topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 6:05 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 [70] 71 72 73 74 75 ... 89next
1726
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: USB Safely Remove for Free
« Last post by Innuendo on August 20, 2009, 03:13 PM »
Great find...signed up to get one. The only limitation I noticed on this free license is it is good for the current version (v4.1) only.
1727
Living Room / Re: Free Mousepads?
« Last post by Innuendo on August 16, 2009, 04:23 PM »
Don't know if it is legit or not, but this is the only offer I found that didn't lead to a dead page:

http://hostohost.com/gift.html
1728
General Software Discussion / Re: Deciphering Win7 Upgrades: The Official Chart
« Last post by Innuendo on August 14, 2009, 11:10 AM »
Oh, I see...the $169 gets you the OS X upgrade plus iWork '09.

Funny picture in the article, though.

mac_nursing_home.jpg
1729
General Software Discussion / Re: Deciphering Win7 Upgrades: The Official Chart
« Last post by Innuendo on August 14, 2009, 11:04 AM »
Apple has to leave the legacy PPC code behind sometime, although I think most would have preferred one more PPC release as there are still a lot of PPC machines out there.

And $169 for 10.4 owners? I always thought OS X upgrades were $129. Well, anyway, thanks for the link to the article. It's always good for Windows users to see how things are done on the other side of the fence, so to speak.
1730
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Total Commander 7.50 public beta 1 - mini-review
« Last post by Innuendo on August 14, 2009, 11:01 AM »
Showing the progress on the Windows 7 taskbar for foreground tasks is a most welcome addition.
1731
justice,
Unticking the alert preference in Update Notifier isn't necessary as the only alert you get is the little indicator in the upper right hand corner goes from gray to orange. No annoying dialogs pop up at all.

This, coupled with Download Statusbar, keeps unwanted Firefox dialog boxes at bay.
1732
ComputerActive and Agnitum are giving away 20 lifetime licenses of Agnitum's Outpost Security Suite.

Just visit the URL below and enter to win. Pretty simple, eh?

http://www.computera...ity-software-agnitum
1733
LaunchBar Commander / Re: McAfee again. Don't ask.
« Last post by Innuendo on August 10, 2009, 07:38 AM »
But it seems like the bigger guys always think they can do it better.

However, Symantec doesn't even try to do it better. They have the anti-Midas touch. That means they can turn gold into crap. Take, for example, the program ATGuard. It was a great firewall with neat stuff like ad-blocking, cookie management, and such built in.

Well, one day Symantec bought the rights to it & rather than keep it in its lean form with optimized performance and speed they rolled the technology into their bloated security suite and if that wasn't bad enough, they installed a ruleset for the firewall to let through all traffic (including ads, coolies, etc.) from all of their advertising partners! There was no way to delete these rules or even see that the rules existed from within the program. One had to trudge through the directory structure and root out the ruleset files manually....provided a person even knew they existed.

Despicable company, IMHO.
1734
General Software Discussion / Re: Is the party over for Microsoft?
« Last post by Innuendo on August 09, 2009, 10:55 AM »
Plus there are probably a lot of guys like me who have the old CRT monitor that's still going strong.

Guilty as charged. When I saw the writing on the wall that CRTs were no longer going to be manufacturered & it was going to be a long while before LCD screens were going to match the quality of the old monitors I bought an NEC MultiSync FP2141SB. It's got a 22" Diamondtron screen and weighs 77 pounds.

I still haven't seen a LCD monitor that can match its display quality and when I replace my current PC it's going to cost over $1,000 custom-built piece by piece by me.

I can see how the 91%/Macs statistic is true as almost all the big PC spenders are like me who build their own & there are very few percentage-wise that go for the Alienware and Falcon PC type prebuilt machines.

However, I think that 91% statistic isn't because the Macs are so special, but rather that most PC buyers don't have to cross into that price range at all to get a fabulous computer. $8-900 will buy one heck of a computer. Heck, $500 will get you a pretty decent one anymore these days.

However, less than $1,000 on the Mac side in the past would only get you a Mac Mini. This year it's better as Apple reacted to MS's Laptop Hunter ads and released a 13" Macbook at $999 so now you have two choices, but every other Mac in Apple's line-up is well over $1,000.
1735
LaunchBar Commander / Re: McAfee again. Don't ask.
« Last post by Innuendo on August 09, 2009, 10:42 AM »
Thanks for the suggestion about Agnitum.  I'm still running Sygate, and while I think it still works pretty well, I wouldn't at all mind having a program that's being kept up.  I may give Agnitum a try.

