topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 6:11 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 [70] 71 72 73 74 75 ... 163next
1726
General Software Discussion / Re: Fixing an XP Laptop, when to give up?
« Last post by nudone on November 19, 2007, 07:18 AM »
i'd jump to the clean install as you may just keep finding one more problem after another trying to sort out the current situation.

a reinstall will probably be the quickest solution - and the one that will give you peace of mind. i've known problems that were fixed for friends only for them to tell me they'd reappeared a week or two later - not having done a complete reinstall to solve the problem just made me wonder if the problem had never been fixed OR was it their actions bringing the problem back.

best to cover you own back and know how things are for sure i'd say - wipe it and reinstall.
1727
fSekrit / Re: LATEST VERSION: fSekrit 1.3 shrinkwrapped!
« Last post by nudone on November 19, 2007, 02:38 AM »
fantastic!
1728
General Software Discussion / Re: Keeping a window permanently focused in XP
« Last post by nudone on November 19, 2007, 02:36 AM »
maybe there's is a clever trick to do what you are asking - but it sounds like something windows can't do.

i.e. you can't have TWO windows in focus at the same time. at least, i've never witnessed it.
1729
Living Room / Re: drum program
« Last post by nudone on November 18, 2007, 04:02 AM »
from what i understand, BFD by Fxpansion is the way to go if you want real sounding drums - though, of course, you can make them sound as synthetic or unreal too.

http://www.fxpansion...com/index.php?page=1

i have a friend that recently rigged up a Traps electronic drumkit to BFD via cubase - pretty much blows away other 'electronic' drumkits - unless you are going to buy a top of the range Roland or something but even then the BFD sounds aren't going to be beat.

edit:
in the UK a 'faggot' is also a type of food...
http://en.wikipedia....rg/wiki/Faggot_(food)
1730
General Software Discussion / Re: Hey Grisoft: I love AVG but I hate popups!
« Last post by nudone on November 17, 2007, 02:42 AM »
could be.

i'll report back if it does appear.
1731
General Software Discussion / Re: Hey Grisoft: I love AVG but I hate popups!
« Last post by nudone on November 17, 2007, 02:09 AM »
i use the free edition of AVG and i've not had any popups appear. i have it set to auto update daily but not to display any messages that it is updating - as i found that annoying - maybe that prevents any other popups appearing???????
1732
As an outside observer in this thread, one who has never looked into all of this, my guess is that the dpi of the screen (like 96 DPI on today's average LCD) would need to be calibrated to the DPI of the graphics tablet. They don't need to be in a 1:1 relationship, but once that is calibrated, you should get your "absolute" mode, nudone. If you held a gun to my head and asked me to speculate further, the software you had, nudone, might have been calibrated to a 72DPI screen, or some similar disparity may have existed.

that sounds very likely to be the cause. i just wonder if the current crop of wacoms do allow for this disparity - possibly not as i seem to be the only person that seems troubled by it.

good luck with the tablets, Darwin.
1733
ah right, i'm very surprised you are using it that way especially with the large monitor you've got.

the trust tablet i had was A4 in size, so quite large, and yet i found the 'relative' mode that you are using your tablet in to be kind of annoying. so i switched to 'absolute', only that it wasn't absolute - screen cursor movements were slightly exaggerated - but obviously not as much as they were compared to using 'relative' mode.

clearly you get used to whatever you have. to me 'absolute' seemed better because it seemed more accurate. it meant doing a stroking motion to get the cursor from one end of the screen to the other but after a few minutes this seemed perfectly natural. going back to 'relative' positioning seemed very strange - almost uncontrollable as the cursor jumps to match the location of the pen on the tablet rather than just following the short movements of your hand.

ideally it would be nice to have a tablet that corresponds to the screen 1:1 and then 'relative' and 'absolute' become the same. pity wacom cintiqs are crazy money.
1734
ak_, can i ask if you have it set to relative or absolute? well, i guess the question is more if you think that 1 inch on the tablet equals 1 inch on the screen (i'm hoping you'll say that 1 inch on the tablet doesn't equate to a great deal more than 1 inch on the screen).

