topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday June 27, 2025, 7:35 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 ... 145next
1801
Why was this moved to the basement?  And, unfortunately, moving topics breaks the image links :(

Whut image links? They don't link to anything...

I shall move it back to Living Room :D
1802
OMG, did Mr S. shave his thighs for you?  :o

Not mine :(
1803
Also fixed a few other stupid Math errors I made...

Either way...My point stands...This shit is funny  ;D
1804
the moon is 1/4 the size of the Earth's diameter, and 238miles from the Earth

  Uhm.....I think the moon is a little further than 238 miles from Earth.   :D  I think it's like 225,291 to 251,910 miles from the Earth depending on its elliptical orbit at the time.   :two:   :lol:

missed the K at the end of it :P, fixed, now says 238,000 :D
1805
If serious...wut?  You know the moon MOVES right?, so for that ENTIRE time, it would have to be moving, very fast, from side to side, to avoid visible detection...not to mention detection from space bound telescopes that are way out of the way of the moon o.0

Hey!  It's a crazy f*cked up Universe...work with me on this.

At least I didn't mention anything about its stealth capabilities.

<CSI Reference>
OK, Zoom, zoom some more...rotate...enhance, rotate, enhance, zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...rotate...invert...polarize...rotate...lighten...enhance...rotate...enhance...zoom some more...rotate...enhance, rotate, enhance, zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...rotate...invert...polarize...rotate...lighten...enhance...rotate...enhance...zoom some more...rotate...enhance, rotate, enhance, zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...rotate...invert...polarize...rotate...lighten...enhance...rotate...enhance...zoom some more...rotate...enhance, rotate, enhance, zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...rotate...invert...polarize...rotate...lighten...enhance...rotate...enhance...zoom some more...rotate...enhance, rotate, enhance, zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...rotate...invert...polarize...rotate...lighten...enhance...rotate...enhance...zoom some more...rotate...enhance, rotate, enhance, zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...rotate...invert...polarize...rotate...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...zoom...zoom...enhance...zoom...enhance...zoom...zoom...
</CSI Reference>
1806
Also, if we all die on Friday, I will publicly apologise for my false findings, First thing Saturday morning.
1807
It's been hiding behind the Moon all the way in, when it's close enough to the Moon its gravitational force will pull it aside, (or it could run it down), and then it will hit the Earth 1.49 hours later.

You're going to bring up the fact that an object that size will be visible behind the Moon aren't you?

The Tardis Effect explains this anomaly: Big objects far away look smaller than small objects really close.
* Stephen66515 can't tell is Satire or serious  :huh:

If Satire...Lol

If serious...wut?  You know the moon MOVES right?, so for that ENTIRE time, it would have to be moving, very fast, from side to side, to avoid visible detection...not to mention detection from space bound telescopes that are way out of the way of the moon o.0

Off Topic
Also...This was your 2,222nd Post...Kinda cool

4wd.png

1808
Nibiru_is_visible_2012.jpg

Right, to all those who believe Planet Nibiru (or Planet X) will hit us in around 24 hours, lets look at a little fact shall we? Niburu is claimed to be 4x the size of Earth.

Now...that's a fucking BIG object...On that basis, you WOULD be able to see it, very clearly by now, with the naked eye...

In fact, it would be very hard to miss...

One way to look at it...is the moon is 1/4 the size of the Earth's diameter, and 238,000miles from the Earth.

That's a LONG way away. Even at that size, and that distance, it is VERY visible with nothing but the naked eye...on clear nights you can even clearly see definition such as craters.

So...A little bit more Math here...If the moon is 1/4 the Earth, that makes the Earth 4x the size of the moon. Now 4x that AGAIN...That's 952,000miles...That's how far it could be away right now, and be as visible as the moon...

 Now...Travelling at the speed of light...It would take appx 1.5seconds to get from the moon to the Earth...

So, we have some basis for Math right now...

We know 'Niburu' is not visible AT ALL, so we can safely assume it is around 19,040,00Miles away (~8x the distance of the moon) - At 4x the size of the Earth, it would be perfectly visible by Telescope...but lets imagine nobody has those shall we? OK...so...the fastest meteor goes around ~160,000 mph (Very fucking fast)...That would mean...the distance it would have to be at...RIGHT NOW...on a collision course...(Not possible at the distance it would need to be)...is...3,840,000...Yes...almost 4 MILLION MILES...