If you are wanting 'just a firewall' it'd be a good fit as all the premium features you expressed an interest in definitely not having are reserved for their commercial Outpost Pro product. It should be a good fit for you.

I remember when Sygate was among the best of the best. It was hard to beat by any measure. However, Symantec has a long history of buying great companies who published great products and then churning out some half-baked solution using a parody solution of the once great technology.

Yes, I see your point.  However, as EmoDiva, I exaggerate,  and I write first, think later  >:D

I can't wait to see the new EmoDiva avatar!  ;D
1736
General Software Discussion / Re: Lenovo OneKey recovery problem
« Last post by Innuendo on August 09, 2009, 10:34 AM »
Another option is if you have access to a desktop PC is to hook up your laptop hard drive and the new hard drive simultaneously and use a hard drive duplicating program to do a verbatim copy of the old hard drive to the new. That'd also save you from having to reinstall Windows.
1737
I asked if they could make TB! start any editor of your choice, i.e., present the message you were working on as a file for your preferred text editor to work on.  That's the way many systems worked back in the Fidonet DOS days.

Oh man...talk about flashbacks...I had almost forgotten the way things worked back then. Back when we thought the invention of the QWK offline message reading format was the pinnacle of technology. ;)

An email editor should be able to wrap without problems.

Have Auto-Format and Auto-Wrap turned on in the editor preferences and MicroEd will wrap without problems. Well, almost no problems. There's still a few quirks, but most of your gripe will be fixed, though.
1738
I'll quote it here.  You can see how the wrapping is already screwed up in the post.  I wrote to the mailing list using Microed and everything looked fine on the screen editor in the program, and you can see how it showed up:

I use MicroEd as well, but turning on Auto-Format under Editor Preferences stopped that behavior for me.
1739
LaunchBar Commander / Re: McAfee again. Don't ask.
« Last post by Innuendo on August 07, 2009, 08:56 AM »
I'm not sure whether this is in response to what I said about getting rid of Online Armor, but I think I should explain that I received a registered copy for free in some special offer.

Oh, no. I was replying to April & didn't think quoting was necessary because I was posting right below her. She got rid of a PaintShop Pro plugin, a game, a program included with one of Mouser's program, and upgraded another program all in the name of keeping McAfee happy. I don't think I would have been so understanding of McAfee's inability to play nice with others.

There was a lot I didn't like about it--e.g., it slowed down my computer, and it tried to be an anti-malware and an anti-virus program (although it was supposed to be just a firewall) and interfered with other programs I have for those functions.

I've never used Online Armor, but it definitely has caused some people problems on their systems. Heck, it was on Giveaway Of The Day recently and the comments section was filled with people who still felt like they were ripped off even though they paid nothing for it.  :D

Agnitum as a free version of their Outpost firewall program that has been well received. It's the only firewall besides Online Armor that scores 100% in leak tests.

BTW, I think I have less patience with false positives than you do.  They make me waste lots of time and they raise my angst level.

Can't be having that or you'd have to be emailing Mouser and having him change your forum name to EmoDiva or something similar.

Any program that reports a false positive more than once in a blue moon is a program I think seriously about replacing.

Sometimes false positives are not really false. One example of this is some security software. Some anti-malware programs will flag them because they can be used for bad as well as good. Another thing to consider is the context of the alert. I had to set up a keylogger for a client who needed to see what some wayward employee wase up to on a company PC. His anti-malware program immediately flagged it as Generic.PS (Password Stealer). Of course, a keylogger could be used to steal passwords so that was a valid alarm even though the program was on the computer for a valid purpose.
1740
[
Diskeeper 2009 defragments drives with as low as 1% of free space, the 15% free space in the past was a Microsoft Windows recommendation because 12.5% that is reserved for the MFT and you can not move files into it.

That sounds like a good explanation except for the fact that PerfectDisk has never had such a limitation. I have been completely defragging drives for years that only had 2 or 3% free space left and that was a feat that Diskeeper or O&O could never accomplish despite PerfectDisk's ease in doing so.

If Diskeeper can do it now, that's great, but PerfectDisk has had that feature as one of its bullet points for years.

Looks like Diskeeper still isn't certified for Windows 7 yet, either. PerfectDisk is.

As for free space requirements, all defrag apps I've seen take longer time (and shuffle data around more) when there's not "enough" free space.

I fully expect a time trade-off when my drives are full to near-capacity, but don't go through the motions like Diskeeper does & when its finished the drives aren't completely defragged because Diskeeper can't handle the task of nearly full drives.

