topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday May 16, 2025, 5:41 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 [64] 65 66 67 68 69 ... 114next
1576
DcUpdater / Re: Eight FARR Plugins Are Failing on DCUpdater
« Last post by J-Mac on March 18, 2009, 12:49 AM »
On second thought, can I just remove the plugins that aren't updated anymore? I don't think I want to hunt for the updates.

Thanks!

Jim
1577
DcUpdater / Re: Eight FARR Plugins Are Failing on DCUpdater
« Last post by J-Mac on March 18, 2009, 12:44 AM »
That's because they've all been moved into one nice convenient package.

CZB Package

Well that's nice, but how was I to know?  :huh:   I have come to rely on DCUpdater to update FARR and all of its plugins. It never offered such a package. And I never noticed that they were "replaced" by that. Hopefully it has not become a requirement to scour the forum for such changes?

Thank you.

Jim
1578
DcUpdater / Eight FARR Plugins Are Failing on DCUpdater
« Last post by J-Mac on March 17, 2009, 11:22 PM »
mouser,

The same eight FARR plugins have been showing as "Get Update Failed" in the Status column of DcUpdater for the last several weeks:

1 Character Table
2 Console
3 Definr
4 Dicts-Thesaurus
5 G-Cal quicadd
6 Google Translator
7 Pop Quotes
8 Timer

You might want to look into this as there has been more than one FARR update since this started, and these plugins might not be working well.

Jim
1579
General Software Discussion / Re: Heuristic Antivirus
« Last post by J-Mac on March 17, 2009, 12:07 PM »
Having read that thread is there any point in upgrading to version 4?
-Carol Haynes (March 17, 2009, 09:33 AM)

I've seen a few more bugs too. mouser posted about false positives that delete Windows system files (Yikes!). Also I saw at Wilders that NOD32 v4's email integration has wiped out a lot of users' Thunderbird email messages - both on their computers AND on the server.

I think I shall wait also.  :Thmbsup:

Jim
1580
General Software Discussion / Re: Collectorz.com... again!
« Last post by J-Mac on March 16, 2009, 10:26 PM »
I know, I know, Carol. I am looking for another DVD collection catalog software. I just haven't found one yet that I like.

Jim
1581
General Software Discussion / Re: Heuristic Antivirus
« Last post by J-Mac on March 16, 2009, 10:21 PM »
I agree it's nice to see password recovery tools flagged as potential viruses, I've also seen nod32 flag a lot of irc scripts and nasty bots coded for the linux bash shell while I've been downloading them for analysis onto a windows machine.

Spybot is strictly dictionary based as far as I'm aware,
and yes, you can do just a heuristic scan with nod32 - latest version for sure.  The easiest way to do so is to open up nod32, select computer scan, click on custom scan, click on setup, then on the left go to options - there you can disable everything but heuristics and advanced heuristics.

I haven't had any problems with NOD32 (viruses or annoyances with the nod32 software) in the past 2 years.  I highly recommend it.

OK - I'm pissed at Eset again! They released Version 4 of their AV and no notifications. I don't think they ever send notice of new versions; visit their site and check or lose out. Grrr...

Jim
1582
General Software Discussion / Re: Check&Get or Power Favorites or Linkman
« Last post by J-Mac on March 16, 2009, 02:25 PM »
Linkman Pro 7.80 is out:

((  snip  ))

-Outertech Support (March 16, 2009, 06:06 AM)

Trying to drive me crazy, aren't you?! I knew I had seen this post last week and already updated. You had me checking the date and time on my computer!

Jim
1583
There's a very detailed post I made about email etiquette/netiquette and the reasons behind it (e.g., the effect of email behaviours on network resources and mailservers). It's not just about "good manners". Might be too detailed for your needs though.
Hope this is of some use/help.

URL is here: email etiquette

Very nice article, Iain!

About all else that I can add is to use proper language - or at least language that fits the recipient and the company - along with punctuation, grammar, spelling, etc. I am not trying to be pedantic about language but email is not a text message, and a business message should not sound like the kind you may send to your close friends with the latest internet abbreviations/acronyms and the like.

Thanks!

Jim
1584
General Software Discussion / Re: Official players - What is the big deal?
« Last post by J-Mac on March 16, 2009, 12:35 AM »
I have a question for everyone. Ever since getting my wife her laptop for school, I have come to the realization that most of these OFFICIAL media players for various formats are very wildly over-attacked for their abilities. For example, quicktime and real player. My biggest gripe with real player was from back in the day when it used to startup several programs and alert me with these advertisements. Given the recent trend, they have seriously cleaned up their act. I have no problems with them at all now. The same goes for quicktime. I installed it and after disabling the apple software update service, I had no problems with it. The players are really well thought out and function great. They have seemless integration with various web browsers and serve their purpose. Now, I do not use any of them as a default player for my various media files, I use KMPlayer for that, but I do rely on their players for browser-based playback. Heck, real and apple have both included ways for me to save various media files without having to resort to rippers such as streambox.