BUT...what's more...is that, even in 1927, WE COULD SEE THINGS THAT FAR AWAY...A newspaper story from Wednesday 25 May 1927: http://trove.nla.gov...del/article/36046580

Clicked the link and read it?  Good...lets carry on shall we?

Oh look...it means we would know...

So...All in all...in order for nobody to have seen it...AT ALL...no glimpse, no slight piece of solid evidence (Even amateur astronomers would be able to track at this distance)....it would have to currently be sitting, around....the 50 or 60 MILLION mile mark...OH...no it wouldn't...because guess what...MARS is 60 Million Miles away at one of its closest points to Earth...and ... hmm...guess what...ITS VISIBLE from that distance, even with the naked eye! -

SO...Lets go deeper shall we?

Pluto is 3,674,490,959miles away...o.0...that's 3.5 BILLION MILES...Btw...we can SEE that with some of the better telescopes we have...(How the fuck else would we know it's there?)...

Soooooooooo..........

Going on another basis, that NASA currently track objects within 120 million miles of us...so if it was close...we would know  - BUT, if it is going (EXTREMELY) fast...and is around, for the sake of argument...5 Billion Miles from us (Other side of Pluto)...it would have to be travelling at around 138888888.8888889MPH (138.8 MILLION MPH) (38,580 Miles Per Second...or around 1/5th The Speed of light, which is approximately 186,282 miles per second)

Anyway...My point is...NO object could be travelling, that fast, and be that far away (Don't forget , if its going that fast...and the Mayans predicted it...lets say, around the end of when they where here...about 900AD...or...1112 years ago...'Planet Niburu' would have been...assuming it has always been travelling in the same direction...with no deviation (It's going fucking fast...so wtf could alter its course?) ... 1,352,933,000,000,000 Miles from Earth (or)...

1 Quardrillion, 352 Trillian, 933 Billion Miles...

Oh, I'm also ignoring the fact that the Mayans did NOT know about the Leap Year...

Anybody want me to take that into account and do some more math?

(Thanks to Deozaan for help with some of the Math in here!)
1809
Living Room / Re: Cyber Cody & Zombie Cody...My mrs is slightly...odd?
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on December 19, 2012, 10:35 AM »
Wow! Vlastimil, that is bloody awesome!
1812
Well, looks like Instagram will lose 80-90% of its user-base due to a new policy update which will become effective on the 16th January 2013.

Instagram, which was recently acquired by Facebook, has announced that it is updating its terms of service and privacy policy. Some of the new changes, that will be effective on January 16, 2013, have sparked off protests from users.

The new terms of service and privacy policy will bring them in line with Facebook's policies. In a post on its blog, Instagram assured users that, "nothing has changed about your photos' ownership or who can see them" and added that the "updated privacy policy helps Instagram function more easily as part of Facebook by being able to share info between the two groups. This means we can do things like fight spam more effectively, detect system and reliability problems more quickly, and build better features for everyone by understanding how Instagram is used."

Though Instagram in the blog post says that the "updated terms of service help protect you, and prevent spam and abuse as we grow," it does not highlight the clause 2 under Rights which says, "Some or all of the Service may be supported by advertising revenue. To help us deliver interesting paid or sponsored content or promotions, you agree that a business or other entity may pay us to display your username, likeness, photos (along with any associated metadata), and/or actions you take, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you."

What this means, is that Instagram/Facebook, can SELL YOUR Artwork/Photos, and not tell you, or even compensate you for doing so.

Users have taken to Social Media sites to voice their outrage:

@lostart: Dear Instagram, please change your name to more adequately portray your abusive terms of service: instaGRAB!

@kidzrevil: So instagram is turning itself into a stock photo agency. A stock photo is kinda like a template a company could buy to make an ad with.

@justimage: Not surprised Facebook's Instagram is evil. Sadly, I think people will still use it. Big blow to photographers.

@prague360: Goodbye instagram. I'm uninstalling you now. I never want to see you again

@ReformedBroker: Facebook's terms of service changes to Instagram are hilarious. It's like they want us to hate them

@markonen: I am basically trusting that enough of you guys will delete your Instagram accounts to reverse the policy without me having to do anything.

@bozoskeleton: Never been happier that I don't Instagram: now they want to sell users' photos because they own them!

@buzzbishop: Just in case you thought @instagram was trustworthy and wont do evil, look what they did to

@jdross: Heh... apparently even Zuckerberg's wedding photographer isn't a fan of the new Instagram.

