topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday June 27, 2025, 10:56 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 [64] 65 66 67 68 69 ... 79next
1576
Living Room / Re: Photography Questions
« Last post by Dormouse on December 22, 2008, 06:02 AM »
  • DSLR Camera with interchangeable lenses. The lens it comes with MUST have a focal length of 18-55mm. I was looking at the Canon EOS 40d which seems to have all she needs and will be a decent system for her use throughout the course (Or until they require us buy more lenses, etc)

Whatever anyone says, it's best not to choose a camera without trying it in hand, trying the control system (buttons and menus) etc. Some people adjust quickly from one system to another, some find one system much more intuitive than others. How the camera feels, size etc also makes a difference. We all do better with a camera that feels right.

Also worth looking at photos made with the different systems by 'ordinary' photographers. All makes produce good cameras, but color tones and the general look of a photo vary in a significant way - even if you shoot raw and do a lot of PP.

Once decent (ie expensive) lenses are bought, that becomes an extra disincentive to change makes. So buying the brand that feels best at the beginning is worth the effort. There does tend to be a consistency within each brand in the types of body, control systems and tones etc. And remember, in the end, most photographers end up with far more money invested in lenses than in camera bodies.

At the very least, I'd try Canon, Nikon and Sony (all likely to be around long-term; Canon and Nikon well-established; Sony fast expanding market share from its Minolta/Sony base); and I'd also try to look at Pentax and Olympus, though they'd have to feel very attractive to make me go with their systems at this stage). All capable of producing good photos.

I assume that it doesn't have to be an 18-55 lens, just one that covers that range?
1577
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: MiniReview of Linkman URL Organizer and Search Tool
« Last post by Dormouse on December 22, 2008, 05:20 AM »
I'm just surprised and a little disappointed that Linkman's Help file is configured to run in an IE window rather than in the window of the user's default browser.

I'd agree with that. Seems to me that most people who don't use IE as their default prefer not to see it activate at all. May not be a big issue, but a bit disquieting.
1578
N.A.N.Y. 2009 / Re: NANY 2009 Teaser: Tree List
« Last post by Dormouse on December 21, 2008, 09:06 AM »
I would like to be able to see more text visible (ie that the text box is able to go as wide as the window). Also easy export/import; I assume it would not be too much of a prob to do this with xml files.
1579
N.A.N.Y. 2009 / Re: NANY 2009 Teaser: Tree List
« Last post by Dormouse on December 21, 2008, 08:59 AM »
Congratulations Richard, as a simple To Do List it works fine (at least I couldn't break it).

And simple is pretty nice. I also use ToDoList, which now does almost everything, but it's not small and quick anymore (well, not as small and quick as it used to be)

I also use ToDoList, but like most tasklist/todolist progs it is complex and not well suited to quick lists of transitory stuff. So simple tasklist progs definitely have their place, and probably would be used most often. In comparing this with ToDoList and JustDoIt, it seems to me that this is the prog that is best for very transitory jotting and todo management, JustDoIt interfaces well with other progs (easy to export from ToDoList into it for example) and is better for checking whether something was done and so fits in-between TreeList and ToDoList. I hope both progs develop further because they could both be even more useful than they are now.
1580
N.A.N.Y. 2009 / Re: NANY 2009 Teaser: Tree List
« Last post by Dormouse on December 21, 2008, 08:47 AM »
Terrific. The hierarchical functionality is what's missing from JustDoIt IMO.
Interesting differences between the two.

This has the hierarchy. And multiple lists.
JustDoIt has moving of the done items, a record of what is done (can be kept long-term, on daily, weekly, monthly etc basis), a very easy way to import items in bulk and 'automatic export'.
1581
Finished Programs / Re: JustToDoIt - Fast ToDo lister
« Last post by Dormouse on December 21, 2008, 04:55 AM »
Would also be cool if there were options for the CompletedTasks:-
  • them all to have a time/date stamp when completed
  • for them to be struck through when completed (makes it more obvious that it is the completed list being looked at, but possibly less easy to read)
1582
Finished Programs / Re: JustToDoIt - Fast ToDo lister
« Last post by Dormouse on December 20, 2008, 08:58 PM »
Also seems to me that putting items straight into the text file (either writing or cutting/pasting - especially from a clipboard manager) is the fastest way of doing this in bulk.
This is a major improvement over the tedious large boxes that need completion in most todo apps.
1583
Finished Programs / Re: JustToDoIt - Fast ToDo lister
« Last post by Dormouse on December 20, 2008, 07:32 PM »
I'm thinking about how to show multiple lists too or some way of being able to seperate multiple projects. Maybe it could recognise <project>: task formatted tasks and generate tabs or a menu of some kind, keeping the speedy input/overviews.

project a: example task
project b: some other task

this could result in a tasklist per project.

Isn't this what we have, more or less. Multiple instances give multiple lists.

Simplicity is good, portability is good.
Showing more than one list at a time would also be good (ie potential for multiple panes); also potential to set background color for each list (so I know immediately which list is which).