I don't like to run my drives nearly full, but sometimes it's just a reality. PerfectDisk can handle that. Diskeeper (at least in the past) can't.
1741
LaunchBar Commander / Re: McAfee again. Don't ask.
« Last post by Innuendo on August 06, 2009, 04:14 PM »
Gosh, I think I'd be more inclined to trash the AV program that wouldn't work well with my programs rather than trash the programs that didn't work with the AV program.

False positives are a fact of life. Just about every AV program has one or two every once in a while, but if I can't tell the AV program to ignore it permanently then soon I'm going to be looking for a new way to scan for viruses.
1742
For example, the Bat still can't wrap lines like a normal editor.

Can you elaborate on this point?
1743
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 7 evaluation
« Last post by Innuendo on August 06, 2009, 09:29 AM »
]WrongWrongWrongWrong. As mentioned several times already by other people, Win7 UAC isn't safe unless you crank it to the max. Sure, a lower level is still better than nothing, but since it allows for privilege escalation, it only guards against old threats - new ones are sure to use the design flaw.

So very true and in my opinion there is no sane reason in the world to run UAC at less than max setting. The third-party software authors have finally caught up with MS's new security model. Very, very few programs on my system ever invoke a UAC prompt these days. 99% of the UAC prompts I see are either when I install a new software package or I run some security software that needs direct access to the system to do its job.

I hereby declare that effective Windows 7 release if you get any computer advice that starts out with "Well, the first thing I do is turn off UAC..." that will be a surefire way of knowing you are talking to a whackjob. :)
1744
Post New Requests Here / Re: Request/Idea-Winamp Titlebar Control
« Last post by Innuendo on August 06, 2009, 09:18 AM »
Something outside the realm of your request, and not free, is CustomBar by Lizardsoft. It places an 18 pixel high, always visible bar on one side of your screen. One of the many things it can do is display Winamp controls. The author has been promising a new version for a long time with more functionality & it's never surfaced, but the current available build is pretty solid.

http://www.custombar.net

Again, probably beyond what you are looking for, but I post t his here in case it trips someone else's trigger.
1745
LaunchBar Commander / Re: McAfee again. Don't ask.
« Last post by Innuendo on August 05, 2009, 09:58 PM »
The negative interaction between Newsbin and Avast is that Avast interferes with Newsbin's ability to download and corrupts the files as they are downloaded. The only solution is to exclude the Newsbin download directory.

I'd recommend Avira Free, but I can't in good conscience do so as the last time I tried it there were way too many false positives for my tastes.
1746
LaunchBar Commander / Re: McAfee again. Don't ask.
« Last post by Innuendo on August 05, 2009, 10:39 AM »
Innuendo, can you say a bit more about the programs Avast interferes with?  If they're not programs I use, then perhaps I shouldn't rule Avast out.

So far I have only run into major compatibility programs with two programs. DC's own CodeTRUCKER has run into problems with The Bat! email program while running Avast and the Newsbin Pro forum has posts regarding problems while running Avast as well.

It's the same problem with both apps. Avast's real-time scanner interferes with the two apps writing data to the hard drive. I seem to recall a third program in the back of my mind, but since I don't use that one it's name has slipped away.

Avast is free so it won't hurt anything to try it. Just pay attention to your other programs while its running and if there are problems you can always uninstall it. AVG is another free one to look into if Avast does not work out for you.
1747
Zaine, like I said in my post...my comments were not meant to discredit you or even to disagree with you. My problems were with the posts on the blog.

1) In today's post-print world I think blog posts can be considered articles. I'm sorry if my classification as such didn't sit well with you. I referred to them as articles as I wanted to convey that I was treating his words with respect. In retrospect, I suppose I could have referred to these posts as ramblings on a blog, but I think that would have struck you even worse than the word articles did.

2) I'm sorry I neglected to attribute the original words to Mossberg, but Sutor agreed with the supposition put forth by Mossberg & built on top of it without even knowing if what Mossberg said was true. I'll retract my comment on calling it a diatribe and replace that thought with him pushing forward a personal agenda instead.

3) I could have posted my comments on his blog, but seems very much a Linux fanatic/zealot so I doubt my words would have fallen on anything but deaf ears. Besides, if he doesn't know that life with an operating system goes beyond just installing apps after the OS installs then he has bigger problems than any comment I could make would cure. As to why I posted them here, you brought the series of posts to light here so that's where I posted my reaction to them.

