topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 1:30 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 ... 118next
1826
Cameyo isn't that great. Although for your eye the app you have 'Cameyo'ed' stores everything in the same location, it does create a VOS folder in your user's data folder with a lot of info in there. Understandable, as it will make functioning of 'cameyo'ed' applications a lot easier. However, don't be completely "fooled" by the concept that everything is really stored in one folder only.

Don't know about other, similar to Cameyo applications, so no comment there.

4wd's post above is spot on, that is the best way to go.     
1827
Living Room / Re: 513 interesting wallpapers
« Last post by Shades on May 29, 2012, 07:07 AM »
1024px wallpapers do not make me that happy anymore...it has to be at least 5 years ago the last time I looked at such a monitor.

1080p or bigger is my credo nowadays  :)
1828
1) Bend one leg from the spork. That way I can use it as a wind vane, which would help me which way to go.
2) The person who likes to fly kites?
3) Any kind of soup with meaty parts in it?
4) Couldn't tell, my dog keeps chasing all cats away.

 :huh:
1829
General Software Discussion / Re: EXCEL - ACCESS hybrid without limitations
« Last post by Shades on May 22, 2012, 07:44 AM »
@kalos:
Believe me, people/organizations that really require a database, do not consider Access. Too slow and bloated. Microsoft also offers (an Express version of) MS-SQL Server. the free version has a limit between 4 to 8 Gbyte if memory serves me right. Oracle also offers a free versions of their Database software (based either on their 10g or 11g version). Their limit is 4Gbyte.

Both databases are the real deal and waaaaaaay more interesting to play with then Access. Excel can work with both of these databases. Initially a bit more work to get your system running, but it scales a (whole) lot better.

Use PostgreSQL as open source alternative, which has a feature-set similar to Oracle database. As I am not that familiar with MS-SQL I cannot say if the PostgreSQL feature-set is also similar with that product.
1830
DC Gamer Club / Re: Diablo 3 announced!
« Last post by Shades on May 19, 2012, 07:18 PM »
Here is a funny video from/with/about Diablo III (youtube).   :P
1831
General Software Discussion / Re: powerful undo
« Last post by Shades on May 18, 2012, 04:35 PM »
+1 to the post above

Besides that, you have to have the discipline to keep using the selected VCS system for all the files you want to keep track of. And that is a lot harder for users that don't quite grasp the concept and/or significance of these kind of systems.

Read up on the material already offered by skwire, there are threads here in DC that discuss these systems in more detail and search on the internet for (free) books on this subject.

Once you get the logic behind such systems, you'll wonder how you ever could have gotten by (with computing) before.

Oh yeah, don't make the mistake of using VCS systems as an alternative for a backup.   

 
1832
If it is better performance you want, disable services you don't need. This trick does work as long as you know what you are doing and can live with the consequences of disabling those services.

Most people don't, so the above advice is not likely not the best in your case. Under-volting is (to my knowledge) not the way to go for increasing performance in software.

In general though, if you want more performance from software...buy better (or more) hardware, beginning with RAM.
1834
Apparently the Linux kernel can behave very strangely when it is enabled. Most forums I visited with regards to errors I experienced always told me to disable ACPI. For some chipsets it works, but with most it just introduces erratic behavior that drives you insane.

 
1835
Let me start with that again:

Whenever you install Linux (whatever distro), disable ACPI in the BIOS. I have not met one distro who handles this well (CentOS 4 & 5, OpenSuse 10 & 11, Ubuntu 8 till 11, Fedora 12) on any of the mainboards I have tried (with VIA, Intel and NVidia chipsets). Literally, none would work. However, after disabling installation and functioning was fine. Currently I run server editions from Ubuntu and these are rock solid. For desktop use I wouldn't consider Ubuntu, but really, disable ACPI (re-)install Linux and enjoy the experience.

 
1836
General Software Discussion / Re: In search of ... a Gateway cure ...
« Last post by Shades on April 07, 2012, 02:53 PM »
Hmmm, you could try and use the instructions from this link to get things running on Windows OS's higher than XP.

You could try to set things manually in the registry. Make a backup of the registry before starting any of this. If you don't know, ask someone who does to help you out with this. Seriously!

