195
« Last post by kfitting on March 17, 2006, 07:22 AM »
@superboyac: I agree with you to a certain extent, though I havent tried the latest version yet. I dont use it for similar reasons. But it's another entry in the list of note-taking software. I personally found the ability to add columns in the tree-pane interesting. But, I dont think that's enough to make it a must-have. However, I think it's interesting to see what each piece of software has that the others dont.
@rjbull: Keynote revolutionized the way I work and organize things. I totally understand that note-taking is slightly different from the writing end of things... but I dont think the two are mutally exclusive! They may be mutually exclusive in the current round of apps, but they dont need to be. I'm not saying that note-software should have header/footer support, page numbering, etc... that's for office apps. But, for the type of writing I do, Keynote 1.6.5 is fine. For notetaking, Keynote was fine, until I saw Opera's email approach. That ruined me!
I have to agree with thomthowolf. Note-taking apps need to be easy to get information into, easy to relate and re-relate information, and easy to assign rigid structure IF needed. To polish things off, import/export is critical too. (And those are two poorly worded sentences!) I stand by my assertion that WHATEVER the backend is that holds the information, the user frontend should allow what is currently in place PLUS a whole lot more! You should see all the people on the Keynote forums that complained about the "complexity" being added to Keynote 2. You also should see the people over in the Novo forums complaining about going away from the rigid tab structure... many people are content with the rigid structure, let them have it... and, at the same time, let them discover the benefits of filters etc at their own pace. It OUGHT to be possible!!
Kevin