topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 20, 2025, 9:01 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 70 71 72 73 74 [75] 76 77 78 79 80 ... 438next
1851
Living Room / Re: What Are Your Favorite Science Blogs?
« Last post by Renegade on June 29, 2014, 09:35 PM »
Necrothread... ARISE!

Because it's a good topic and because, nostalgia. ;)
1852
Living Room / Re: Peer Review and the Scientific Process
« Last post by Renegade on June 29, 2014, 09:21 PM »
Again about trust...

http://www.psmag.com...-gums-science-84564/

How the Sugar Industry Gums Up Science

It goes over a bit how "science" is a bitter joke in the hands of the sugar industry shills.

The article links here:

http://blog.ucsusa.o...ebate-at-the-fda-564

Where, thankfully, we can see that there are people that actually care about shilling in science.

Still, I think the most important methodology in modern science is "follow the money", which is an incredibly sad thing.
1853
Living Room / Re: Facebook plays with your mind
« Last post by Renegade on June 29, 2014, 05:53 AM »
A friend of mine pointed this out, and it would apply to Facebook's paper that was published on the PNAS site:

For experiments involving human participants, authors must also include a statement confirming that informed consent was obtained from all participants. All experiments must have been conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Acceptance of Facebook's user agreement, at the time of signup, would not be considered "informed consent".

Informed consent is described in the Declaration of Helsinki as:

26.       In medical research involving human subjects capable of giving informed consent, each potential subject must be adequately informed of the aims, methods, sources of funding, any possible conflicts of interest, institutional affiliations of the researcher, the anticipated benefits and potential risks of the study and the discomfort it may entail, post-study provisions and any other relevant aspects of the study. The potential subject must be informed of the right to refuse to participate in the study or to withdraw consent to participate at any time without reprisal. Special attention should be given to the specific information needs of individual potential subjects as well as to the methods used to deliver the information.

           After ensuring that the potential subject has understood the information, the physician or another appropriately qualified individual must then seek the potential subject’s freely-given informed consent, preferably in writing. If the consent cannot be expressed in writing, the non-written consent must be formally documented and witnessed.     

           All medical research subjects should be given the option of being informed about the general outcome and results of the study.


But, but, but... They *could* have been bots and, err, umm...

I think you're mistaken in thinking that Facebook gives a shit about medical ethics. ;)

1854
Living Room / Re: Facebook plays with your mind
« Last post by Renegade on June 29, 2014, 03:03 AM »
As for Dystopias, I did a project in high school twenty years ago that there is no utopia at all, only varying grades of dystopias.

That sounds about accurate. Bad things will always happen. It's inevitable.

One common element I see in dystopian stories is the way everything is "homogeneous". That will never work because people are different. The opposite of that always seems to be the apocalyptic dystopia, but that's not a comment on society so much as it is just a fun thought experiment - Mad Max isn't around the corner. Perhaps running towards heterogeneity is a better idea. :)
1855
Living Room / Re: Facebook plays with your mind
« Last post by Renegade on June 28, 2014, 07:46 PM »
^^ Interesting. Seems someone forgot to tell the legislators that the dystopian novels weren't manuals. :)
1856
Living Room / Re: Facebook plays with your mind
« Last post by Renegade on June 28, 2014, 10:22 AM »
your racist uncle’s latest rant against the government

Hey, my racist uncle is a pure statist that loves godvernment! :P ;D

1857
General Software Discussion / Re: Microsoft Security Notifications Ending?
« Last post by Renegade on June 28, 2014, 10:19 AM »
If all this is because of Canadian legislation, Canada had best watch it's step.

But, but, but, they're Canadians! Mounties! Snow! Maple syrup! Hockey! Eh?

It's all well and good to go around acting like yet another totalitarian bully. But Canada is not politically significant enough that something can't be done about (and to) Canada.

This is where I wonder just how "independent" Canada is. I think you give governments too much credit.

One word: Bilderberg.


Copying the 800lb gorillas (i.e. USA, Russia, China) doesn't reflect well on Canada.

But, but, but, they're Canadians! Mounties! Snow! Maple syrup! Hockey! Eh?

Especially when they have nothing other than a BS trade agreement (which exists only because the current US administration wants it) to give their laws any teeth outside their borders.

Trade agreements have too much power once you look into them. They're often scary.
 

Sad. I really used to like Canada.

Me too. I left the place a long time ago because it was a shithole in a downward flush/spiral. But the disease is too prevalent. There is no escaping it. It's everywhere.

