topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday November 11, 2025, 10:55 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 66 67 68 69 70 [71] 72 73 74 75 76 ... 106next
1751
Living Room / Re: Open Source Proves Elusive as a Business Model
« Last post by JavaJones on December 01, 2009, 02:53 PM »
Yes and no. The coders choose to make their work available for free. Many of those same developers are part of larger companies paying them - at least in part - contribute. And even though the larger company may make most or all of its money off of support or other services, and not the software itself, some of the devs still benefit. But the real trick of it is, if support is where all the money is, devs are not barred from providing it... they just don't *like* it. So maybe it sucks that support is where the money is, but that's really because support is needed *and* the software is made freely available. If either one of those things weren't true, things would be different. If devs spent more time making more intuitive software or built-in help; or if they chose to charge for their apps; or if they were willing to spend part of their time investment on support...

- Oshyan
1752
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by JavaJones on November 30, 2009, 04:02 PM »
Yes, I guess I failed to mention the level of customizability some offer. I believe it's ReadyNAS (or a similar one) that has a whole modding/plugin community around it, with lots of cool tweaks, mods, plugins, etc. to enhance functionality and get it doing exactly what you want. There are even dedicated bittorrent and other clients available for them.

- Oshyan
1753
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by JavaJones on November 30, 2009, 01:38 PM »
Not a problem, I totally understand your reasoning... and in that case, you could get something like ReadyNAS, with 4 or 6 bays, empty, and buy some 1-2GB drives to fill it with. It's expandable, lets you tinker and build and configure, and has all the other advantages of a NAS. ;)

e.g. http://www.amazon.co...259609756&sr=1-4

Perhaps you could explain more specifically what you want to do with a "home server"? Backup? Media streaming? Central file repository for sharing (NAS-like)?

- Oshyan
1754
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by JavaJones on November 30, 2009, 01:16 PM »
What are all the drives for? Maybe just get a large NAS and stick everything on that, then backup the NAS to an external drive. Lower power than a full system, takes up less space, possibly quieter, little or no maintenance, accessible from all systems on a network.

Total solution cost, about $800:
2.5TB (~2.3TB formatted) RAID 5 NAS - $600
http://www.adorama.c...html?searchinfo=5big

2TB single drive for backup - $140 (after rebate)
http://www.buy.com/p...c/101/212502309.html

Just a thought. :)

- Oshyan
1755
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 7 — first impressions
« Last post by JavaJones on November 30, 2009, 12:46 PM »
Jump Lists:
http://windows.micro.../features/jump-lists
http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=16143

Another "Ooo, shiny and new, only available in Win7!" feature that was actually available all the way back to WinXP and maybe even Win2k, although at that time it required more work on the part of the developer (see Winamp for example). Still a cool feature though, and much more powerful and flexible in Win7 in any case.

- Oshyan
1756
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 7 — first impressions
« Last post by JavaJones on November 30, 2009, 12:48 AM »
Right, exactly - backspace is "back" and there's a button for that. An "up" button would still be nice, even though I know the breadcrumbs serve the same (and even greater) purpose.

- Oshyan
1757
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 7 — first impressions
« Last post by JavaJones on November 29, 2009, 08:41 PM »
I think the customizable systray is a good thing, I just think A: stuff shouldn't be hidden by default and B: like the new "Jump menus" they implemented (and the less customized right-click menus before), all systray icons should have standard functions like close, including "don't show this icon anymore" or some such. It would be more convenient and intuitive to do that than have to go into a special settings window to do the same thing as we have to now.

Does backspace go *up* or "back"?

- Oshyan
1758
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 7 — first impressions
« Last post by JavaJones on November 29, 2009, 05:29 PM »
I agree that UAC is much better in Win7 but I still find it popping up a lot more than I'd like and seemingly unnecessarily (or at least the reason why is not *made* clear, as it should be). I haven't turned it off yet though, as I did in Vista, so maybe that says something...

For Device Manager and a lot more a 'trick' (not really, but surprisingly not everyone knows about this) I learned back in the Win2k days serves well here:
Right-Click on Computer and go to "Manage".
This gives you not only Device Manager, but Disk Managemenet, Event Log Viewers (lots more options in Win7 than before - nice!), System Services, and a lot more. In Win7 the Management Application has actually been further expanded and it's an extremely useful tool. I recommend checking it out it you don't already use it.

- Oshyan
1759
I've just had a play with RawTherapee and I'm afraid it's just too slow and lacking in UI feedback for me. Maybe I just don't know the interface enough yet, but I found it hard to determine when it was working on something I'd just changed, vs. already done and just sitting there, except when I found something unresponsive until it was done. I also couldn't find the demosaicing options it's so famous for, and while I'm sure they're somewhere, and maybe even staring me right in the face, next to the Bibble UI it doesn't impress unfortunately. Quality is still important, and that's where it seems to have an edge, but I will have to see with the Lightroom 3 beta and Bibble 5 previews how the comparison ends up.

