1701
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Comparative Review of Writers' Tools (INITIAL DRAFT)
« Last post by wraith808 on May 21, 2018, 02:57 PM »I have now done the table for Atomic Scribbler. I found it attractive, but it felt like a light program, and I'm not sure how it would stand up to a lengthy or heavy piece of work; this impression may be false. Some irritations, and felt a little slow.
I'm not sure about future development. It has just been made free with only the SmartEdit add-on providing an income for the developer. He'd said that 92% of his SmartEdit sales came from the Word version and has just released SmartEdit Pro just for Word. There has to be a question of how much future development the income from Atomic Scribbler and its add-on will justify. The add-on for Atomic Scribbler is fairly basic, but a lot of self published books would have benefited from it.-Dormouse (May 21, 2018, 02:30 PM)
https://www.atomicsc...ntroducingSmartEdit/
He addresses a lot of it in that post, and on the forums. He's actively on the forums and soliciting improvements, and uses the application himself. He was just dissatisfied at the adoption rate as a paid application. I don't think the development of the program is at risk, personally. And am looking at using it as the basis for a lot of my development because I quite like how open it is compared to Scrivener. He's even provided me with help for a supporting application that I'm looking at developing to get items from his format into markdown for compatibility (especially as I use Sublime Text for a lot of my editing currently)
https://forum.atomicscribbler.com/

Recent Posts