if the tablet and screen movements are almost identical then i'd be happy. i probably sound like i'm making a big issue over nothing but it's something i was alarmed about when i last used a wacom. it's the main reason i don't own one right now. i'd always assumed that you'd be able to adjust this kind of thing with the leading tablet brand.

in other words, when you use a wacom and draw a circle about 1mm in diameter do you get a 1mm circle nicely drawn on screen (looking at 1mm even seems a bit too big really so maybe 0.5mm would be a better indication to test).
1735
fair enough, i'll accept what i said didn't come out the way i meant it to. i thought i was saying the opposite, i'll not try and correct myself as i'll probably end up saying the same wrong thing again.

as for a wacom's ability to adjust the way the movement of the pen translates onto the screen - anyone else care to answer?
1736
like i said, i really, really hope i'm impressed when i eventually buy a decent wacom tablet.

can ak_, or anyone else, answer whether the absolute positioning is adjustable with a decent wacom or whether it's perfect right out of the box. if it is, then i'm more likely to buy a wacom in the very near future.

edit:
just thought i better clarify. i wasn't trying to say that a computer will do all the work for someone that can't draw.
1737
General Software Discussion / Re: Blog steals Zaine's Great Software List
« Last post by nudone on November 16, 2007, 02:30 AM »
it doesn't help Zaine but it's good to see that that site looks crap. it's not something i'd ever want to visit again as a casual browser.
1738
oh dear. i smashed up my A4 sized 'Trust' tablet and pen last week. if i hadn't been so angry at the time i would have put it to one side and considered giving it away - meaning i could have sent it to you as a gift. oh well, too late now.

why did i smash it up (yes, pen snapped in half and tablet split into several pieces)?

it was unreliable. i only plugged it in when i needed it (usb). i'd have to change the options each time i did this but i didn't mind. but then it just refused to work one day. i checked the battery in the pen - perfect. i tried unplugging it plugging it back in a few times - no difference. so i decided it must hate me - so i killed it.

if it had been a wacom tablet i wouldn't have destroyed it - because of the cost they are. 'Trust' products are always bargain priced so this A4 tablet was about £50 ($100) which is a great deal less than a Wacom A4 sized tablet.

Admittedly, the Trust tablet only had about 512 levels or sensitivity - half of the current Wacoms. does that matter? i think it doesn't matter at all. when using these types of pens i've never seen anything that would demonstrate 512 (or double) the levels or pressure being translated onto the screen. they look like they've got about 12 levels of pressure to me, i.e they are nothing like using a real life pencil with all the subtlety that allows. mouser sent me an older Wacom tablet a few years back and i wasn't impressed by that either (i can't remember now which DC member received it after me).

another thing that annoys me about tablets is the poor 'absolute' positioning they have. to me this should translate to one inch moved across the tablet with the pen should equal one inch moved across my monitor with the cursor - but it doesn't. maybe new Wacoms can be adjusted to perfection, i've not had the privilege of using one.

i see many artists using Wacoms online and producing brilliant pieces of work so i know that you can get good results - you adapt to the tool in hand and learn to compensate for its shortcomings, of course. so i hope to do the same when i eventually buy a new wacom tablet. hopefully i'll be able to test drive one before i buy it as i really don't want to waste money on something that is going to work exactly the same as a £50 Trust tablet but costs six times as much (i know Wacoms have many more features but i don't think they are worth six times the price).

another thing about tablets, i don't think they are all they are cracked up to be. if you are painting/drawing/sketching within a program like photoshop it makes sense. if all you are doing is drawing selections around parts of an image and doing a few other non painterly type edits then a tablet it pretty pointless.

i've seen one or two friends buy a tablet (Trust) only to be frustrated when they realised they had better control using a mouse. they found it difficult to coordinate with the pen and tablet and for how much they were going to use it (just drawing selections around peoples head, etc) they'd never master it - so back to the mouse they went.