Spent a lot of time up there some years ago,

Me too! ;)

and had nothing but the deepest respect and admiration for the country and its people. It's getting hard to feel that way about our "Northern Neighbor" these days.


I lost any respect for Canada a very long time ago.

And to be blunt, I basically hate what most Canadians think. The vast majority are unthinking morons that follow Ottawa blindly with idiotic aphorisms about tradition and crap. They're horrible at math too, which in itself is reason to hate anyone that isn't an artist. :P

God save the Queen? Yeah... like this

I have a special spot in my heart for Canada, filled with disgust, contempt, and loathing.


Not to single out Canada. Everything I've said previously applies equally, if not more, so to the present version of the United States. :(

Heck, I love to single out Canada! I wish it would happen more!

All too often we read about the US and the evils it does.

But everyone forgets that Canada is the USA's cheap bimbo whore cheer leader.

Want some insight? Look at where Uncle Sam's unit is. Hint: It's in Ottawa's mouth. (And other parts.)

Canada even spearheads crap for the US! Because...

But, but, but, they're Canadians! Mounties! Snow! Maple syrup! Hockey! Eh?

People will put up with crap from Canada because Canada has a reputation that it doesn't deserve. "Oh, Canadian peace keepers from the UN? Oh, they're bloody saints!!!" Yeah... whatever.

Canada can soften up targets politically because it is perceived as a "friendly" country when it's nothing more than an Anglo-American whore to be used and abused at will.

Hint: Whores are exceptionally good at separating you from your money, etc. They're professionals, and don't think they aren't. They're very good at what they do. Canada is no different.

Oh, and as a Canadian... I feel I must give the obligatory...

Sorry! ;)



I don't for a moment think that these insane Candian laws are independent in Canada -- there is outside influence here. Canada is just being used for its reputation to ram through the idea. Hopefully others will see through the BS and reject it.

1858
Living Room / Re: Facebook plays with your mind
« Last post by Renegade on June 28, 2014, 09:52 AM »
"Do words affect your mental state?" is what the question can be boiled down to.  Well... duh?

Hahaha! ;D Nicely put!  :Thmbsup:
1859
It all comes down to just one more way the quest for green technology has actually created an even bigger problem than the one it solved because it was forced into mainstream before it was mature.
-SeraphimLabs (June 26, 2014, 11:56 AM)


Yes.

However, we also need to remember that it was GE and others lobbying to have incandescent bulbs phased out for CFLs.

http://freedomlightb...obbying-for-ban.html

http://washingtonexa...y-jobs/article/36662

“Government did us in,” says Dwayne Madigan, whose job will terminate when General Electric closes its factory next July.
 
Madigan makes a product that will soon be illegal to sell in the U.S. - a regular incandescent bulb. Two years ago, his employer, GE, lobbied in favor of the law that will outlaw the bulbs.
 
Madigan’s colleagues, waiting for their evening shift to begin, all know that GE is replacing the incandescents for now with compact fluorescents bulbs, which GE manufactures in China.
 
Last month, GE announced it will close the Winchester Bulb Plant 80 miles west of D.C. As a result, 200 men and women will lose their jobs. GE is also shuttering incandescent factories in Ohio and Kentucky, axing another 200 jobs.
 
GE blamed environmental regulations for the closing.

REGULATIONS THAT GE LOBBIED FOR!!!

http://homerepair.ab...t-Lighting-Ban_2.htm

http://homerepair.ab...crony-capitalism.htm

Shining A Light on Crony Capitalism

http://jolt.richmond...ight-bulb-phase-out/

etc. etc. etc.

This has NOTHING to do with "green" at the roots. This is entirely about milking you for more money.

The industry has a proven history of this kind of predatory behaviour.

The Light Bulb Conspiracy




LED technology is shaping up nicely though. I think the only remaining snag with it is getting the manufacturing costs down- and making it so manufacturing them isn't so hazardous. Of the LED based fixtures I have deployed in the past 5 years, I have been consistently impressed with the reliable and efficient output. Its just a question of does their durability meet expectations- which so far is yes.
-SeraphimLabs (June 26, 2014, 11:56 AM)

LED is a far better option over CFLs. Still... the costs for them are very high.

Part of the LED push is that consumers have basically rejected CFLs in large enough numbers.

HOWEVER...

LEDS ARE VERY, VERY DANGEROUS!!! THEY ARE SEMI-CONDUCTORS!!! HELLO!?!

I went over this in another thread. Nobody was interested. But, I'll try again...

On the other side of the LED issue...

I do a fair amount of work in the semi-conductor industry, and LED lighting is a good part of that.

Going forward, what you need to be aware of is that LEDs ARE SEMI-CONDUCTORS. This is important.

