topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 8:12 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 71 72 73 74 75 [76] 77 78 79 80 81 82next
1876
Living Room / Re: Windows culture vs. OS X culture...
« Last post by brotherS on October 20, 2005, 04:27 AM »
Pretty good points there. However, your first point got me confused right away.. the average Mac user is MORE experienced? How do you figure? My friend who is getting a powerbook today, (quite a bad timing, might I add, as Apple is supposed to introduce brand new powerbooks on Friday, if there's any truth to the rumors floating around the web...), is close to as inexperienced as it gets.
Well, I said that's why I saw... and those few Mac users I know (2) are more experienced than the average Wintel user I know.

He's getting a Mac because it works and because it will let him spend less time fighting with his OS to get done what he wants done.
Yes, one of those two I know thinks so too (but still knows some stuff).

He's getting it because there are less choices. Less choiecs mean less trouble, mean, probably, more productivity, as less time needs to be spent choosing, and more time can be spent getting things done.
Well, more choices means you could use the best program on this planet - but only on Windows ;) Read https://www.donation...dex.php?topic=1167.0

If it's about a business environment you sure want to optimize it for productivity, but if you just use it at home, maybe even instead of sitting in front of the TV (good choice!), you also might want to just try some stuff, optimize ease of use, etc.

1877
Living Room / Re: Windows culture vs. OS X culture...
« Last post by brotherS on October 20, 2005, 02:38 AM »
[...]
Why do the two systems contrast so harshly? I could probably answer the question myself in a whole set of ways if I go by what's in my head right now... but I'd like this to be a discussion.
[...]
I dare say, even with my lackluster familiarity and knowledge of OS X, that it is a better OS than Windows.
Well, from what I saw these are the main reasons:
  • the average OSX user is more experienced, resulting in less problems to begin with
  • there's MUCH more malware for Windows based systems around - and it now takes less than two minutes (average) for a not protected Windows PC to be infected if you just connect it to the Internet
  • since there are thousands of companies making hardware and software for Windows based systems there's a greater risk that you run into problems - but yes, I still prefer to have more choices
1878
Screenshot Captor / Re: suggestion: improve zoom with mousewheel
« Last post by brotherS on October 19, 2005, 12:06 PM »
mouser did so much nice coding for the site recently, that I felt I had to be more colorful to explain things better:

Stefan was talking about what this man HAS...

http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/7428/cathair22ji.jpg



...and what this cat misses completely in a few moments...



:D
1879
Screenshot Captor / Re: suggestion: improve zoom with mousewheel
« Last post by brotherS on October 19, 2005, 11:53 AM »
Didn't find cat owners cat hears all over the table ?
I don't want imaging what we could find from this gigant cats 

what does this mean?
Think "hair" ...all over the place! :D
1880
Screenshot Captor / Re: suggestion: improve zoom with mousewheel
« Last post by brotherS on October 19, 2005, 08:16 AM »
mouse wheel zoom is supported!
just make sure you are clicked inside main image window
(maybe i will try to add "hottracking" to it so you dont have to be clicked into the window to use).
That would REALLY help! :)

different color for when % not 100 i can do that.
Thanks!

i could move it up BUT i think there is some advantage to having it on the right, it gives you a nice big area to click on to quickly adjust zoom, and it helps to bring attention to that zoom area which many people seem to not even notice.
Hmm, you are right... maybe there's a better way to display that slider? or don't use the full height for it so it doesn't look like a part of the window layout?
1881
Screenshot Captor / suggestion: improve zoom with mousewheel
« Last post by brotherS on October 19, 2005, 07:44 AM »
Hi,

I just wondered: what about supporting "zoom in" with Ctrl-MouseWheelUp and "zoom out" with Ctrl-MouseWheelDown? Several other apps (like the cool http://fileforum.bet...aintNET/1096481993/1) support it too.

Also, what about giving the zoom slider on the right side a different color when it's NOT = 100%?
And maybe move the %-value to the top of that 'column', so it could sit there in a bigger font next to the other %-values. This would also allow to use more space for the central edit window.