Now, that said, I have tried the alternatives such as "Real alternative" and QTLite. Both are OK, but both have caused me to have to reinstall them because some component became unregistered in my system or just wasn't playing right after a browser update or other software update. The default official players, however, have never failed since my recent experiment over the last few months. This leads me to the question, are these players as horrid as they once were to most? Or is it the old "They started out evil and will remain so" reputation that most larger corporations get?

Comments? Questions? Concerns?

A brief report on RealPlayer at StopBadware.com. RealPlayer is still installing adware and silently installs the Rhapsody Player Engine software and does not remove it when you uninstall RealPlayer. The adware is in the form of their "Message Center" popup junk which they describe on their Terms & Conditions page as a software update process. Ha!

And anyone around as long as me surely remembers - and not fondly - the original RealAudio Player, Real Jukebox, and RealPlayer G2. PC Mag a couple years ago listed RealPlayer 1.0 (1999 version) as the #2 item on its Worst Products of All-Time report, and all RealPlayer versions from 1996 - 2004 collectively as the #5 item on that same report.

I remember that once you installed the original version you could NOT remove the damn thing - it was a monster! You could try to manually clean out the registry, like I did, and eventually reinstall the OS because of it. It was one of the worst programs I have ever installed.

Jim
1585
General Software Discussion / Re: Quicktime only available with iTunes
« Last post by J-Mac on March 15, 2009, 10:44 PM »
Quicktime alternative is just the codecs ripped out from the full QT package, isn't it? And how often is it updated compared to the main package?

Not extremely often, but it seems to be enough for me to always be able to play QT movie files.

Jim
1586
General Software Discussion / Re: Quicktime only available with iTunes
« Last post by J-Mac on March 15, 2009, 10:43 PM »
Try the following:

Download the iTunes installer.

The installer is an archive file which can be unpacked - I am not sure which apps will do this but I have found WinRAR can unpack it to a folder.

Inside the unpacked folder is QuickTime.msi which allows you to only install QuickTime.
-Carol Haynes (March 15, 2009, 08:04 PM)

Total Commander should also allow you to extract the contents of the installer. I haven't tried it for iTunes but I usually use TC any time I need to unpack an installer file.

Jim
1587
In emails top posting - above the quoted content - is perfectly acceptable. Some who were around in the early days insist that only bottom posting is acceptable, but while that was always true for Usenet posts it was never a requirement for email etiquette. Quoting only relevant portions of the original message WAS strongly recommended, since storage memory was a premium cost at the time so there was no good reason to "beef-up" a message with unnecessary quotes. Today, with hard drives being so inexpensive, including the entire original message contents is fine as long as the email message is easy to read and navigate. If the recipient has to scroll through a lot of redundant quoting to see anything they need to see, then you are making your communication a difficult one. Of course allowing a whole slew of back-and-forth replies to build up in your message is usually unnecessary and just a waste of paper if someone needs to print the message. Unless it is important to document the entire exchange for some reason.

Here is a link to a site that is supposedly all about proper email replies etiquette - I did not read this yet; I just Googled it for you. Might be worth a look.  http://www.emailreplies.com/

Jim
1588
General Software Discussion / Re: Heuristic Antivirus
« Last post by J-Mac on March 15, 2009, 10:27 PM »
NOD32 seems NirSoft these days (at least the version I am running doesn't seem to flag issues and I don't have exclusions listed). I used to have odd problems with some of their Password stuff in NOD32 v. 2.7 but in V. 3 it seems to be fixed. In version 2.7 I added the offending files to the exclusions list and then it didn't trouble me.

To be fair I think flagging password utilities as potential password stealers is a reasonable thing to do - at least it means someone who has the software installed without their permission will get a warning and anyone who needs to use the software should know how to get round potential warning problems.
-Carol Haynes (March 15, 2009, 04:11 PM)

I agree completely that flagging password cracking utilities is admirable. However at one time you could not even exclude them. Well, actually you could exclude the setup files but as soon as you opened a file and it created its own folder in C:\Program Files NOD32 would eat it up quickly, before you had any chance to exclude that folder or the .exe file. There are threads at Wilders about this - it seemed a new one would pop up each year for a while, without any response from Eset. Plus I wrote to Eset about this twice and never got a reply. I just got into the habit of disabling it when I downloaded them and moved them to my flash drive.

Jim
1589
Thanks evgeni. Looking forward to CSM3!

Jim
1590
evgeni:

One other item which I wrote to you about: Check for Updates. Please get that working!

Currently clicking that opens your browser, to the download, downloads it, and then directs you to install it. But it never tells you what version it is. I have installed the same version three times, thinking I must be getting newer builds or why else would it download and install? Turns out that as many times as you click "Check for Updates", you'll get to install the same version over and over.

Also please consider allowing installation on a notebook and desktop computer by the same licensed user. Even if it requires some additional cost (but not too much!!!) for the license.

Thanks!

