topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday November 24, 2025, 6:09 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 ... 131next
1826
Proprietary media formats like WMV, MOV, and WMA need to go. Many of the same arguments for open standards (e.g., OASIS OpenDocument (ODF) format) apply here:
  • you should be able to do anything whatsoever with media (you create);
  • users will migrate toward software and devices that play open format media;
  • EVERYONE can implement a true, open standard, and it increases competition and choice;
  • the world is shifting to non-proprietary open standards based on the amazing success of the web, a success that was far more important than any single vendor’s market position or ideas for what was right for the world. (Imagine if the web had started out as a proprietary entity! Thanks to the DMCA, a public library could never been conceived and built in this century — "You can't share that book among more than one person, you criminal!)

ibrain1011.jpg

With proprietary media comes the dreaded DRM. PCMag's Bill Machrone talks about how: [DRM] has become a circus act in which we're trained dogs that jump through media companies' hoops. Their goal is to resell us every song, TV show, and movie each time there's a new format and to control how and where we consume the content.

I'm not about to rip someone/some company off, but the point of a proprietary media format is restriction, not collection or sharing. Be gone already!
1827
General Software Discussion / Re: Do we need a Linux and/or Mac child board?
« Last post by zridling on June 17, 2008, 09:57 PM »
What Daleus said, and also Dormouse: "...an increasing number of utilities are cross platform."

I changed my little "Great Software List" to reflect that trend, as I find myself using many apps that were common to both Windows and Linux (OpenOffice, Firefox, Opera, Filezilla, PGN viewers, Gimp, webware, etc.). Seems there are more topics of conversation in common among platforms than not any more. And let's face it, neither Windows nor OS X nor Linux is going away any time soon.
1828
General Software Discussion / Re: "The browser is the new OS" ...(really?)
« Last post by zridling on June 17, 2008, 09:45 PM »
Lashiec, how is webware proprietary when it uses open standards like HTML and ODF, and to a lesser extent, PDF?

By 2006, I was looking to get off the Microsoft wagon, and both open source software and open standards allowed me to. mouser mentioned how "platform independence" gave me the liberty to migrate away from Windows and stay away. Although it's a compromised substitute, at least with webware like Google Docs, I don't have to ever think about downloading, upgrading, or spending a penny on software I use mainly to write letters with.
1829
Living Room / Re: Career Advice : Masters Degree
« Last post by zridling on June 17, 2008, 06:22 AM »
What mouser said. Even through both my Masters and PhD studies, I never took a course that didn't directly count toward my specific degree requirements, while I saw others take 2-3 years longer to finish because they followed a temporary interest. My advice would be to treat your schooling like a credit card — if you can't pay for it, then it's not worth it, and the credit hit will follow you for 20+ years. Barack Obama's a millionaire and had top legal jobs since the early 90s, but claims he only recently paid off his student loans. And he's 46! (I've yet to pay mine off at the same age, and I'm not even a hundred-aire.)
1830
Living Room / Re: Simply Google
« Last post by zridling on June 17, 2008, 06:16 AM »
Granted, this is a lot easier to point someone to than explaining how to use Google. A page like this would make more people intelligent searchers, and at the very least that saves them time.
1831
General Software Discussion / Re: The LiveCD List
« Last post by zridling on June 17, 2008, 06:08 AM »
Wow, now that's a really cool, really useful list — thanks Phil! The filter is great. This is the one thing I wish new versions of Windows had, but that may never happen because it is proprietary. Besides, if you're using Windows, you're usually "all in" as the saying goes.
1832
General Software Discussion / "The browser is the new OS" ...(really?)
« Last post by zridling on June 17, 2008, 05:54 AM »
TechDirt's Timothy Lee tries to expand on this browser = OS metaphor and receives a backlash from his (English grammar-challenged) readers. While I love the cross-platform, proprietary-erasing nature of most webware, I hate the idea that my computer is only as fast as my connection speed, and that for the most part, it's a dead machine without being online.

opera_mobile12143.jpg

However, for small (EEE) machines and iPhones, their utility comes from their connectability, not their power. Here's some of the discussion. Good links at the blog page itself.
___________
[author]: As websites have come to look more and more like applications rather than static pages, they've begun to bump up against the limits of what today's web browsers can do. Developers have responded by using a variety of proprietary plug-ins and workarounds to expand the browser's functionality. One example of this is local storage.

