And then the standards question, if we are talking actual STANDARDS then yes I agree. If we are talking passing the ACID# test, then I disagree. The acid test, while good in a test environment, is not valid for every day in the wild browsing.
-Josh
IE8 was actually TOO standards compliant in its early beta versions, believe it or not. See
this article by Joel Spolsky. (I know some here don't like Joel but this article is a classic!).
But they fail to consider this:
If Microsoft didn't include a browser with their OS, then what would you use to visit a site and download your browser of choice?
I dunno... But I do know that I had no problem getting my hands on Netscape Navigator back before IE was there.

(I probably used my Apple II!! Or maybe my Mosaic or Lynx browser. Or maybe I just used one of the 346,000,000 "Free Disks" I received from just about everywhere!)
I haven't read enough about Microsoft's decision to determine if this actually removes all the interface between Windows and IE or if it just removes the ability of IE to open as a browser. Completely removing all of IE's ties to the OS would be a massive undertaking, "new" OS version or not. Be interesting to see just what they actually did.
Jim