The capabilities of lighting devices will expand well beyond "lighting" in the future. Any number of different sensors can be included with them.

Expect LED lighting to include more sensors, and to have the capability to spy on you. It will happen. Just keep your eye on the added "benefits" that they tout in their marketing.

I'm well aware that a good number of people here think that I'm a paranoid conspiracy theorist. You wouldn't if you saw what I saw. I get to look at internal documents that aren't public. As an example, I recently had a document come across my desk from a large semi-conductor manufacturer talking about how they were near ready to distribute tracking chips designed to be embedded in people. This is almost not-news at all. It has been reported for many years, and the technology is near ready for large scale deployments.

LED lighting has huge potential. It can recreate what looks like sunlight. The range of light that it can replicate is astounding. The development kits for lighting device manufacturers are becoming more and more robust with lighting being able to be upgraded through simple engine replacements rather than through complete redesigns.

But... it's a Trojan horse. Make sure your horse is empty before you let it through the gates.



Semi-conductors can be controlled. That means that someone can turn your lights on or off. They could even be turned into listening devices or surveillance devices.

Given what we already know is going on, ask yourself if I'm stretching things. I think you'll see that I'm not stretching in the least. Maybe not tomorrow, but it is coming.

LEDs are a Trojan horse. They will be abused.

Look at the steps taken:

  • Outlaw incandescent bulbs
  • Offer up toxic CFLs
  • Get outrage over CFLs
  • Solve problems with LEDs

That's the Hegelian dialectic in action -- Problem - Reaction - Solution. Twice! One to use the "green" agenda to outlaw incandescents, then again to bring out semi-conductor lighting.

Of course, such a thing could never happen...Oh wait, do you mean to imply with that argument that it has happened...?

You can probably guess where I stand on all that. ;)

Malthus was an ignorant, unimaginative asshole.

Take farm production numbers:

http://farmdocdaily....ts-given-prices.html

They're looking at under $1,000 per acre per year.

There's a farmer in Illinois doing $200,000 per acre per year. And it's no big secret. But it's a threat to Big Agra, so you will never hear about it in the news. Ever. People are using the same technique all over the world. In their backyards. In commercial operations. In North America, Australia, Europe, Africa, Asia, South America.

Greater than 200x times higher? Than modern agricultural methods? Yeah... That's why Malthus was premature in what he had to say. He didn't even see modern agricultural methods coming, much less the new techniques that are still in their infancy.

But, the freaks in power will still use Malthusian nonsense for fear-mongering amongst the populace. Just like how GE used the green agenda as we've seen above. There's always an agenda, and it's never in your favour.
1860
Living Room / Re: Facebook plays with your mind
« Last post by Renegade on June 28, 2014, 09:03 AM »
^^ I think we're giving them the benefit of the doubt that they did some actual science and accounted for statistical variations and significance.
1861
General Software Discussion / Re: Microsoft Security Notifications Ending?
« Last post by Renegade on June 28, 2014, 08:33 AM »
"due to changing governmental policies concerning the issuance of automated electronic messaging" ... WTF?!?

Again, short-sighted legislation without an understanding of technology.  And the fact that this will cross country boundaries... wow.

Can someone remind me again why we have government? They sure as heck seem to cause a lot more problems than they solve.

But who will build the roads?

Oh, that's right...

http://mises.org/doc...f-Roads-and-Highways

People.

[Bob Slydell and Bob Porter are interviewing Tom]

Bob Slydell: What you do at Initech, is you take the specifications from the customers and you bring them down to the software engineers?

Tom Smykowski: Yes. Ye...yes. That...that's right.

Bob Porter: Well, then I just have to ask, why couldn't the customers just take them directly to the software people, huh?

Tom Smykowski: Well, I...I'll tell you why. Uh, because engineers are not good at dealing with customers.

Bob Slydell: Uh-huh. So, you physically take the specs from the customer?

Tom Smykowski: Well, no, my, my secretary does that, or the fax.

Bob Slydell: Ah.

Bob Porter: So, then you must physically bring them to the software people.

Tom Smykowski: Well...no. Yeah, I mean, sometimes.

Bob Slydell: What...what would you say you do here?

Tom Smykowski: Well, look, I already told you. I deal with the goddamn customers so the engineers don't have to. I have people skills. I am good at dealing with people! Can't you understand that? What the hell is wrong with you people?!

Yeah. Something like that. But in the real world Tom clubs the customers half to death on a good day.
1862
Living Room / Re: Facebook plays with your mind
« Last post by Renegade on June 28, 2014, 08:16 AM »
Anyone want to take bets that their profits increase the closer they get to election time? (Anyone that thinks this won't happen is naive.)