Ok, after that obligatory registry-editing warning, lets go to key:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\SubSystems\Windows

There should be a line with the following or very similar text:
ObjectDirectory=\Windows SharedSection=1024,20480,768 Windows=On SubSystemType=Windows ServerDll=basesrv,1 ServerDll=winsrv:UserServerDllInitialization,3 ServerDll=winsrv:ConServerDllInitialization,2 ServerDll=sxssrv,4 ProfileControl=Off MaxRequestThreads=16

The part 'SharedSection=1024,20480,768' is the most important section in your case. Adjusting these values can have serious implications for the well-being of your system, so tread carefully!

First some explanation
After the Microsoft® Windows® operating system has started, various areas of memory for resource tracking are reserved. Memory allocation of the heap is controlled by the number of open applications, windows, services and other resources. When a large number of processes are running, this heap may run out of memory.

How this memory is allocated has implications in your system. Changes in the default environment will affect overall performance considering your system architecture. The numeric values following SharedSection= control how desktop heap is allocated and are specified in kilobytes. Windows uses desktops classified as interactive and non-interactive.

The first SharedSection value (1024) is the shared heap size common to all desktops and changing this value is not (likely) necessary as this part of the heap contains the handles to windows, menus, icons, cursors, etc. and shared system settings. The second SharedSection value (20480) is associated with the "interactive" window station WinSta0. User objects like hooks, menus, strings, and windows consume memory in this desktop heap. Changing this value is not (likely) necessary as well.

The third SharedSection value (768) is associated with the "non-interactive" window station. If this value is not present, the size of the desktop heap for non-interactive window stations will be same as the size specified for interactive window stations (the second SharedSection value) and is used to keep track of processes without graphical user interfaces. Changes are likely necessary here.

Prior to Windows NT v3.5, Microsoft recommended a heap size of 3000 Kbytes (allowing for 460 processes). For later versions of NT and for Windows 2000 they recommend a size of only 512 Kbytes (allowing for 79 processes). Increasing the heap size beyond 512 Kbytes can cause instability or "blue-screening" of the system but the factors involved are sometimes obscure. Possibly, increasing the heap size depletes some other vital resource.

The size of the heap is the limiting factor controlling how many software packages can be active on any given system. Setting these values comes with a trade-off, your system will be able to support more running processes but overall performance will decrease. If performance is degraded too much for your liking, returning the third number to the original value should fix that.

The info above is gathered from several internet sources. However I tried the mentioned suggestions myself to initiate 80 Excel 2010 instances (on a WinXP SPIII with 2GByte of RAM) and that did work. You should never want to try that though, as your system will become really slow. An hour delay between mouse-click and computer responding to the mouse-click was not uncommon, when all instances were activated. Without that load, but with the changes to the heap that XP PC felt only a little bit slower than usual.

Please, don't take these Desktop Heap changes lightheartedly. During that time I did cross the limit (>80 Excel instances) and the BSOD monster did rear its ugly head almost immediately.

Sorry for the long post, I hope it can help you out though.
1837
General Software Discussion / Re: In search of ... a Gateway cure ...
« Last post by Shades on April 07, 2012, 12:47 PM »
It appears to me you should have a look at the 'Desktop Heap' of your system. Check on the Microsoft site if they have a version of 'Desktop Heap Monitor' for your OS. Its a small, free app that gives you a lot more insight in how the Windows Operating System actually uses RAM and how you can run out of resources while it appears there is more than enough left.

Having run this application on XP myself (and reading the MS documentation) I can tell you that you can (rather) easily pinpoint the culprit(s). 

1838
Living Room / Re: When they make the movie about your life...
« Last post by Shades on April 03, 2012, 03:23 PM »
Brad Pitt (if he's up for the challenge).