Thank you for taking the time to count the words in my post. It's comforting to know that someone pays that much attention to my word count, but with all due respect Zaine, and I mean this sincerely, with all due respect, I know you love Linux. I know you don't like Windows. I know you are going to continue to take the time to post about what you like and use.

That's great. No, really. That's great because you must have missed in my post where I distinctly stated that I usually enjoy your posts about Linux. I enjoy everyone's posts about Linux provided they have content. This post of yours did not so I didn't enjoy it, but it's not your fault. It's Sutor's.  Your usually insightful posts on Linux relied on Sutor's empty words this time.

Now, if you were personally offended by my reply then I do apologize. I am sorry as that was not my intent at all. I was all set for some high-quality Linux musings like you usually bring to the table and all I walked away with was a guy trying to get his apps installed after a fresh install of an OS.

I will admit that I did see one comment in his series of posts that does bear repeating. Linux needs to quit trying to look like Windows & start pulling the good ideas from OS X. Even better yet, Linux needs to strike out on its own and set its look apart from other OSes.

And I'll try to re-iterate this one point one more time before I close. I enjoy your posts, Zaine. Linux is under-represented here & we could use more people expressing the Linux side of the story as it can only make computing more enjoyable for all platforms.

However, I just did not like Life With Linux. At all. Sutor's name is attached to those posts not yours so don't take my 531 words of criticism personally because you had nothing to do with the failings of those blog posts.

1748
General Software Discussion / Re: Deciphering Win7 Upgrades: The Official Chart
« Last post by Innuendo on August 05, 2009, 10:07 AM »
Not much to add to this but to add that the in-place upgrade procedure is sweet. Microsoft has done a lot of work on this part of the installer and it shows. There's none of the flakiness of previous upgrade install routines.

I've done a few in-place upgrades on some Vista systems and every one of them has come out of the process as if Win7 had been cleanly installed on a formatted hard drive & then the applications and games installed after.

Microsoft should be very proud of this accomplishment.
1749
Let me preface this message by saying that although I am a dyed-in-the-wool Windows user I love to read about other OSes. I love reading about Linux & OS X.....and even oldies like BeOS or NextStep and cutting edge stuff like ReactOS. I love to see what problems the other OSes encounter, how they do things, and how I can apply that knowledge to my chosen OS to make my computing experience better.

It is with these high hopes I read that series of articles. Yes, the entire series. No offense to you, Zaine, but these articles sucked. Life with Linux, I thought. Hmmm...I'm going to get a good look at the way a Linux user lives with Linux and applies it to his daily life, I thought.

But....no. I read the first six articles in the series and while I hoped we might get to the part where someone, somewhere was living with Linux it was never meant to be. They entirely consisted of his trials getting his software installed. How disappointing. However, the seventh article with its title of On The Road seemed like it might be the pay-off. All right, I thought, he's been building to a rich pay-off where he shows the world how he can take his Linux mojo on the road and keep up with any other OS by outlining situations in his work & personal life and validating his choice of Linux by performing in these situations well.

But....no. The title On The Road just alluded to him being away from home and configuring and installing yet more software. Grrrr...

Okay, bonus time...everybody likes a good bonus so I tackled the bonus article. Maybe I'm finally going to get some meat by seeing how upgrading a desktop computer can be a rewarding experience. Maybe something along the lines of showing how each task can accomplished in Linux that can be accomplished in XP by illustrating what the differences would be with good tips on how to work around & through the differences.

But....no. He wastes no time in jumping into a diatribe about Windows 7 and what it might be or might not be. That's the first half of that article. The second half is all about how you should try Linux while you wait for Windows 7. What could it hurt is his argument.

What. The. Frick. As I opened each of the articles I felt like Charlie Brown having the football yanked away from him. Eight. Frigging. Times.

The only payoff for me was the chuckle he prompted when he was talking about how he didn't like Windows software sometimes doesn't work right & then later talked about how he couldn't install Firefox 3.5 on his Linux machine because it wouldn't work right. :)

I knew I probably should have stopped reading when he was talking about the Windows registry bogging down. That hasn't been a concern for a very long time. He's out of touch with the Windows world for him to be making any meaningful comments on the subject.

Sorry, Zaine. Usually I like your little glimpses into the Linux world, but this batch misses the mark by a large margin.
1750
Living Room / Re: multiple users using one set of favorites
« Last post by Innuendo on August 04, 2009, 10:12 AM »
Are you wanting all favorites to be available to all users or are you wanting a set of favorites to be available to each group which may not be available to other groups?
Pages: prev1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 [70] 71 72 73 74 75 ... 89next