- Oshyan
1760
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 7 — first impressions
« Last post by JavaJones on November 29, 2009, 05:14 PM »
Excellent comments and observations. I think I echo almost every one of your complaints and criticisms. Overall I'm reasonably happy with Win7, but it's pretty hard to believe, with all the changes made, that fundamental things that have been wrong for a long time still go unchanged, or worse yet the unchangeable "improvements" like system tray behavior (which I happen to agree is a usability sacrifice in favor of aesthetics, which is ultimately in the service of neither amateur nor professional user). That UAC exists and is so obtrusive, yet "known" extensions are still hidden by default is such a glaring conflict that it's hard to believe.

- Oshyan
1761
General Software Discussion / Re: Nice DonationCoder.com WriteUp on dotTech.org
« Last post by JavaJones on November 29, 2009, 05:08 PM »
Very nice writeup. I especially like all the feature suggestions and constructive criticism. It's great to get recognition and praise, but nothing is perfect. Without any points for improvement, a review will often seem biased to me. This is very even-handed, and the apps mentioned are all very deserving.

- Oshyan
1762
Living Room / Re: Tech News Weekly: Edition 48-09
« Last post by JavaJones on November 29, 2009, 04:54 PM »
Lego Matrix rocks. First Else looks intriguing since I'm in the market for a new phone, but the wait will probably be too long. Frankly I'm not finding myself so underwhelmed by what's already out there (Droid) that I *need* to wait. All I'm interested in is seeing what other Android 2.0 devices there are going to be, particularly one that may be higher-powered and thus longer-lived in a performance-relevant way. And until Else can demonstrate a GPS system that rivals what Google has shown with Android 2.0, I'm not sold. I'm also not entirely sure about the largely monochrome and text-heavy UI with glowing theme, though I am generally a fan of minimalist UI...

- Oshyan
1763
Living Room / Re: looking for an old science-fiction movie
« Last post by JavaJones on November 28, 2009, 10:22 PM »
You can see a lot more of Mathilda in the flick Becoming Colette or sometimes titled just Colette.

How could there possibly be a way to see more of Mathilda May than in Lifeforce?

I was wondering the same thing. :D

- Oshyan
1764
Nice list. iPlotz looks incredibly useful for some of my upcoming projects!

- Oshyan
1765
How important is it that the 3rd monitor be on a fast card? You could think about a PCI-based graphics card just for that 3rd display. ;)

- Oshyan
1766
Depending on your camera, it might not even slow down that much. My A700 doesn't particularly (with a fast media card), it just further limits the number of sequential burst shots, but not so much the speed of the burst.

- Oshyan
1767
Not to mention the muuuch greater expense of both Blu-ray writer drives and media.

- Oshyan
1768
So the question then becomes why not shoot in RAW+JPG? The JPG is usually processed "good enough" in itself by the camera. Little further tweaking needed. And if you do need to do major tweaking, the RAW is available.

- Oshyan
1769
General Software Discussion / Re: "New image organizer feedback wanted"
« Last post by JavaJones on November 26, 2009, 09:53 PM »
Great, thanks for the quick adjustments. I'll give it a shot after Thanksgiving now that I know I ned to have Windows Search installed. :D

- Oshyan
1770
For those about to Wave... we salute you. ;)

- Oshyan
1771
Honestly I think RawTherapee produces some of the best results. It's fitting it into the rest of your workflow that may be a challenge. Not sure if it can be automated. There are other tools based on dcRAW that can though. Not sure if you've seen this quality comparison page (a bit outdated now, but still interesting): http://www.rawtherapee.com/RAW_Compare/

The other thing to consider is that ideally you would do *all* work, all post work, on the full-range RAW file, not on an 8 bit/channel version. If you're saving out to say 16 bit TIFF and you can potentially maintain some of the benefits, but I'm not sure how well PSP does with >8 bit color spaces.

Because of all that I'm really hoping to find something that does it all, or most of "it". Bibble seems promising as it has potentially good organizational tools, along with a good RAW engine, and some editing tools (e.g. it'll have Clone in the final version).

- Oshyan
1772
General Software Discussion / Re: "New image organizer feedback wanted"
« Last post by JavaJones on November 25, 2009, 04:14 PM »
I do think the renaming should be optional. The auto-renaming is a nice feature for a lot of people I think, similar to what the default Windows camera transfer system does, but it's not always desirable, especially for more "professional" users.

You could add RAW support with DCRAW and/or LibRAW if you want. They're free, DCRAW is the source of functionality for both, but LibRAW exposes it in a more friendly library I think. I would definitely suggest supporting RAW format as it will make the app a lot more attractive to a wider audience (like meee! hehe).

For even broader format support you might consider using the GFL SDK from the maker of XnView, and/or FreeImage, both of which might also incidentally help with the EXIF problem below.

If you're not doing lossless EXIF changes now, I honestly think this is a huge problem and you should have a warning whenever you change EXIF data in an image. Repeated JPEG saving can do horrible things to files. I'm not sure if that's actually what you're doing though. Unless you're actually re-encoding the JPG when you save, it may already be working correctly. But this should definitely be verified as it's vital for maintaining long-term image quality. Here's an example of what can happen with repeated JPEG saving: http://www.impulsead...o/jpeg-resaving.html
I know there are ways to change *just* the EXIF data. Definitely something to look into and resolve ASAP IMO.