i can draw kinda okay just using the mouse. i can't apply different levels of pressure but after using a tablet i'd say so what. a tablet doesn't allow me to apply the same levels of pressure a pencil does.

from using the Trust and the old Wacom tablet i'd say using these things is like using a fat bendy ink pen whilst wearing thick leather gloves that restrict your finger movement. in other words, they are crap compared to real pens (and paint brushes). but, again, the art i've seen online obviously means people are more than capable of getting brilliant results from them - though, i think this is mainly because of all the other editing features you get from using software like layers, dodging/burning, masking and undo - which can be done with a mouse. obviously using a tablet and pen will be quicker for drawing but i find them bad for navigating around your operating system - double clicking and all that can be awkward (hence the double click button on all pens).

conclusion:
i really, really, hope that when i finally get around to buying a new Wacom i'm blown away by how responsive it is. if you're going to be doing detailed paintings then maybe a Wacom really is going to be essential but i would put money on a decent artist being able to get exactly the same results from a bottom of the line budget tablet and pen.

my advice, try the Genius first.
1739
Living Room / Re: Feedback on New Fun Software Please
« Last post by nudone on November 15, 2007, 08:12 AM »
haha, fantastic.
1740
Living Room / Re: Feedback on New Fun Software Please
« Last post by nudone on November 15, 2007, 02:16 AM »
what if you could save out the image with the related name so you could email it on to the culprit - then they'll know you've got their number.
1741
Living Room / Re: Genuinely stupid laws - that still APPLY !!
« Last post by nudone on November 07, 2007, 06:35 AM »
i quite like this one. we should adopt it worldwide.

In Milan, it is a legal requirement to smile at all times, except during funerals or hospital visits (5%)
1742
Living Room / Re: PREY trailer - looks funky
« Last post by nudone on November 06, 2007, 02:08 AM »
with the references to 'black mesa' in Portal i'm hoping that there will be some half-life portal action in the future - maybe in espisode 3. unlikely to happen, i know.

(i've thought about having a go at making a map (or three) for Portal but as i've not looked into it i don't know how difficult this will be.)
1743
Living Room / Re: PREY trailer - looks funky
« Last post by nudone on November 05, 2007, 01:04 PM »
thought i'd post this here as it's all about 'portals'...

...anyone played Valve's new 'Portal' game? http://en.wikipedia..../Portal_(video_game)

i've just finished the main game - so now all the extra levels are open - and i have to say it was most enjoyable. the idea of being able to fire portal doorways from a gun is a great idea - the puzzles are just about right not to be too frustrating either.

anyway, if you like puzzles but like portals even more then i suggest you have a go with 'Portal' the game.

f0dder? i thought you've have picked up it by now?
1744
The Getting Organized Experiment of 2007 / Re: Here is my problem
« Last post by nudone on November 05, 2007, 05:18 AM »
i think you have some difficult questions to ask yourself - with answers that are probably just as difficult.

i'm speaking as an expert because i have exactly the same kind of thoughts that you describe (as you well know already).

i have a list of projects that i 'think' i want to do. the fact that i won't live to be 1003 means i won't be able to do the majority of these projects. also, i haven't the energy to do most of these projects. and a harder truth is that i probably just shouldn't be even thinking about such projects for one reason or another.

i think you need to meditate on 'why' you think these projects are worth doing. are they worth doing? are they worth the time and energy. i may say i want to do several projects - i may promise people that i'll do them - but they won't happen. so why go through this process time and time again - thinking of a project, getting excited about it, and then just becoming annoyed by not actually finishing it (or even starting it), AND then after that, beating myself up every time i remember that i've let yet another project fall into the pit of despair.

i'll not stop thinking of new projects and nor will you. the exciting part is thinking of something new, planning it out in your head, seeing the completed article in your mind, feeling the admiration you'll receive from you imaginary audience. that's all done in an instance and it feels really nice. drudging through the actual process of working on the project may seem like an enjoyable experience whilst you still haven't released the project on the world - you can still imagine what a brilliant response you'll get at the end of it so it all seems worth it.

