topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday June 20, 2025, 5:56 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 71 72 73 74 75 [76] 77 78 79 80 81 ... 106next
1876
I'm not a dev so I can't vouch for it, but don't forget NSIS - the Nullsoft Scriptable Install System: http://sourceforge.net/projects/nsis/
Open source.

- Oshyan
1877
I think you might be surprised how popular such a feature would be. I'm not aware of any other stand-alone apps that can do it, and it's immensely useful for documentation purposes. Technical writers would love it (I know of one in my own house :D). It may just be a matter of connecting with the right audience...

- Oshyan
1878
Ah well, it seems either no one was interested in this, or no one had an answer. But I thought I'd update just in case anyone has a similar problem.

I've continued to research and essentially concluded - perhaps not surprisingly - that a wiki is the best currently available option. What I realized is that it should be fairly easy to include image map functionality in a wiki. In fact there are plugins for both MediaWiki and DocuWiki that do just that. The task now is converting Dr. Explain's output (HTML image maps) to wiki syntax for these plugins. I think it may be quite do-able. This could end up as a surprisingly effective solution. In combination with a WYSIWYG editor it will be a nearly complete solution.

Still, I've never entirely embraced wikis. They've always felt clunky to me. We'll see how well this works out...

I'm also still hoping to find a free/open source, or at least cheaper, stand-alone application that does the kind of UI screenshot auto-labeling that Dr. Explain can do. If anyone has any advice on that it would be great. How cool would it be to see that added to ScreenshotCaptor?  :D

- Oshyan
1879
Hello again everyone. It's been, um... 2 years since I posted here? I missed this place. :D I hope I'll have time again to stick around, we'll see. But for now I need this magical community's rabid genius to bend to my will and find me something that I don't think exists. If you just want to read my software request, skip down to the bold bit below. ;)

Right, so the quick back story is I'm working at a software publisher, on a complicated piece of software, and it's part of my job to handle documentation. Or at least to manage it. I'm sorry to say I hate doing it, it's my least favorite part of the job.

One of the most laborious parts of it involves documenting the whole UI and the many unique "objects" in the software. For this task I've been using Dr. Explain, a frequent feature on this forum last I was here. I'm usually a free/open source software kind of guy, but this one I bought. It seemed very unique at the time; still is from what I know. And overall it's been a pretty good solution, despite some quirks and limitations. The automatic screenshot capture and labeling of UI elements is priceless for a job like this. I'll show you why: http://www.planetsid...uk/docs/tg2/noderef/

The problem is it's clearly not finished, and there's a long way to go. Dr. Explain did half the job quickly, capturing and labeling all the controls. Thumbs up there. But now there is scads of writing to do. And I don't want to do it alone. The problem has been that I am really the bottle neck. I'm not the only one who knows the software, not even the one who necessarily knows it best. Others on the team certainly know particular areas better than I and could directly contribute their expertise... if only they could edit the thing directly.

Shuttling around Dr. Explain files just isn't feasible. Nevermind that one of the devs mostly runs on a Mac, it's just not a functional way to collaborate. Not to mention that I've frankly found Dr. Explain to be a bit cumbersome and unstable with files the size I've got going here (over 100 nodes documented, each with upwards of 50 controls, plus the rest of the UI).

So, finally, to the software request: Basically what I want is a collaborative, online help authoring system, similar to a Wiki or knowledgebase, but with a decent WYSIWYG editor and - here's where it gets tricky - somehow the ability to reference specific UI controls on screenshots of parts of the UI. The whole mouseover graphic box thing that Dr. Explain does isn't necessary - normal tooltips/mouseover effects would be fine - but I do want the control to link to its explanatory text easily and quickly. Maybe even a nice lightbox effect with pop-up explanation.

Basically I want Dr. Explain, but online and collaborative. Ideally this would also include the ability to capture UI controls like Dr. Explain does. The grand vision would see it done as a Java applet that would work cross-platform. Or, if not that, then a sophisticated browser plugin or web-based app, like Techsmith's Jing. But I think that's going a bit far.

Anyway, do-able? Does it perhaps already exist even? If it doesn't, heck I'd even pay a decent sum to kick start development. I think this thing could be useful to a lot of people.

Feel free to reply if you know of a solution or if you don't! Even posting to say you too would find this useful would be helpful.

Thanks everyone!