[reply]: I'm so tired of hearing this crap. An OS is an OS. A browser is a browser. To the extent that they do the same thing, you are just creating inefficiency. It's very clear at this point that we need a cross-platform thick client.
___________
[author]: What's really interesting about this is that browsers are starting to resemble operating systems in their own right. One of the most fundamental features of operating systems is to provide a consistent interface for data storage. OS developers call it a file system, rather than "local storage," but the concept is the same. And as websites come to increasingly resemble full-blown operating systems, I think browser vendors are increasingly going to have to solve the same kinds of problems that operating system vendors do.

[reply]: There has been quite a lot of hype about a Web OS and the browser performing the function of operating systems. But put simply, that's never going to happen. As anyone who has seriously coded an operating system(which is quite a slim minority) will know, an operating system has to do so much more than simply deal with "local storage." First of all the browser has the underlying kernel to deal with file systems. All it has to do for a "filesystem" is to simply call fopen(). An operating system in contrast would actually have to call a hard disk driver which has to deal with the eccentricities of hard disk drives and then read everything into a buffer and then pass that to the filesystem driver where it will be parsed. Then that file information is passed to the VFS and then finally to the browser. The complexity of what a true operating system does simply dwarfs the complexity of writing a browser. Firefox, IE, Safari, Opera, and every other major browser has a true operating system to provide a consistent API on a plethora of hardware. It is true that the web is becoming more like an application and it is also acceptable to say that soon, the web will be able to serve most day-to-day applications. However, no matter how many applications it serves, the Web will never be an operating system and without the support of true operating systems, it would cease to exist in the first place.
___________
[author]: For example, it has become increasingly common for my browser to slow to a crawl because one poorly-written, JavaScript-heavy website is sucking up all the CPU. Just as operating systems have preemptive multitasking to prevent one application from bringing the whole system to a crawl, browsers should have mechanisms to prevent one misbehaving website from bringing my browser grinding to a halt.... When websites begin to resemble full-fledged applications, browsers are going to start behaving like full-fledged operating systems.

[reply]: Kudos for using "javascript" and "misbehaving" in the same paragraph.
1833
General Software Discussion / Re: Do we need a Linux and/or Mac child board?
« Last post by zridling on June 14, 2008, 12:07 AM »
I'd say no we don't need to add Linux/Mac child boards for the very reason Darwin mentioned — I've been grateful for the reception (and patience) DC members have shown my Linux topic posts. Because of you guys, I see the larger picture now; that is, use what you want as long as you don't come back and tell me I'm stupid for not using the same software you are currently using. Besides, I enjoy other perspectives on everything. I haven't used Macs except for playing with friends' machines, but that doesn't mean I don't like reading about them.

Simple.
1834
Living Room / Re: Opera 9.5
« Last post by zridling on June 13, 2008, 11:58 PM »
Got to say I've long loved Opera because of its broad customizability. That's more true than ever. Moreover, like FF, I can take every piece of it with me between Linux and Windows. Sites that Opera doesn't render, i.e., "IE-only," I merely don't visit. And while I'll admit that Roboform is fantastic, Opera's Wand remembers all, and is by far the simpler device to manage, not to mention one less piece of software I need to install/upgrade.
1835
Living Room / Re: Linux hardware support about to get better
« Last post by zridling on June 10, 2008, 10:39 PM »
Holy freakin' crapzilla. I've been fortunate not to have any driver problems with Linux (except with one new printer that I didn't like anyway), but this is great news indeed. Open sourcing hardware is a whole 'nother animal compared to open source software, for a lot of reasons. So any openness at all is welcome.
1836
VuePrint is still one of the best lightweight photo viewers ever designed. Newer ones like MaxView never included an index view — which IMO — is essential to its utility.
1837
The world begs for lightweight apps... those were the days.
1838
Thanks cranioscopical and Edvard for both truth and laughs, but at least with earlier versions of Photoshop you could copy money. f0dder points to an unpopular trend: OpenOffice is slower by the version. Better, but slower.
1839
Living Room / Interactive Linux kernel map
« Last post by zridling on June 09, 2008, 11:29 PM »
Well, this is cool — the Interactive Linux kernel map gives you a top-down view of the kernel. You can see the most important layers, functionalities, modules, functions, and calls. Each function on the map is a link to its source code. The map is interactive. You can zoom in and drag around to see details.