1882
Hi,

you maybe know that I love the new, great Google Sidebar: http://desktop.google.com/en/ (improved again). I just miss tiny feature - back when I use the old Desktop Search I had a Google search field in my taskbar which I could jump to with Ctrl+g. Not possible anymore  :(

Now it looks like this:
http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/8886/screenshot103714v60bw.png


So a tiny script for Ctrl+g would just need to place the cursor at -10 pixel from right side of screen and -10 pixel from bottom from screen and click the left mouse button.


;Google Sidebar search with Ctrl+g
;https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=1252.0
^g::
[please fill with script, thank you]
;Google Sidebar search with Ctrl+g
1883
Living Room / Re: Polyphasic sleep?
« Last post by brotherS on October 18, 2005, 11:19 AM »
Yeah, very interesting. I heard about this before, but never tried it since you'd really have to plan your sleep - but who knows, maybe someone will find a nice solution :)
1884
Living Room / Re: use a real Wiki on this site?
« Last post by brotherS on October 17, 2005, 05:53 AM »
I won't tell in here, but if you are curious enough you'll find out over time :D

PS: It's kinda cool when you see that a page that you added reaches 100000 page views in a few weeks only :)
1885
Living Room / Re: use a real Wiki on this site?
« Last post by brotherS on October 17, 2005, 04:54 AM »
My only worry would be the amount of maintenance necessary and the potential for abuse?

How do WikiPedia cope with these issues?
Well, I'm an administrator in two not-that-small MediaWiki-based wikis myself and because of spam-bots and annoying kids we just switched to "only users with an account may edit the wiki". We administrators can quickly setup new accounts (using IRC to let people ask for an account) and it works like a charm!
1886
Living Room / Re: use a real Wiki on this site?
« Last post by brotherS on October 17, 2005, 04:00 AM »
i'm just not sure what we would use it for!!

maybe a "tips+tricks" wiki for each program on the site?
Exactly :) Read my first post above? ;)

A good wiki would be perfect to let (registered) users add their "how to do this" screenshots and explanations.
1887
Living Room / Re: use a real Wiki on this site?
« Last post by brotherS on October 17, 2005, 01:41 AM »
I vote for MediaWiki  :Thmbsup:

If mouser could manage to set it up would be great... working with it it very easy and many know how to do it already.
1888
Living Room / Re: Partitioning hard drive - any point?
« Last post by brotherS on October 16, 2005, 03:28 PM »
This is kinda funny :) I spent quite some time with RAID basics ~2 years ago - I think http://www.tomshardw...29/fastrak66-02.html really is right:
RAID 1 - Mirroring

RAID 1 is also called 'mirroring', because it simply keeps a complete copy of one drive on another drive. A RAID 1 array of two hard drives has the storage capacity of only one drive, because the other drive contains the 'mirror'. RAID 1 is obviously the most reliable kind of array, because it always keeps a complete backup of your data. Its performance is naturally not as high as RAID 0 though. Read requests are actually faster than from one single drive, because the data is simply read from the one drive of the two that delivers it faster. RAID 1 is therefore reducing the access time. Write requests are usually slower on RAID 1, because the data needs to be written on two drives and then compared.

Because the comparison is only done when data is written reading it is actually faster with RAID 1.
1889
Living Room / Re: Partitioning hard drive - any point?
« Last post by brotherS on October 16, 2005, 01:25 PM »
I don't recall how I arrived at this scheme, but I use EXACTLY the same partitions on mine.
1890
Living Room / Re: Partitioning hard drive - any point?
« Last post by brotherS on October 16, 2005, 11:10 AM »
Err, you seems to be confusing RAID 1 with another RAID: http://www.bytepile....om/raid_class.php#02
I like my RAID 1 a lot
No that is exactly what I was thinking ...

RAID 1 (Mirroring) is great but it requires two drives to store one data set which is saved to both. This is great if you like to guard against drive failure, but that is quite expensive for home users because you use two drives to effectively do the job of one! If you like this security great - but there is no performance benefit over a normal single drive.

Err... :) let me quote the page:
Advantages: Twice the Read transaction rate of single disks. 100% redundancy of data means no rebuild is necessary in case of a disk failure, just a copy to the replacement disk.