I find multiple lists easier than setting projects.
Phone calls to make;
things I've just thought I must do in a minute;
letters to write;
etc
Anything complex and I would use a much more complex program, but I don't want a much more complex program for very simple things I expect to do very soon.

This can also be used as a simple checkbox template; one instance per task; at end, save completed tasks under the task name.

Also a very quick way of making a test list into a checkbox list.
1584
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: MiniReview of Linkman URL Organizer and Search Tool
« Last post by Dormouse on December 20, 2008, 06:03 AM »
Cranioscopical's occurrence seems the same as mine: calling ie when trying to update from Linkman. At least it suggest that the issue was not for my system alone.
1585
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: MiniReview of Linkman URL Organizer and Search Tool
« Last post by Dormouse on December 19, 2008, 06:53 AM »
That's very strange then. It is many years since I had ie as a default browser and the only time it can ever appear so on any of my machines is when Windows is first installed. I know it has never been the case here since other progs always launch the default browser (Opera). Well, I'm glad Linkman usually installs the same default as the machine, but slightly perturbed at why it wasn't the case with me (this is the point at which I become slightly paranoid about what might have been secretly changing settings in the background).

Thanks for all the info.  :up:
1586
Living Room / Re: Please help me build my new computer, DC!
« Last post by Dormouse on December 18, 2008, 07:09 PM »
I think two 24" is too much, but I'm not sure.  I don't know what brand is good. 

Why do you think 2 x 24" is too much? Usefulness will depend on how you have them set up, where you sit etc, but I'm not sure too much screen space is possible.

Brand. Always worth checking reviews, but in my experience very cheap, well reviewed models turn out to be very good (so long as the guarantee is equivalent to other brands anyway - I've never tried a monitor with less than 3 year cover). My latest was a DigiMate - very cheap but does exactly what I need and I'm very pleased with the quality. I would only buy models that have good user reviews though (assuming that the site you buy from has reliable reviews) - with cheap models it is easy to get poorly manufactured monitors with awful quality control. But for normal use, I still see no reason to pay more.

Not true for specialist uses though. For instance, if you are a keen photographer who will be wanting to calibrate your monitor so that you can see exactly what will be printed, you will have to select very carefully and expect to pay a much higher price; photographer friendly models are reducing in numbers too.
1587
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: MiniReview of Linkman URL Organizer and Search Tool
« Last post by Dormouse on December 18, 2008, 06:03 PM »
If you mean "Help | Updates" in Linkman's main menu then it launches the browser that is specified in the Linkman settings as your default browser (Tools | Settings | Launch URLs).
-Outertech Support (December 18, 2008, 05:26 PM)

I do and I have changed it now , but surely it should use the default browser in the absence of instructions to do the contrary?
1588
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: MiniReview of Linkman URL Organizer and Search Tool
« Last post by Dormouse on December 18, 2008, 04:19 PM »
Interesting.

I clicked on the search for updates and up sprung internet explorer (definitely NOT my default browser) looking for the update. I took advantage of it to install the security patch, but I definitely do not like it launching ie.
1589
General Software Discussion / Re: Is it finally time to abandon IE?
« Last post by Dormouse on December 17, 2008, 10:39 AM »
To stay protected, it pays to be informed about risks as they occur, and to have options.

I use Opera, and FF, and increasingly Iron/Chrome and occasionally ie. I see few advantages to using ie, so I avoid it, partly for the benefits of the other browsers but also for the reduced risks of not using the  most prevalent programs. If I see a risk with one, I switch to using the others until it is sorted.

I use the same approach for most types of programs, though still use XP more than Linux.
1590
i for example still remember that 258512 was my phone number when i was a kid.

So can I!  :-\ :-\

OK, lets see how common that is
No, I had a different number
1591
General Software Discussion / Re: Another 'Lifetime' license bites the dust
« Last post by Dormouse on December 16, 2008, 04:22 PM »
a developer has to fund themselves in some way ... When the sales tail off, either because the market matures, or like now, people rein in their spending then we have to expect people to change their models.

The problem is the idea that a change of model will solve the income shortage. The best model for a product is the best model for that product whatever the state of the economy. There are things that can be done to bring income forwards, but moving to a different model will not improve things unless the wrong model was used in the first place. The danger of making an abrupt and major change is that it will affect the perception of customers and future customers in a way that can't be undone.

As you say, a lifetime model only really works if there will always be a supply of new customers. It can make people more likely to buy (sometimes much more likely) and can be a useful differentiator from competitors. So it is not necessarily a bad model for many products. And many people lose their license details and still upgrade their hardware from time to time - can be tempted to buy a new license. Usage of a program is often short or medium term (say between 2 and 6 years) - so there may not be a huge loss compared to an Upgrade cycle model (and on upgrade models, many people have another look at the competition every time they are asked to fork out again).

