topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 9:45 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 ... 252next
1601
I'm not quite ready for skwire to earn another superboy badge yet!  I'm saving that for when I'm in a real bad fix.

and actually, trout's find feature is quite perfect out of the box, i just tried it.  i wish foobar could be configured that way.
1602
oh wait...are you saying trout can search filenames?!  need to try that...totally missed the point there. :P
1603
Trout doesn't have some of the flexibility of foobar for certain superficial things I like.  I do use Trout for my sample drum looper when I practice piano.

At one point, I had everything blanked out, but then there were too many results in my searches because it searched all the fields and it wasn't effective in filtering the list at all.  my filter is almost perfect right now: artist, album, title.  i just need a way to add filename to it.

I don't understand why foobar has so much documentation and power under the hood, a very active community...and every time I have a simple question, it's not there.  I don't get it.
1604
Living Room / Re: 1080p playback: hardware discussion
« Last post by superboyac on September 15, 2012, 07:30 PM »
Ok update, this is exactly why I want to be clear about what I'm trying to do.  Most of us talk like "this SHOULD be enough" and "I've never had a problem with playback".  So let me describe exactly what is happening.

I just shot some 1080/60p video with my new panasonic camcorder.  These are my computer specs, should be pretty beefy even if it is a couple of years old:
https://www.donation...ex.php?topic=16186.0

The files are m2ts files.  If I play them in Light Alloy, Daum Potplayer, and anything else, it struggles with it.  The playback is choppy.  The whole computer almost locks up as it struggles to handle all this video.  This is not a smooth experience.  It works, nothing crashes, eventually you can get the video to play decently.  But it's clear that it is lacking processing power somewhere.  So where is it?  This is what I want to figure out.  Why?  Because once I do, I will know exactly what parts to buy, what specs to look for when building a system that is primarily optimized for 1080p playback.  Not gaming, not rendering, not photoshopping, just 1080p playback.

Now, if you guys say that your raspberry pi or older and less powerful computers can play back these types of files with "no problem" then I will be surprised.  If that is true, there is some component in your system that is just the right thing for this.  What is it?  A special type of RAM?  A special type of GPU?

What I want is this:
--when a video is double-clicked to play, it should be as quick as possible.  no thinking about it for 10 seconds.
--dragging the seekbar back and forth should not lock up the computer.  Should be relatively quick also.
--playback should be smooth.  This is 60 frames a second at 1080 resolution.  It's a lot.  When it's smooth, it's a wonderful experience.  When it's not, it's not worth watching.
1605
As usual, I cannot for the life of me figure out how to configure foobar's "playlist search" (the window you get by pressing ctrl-f) to add fields to filter for.  Right now, it filters artist, album, and title.  I want to add filename.  I don't know how to do it.  I thought the area in the preferences below would do it, but it doesn't:
Screenshot - 9_15_2012 , 4_45_40 PM.png

I don't know if I should type "filename" or "%filename%" or what.  Of course, foobar's documentation and forums don't explain at all, as if I'm the first person to ask for this.  I've always hated their forums, you can't find shit in there.  i googled around for an hour now, nothing.  I just want to search for filename.  I just need the thing to type in that freaking field.
1606
^^Well thanks 40!!
This looks to have fantastic capabiltities.  And now you're adding experiments for me to work on on top of all the movie and book recs?  I need to figure out how to get all this on a resume..."Certification and expertise involving information processing and analysis in the 40Hz spectrum"

Yeah.
1607
Another good choice is Belvedere. (on Github)
Oh yeah!  This was one of the ones I was planning on trying out but never got around to it.  I was going to turn to it if the sync programs didn't work.  I'm still going to test this one out as it looks great.

The other one I tried that looks ok but not awesome is "Watch 4 Folders".
1608
Roboform has been going down a somewhat negative path as of late, since v7 it seems.  First they pissed everyone off with the lifetime license reneg.  Now this behavior.  It's interesting how the "Import" function is right there in the File menu, and Export is not.
1609
I have a few folders where files accumulate and I'm afraid to delete them, so I move them to a useless folder.  Now, I hate doing this as it's repetitive and not very productive other than satisfying my paranoia.  You know those programs that have good logging capabilities, and paranoid people like me will change the setting from "keep the last 5 files" to "keep unlimited files".  Stuff like that.

I searched for a while to find folder monitoring programs, there are probably a couple of threads here somewhere.  But I wasn't satisfied with them.  Now I found the perfect solution: just use your favorite file synchronizer program.  Mine is Syncrecovery (previously Super Flexible).  This is how you do it:
--set it up to MOVE files from one folder to another (instead of copying or normal synchronizing)
--set up the filter to ONLY include the stupid files you don't care for (*.log, *.bak, things like that)
--set up the schedule for REAL TIME (Syncrecovery has brilliant options for real time synchronization)

I just set it up and it works flawlessly.  Very nice and elegant solution.  No command line needed, all gui controlled, very powerful, very flexible, and for those of you that are cash strapped, it adds value to a good program that you have already paid money for.

I'd like to just showcase the real-time options in Syncrecovery (great work, Tobias!):
Screenshot - 9_14_2012 , 9_11_24 PM.png
Screenshot - 9_14_2012 , 9_12_19 PM.png
Screenshot - 9_14_2012 , 9_12_50 PM.png
1610
Living Room / Re: NSA Whistleblower interesting technical details
« Last post by superboyac on September 13, 2012, 12:19 PM »
^Likely that's a variation of the Coventry gambit.

But the goal of this sort of thing isn't to prevent crime. It's to protect the security and secrecy of certain entrenched political interests.

Like Hoover said, justice is incidental to enforcing law and order. So is fighting crime since people who are victimized by criminals provide the convenient benefit of demanding more restrictive laws and a larger police presence to enforce them.

