topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 6, 2025, 2:11 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 33next
151
Living Room / Re: Today is my birthday- when is yours?
« Last post by KenR on November 10, 2007, 09:43 AM »
You guys should have said something sooner. Happy belated birthday f0dder and Zaine.

Ken
152
General Software Discussion / Re: ESET Smart Security
« Last post by KenR on November 06, 2007, 01:27 PM »
Actually, although I have tremendous respect for Eset and NOD32 and thought I would use their combination product, I think I am more interested in performance tests of Outpost and its antivirus component. Who knows though, maybe I'll just keep using both products as I have been.

Ken
153
General Software Discussion / Re: ESET Smart Security
« Last post by KenR on November 06, 2007, 12:12 PM »
First thoughts of Scot Finnie:

But I've made a decision in the opposite direction about Eset Smart Security suite. Take a pass on this one. The firewall seems very pedestrian; it's able to handle only three of the leaktests on my list of 17. And what's with the antispam module? That doesn't belong in a package like this. The best thing about Eset Smart Security is Nod32 3.0 and the fact that you can turn the other two modules off.

I suppose that means the firewall is secure enough. I don't like that he now focuses in leak testing before usability. Oh well, I think Ken knows better about this, after all his past fights with Comodo ;)

Not that I did any tests with it, but I was afraid that's what might happen. I have been looking at the Outpost suite the last few days. I like it so far and have not seen any performance drop or cpu spiking from the program. Of course, neither have I seen any formal testing of the antivirus aspect of this suite. If it's adequate though, I would really like to go with an integrated suite. Agnitum has moved the product in the direction of not having to rely on signatures and I think the developers responded well to the leak test problems that were previously found on formal testing (though retesting has not been done to the best of my knowledge). The outpost suite is also extremely reasonably priced. So, I guess I'll .......

Ken
154
General Software Discussion / Re: ESET Smart Security
« Last post by KenR on November 06, 2007, 11:39 AM »
Thanks for all your effort. I am currently downloading the software.
Ken
155
General Software Discussion / Re: ESET Smart Security
« Last post by KenR on November 06, 2007, 10:23 AM »
Free trials are on the download page at http://www.eset.com/download/index.php...

Unless I am really missing something, all you can download on that page is their antivirus, not their smart suite. I agree with you completely though on their horrific web site.

Ken
156
General Software Discussion / Re: ESET Smart Security
« Last post by KenR on November 06, 2007, 08:53 AM »
So how can I get a copy to try it and

what, if any, is the upgrade policy?

Ken
157
General Software Discussion / Re: SyncBackSE vs. SuperFlexible
« Last post by KenR on November 01, 2007, 09:50 PM »
... Any donationcoder members still using SyncBackSE?
DBC

Yes, I still use SyncBackSE. I have looked at SF about 4 times. I have tried earnestly to see what everyone's enthusiasm is with SF and I just don't. So, there is at least 1 left. :)

Ken
158
Hey all,

I made an oversight in my initial J. River post (see link above) that communicated something that was both untrue and unfair. This is the post I made to correct the matter: http://yabb.jriver.c....msg294168#msg294168. If you read my initial post, please read this post to see my clarification.

This thread on the J. River site has become a really interesting discussion. I would encourage everyone who has experience with the forum to communicate it to that community by making a post in this thread. I know some of you have very strong feelings about the site. This is your chance to express them.

Ken
159
For those interested, this was my reply to the thread:

http://yabb.jriver.c....msg294085#msg294085

Ken
160
Living Room / Re: How much RAM do you have on your PC?
« Last post by KenR on October 17, 2007, 10:28 AM »
1Gb here, and I seldom use more than 50%. I must say I have a good memory manager, O&O's CleverCache.
Unused RAM is wasted RAM :)
Can you believe that i saw that one coming even before i read your post? ;)

TeaTime: f0dder is right, you should read more about these "memory optimizers", if most of your RAM isn't being used, it probably isn't 'optimizing' that much, it's making you waste speed.

Ok, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Most of my ram was being used and it got me back 20%. I've tried a few managers/optimizers and this program does seem to be a very nice. I'm going to try it for a while and see how it changes my life.

Ken
161
General Software Discussion / Re: Less Than Worthless Reply From Take 2 Interactive
« Last post by KenR on October 15, 2007, 10:49 AM »
I have no sympathy for technical support/customer service. I was a Senior Developer Support Engineer for Borland for many years. Yes, customers are jerks. Yes, customers are stupid. Yes, most answers are RTFM. However, it is your job to put on the fake smile and honestly try to assist the customer.

Let me throw a word of advice out there for anybody that might stumble upon this thread via a search engine.