- Oshyan
1880
Oooo! Sexay. :D

- Oshyan
1881
Living Room / Re: LineSuperFollow
« Last post by JavaJones on October 28, 2006, 02:20 PM »
Left-click to get different line types too. :)

- Oshyan
1882
Living Room / Re: "Pong... Not just a game" - A true classic
« Last post by JavaJones on October 28, 2006, 02:18 PM »
Ahhh yes, I believe I saw this, or a varation of it, ages ago. But it's worth a reviewing. :)

- Oshyan
1883
General Software Discussion / Re: Firefox extension>COOLIRIS
« Last post by JavaJones on October 28, 2006, 02:11 PM »
And here we see one of my main beefs with Opera: limited plugin support means no love from cool apps like this. :(

- Oshyan
1884
General Software Discussion / Re: Sophos no whiner
« Last post by JavaJones on October 28, 2006, 02:10 PM »
So then the answer to my question is never. yes? You've never had a legitimate virus caught by heuristic tests that wasn't deliberately introduced for testing purposes?

Everything else you said I am also aware of, and it all sounds fabulous in concept. Except, once again, I have *never* had legitimate viruses or trojans cought by such behavior monitoring systems. Meanwhile a good antispyware scanner, without system hooks, can do basic behavioral monitoring and catch suspicious activities just fine for spyware/adware. Those *do* get caught on my system, but there's no need for system hooks to do that.

Again I am not saying these functions are not needed, just that as a computer support professional I have never really seen significant evidence that heuristics or behavioral modeling provide significantly more support. The argument then being that I don't think the Sophos engine is a bad one just because they're not doing behavior analysis.

- Oshyan
1885
Living Room / Re: Strange statues around the world
« Last post by JavaJones on October 28, 2006, 02:38 AM »
Wow, quite a gallery! Some really wonderful pieces in there, and some very strange ones too. :D Thanks for the link. :)

- Oshyan
1886
General Software Discussion / Re: Sophos no whiner
« Last post by JavaJones on October 27, 2006, 07:55 PM »
When was the last time a legitimate virus was caught on your machine using heuristics? I've been on the 'net and using antivirus programs with heuristics for, hmm, 10 years or so. Not ONCE has a *legitimate* virus been caught by those systems. They're always false positives, and sometimes even legitimate viruses are allowed through by these systems! Frankly I'm inclined to believe they're largely marketing FUD, and will continue to feel that way until proven otherwise. :D

That being said I would be happy to be proven wrong with practical, real-world evidence. Even something anecdotal (like my own "evidence") would be interesting to hear about.

- Oshyan
1887
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: DotNetNuke Keep Alive Utility
« Last post by JavaJones on October 27, 2006, 07:51 PM »
That doesn't exactly answer the question. But oh well.

- Oshyan
1888
Living Room / Re: Productivity killer: Line Rider (Flash game)
« Last post by JavaJones on October 27, 2006, 07:42 PM »
Fun but very hard. Would be nice to be able to specify how "tough" the rider is. A line eraser would also be nice. :P

- Oshyan
1889
General Software Discussion / Re: New Winzip will open rar archives
« Last post by JavaJones on October 26, 2006, 10:39 PM »
Sure, maybe the support is worth it. But at least buy a *decent* commercial app. WinRAR stomps all over WinZip. :D

- Oshyan
1890
General Software Discussion / Re: Sophos no whiner
« Last post by JavaJones on October 26, 2006, 10:31 PM »
Yeah, this has been discussed a fair bit over in this thread too: https://www.donation...dex.php?topic=5827.0

As for Sophos, I've heard very good things about it, but I have no personal experience. Sounds worth it at that price though - Spysweeper is also one of the better antispyware apps.

- Oshyan
1891
Very cool archive! Grabbing it now. :)

Note that the image you put up there is around 800KB. ;)

- Oshyan
1892
Living Room / Re: Pranking a telemarketer - priceless!
« Last post by JavaJones on October 26, 2006, 02:27 PM »
Hehe, true, making way longer and more complex addresses might help. As long as they were human-memorable, it'd at least make the spammers work a lot harder to reach actual people.

- Oshyan
1893
Living Room / Re: GIGOIT! Keep unwanted things out of landfills
« Last post by JavaJones on October 26, 2006, 02:19 PM »
Nice! Craigslist seems to still be a decent resource as well, but this seems focused more on the free, which is handy. Working at a non-profit myself I think this may be quite useful.

- Oshyan
1894
Does a thumbs down really rate the artist as well as the song? If so there should definitely be separate ratings.

I agree a "really good" for occasional use could be cool. It's nice to be able to express your enthusiasm for stuff you *really* like. But I'm not sure it could easily be taken fairly into account for overall music selection. Stand-out artists or songs tend to be kind of unique, harder to pigeonhole or compare to. If the system rated similar songs/artists to the one you selected very highly, it might really skew your station - making it more occasional great highs, but more lows. Just a thought.

- Oshyan
1895
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: application sensitive pop-up notes
« Last post by JavaJones on October 25, 2006, 04:00 PM »
Hrm, still haven't found the original "write on a web page and share your notes" system I was thinking of. Unless Purplebunny is it, but I don't think so.