Dramedy.
1839
Post New Requests Here / Re: PC Time
« Last post by Shades on March 29, 2012, 02:13 PM »
The tool you will find after following this link should be of help to you. It freeware and portable.
1840
Living Room / Re: Show us the View Outside Your Window
« Last post by Shades on March 29, 2012, 12:31 PM »
So its 'yes' to the weed, 'no' to the cocaine and you're smiling at the hookers...  :P
1841
Living Room / Re: 800 lb Paper Airplane?
« Last post by Shades on March 29, 2012, 12:28 PM »
I think they stuck to the letter of the law when it came to size, so it was probably fly paper.
-cranioscopical (March 28, 2012, 03:14 PM)
Think it had a change of heart and became sandpaper instead...after all it grinded to a halt.
1842
General Software Discussion / Re: Whats your preferred web browser?
« Last post by Shades on March 28, 2012, 11:35 AM »
In this case even (a) Lynx knows how to survive (the) Safari....  :P
1843
Living Room / Re: 800 lb Paper Airplane?
« Last post by Shades on March 28, 2012, 11:28 AM »
Are you sure that the plane was Legal?
1844
General Software Discussion / Re: Goodbye OpenOffice, Hello LibreOffice
« Last post by Shades on March 28, 2012, 10:18 AM »
LibreOffice comes default with a PDF generator/printer that is actually very good (at least for the .doc/.docx documents that I convert to PDF). It also is able to handle the new .docx/.xlsx/.pptx formats.

The portable version of LibreOffice that I am using (3.3) is not fast with booting its components, though. Part of that is the fact that it is portable and LibreOffice is 2 to 3 times bigger than SoftMaker Office 2008.
1845
Living Room / Re: Windows 8 is just a Service/crapware pack for Windows 7
« Last post by Shades on March 26, 2012, 08:52 AM »
Yep, for a market they have to deal with in a serious (and professional) matter. So who can blame them for taking the consumer side so lightly (and frivolously)...
1846
Living Room / Re: Windows 8 is just a Service/crapware pack for Windows 7
« Last post by Shades on March 26, 2012, 07:10 AM »
In the pre-ribbon days for most of what I did with MSOffice really took 2-3 clicks. Using the same functionality with the ribbon-versions of Office it takes 4-5 clicks to do exactly the same. That is my main gripe with the ribbon, although the lost screen estate comes as a very close second. Hiding it adds another click to the already impressive number of useless clicks necessary.

Really, the only reason why I still use MSOffice is the fact that the functionality I require is hidden behind even more clicks in LibreOffice. If they would fix that, I jump ship in an instant. I am all for change if it improves workflow, but for me the ribbon is not an improvement (at all), hence I don't want the change. Unfortunately I hardly have any choice in the matter.

And now...the Metro interface? Really? I have to give it to Microsoft, they managed to add insult to injury in a such a major way I never thought could be possible.

The only thing I am interested in are the new server editions from Windows. In a Microsoft video I saw some impressive functional (ribbon-less) improvements in that division. 
1847
ProcessTamer / Re: Process won't listen to priority change
« Last post by Shades on March 24, 2012, 09:14 AM »
To my understanding the lowering of the priority from a process does not affect the CPU usage from this process. Until another process is executed claiming a lot of CPU resources as well. In that situation, most (if not all) of the available CPU resources will go to the process with the highest priority first.

Hence I always have an instance of Process Explorer (from SysInternals, nowadays a part of the Microsoft family) running in the background. Its freeware and part of a suite, which I heartily recommend to download. You will find a lot more gems inside that suite that will give you (way) more insight in how Windows works, while gaining a lot more ways to manage your Windows as you see fit.
1848
The recent versions of LibreOffice do read the .xlsx format. Just verified that with my portable LibreOffice 3.3. As far as I know the latest portable build available is version 3.5. Granted, it doesn't go fast, but that doesn't rule it out as a salvage option now, is it?
1849
Try reading the file with a different Office suite, for example LibreOffice. From personal experience, and YMMV, I can tell you that I have received on several occasions MSoffice document(s) that were unreadable by MSOffice, but LibreOffice could open them just fine. Save the document again and it would open up in MSOffice as well. For these events (and PDF creation) I have a portable version of LibreOffice on my system. Always.
1850
Go to the site that hosts a piece of software called: nLite

Its free, powerful and can do everything you want and so much more. It will create a new installation disc that is all setup as you want, which will eliminate (a lot of) the hassle of afterwards configuring Windows behavior.

Made quite a few of these discs already, which install XP SPIII 'fresh' in about 20 to 25 minutes, without any interaction on my part.

Slightly off-topic:
Because of the above I am actually thinking that it would be more practical (and maybe faster) to be able to reconstruct your Windows installation instead of backing it up...
Pages: prev1 ... 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 ... 118next