The sales and marketing divisions of companies spend millions of dollars trying to get two seconds of the customer's time. They try advertising, mailing lists, etc. When a customer contacts a company with a problem, you have a genuine opportunity that absolutely should not be passed up. You have somebody who has identified themself as a customer with a bad feeling about your company or product - and we all know that unhappy customers are more likely to speak up in public than happy customers - and (this is the key) you have been provided an opportunity to change their opinion about your company or product. Most unhappy customers will just rip your company or product and you will never even know who they are or that they did you harm. It is your job to turn their poor opinion of the company/product around and make them an advocate for your company.

But when you are a support rep, that it is your job. They know what they are getting into. They chose to interact with the customer on behalf of the company. So, yes, it is a pretty sucky job most of the time, and even I had my bad moments/days/replies/postings/calls/etc., but it is the job of the seniors/mentors to monitor and watch for those and help the representative improve.

As for this particular posting of mine, it wasn't anything in particular other than I knew, going into this, that I was probably not going to get any helpful advice, based on dozens of contacts with support people in the past. It was meant to be more of a "look, the industry as a whole still sucks" posting, than anything in particular. The only hope I had was that, at best, multiple people had the same issue and so they had found an answer put hadn't posted it online yet, and if not, I would be adding a +1 to help the issue onto tech support's radar.

And last, a company's rules/policies/procedures are a huge part of customer support/service. You can have excellent people in those roles, but if you don't provide them with the proper tools, and atmosphere, to do their job well, they can't. A support department is a multiplier that can be positive, and raise the level of support a customer receives, or it can be a negative, driving down even your best workers.

Interesting and thoughtful (as usual) post TinJaw.

Ken
162
Yes, it might very well be a question about being stupid but happy...  8)

Seriously, I was trialing D'Opus, but didn't find any reason to keep it. Without remembering, I would guess that some / many of the impressive D'Opus features you were telling about - and they do sound impressive! -, demands that I learn how to write a script??

Directory Opus is extremely powerful. In some ways, we might compare it to Opera. It has a lot of things already built in that you can add on to other browsers. For example, directory opus has built in FTP, even advanced FTP features (encryptiuon) if you pay for them.

However, at least in my opinion, the real power is the ability of DO to be built (configured) into what you want. You can have different layouts and that simply pick between them. I could spend the rest of the afternoon talking about the things you could do with DO. You can do ..., you can do ..., you can do... with Diectory Opus, but you have to configure it. If you're not going to take the time and effort to do that, then it's not going to be much different than anything else out of the box.

As you may know, I just got XYplorer (see forum for more info) so I have not had time to work with it to know all that it will do. I have been using DO for about 5 years so I know it pretty well. So I don't really believe that I am qualified to address the features of any other file manager. But regarding Directory Opus, it's been able to do about everything I've ever tried to get it to. The things I mentioned were just scratching the surface. If you want to be stunned sometime, download the manual and read through it. It's staggering what the program is capable of. Again though, much, arguably most, of the power is in it's configurability and customization to meet your own needs and interests.

If all you're interested in is simple, straightforward file management, I'm sure about any program would work fine for you.

Pontificaciously, Ken
163
Curt, using Directory Opus, I have created scripts to set conditions before running a program, run the program, wait until it's finished and then do additional activities like delete files and then copy others.

I have created independent standalone toolbars that run all the software on my computer. These toolbars are set to be small icons until clicked and then the toolbar that comes out has large icons on.

I have buttons on my toolbar to set the default printer.

I have a toolbar on my file lister that has directories so I can drop files in or go to them. DO has a flat view that lets me view all of the files in all of the subdirectories below the current level. I can filter what files and folders I want to see and what files and folders I don't at any location.

I could go on and on. I am not familiar with the tool you are using, but I would be surprised if it has the power and flexibility that DO has. It has a scripting language that allows the user to perform and extremely wide variety of things.

On the other hand, if you're happy with what you have, then why worry about this stuff. Just stick with what you are happily using.

Ken
164
I finally upgraded to outpost v4, and some of the features are really nice.

However, it frequently eats up half my cpu cycles for no apparent reason and drags my computer to a virtual stand still.  not cool.  i've just about had it with outpost and i'm ready to find something else.

Hey Jesse,

How long have you been using the software? I found it did this initially after install, but then stopped and did not do it again. I have been happily using it for some time without any problems. I am often in the process manager box and can tell you that most of the time it is using between 2-5% of cpu cycles. Maybe give it a while longer and see if things settle down.?

Ken
165
I just tried archivarius again - it doesn't seem to behave well with Outlook 2003 !!