I still think it's good for home users - it's more safe and speeds things up and HDs are not that expensive anymore if you don't 'need' to buy the very latest model on the market to compete with friends or neighbors.
1891
Living Room / Re: Partitioning hard drive - any point?
« Last post by brotherS on October 16, 2005, 06:18 AM »
Yes, you should use a tiny partition next to the OS partition.

If you onlyhvae one physical hard disc this is true, if you have two or more then putting it on a completely separate hard disc is much better as you can access your page file and other system files simultaneously. Same is true for Linux Swap partitions.
100% right! :)

RAID is PERFECT, be it for backups or not :) If you want to be on the safe side you just should use RAID 1, no risk there :)
Too bad Acronis True Image seems to not recognize RAID controllers for backup purposes :(
RAID 0 is FAR from perfect for backups. If anything goes wrong at all with your system you stand to lose everything on a RAID 0 system as it is very difficult to retrieve RAID 0. With a backup on a standard IDE or SATA disc you can simply move it to another computer, so long as it isn't your backup disc that is damaged. With RAID 0 you would probably have to have an identical RAID controller - and given lots of systems now have integrated RAID controllers this is unlikely to be possible (unless you can find an old motherboard identical to your own).

RAID 1 is fine, but it costs twice as much and has no speed benefits whatsoever so for consumer level systems it seems a bit like overkill!
Err, you seems to be confusing RAID 1 with another RAID: http://www.bytepile....om/raid_class.php#02
I like my RAID 1 a lot :)

Strange Acronis recognises my RAID controller ???
Strange indeed....

I see no need for doing so, instead I recommend the great CCleaner!
The main benefit in my system is I have one PageFile and one Temporary file cache for all my Windows installations - that saves quite a lot of space.
Ah, ok :)

Keeping Temp/Cache files away from C: allows Windows to manage its space better on Drive C: so that when I run a defrag program (PerfectDisc) I find that the majority of the disc (labelled infrequently accessed in PerfectDisc) have not fragmented at all, and only directories and recently written files need any defragging at all. This is one of the reasons I moved from DiskKeeper back to PerfectDisc as it consolidates all the rarely modified files in one place on the disc, decreasing access time and reducing defrag time.
That's a good point.
And yes, I switched to PerfectDisk too last year, it's really good.


I fully believe you, but personally I prefer to boot my system only every few weeks :)
I'm afraid I switch my machine off when I go to bed - I already feel a bit guilty leaving it on all day (even when I am not sitting at it - but I believe there are sound hardware reasons for that) because of the growing cost to the environment and global warming (not to mention the UKs ridiculous fuel costs - inc. electricity). I have even started to unplug my TV/DVD/Video etc. unless I am leaving it to record something - did you know these appliances all use 80% power in standby mode!
You are right, SOME use way too much engery, some only like ~5% - but it still sucks. I try to unplug everything too if I don't use that.

What we really need is more initiatives like http://www.greencarcongress.com/ and less US folks wasting ressources. Energy prices should have been higher for quite a long time... it was way too cheap to waste it :(

PS: I hate the high costs too, but I feel that's the price we have to pay to learn how to use less oil/gas/water/whatever.

1892
Living Room / Re: Partitioning hard drive - any point?
« Last post by brotherS on October 16, 2005, 03:46 AM »
My plan is to have 3 primary partitions, hidden from each other, with 3 separate installations of Windows 98SE and an unformatted partition for BeOS v5.03 and  BeMan boot.
:o  If you can you should avoid Win98SE at (almost) any cost and use Windows 2000 instead.
1893
Living Room / Re: Partitioning hard drive - any point?
« Last post by brotherS on October 16, 2005, 03:44 AM »
Partitioning has numerous benefits, and a few pitfalls:

1) PageFile ... if you stick it in a separate partition on the same volume as windows it can slow down your system - constant seeking backwards and forwards across the drive introduces delays - especially if the partitions are separated by a large distance. A separate pagefile on a separate partition works much better and increases system throughput. If you have standard drives and a striped array putting your system on the RAID array can make a big difference to.
Yes, you should use a tiny partition next to the OS partition.