To those who pull strings, ongoing violent crime is a win-win. Especially for the proponents of expanded government authority.
:(
truth...it ain't easy.
1611
Living Room / Re: 1080p playback: hardware discussion
« Last post by superboyac on September 12, 2012, 05:29 PM »
^^exactly!  That's why my priority for any computing device is always a desktop pc...and one I put together myself.  I struggle a lot with buying any ready-made pc's for any reason, because there's always another experiment waiting to be done.  I don't think there's any computer around me that I don't tweak and do tests with.  Actually, my tablets are like that and guess what happens?  I stop using them entirely after a short while and return to some old desktop to fuss around with.  And that means adapters and cables running around everywhere, with girls calling my place "such a bachelor pad".  I just can't help it.  I got my place date-ready 2 months ago, and now it's back to the lab look.  It's not worth fighting, it's too deep within me!
1612
WTF?  He died while gaming?  This is bizarre.
1613
Living Room / Re: 1080p playback: hardware discussion
« Last post by superboyac on September 12, 2012, 04:22 PM »
How about XBMC on a Raspberry Pi?

The MPEG-2 license will only cost an additional $3.79. And the VC-1 codec costs $1.90. And that's for registered fully legal use. Read more here.


I plan on running OpenELEC on mine - if I ever get it. :-\
I have another experiment for the Raspberry Pi, I'm calling it the portable university.  I tried it out last friday with a friend sans the Pi.  So once I get my hands on that, that will be something.

I know it sounds like overkill, but I need a full desktop pc if I'm going to do experiments.  Once I know exactly what I want, then I can settle on certain features.  And I hope people won't judge me too harshly for all the trees that will die and the money that could have been better spent on poverty.
1614
Living Room / Re: 1080p playback: hardware discussion
« Last post by superboyac on September 12, 2012, 12:48 PM »
Ah well, you'll end up paying more, wasting power, and getting an inferior product that also takes up more space in your apartment - your choice :)
I agree with the first two, but in what way is it inferior?  And how much power am I wasting?
1615
Living Room / Re: 1080p playback: hardware discussion
« Last post by superboyac on September 12, 2012, 10:51 AM »
Because I don't like to buy ready-made appliances.  I don't just watch the TV; I run experiments.  I experiment with different playback software, different mouse control things.  I'm going to try doing some things with XBMC.  I'd like to load different OS's possibly and try certain things with that.  I absolutely hate buying non-tweakable things like this.  It's boring.  For 20 years now, I have yet to be bored with desktop computer.  I've gotten bored very quickly with laptops, ipads, other tablets, phones, etc.  Never with the real deal computer.

Remember: I'm the guy who wanted to buy a windows netbook to use as an alarm clock.
1616
Living Room / Re: Raspberry Pi's $35 Linux PC
« Last post by superboyac on September 12, 2012, 09:06 AM »
^^wicked awesome.

Yeah, seriously.  how the F did they get all those boards?  politics.  porbably  part of the illuminati.
1617
Living Room / Re: Recommend some music videos to me!
« Last post by superboyac on September 11, 2012, 09:33 PM »
 :( too far?  my apologies.
1618
Living Room / Re: Recommend some music videos to me!
« Last post by superboyac on September 11, 2012, 08:11 PM »
first...the violin girl is lovely <---edited (i.e. fake)
second...that violin sounds amazing!  holy crap!

this pose is amazing, i'm in love:
Screenshot - 9_11_2012 , 6_15_08 PM.png
1619
Living Room / Re: 1080p playback: hardware discussion
« Last post by superboyac on September 11, 2012, 03:00 PM »
^^aaah...sorry wr975...I overreacted. :(
I was going to delete the whole thing, but there's good info there.
1620
this is my favorite thread.
1621
Living Room / Re: 1080p playback: hardware discussion
« Last post by superboyac on September 11, 2012, 12:55 PM »
I know, I always seem to be in that middle layer that gets ignored by the techies and the dummies.

So I guess it's settled: GPU is where it's at.  RAM 4-8GB no problem, cheap either way.  CPU, I can probably just get whatever, probably something in the lower middle-class range.  So are there particular GPU features worth noting specifically for HD video playback?


Also (pet peeve, and no offense)...how come whenever someone on the internet mentions a codec/extension/container, someone always has to point out that this is a container, not a decoder, etc.  It gets pretty annoying.  First of all, the whole video file ecosystem is fairly complicated to define.  there are dozens of containers and formats and encoding types and all sorts of things, with all sorts of combinations possible.  And furthermore, the whole "this is JUST a container" thing is complete nonsense.  I ran some tests and let me tell you, there are differences even in the things that are "just" containers.  For example, I created a video file from a source, and then made two files: an mkv file and an mp4 file.  In both cases, the exact same video content went in the container with no modifications.  So the only difference is the container...both contained h264 video.  Now, you would expect the video quality to be the same in both, but they weren't.  mkv was significantly smoother than mp4, which was a little choppy.  So I know everyone gets a kick out of pointing out what is a container and what is a format, but big deal.  If you really want to get into it, it's a hairy beast.  I keep looking into these things and I keep coming up with the conclusion that mkv files are the best way to go right now.
1622
Duly noted:
control-center31_stormtrooper.jpg
1623
Living Room / Re: Recommend some music videos to me!
« Last post by superboyac on September 11, 2012, 11:41 AM »
^^I love that you went to get a Whopper, that is straight up funny.
1624
Renegade, I wish you were the ceo of my company!

Here's what I've got so far:
control-center3_1.jpg
control-center3_2.jpg
1625
That's a pretty badass room, z, thanks.  And I like the chair...it's like the knight says in the Last Crusade..."You have chosen...wise!"

I might use the Creston reference.
Pages: prev1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 ... 252next