then you finish the first stage of whatever it is and gain some feedback - it's almost certainly going to be positive feedback - and you think how fantastic everything is and it was all worth it. then the next day comes and you realise that the world hasn't changed one single bit. that little thrill you received has now waned. so you think to yourself, this isn't how it was meant to be, this project hasn't lived up to my expectations afterall - i know what i must do - i must start a completely different project that will actually fulfill my expectations this time around. and so the circle is made and you carry on down the loop of forever seeking a new hit to crave you addiction.


okay, that has obviously stated what happens in my head and it may well be nothing like what you are experiencing. but it looks the same to me.

solution: are you expecting the wrong thing from these projects. are they something you'd do in total isolation without any recognition from anyone else - if not, then does your audience really satisfy you. are you doing it for the benefit of others or for yourself - that will obviously determine a great deal in whether these projects are worth doing or not.

my projects? are they so special that the world will one day mourn that they were never completed - not one bit. so, i'd say, don't do anything unless the process is satisfying in itself or you think that the eventual result with change your life in a positive way.
1745
Living Room / Re: To wide-screen or not to wide-screen
« Last post by nudone on November 05, 2007, 02:19 AM »
some games will look correct widescreen and some won't. you'd think by now that all games would have a correct widescreen aspect ratio but they don't. some even claim to have widescreen but really it is just stretched - so there is no way of knowing until you try the game.

but there is help at this website that is all about widescreen gaming http://www.widescreengamingforum.com/ they have a list of games and also talk about methods to force games to be widescreen. many times someone will have wrote a little util to induce the correct aspect ratio.
1746
sorry, i had forgotten about 'structured procrastination'. i've probably forgotten everything else that happened or was mentioned in the 2006 experiment.

as for this...
instead, you need to put yourself in an environment that will make it difficult for you to do the thing(s) you are wanting to avoid. maybe not very practical but it appears to be the successful way to achieve something.

this will hopefully sound better...
"instead, you avoid negative habits by consciously avoiding the situations and places that these negative habits usually occur. this method is shown to work better than expecting will power to help you."

in other words you are weak and can't be relied upon to stop yourself so you need help externally.

i know this is a 'how not to' rather than a 'how to' technique but i would assume that with a bit of clever planning you can put yourself in a better situation or environment that is more conducive for doing the right thing. and i suppose you could say that you are trying to avoid procrastination so you need to make your environment a bad place for procrastination. what that place is - i'm not sure.
1747
the book is "The Motivated Mind by Dr. Raj Persaud" here's the links on the US version of amazon

http://www.amazon.co...194197431&sr=1-2

here's the link for the UK amazon that has a few more comments than the US site

http://www.amazon.co...1&pf_rd_i=468294

as you'll see (perhaps), it isn't a book on step by step motivation techniques - just a lot of findings from research. some of the comments on amazon are complaining about it not being a self help book but i would say this is exactly what gives it credibility.
1748
hey, that clockwork mouse isn't such a bad idea. why not have a wireless mouse that recharges itself via the motion you put it through - yes, that's right, using a ball underneath it connected to a dynamo (or whatever).

or like those windup flash lights - have a squeezy type mechanism that you can squeeze a few times to put some power back in.

AND connect the dynamo thingy up to the mouse buttons as well.
1749
thanks for suggesting such a thing, mouser, but i'm really happy with the mouse i've got (and its cable). it's my trusty 8 button mouse friend that never lets me down.

i'm glad to hear that Gothi[c] hasn't succumb to the fad of the wireless warriors.
1750
not only am i a cable mouse bore - i am also bored.

so here are photos of my mouse cable and the clip i spoke of.

cablemouse.jpg

cableclip.jpg

oh yes, and look at the size of my mouse mat. i'd have to pay about $30 for something that size but i just stuck a few together that cost about a $1 each.
Pages: prev1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 [70] 71 72 73 74 75 ... 163next