Welcome to Hell.

I gave up on FB last year and refuse to use it anymore. This is just solid verification that I should never touch it again.
1864
General Software Discussion / Re: Metalenguage - Encoder - Decoder
« Last post by Renegade on June 27, 2014, 08:40 PM »
Why would you want to do this?

I can pretty much guarantee that your results will be broken.

Or should I say, "I can pretty good much guarantee that your results will be broken."? ;)
1865
Living Room / Interview with Dr. Richard Stallman at CEBE 2014
« Last post by Renegade on June 27, 2014, 08:38 PM »
Here's another interview with one of the most influential people in software (video - 7:49 - so not very long):

http://cointelegraph...-dr-richard-stallman

Interview Topics:

  • Money
  • Bitcoin & tax
  • After Bitcoin
  • TTIP
  • Ring signatures
  • Icecat
  • Big corps & "Open Source"
  • Decentralized networks, privacy, P2P, etc.
  • Websites tracking people



1866
I'm slowly working my way through the actual text of the decision.

Do you have a crisp link to the decision? I always get lost in layers of news articles and their "descriptive links" that go to other news stories.


PDF: http://www.supremeco...3pdf/13-461_l537.pdf


Other news:

http://www.vox.com/2...danger-cloud-storage

The Supreme Court's Aereo decision could endanger cloud storage services

And the establishment shills rushing to cover up the damage:

http://www.forbes.co...d-they-kill-dropbox/

MYTH #3: A cold wind is blowing and Dropbox and all cloud-storage providers are going to be chilled out of existence by it.

Yeah. Right. Trust us. I can't possibly see how THAT could go wrong...  :-\

This wound is going to bleed. They all do.
1867
Living Room / Re: Movie news and views
« Last post by Renegade on June 26, 2014, 11:36 PM »
We are all but grains of rice or mustard seeds to them.
1868
I'm slowly working my way through the actual text of the decision.

Do post back about that.

1869
Living Room / Re: Movie news and views
« Last post by Renegade on June 26, 2014, 08:23 PM »
:P 40, you're cracking me up here.

It's all just as well... we are nothing but food for the Great Old Ones, and if you choose to be an egg... ;)
1870
http://edition.cnn.c...ernatives/index.html

Bye bye Aereo. The shitlords have won again.

What's amazing is that Scalia of all people was in the dissenting opinion.

It's likely that he might have had a tiny inkling of what he was ruling on, i.e. He might have understood a tiny bit of technology.

This is a horrible decision. The implications are extremely dark.
1871
http://edition.cnn.c...ernatives/index.html

Bye bye Aereo. The shitlords have won again.
1872
Continuing with food humour:

1873
Living Room / Re: MPAA brings about Streisand effect - /r/FullLengthFilms
« Last post by Renegade on June 26, 2014, 03:46 AM »
Um... More context please? I clicked the link but all I saw was what you quoted, and a bunch of replies.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: When it comes to Reddit, I just don't geddit.

The MPAA is trying to shut down /r/FullLengthFilms. It's backfiring. Badly. :)

http://motherboard.v...-an-entire-subreddit

The MPAA Is Trying (and Failing) to Take Down an Entire Subreddit


Call attention to something sketchy and you're bound to make it more popular. In its latest piracy-thwarting attempt, the MPAA just alerted hundreds of people to the fact that there are links to stream and download thousands of full-length movies on the subreddit /r/FullLengthFilms. Smooth move.

Early on June 24th, before TorrentFreak got its hands on a Google takedown request filed by the MPAA against the subreddit, you can see there's a relatively small hundred or so users checking the subreddit each hour. But last night, when TorrentFreak published its article, you can see a substantial jump.

More at the link with traffic graphs.

1874
Living Room / MPAA brings about Streisand effect - /r/FullLengthFilms
« Last post by Renegade on June 26, 2014, 03:22 AM »
http://www.reddit.co..._the_mpaa_sent_them/

Anyone else only here because the MPAA sent them?

Related (NSFW):

https://www.youtube..../watch?v=5mOB_5KkEuI

That's a great tune! =D
1875
Living Room / Re: Movie news and views
« Last post by Renegade on June 25, 2014, 09:28 PM »
As far as movies about assassinating the POTUS...

http://en.wikipedia....President_(2006_film)

Ah... Never heard of that before. I'll have to check it out.
Pages: prev1 ... 70 71 72 73 74 [75] 76 77 78 79 80 ... 438next