Annual licenses generally play poorly in the consumer market except for AVs - and then only because people are scared into it. I would be surprised if many products can increase their long-term income by moving to this model, wherever they start from.
1592
Very strange that Silverstein arrives here to draw attention to this thread more than two years after the most recent post. If he/she didn't want the site promoted, then why post in this forgotten thread at all?
1593
General Software Discussion / Re: Another 'Lifetime' license bites the dust
« Last post by Dormouse on December 12, 2008, 08:12 AM »
I agree completely with Carol that this announcement of an imminent loss of the lifetime license is an attempt at a good marketing ploy. Some realisation that the annual license may not be as remunerative as they would like, but they want to get as much cash now as they can without getting a reputation for sales and discounts.
1594
General Software Discussion / Re: Another 'Lifetime' license bites the dust
« Last post by Dormouse on December 12, 2008, 08:09 AM »
There is SUPERAntiSpyware Lifetime Subscription. I've got a licensed copy. Check it. It can't detect any spyware, though nor can it prevent the system being infected. Thrown it out and installed Spyware Doctor. Peace, now.
I use Kaspersky atm. 3 year license; cheap deal; very effective; uninstalled Spyware Doctor some time ago. I reconsider the prog I use everytime I get to the end of my license. There are some progs I have a lifetime license for that I don't currently use (so the lifetime sale was good marketing); others that produce regular upgrades where I also don't use - and don't buy upgrades.

What developers should be considering is what sort of product and market they have and what type of license is likely to be most effective for them.

In practice, I think many of them just think "I'm not getting as much money as I think I should be getting, so I'll change the license to bring more money in". This strategy is quite capable of reducing their income rather than increasing it.

We are now in a recession. Most developers will just have to accept that incomes are likely to reduce until things pick up again.

TreeDBnotes did a similar thing to FruityLoops.
1595
General Software Discussion / Re: Another 'Lifetime' license bites the dust
« Last post by Dormouse on December 12, 2008, 05:04 AM »
Lifetime licenses may provide more income than annual subscriptions. New users tend to need more support than old ones, so most cost is attached to new users. Old users are a good marketing tool and there are many people who will buy a lifetime license who would think twice or thrice about paying for upgrades let alone annual subscriptions. Lifetime licenses depend on a marketing model where there will always be a lot of new users buying the program; annual licenses rely on committed users who have decided they need that product and always up-to-date.

I have to say that there are very,very few programs (current number = nil) where I would consider paying an annual subscription.

Upgrades from time-to-time I will consider, but I don't expect the cycle to be more frequent than every 3 or 4 years and I do expect to see a clear benefit from the new version.
1596
General Software Discussion / Re: Editor for PDFs: recommendations, please?
« Last post by Dormouse on December 03, 2008, 10:41 AM »
Of course, there's a whole range of PagePlus versions available - from SE (free) which won't export PDFs to 9 (which will) and 10, 11 to X3 which is the most recent. 9 is fairly cheap (under £10). All Serif software seems well recommended by its users for functionality and value, but I don't use it myself and so don't know the best value way in. The do use free older versions as a marketing technique and do appear to give discounts on newer versions to people who are upgrading.
1597
General Software Discussion / Re: Is XP really that good?
« Last post by Dormouse on November 29, 2008, 06:43 PM »
Users mess around alot, and linux is more fragile than windows. Users will figure out how to run everything as root, and then they'll go wreck their system.
...
*mumbles something about having to manually edit configuration files as soon as you want to do anything out of the ordinary... like getting a multiple monitor setup working*

Actually most users don't do anything of the sort. They keep the system as it is (because they don't have enough interest to do anything different) and occasionally update (more often if automatic updates are switched on) and install new programs. They run everything on default settings and scream 'help' if something stops working. And they can't comprehend why anyone would want two monitors.

In this context, Linux is certainly good enough - and so is XP.
But the ones I know find it far easier to use the repository system than to search the net for Windows software.
1598
General Software Discussion / Re: Is XP really that good?
« Last post by Dormouse on November 29, 2008, 09:38 AM »
For your normal user, there is little reason not to run Windows.
No activation. Linux runs effectively on less powerful computers.

More apps
True. But how much difference do the extra apps make to most users?

faster or just as fast (KDE and Gnome are just as fat and bloated as Windows counterparts)
Well, Windows has never run as fast on any system I've put them on. And Vista is infinitely slower than XP. If KDE and Gnome are just as bloated, then Windows must be inherently much slower.

for most people, Windows will come for free
No again. Microsoft take their cut from every legitimate version of Windows installed. If people aren't paying directly, it comes in higher prices for the computer. And watch for the bill when the mobo needs changing.

easier to use
My non-techie kids find Linux easier. Refuse to go back to Windows. When there's a prog only available on Windows, they want dual boot or Windows in a VM - anything but disturbing their Linux.
They find the whole repository system easier than anything for Windows - and it is only really possible for free software.
It's only familiarity that makes most people think it's easier.
1599
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: Create a modern version of Lotus Agenda
« Last post by Dormouse on November 28, 2008, 04:04 PM »
I'm trying.
-AgendaRediviva (November 28, 2008, 03:43 PM)
But only for Mac ?
1600
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: Create a modern version of Lotus Agenda
« Last post by Dormouse on November 28, 2008, 04:02 PM »
Chandler .... is proceeding 
;D ;D ;D

Pages: prev1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 [64] 65 66 67 68 69 ... 79next