As for dupe checking, there is another project somewhere here on DC for this. You might consider teaming up for this part of the functionality, or just calling the other app when needed.

It's already looking pretty cool though, and I really appreciate that you made this public for all of us to play with. :)

- Oshyan
1773
I've just started playing with the new Lightroom 3 Beta, as well as the even newer Bibble 5 Preview 3. I'm impressed with both, though I'm leaning toward Bibble quite a bit more for various reasons, including speed and intuitiveness.

Lightroom you probably already know about or have heard of. It's an Adobe app, and it combines both photo organizing and image "development"/editing. It's a very capable app in its current incarnation by all accounts, and version 3 seems to be making some further improvements. I don't know enough about the differences to comment in an educated way. But the beta is currently free, so it's worth a try:
http://labs.adobe.co...nologies/lightroom3/

Bibble is a bit of an underdog favorite in the RAW processing world. It has a reputation for quality, power, and flexibility. Version 4 has been around for several years and was/is widely used, but its features are getting out of date, as well as its camera support. Bibble 5 has been in development for a number of years now and has something of a tarnished reputation because of its long development cycle, but within the last year they started putting out public previews of its development progress, which has helped a lot. The Bibble 5 previews show a much faster, and even more powerful app in its current state. I for one find it a lot faster and more intuitive than Lightroom thus far, though I am still testing both. You can find more info and the download here:
http://bibblelabs.co...s/bibble5/index.html

Unfortunately there is no release date for either one of these as a final product. Bibble 5 has been in development for quite a while now. That being said the latest preview does seem pretty fully functional and stable, and I could see it getting finished up within the next 6 months or so. The same timeline may well apply to Lightroom 3. It's a shame that Bibble in particular is not done yet, perhaps that doesn't recommend it for your needs, but I've already found it to be better than any other app I've tried so far, even in its preview state, and I'm considering buying. It isn't particularly cheap, much less free, but it's definitely cheaper than Lightroom (about half for the Pro version), and there's a version for under $100 that I think would be well worth it.

Other options to consider are:
  • DxO Optics Pro 6 (new version) - not cheap, similar to Bibble, good reputation.
  • Google's Picasa 3.5 - Yes, really! If your needs are reasonably basic, it has decent RAW format support, easy adjustments, photo tagging and organizing capabilities, face recognition (fun!), upload to multiple websites, etc. and it's free. Despite my interest in more advanced apps, because I have yet to find one (and because face recognition is so cool and fun), Picasa is actually my main photo viewer and organizer at the moment. I use Photoshop when I need to do heavier or more precise editing.
  • Capture One 5 Pro - I've heard good things about this too, but have no personal experience. Also not cheap.
  • Helicon Filter - I have no idea how good or bad this is, but it supposedly supports RAW formats and is a decent general image editor. It's cheaper than the rest (except free options of course).
  • Silverfast - Another mystery option. Tons of product options at different price points.
  • Lightzone - Focused on RAW development, the most used feature I see is tone mapping, which can produce cool results but also weird and downright bad results if misused or overused. Seems to have interesting features though. It's on my list of apps to test further.

Many of these are professional-level tools and carry a price tag that reflects such use...

- Oshyan
1774
General Software Discussion / Re: "New image organizer feedback wanted"
« Last post by JavaJones on November 25, 2009, 03:30 PM »
I'm at work so I can't try the app, but my two most immediate pieces of feedback, from knowing my workflow with other apps (which I am also not yet satisfied with!) are:

First, make #3, auto-rename of files when moved, totally optional. I like preserving the names of my files, even though they are cryptic, because they are my originals. Only once I finish editing an image do I bother changing its name. I use the folder name for a more descriptive organizational tool, as well as meta data.

Second, I don't use GIMP, though I think it's a good option. So I agree with Tomos, it needs an easy way to specify an alternative app to open with.

Other than that I'm really looking forward to trying this. It looks like a great, quick way to tag and organize.

P.S. Question: does it support RAW image formats yet?

- Oshyan
1775
General Software Discussion / Re: "New image organizer feedback wanted"
« Last post by JavaJones on November 25, 2009, 02:35 PM »
I think this has a lot of potential and I'm glad you decided to share it with us. My one question is, given its evidently very personal nature (e.g. "I only show these metatags because they are what I use), are you really wanting feedback like "I use other tags, can you add them?" and if not, what kind of feedback are you looking for? Forgive me if the answer to this is implicit in your posting this and asking for feedback from an open community (e.g. you want any and all feedback). I just wanted to make sure I didn't evaluate it from an unrealistic standpoint.

That question aside, I think this presents some interesting ideas, and I'd love to see it evolve further. So if you're interested in evolving this app into something of general use for many, I think there is a real possibility of this becoming great.

- Oshyan
Pages: prev1 ... 66 67 68 69 70 [71] 72 73 74 75 76 ... 106next