Anyway Stickies sounds great. But will V6 be Vista only?? If so that sucks! A *ton* of people will not be upgrading to Vista for quite some time, including myself. Aside from that issue it sounds like V6 might be just what we're looking for, and freeware too. :)

- Oshyan
1896
General Software Discussion / Re: Writing perfect software
« Last post by JavaJones on October 25, 2006, 03:44 PM »
Definitely a very good article. I wonder how many people, how many coders, can really work like that though. Documentation in particular is anathema to many of the "best" coders I know. Not necessarily in terms of commenting your code, but often as far as end-user documentation, and certainly as far as documenting the coding *process* is concerned. You may make simple notes and keep a basic log - a change log is important of course. But when you're talking about 40,000 pages of planning documents and who knows how many more of change documentation, it seems a bit mind-numbing.

So yeah, sounds like the way to write "perfect" software. But is that really what we need elsewhere? And if so, who is willing to write software this way? Coders - does this seem like an appealing environment to you?

- Oshyan
1897
Um, I don't remember being able to download ("own") and remix/alter content as being an intrinsic part of "Web 2.0". I'm betting that a lot of "Web 2.0" companies didn't get that memo either. Maybe Lawrence should have sent it priority mail or something. :P

Seriously though, it seems like this is just Lessig attaching his particular vision of "user empowerment" to the Web 2.0 moniker. Unless this is something everyone has talked about and I just missed. I do recall plenty of discussions about "the future of media" with the whole world making crappy remixes of real artist's work, but I don't recall it being imtimately intertwined wtih Web 2.0.

Anyway the whole use of that term just loads the conversation IMO. Instead of criticizing a company for calling itself "Web 2.0" and then not living up to some imagined ideal of that term, why not just criticise them for not doing what you want them to do in the first place?

But let's move on to the real meat of the subject: YouTube is not "truly" enabling its users to "share", because you can't download stuff off it through official means. Um, but you can *view* it online, right? I mean, same with Flickr, right? And sure you can right-click and download pics off Flickr, but I bet you Joe-Bob didn't really put his pics up there just so you could grab them and use them in your latest photo collage.

What I'm getting at is that Lawrence's idea of "sharing" is a lot more open and broad than most people's idea. It's a great ideal, but it is just that: idealistic. YouTube would certainly be dealing with a lot *more* legal hassle if people could actually download and enjoy these videos at any time. Streaming them is bad enough for the big media moguls.

So whether they (the media companies) are doing right or wrong in pursuing the protection of their copyrighted material, it is silly at the least to be harsh on the distributors for not allowing download. The only way things are going to be changed is by addressing this in legislation - as long as it remains illegal, nobody in their right mind would stake a business worth more than a billion dollars on the bet that media owners won't sue. :P

- Oshyan
1898
Living Room / Re: Pranking a telemarketer - priceless!
« Last post by JavaJones on October 25, 2006, 12:29 PM »
True! Spam is probably my #1 irritant with computers today. Not that I have to deal with a ton of it necessarily as I have decent spam filters, but I do have to review their work, and my customers complain about it a fair bit. It's very frustrating having to say you can't really do something about it. Although it's funny, most people are used to the junk they get in their postal mail and can't get rid of. Then again most of that isn't ads for erection pills, diet pills, or "hot stocks". :P

- Oshyan
1899
General Software Discussion / Re: Firefox 2 hints and tips
« Last post by JavaJones on October 25, 2006, 12:25 PM »
Have you ever had one of those moments where you were about to say something only to realize that doing so would make you an a-hole? Yet you really want to say it still? :D

- Oshyan
1900
I'm with Mouser here. I wouldn't mind a bit of testing, but don't expect too much commitment from each tester, necessarily. Open it as wide as you can, with appropriate warnings/caveats to protect your butt. Make a download available and specify a few simple guidelines/requests for testing. Then make it as easy as possible for people to submit feedback and bug reports (forum without signup maybe, or email or form, or all 3). Sure you'll get lots of people just grabbing and not giving feedback, but you're also much more likely to get in touch with people through demonstration who are actually excited about the idea and will really want to help out as much as they can. So in essence, if you build it they *might* come. ;)

Your app definitely sounds very interesting indeed. I'd love to test it myself, but I just don't have the time right now I'm afraid. Perhaps when I get back from vacation in a few weeks I'll see how things are going and chip in if I can (and it's needed). I sincerely hope you get a good load of testers though as it sounds like this is both a needed app, and one that would require a good bit of testing.

- Oshyan
Pages: prev1 ... 71 72 73 74 75 [76] 77 78 79 80 81 ... 106next