lin-kernel-map.jpg
1840
Wow, great responses, and they cover the lot, from booting to services to processes to webware and installed apps. As Lashiec suggested, I'll always settle for the better written, more resource-efficient software if at all possible.
________________________________________________
cranioscopical, correct me if I'm wrong, but other than more multimedia choices (including the ubiquitous DRM), what more are we doing today? Office suites haven't changed much at all except around the edges. Most people still use spreadsheets for a thousand tasks, I was very happy with game play back then, but today, I'd much rather play on a dedicated game console. I've still got porn, and it hasn't changed (except for the faces). No PIM software has still caught up with 1997's Ecco Pro. Yea, I can play a DVD movie, and I appreciate that, but just as soon as I do, the "corporation" wants me to trash my DVD collection and reinvest in Blu-Ray at three times the cost.

Maybe it's me, but I'm not seeing a lot of progress. By now, I was kind of hoping the computer would find a way to deposit money into my checking account daily.  :P
1841
General Software Discussion / Re: Media Player Linux Distro Available?
« Last post by zridling on June 07, 2008, 07:56 PM »
Wow, good call scancode.
1842
No OS is safe from this criticism, but shouldn't computers — with the awesome processor power we have today — be fast as hell? I don't understand how a computer ("for example") in 2008, is slower than the one I ran using Windows ME in 1998!

frustrated1044.jpg

Someone set me straight, and then tell the rest of us how to cure this wicked trend.
1843
Wolfenstein, damnit!
1844
Cool. Done.
1845
General Software Discussion / Whatever happened to... <INSERT DEADWARE HERE>
« Last post by zridling on June 05, 2008, 01:40 AM »
Software, like all things, comes with a half-life. I was about to say the same 'whatever happened' line about Copernic search when suddenly they come out with an update. Then I thought of Apple III and Zune. What other software/hardware either dropped off the planet or just stopped evolving?

compiling.png
gratuitous, off-topic graphic
1846
Living Room / Re: Why I could never buy a Dell or HP computer (rant)
« Last post by zridling on June 03, 2008, 11:20 PM »
Thanks for the tips, guys. Next time I will politely refuse the offer to help someone with a commercial computer, except to point them to the business machine section first. He didn't ask before purchasing, but I'll let him know for future machines that's what he needs to do.
1847
Living Room / Why I could never buy a Dell or HP computer (rant)
« Last post by zridling on June 01, 2008, 11:39 PM »
A neighbor of mine bought himself an incredible new HP laptop a few days ago and asked me to come over and tweak it for him, since he knew no Vista. However, we spent almost three hours uninstalling (and constantly rebooting) 28 crapware programs installed by HP. Microsoft seemed to have everything they've ever made as a "trial" installed on the HD, and if you clicked on any Microsoft icon, you were immediately asked to buy — not try — the software before using it even once. Amazing audacity to say the least.
fedup-e.jpg
It took a while longer to tweak Vista (no need for tweak apps, I already had a full Vista tweak list from a simple Google search), but HP had Vista locked down so tight that there were many parts you could not adjust, UAC and Vista's power settings for some odd reason. I ended up reformatting and reinstalling from the partition, but that took three calls to Microsoft for "permission," and this included being lectured to for "altering the system" in the first place by a MS tech support rep.

I've built my own systems for years and now I have a renewed wonder why anyone would tolerate the pain of a commercial computer! I seriously didn't have that kind of time to spend on a computer. Just load the OS, load your apps, let them activate/validate themselves, and GO!
1848
Dang, there are that many pirate cards out there for dish TV? Who knew!
1849
Living Room / Re: Questions about upgrading my Linux distro
« Last post by zridling on May 08, 2008, 07:20 PM »
This year will see an effort to provide easier distro/kernel upgrades. Fedora, Ubuntu, and Mandriva are on board. Nice tip on the home folder, Edvard.
1850
Surprise, surprise, a good bit of it is software that's popular to Windows, too. But Thunderbird beat out Gmail?
Pages: prev1 ... 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 ... 131next