Jim
1591
General Software Discussion / Re: Directory Opus 9 Questions
« Last post by J-Mac on March 15, 2009, 02:08 PM »
I use DOPUS for the past 3 years. Never knew this ALT+Dbl Left click existed.
Thanks

How about getting dopus to display only files that were "lastr modified" today..., yesterday...., this week etc. right from toolbar

I know that this can be done using File Collections and Saved Searches. Basically you create a search using the Find feature and have the results configured to show in a File Collection instead of the Output dialog. I haven't tried it in a while but I see no reason why it cannot still be done.

Jim
1592
General Software Discussion / Re: Heuristic Antivirus
« Last post by J-Mac on March 15, 2009, 01:50 PM »
NOD32 allows you to disable their "advanced heuristics" (Threatsense Engine, Unwanted Applications, Dangerous Applications) but it still uses heuristics in its regular scanning. Which is one of the reasons I have to disable it when I download some of Nir Sofer's utilities (password-related, mostly) and immediately move them to a flash drive before re-enabling it. Exclusing these utilities doesn't seem to help this.

Actually I haven't tried it again with the latest version of NOD32; it's entirely possible that they have fixed this and I have been using this PITA protocol so long I haven't noticed. But I doubt it!

Jim
1593

On a related note, I was able to access their newsgroup/mailing list and it is VERY active.  Seems like all the important discussions happen in there.  A bit antiquated in my opinion, but it is a poweruser email program so i can understand why they gravitate towards using mailing lists and newsgroups.

?????!  I don't see the correlation at all. Poweruser programs use usenet and mailing lists?   ;D ;D ;D   I think not! Has nothing to do with whether a program is for, (Ahem!) "powerusers". To me it just indiciates that the developer of the program has probably been around computers for a long time and is accustomed to/more familiar and comfortable with such media.

Jim
1594
It does say in the rules the following:

In this forum, the users of The Bat! can communicate with each other to spread their positive attitude toward The Bat!, to share the experience in attaining different goals using The Bat!

Soooo.... they don't want anything posted there apparently that is not spreading your "positive attitude" about the bat.  What a crock! Talk about self-serving.

I can now add this as another reason I wouldn't even consider installing this thing on my machine! (I won't bother to go into all the others!)

Jim
1595
Living Room / Re: What's your favorite food snack?
« Last post by J-Mac on March 14, 2009, 07:15 PM »
This stuff is addictive and should require a doctor's prescription!

[attachimg=#1][/attachimg]

Jim
1596
And then the standards question, if we are talking actual STANDARDS then yes I agree. If we are talking passing the ACID# test, then I disagree. The acid test, while good in a test environment, is not valid for every day in the wild browsing.

IE8 was actually TOO standards compliant in its early beta versions, believe it or not. See this article by Joel Spolsky. (I know some here don't like Joel but this article is a classic!).

But they fail to consider this:

If Microsoft didn't include a browser with their OS, then what would you use to visit a site and download your browser of choice?

I dunno...  But I do know that I had no problem getting my hands on Netscape Navigator back before IE was there.  8)  (I probably used my Apple II!! Or maybe my Mosaic or Lynx browser. Or maybe I just used one of the 346,000,000 "Free Disks" I received from just about everywhere!)

I haven't read enough about Microsoft's decision to determine if this actually removes all the interface between Windows and IE or if it just removes the ability of IE to open as a browser. Completely removing all of IE's ties to the OS would be a massive undertaking, "new" OS version or not. Be interesting to see just what they actually did.

Jim
1597
There's reasons people are "anti" big companies, or quick to give them a hard time.

Yeah, like the fact that back about three or four versions ago they added ads into Reader? Or maybe the Yahoo Toolbar they added to their downloads about 5 years ago? I can almost understand why the smaller developers do things like this - they are often struggling and trying to help finance their business. (Not that I condone it - just almost understand it!)

What's Adobe's excuse?  Pigs.

Jim
1598
<p>Josh, I disagree that Adobe Reader had to grow as large as it has because of disparate user needs. Adobe finally got a little smarter with v.9 by not having so much load every time you open a PDF document, but it still loads way too much. E.g.:

PDF File size = 4.54 MB:  Adobe Reader 8: 46,320 kb; Foxit Reader 3: 8,220 kb

PDF File size = 6.34 MB:  Adobe Reader 8: 47,032 kb;  Foxit Reader 3: 10,456 kb

No file - Just start the app:  Adobe Reader 35,842 kb;  Foxit Reader 3: 3,952 kb

That's just too much of a hit on memory IMO. Not necessary if you are not using any other features. If other users all over the world have differing needs then create modules that can be added as needed.

Jim
1599
Nice post, Steven!

Jim
1600
Living Room / Re: What's your favorite food snack?
« Last post by J-Mac on March 09, 2009, 12:11 AM »
First one who says that Tofu is their favorite is banned!!   :huh: ;)

Jim
Pages: prev1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 [64] 65 66 67 68 69 ... 114next