176
General Software Discussion / Re: Let's try to create our own suite for internet security.
« Last post by AndyM on January 12, 2011, 02:26 PM »Oh I wouldn't *not* want it, I'm just wondering if it would be a factor of primary or secondary importance. I actually am a belt & suspenders guy, but I don't normally use the context menu selection to scan a file or email (if I have any doubt I'm more likely to just delete it). I suppose the automatic checking could break, but if the av software scanned the file when it appeared and didn't find anything, why would it find it the second time through?> on-demand scanningWith all due respect, I don't see why anyone would argue against this. It's not uncommon for something to get past your initial defenses. So, yes, it would be nice if you could double-check or just check something that you feel is suspicious. I don't see why someone wouldn't want to have that ability. Is it the extra software installation that you don't like? The space it takes up? The memory it uses? I don't understand why you wouldn't want this. it doesn't hurt anything, it only helps.
this is one part of the picture I don't get. I assume that my AV program will catch a bad file or email either when it appears on my system or when I go to open it. I can see wanting to be able to double-check something suspiscious before opening it, but why wouldn't this be pretty much unnecessary, belt & suspenders?-AndyM (January 12, 2011, 11:48 AM)-superboyac (January 12, 2011, 11:56 AM)
Do you manually scan many files?

Recent Posts