@MarcelloNine: I guess Instagram has wrote their suicide note!
-www.twitter.com

Source: http://ibnlive.in.co...-told/311130-11.html
1813
Living Room / Re: Bouncing Tits
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on December 17, 2012, 09:03 PM »
I'd say </offtopic> but...meh, this is funnier lol
1814
Living Room / Re: Bouncing Tits
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on December 17, 2012, 09:02 PM »
She no speaky the engrish welly.
1815
Living Room / Re: Bouncing Tits
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on December 17, 2012, 09:00 PM »
it may just be me but my tits dont go blue wen they are cold lol they tend to go red haha :) lmfao

I apologize for my FianceƩ's severe lack of grammar, and basic grasp of the English language.
* Stephen66515 Hides under the couch

 ;D
1816
Living Room / Re: Bouncing Tits
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on December 17, 2012, 08:53 PM »
Blue Tits

Only when they're very cold.

Damn, I just laughed REALLY loud haha  ;D
+1000
1817
Living Room / Albino Cocks
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on December 17, 2012, 08:51 PM »
Albino.jpg

albinobabycockerel.jpg
 
1818
ie.jpg

Also, this is the 1000th post in this thread :P
1819
Living Room / Re: Bouncing Tits
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on December 17, 2012, 08:38 PM »
Blue Tits
1820
Living Room / Re: Renegade: A Hero In Our Midst
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on December 17, 2012, 08:19 PM »
Title is mainly to embarrass him, but, in all honesty, its still a VERY brave thing to do!

 :Thmbsup:
1821
Living Room / Renegade: A Hero In Our Midst
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on December 17, 2012, 08:13 PM »
Firstly, we read this: http://www.theage.co...-20121217-2bi2e.html

Police are appealing for witnesses to a horrific crash in Melbourne's leafy eastern suburbs.

A 24-year-old Maroochydore man is in The Alfred hospital after his car burst into flames, having ploughed through a fence and a pole before smashing into a tree in Toorak on Sunday night.

Police believe it was a single-car crash. Investigators have been told a white Ford Falcon was travelling west on Malvern Road before the driver lost control near Orrong Road hitting a fence, a pole and then a tree before catching on fire about 10.20pm.

Firefighters extinguished the blaze and the man, who was the only person in the car, was taken to The Alfred hospital where he is now in a stable condition.
Advertisement

People with information should contact Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or www.crimestoppers.com.au.


Read more: http://www.theage.co...e.html#ixzz2FMj9D01G

Then we see this:

ryan.jpg

"How are these linked?" I hear you ask!

Well...That hand, is Renegades...and it is stitched up, because he pulled somebody out of the burning car!



Things like this should be highlighted, to show, that here on DC, we have true heroes!
1822
I think I understand what you mean...so here is a video...if I am wrong...tell me, and I shall re-do it :)

 :up: very slick video Stephen (what do you use?)
The tip with the numbering is superfluous (it wont screw anything up though!) - the only reason it would be necessary to add numbers would be if you had, say four attachments, and you realised you had attached them in the wrong sequence -
then you could use e.g.
[attachimg=1]
[attachimg=4]
[attachimg=2]
[attachimg=3]
- in this example, the fourth file attached would be shown as the second image in the post.

Camtasia :)
1823
Living Room / Bouncing Tits
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on December 17, 2012, 04:36 PM »
1824
Developer's Corner / Re: Game Engines and Apps
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on December 17, 2012, 01:44 PM »
Bumping because mouser made me post a link he found cause he is too lazy to do it himself. (Although, with 30k+ posts...one would think he talks more than he does)

http://www.worldofle...se-how-to-choose.php



There has never been a better time to start designing game environments and level designs. More game engines and level editors are becoming readily available for free or small price of the game to anyone who wants to learn how to level design. But with more choices, comes indecision. Especially if you are just beginning your journey into level design and game environment art.

What game engine should you start with? What level editor do you choose to work with? What is the difference between a game engine and a level editor? How do you download level editing tools and game engine to work with? Is UDK better then CryEngine 3 SDK or is Unity 3D the way to go? Which Source Engine game should I start mapping for? What is the difference between game environment artist and level designer?

Where do I start?

In this tutorial I want to help you choose which level editor and game engine you may want to start with. I will cover the basics and then go more in-depth to help you choose the "right" game engine and level editor.
1825
Living Room / Re: Why does keep changing the bar menu order/visibility??
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on December 16, 2012, 08:09 PM »
"Why does keep changing the bar menu order/visibility??" <--- I think you forgot a word?
Pages: prev1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 ... 145next