn’t think so, or is so overwhelmed by its volume that it has seemingly stopped trying to keep it under control.

Well, thank you, Web 2.0 with your "user-generated" mindfuck.

Although I wonder why other search engines (cough, Yippy, cough) don't have such a massive spam problem, in fact we should all consider the consequences. What could be an efficient way to filter our very own web experience?

Just a thought.
1913
General Software Discussion / Re: Your most used SPECIAL programs
« Last post by Tuxman on January 03, 2011, 10:09 PM »
According to Wakoopa, my "most used" "special" programs besides browsers, media players, P2P stuff, etc. are PuTTy (KiTTy, to be precise), Comicrack and the Windows Command Prompt.

 ;D

Given that these statistics are cumulative starting a few years ago, it says quite nothing...  :D
1914
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on January 01, 2011, 01:19 PM »
Well, it's cold outside!
1915
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on January 01, 2011, 12:54 PM »
Sure, at a later point. :)
1916
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on January 01, 2011, 12:44 PM »
I have.
1917
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on January 01, 2011, 12:29 PM »
Development in Java takes more time than in C++ because you'll have to work around all its misconceptions.
1918
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on January 01, 2011, 12:19 PM »
C++ is not "slow". Compare the startup time of a C++ and a Java application and shut up.
1920
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 31, 2010, 10:12 PM »
Glad to help you out! :)
The GPLv3 allows peaceful coexistence with non-free parts, written for exactly that reason: to allow Linux to get proprietary drivers.
1921
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 31, 2010, 09:56 PM »
It is the most obvious source, isn't it?
Somewhere in the Debian docs, the Blobs are explained more detailedly. But I guess "binary large objects" is quite self-explaining.

:)

No problem!

(So what about changing the topic title now?  :P)
1923
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 31, 2010, 09:28 PM »
And if it's GPL, then it's GNU.
Linux (the kernel) is not even GNU due to the driver BLOBs. No-one said that the whole distribution must also be.
1924
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 31, 2010, 07:30 PM »
GNU is actually a philosophy, standing for "freedom" "as in free speech, not in free beer".  :)
It represents the common sense that information of any kind should not be restricted in any way.
1925
Living Room / Re: Are You Ready to Switch to GNU/Linux?
« Last post by Tuxman on December 31, 2010, 06:57 PM »
RMS has a different POV here.
Pages: prev1 ... 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 ... 101next