2) Separating system and data makes backing up less of a chore - you only need to backup the system occasionally, and you data can easily be backed up regularly. A tool such as Acronis TrueImage is good for this sort of thing as you can schedule regular incremental backups which are really quick. A seperate har disc is good for this - but don't use RAID for backups, they will be more easily damaged in a hardware failure and may be totally unrecoverable. As drives get bigger and bigger it is becoming essential to plan for backups otherwise they become so unwieldly that they are never done!
RAID is PERFECT, be it for backups or not :) If you want to be on the safe side you just should use RAID 1, no risk there :)
Too bad Acronis True Image seems to not recognize RAID controllers for backup purposes :(

3) I also move Temporary file folders and Temporary Internet files to a separate partition. These are quicker to access (esp. if they are on a separate volume) and easier to clean out when you want to. They also reduce fragmentation on the system drive.
I see no need for doing so, instead I recommend the great CCleaner!


4) I run separate multibooting Windows installations (in neighbouring partitions) for some specific applications. For example, video and audio editing can really benefit from having a clean system with a minimal extras installed (not even networking/internet access).
I fully believe you, but personally I prefer to boot my system only every few weeks :)

1894
Read about Gigabyte's i-RAM (Affordable Solid State Storage) already?

It's a really great idea, and when the new version comes out soon you'll be able to use up to 8 GB just like another HD in your PC. I'm only starting to think about possible ways to use this:

  • use it for the Windows swap file
  • use it as cache for image and video editing tools

I bet you'll come up with more ideas!
:)
1895
Living Room / Re: Partitioning hard drive - any point?
« Last post by brotherS on October 14, 2005, 01:46 PM »
I'll read that page later, seems to be interesting. Since I spent lots of time thinking about that here's what I think now:

You should use at least 3 partitions:
  • one for your OS and programs (some prefer to split up even those, I don't feel the need)
  • second for your data
  • third for the swap file - this increases the performance, though will not be needed anymore as soon as Gigabyte's i-RAM (Affordable Solid State Storage) version 2 comes out! :)

#1 reason to use a seperate partition for your data is that when you have severe problems a rescue program might help to recover most of your data - but not, if Windows just wrote randomly over appearingly empty blocks...  :huh:

#2 reason is that indexing programs (for example the great Google Sidebar, which also lets you view the DonationCoder.com RSS feeds perfectly) just don't need to care about your OS partition at all.

#3-10 reasons may follow later ;)
1896
General Software Discussion / Re: Arovax Shield
« Last post by brotherS on October 14, 2005, 01:15 PM »
Looks good! Could anyone tell us something about RAM and CPU usage please?
1897
Would be nice if you could add the VLC details for that later :)
1898
Mini-Reviews by Members / video players / how to capture images from video files
« Last post by brotherS on October 14, 2005, 07:13 AM »
Hi,

while I prefer to use http://fileforum.bet...Standard/978385825/1 to view video files (lots and lots of options to control the player with mouse, scroll wheel and keyboard) I needed to try other players to capture an image from a video file.

I tried http://fileforum.bet...Windows/1034861925/1 which has a "Snapshot" option but didn't really let me get a captured image.

Then I tried http://fileforum.bet...BSPlayer/973752711/1 and finally found what I was looking for: just right-click the video --> Options --> Capture frame. BSPlayer will save the images in its own folder.
1899
i'd put it differently.

if you use and love irc, you most likely want a dedicated irc client.
Well, I love and use IRC a lot (on 4 servers) and Miranda does a great job there 24/7 :) Miranda IRC has vastly improved over the years, the latest version with tabbed interface and stuff is great! And, unlike mIRC, it's free.
1900
Miranda is great.

Never, ever would I use this in place of mIRC though...no way!
Well, if you want/need to use lots of scripts you really MAY want to use mIRC.

If you want all the really important basic stuff and a few scripts plus a really nice, very customizable GUI you'll want Miranda (I do).
:)
Pages: prev1 ... 71 72 73 74 75 [76] 77 78 79 80 81 82next