  • after indexing my PST had errors when I scanned it,
  • it loaded Outlook into memory to index and then refused to unload it again - consequently I had Outlook running in the background permanently (that was even after I exited Archivarius),
  • there didn't seem any way to index PST files without loading them into Outlook first - which is a complete pain and impractical - esp. if Outlook is permanently locked in memory  ... I would be using about 75% of my memory just to search my emails!
  • the help file is useless - there is no useful index and no obvious way to search it - which for a search app seems a bit daft

Am I missing something? Quickly finding stuff in emails (and esp. the hundreds of megabytes of archived mail) would be a primary reason for me to keep a search engine on my system - as it is I have uninstalled it again and will just use the slow outlook search function.

Anyone found anything that works with multiple PST files in a sensible and proper manner (ie. it doesn't damage the file, like Archivarius and X1 seem to, and doesn't require Outlook to be permanently loaded to access the index, and doesn't require all the PST files loaded into the default profile)

Hey Carol,

First of all, please know that while I am not worthy, I am honored to respond to one of your posts.

Having gotten that out of the way, I can tell you that when I initially tested it and in fact still, I have not had a problem with Archivarius with any program. I think I was using Bat! Pro at the time I first tried Arch. 3K. If not, then it worked on my computer with Outlook 2003.

I was pretty sceptical about the program, but decided to try it after all the good things people were saying. I must say, I have found it to be great. Once indexes are built it gives immediate answers and has worked flawlessly for me.

On the other hand, if you are having difficulty, then it would make sense to me to use locate for outlook and Arch 3K (or something else) for other searches.

I really hope you can get it to work. It really is a great program. I was generally satisfied with using X1 at the time, but Arch 3K blew it away. Maybe a forum post or email to the developer?

Ken
166
General Software Discussion / Re: Personal Movie Organizers - A quick rundown
« Last post by KenR on October 14, 2007, 08:31 AM »
On a different note, DVD Profiler is a $29 one time purchase. All future upgrades are included. On the other hand, Movie Collector is $39 for the current version with an upgrade cost for each major release. I know that money isn't an issue for any of us, but the shallow person in me compelled me to note this.

Ken
167
General Software Discussion / Re: Personal Movie Organizers - A quick rundown
« Last post by KenR on October 14, 2007, 04:58 AM »
Interesting post Nosh. I'm curious why Movie Collector didn't make the grade. After getting the input of others, I tried it as well as some others and started using it.

Ken
168
I use two programs for Desktop search. I use Where Is It? when I just want to find a file. When I want to search file contents, I use Archivarius 3000. I've tried lots of search software and like these two for the purposes I mentioned better than any other software - free or pay.

Ken
169
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: 20$ off XYplorer and lifetime license
« Last post by KenR on October 13, 2007, 12:25 PM »
Wow,

You DCers (maybe I should put 'my friends') never cease to astound me. Because of the contibutions/donations of numerous individuals, I received enough money to purchase the software (if I can wrench it away from mouser that is) and have done so. As I started to type this post, I received my permanent license in my email. THANK YOU SO MUCH to everyone that contributed.

I LOVE DC!

Appreciatively, Ken
170
Guess I was slow on this one too. I've considered the overlap between these three programs for quite a while Amondo. I agree with the comments of the others, really nice, detailed, review of the programs.

Ken
171
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: 20$ off XYplorer and lifetime license
« Last post by KenR on October 12, 2007, 04:02 PM »
DC is wonderful!!! Thanks SO MUCH for starting this TinJaw and all of you who followed suit. I can't express how much I appreciate the sentiment.

Ken
172
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: 20$ off XYplorer and lifetime license
« Last post by KenR on October 12, 2007, 02:37 PM »
Well shooooot! Yeah, I just missed it too. I might have bought it for that price and I'm even a loyal fan of DO. I wonder if I could make some kind of gee, I've been SO sick claim and get it at the discounted price...

Ah well,
Ken
173
General Software Discussion / Re: Question: Quickest way to receive spam?
« Last post by KenR on October 12, 2007, 02:02 PM »
Make a usenet news (NNTP) post with that email address as the email address on the post. Unless things have really changed with usenet, you should almost immediately start getting messages.

Ken
174
Living Room / Re: Update on member KenR health status: Surgery went well
« Last post by KenR on October 02, 2007, 04:39 PM »
I wanted to write an open letter DC to discuss the outcome of my surgery and say thanks.

First, I am still recovering from the surgery, but I am making good progress. While I still have considerable surgical pain, the operation appears to have been extremely successful at stopping the pain I was having prior to surgery. Additionally, I have not lost any sensation or motor functioning. In other words, the operation appears to have been a complete success. Clearly it is early in the process and things may change any time, but I am extremely encouraged thus far.

Second, I wanted to thank DC as a whole. I have received countless messages in a variety of forms wishing me success with the operation, good health, emotional support and numerous other good wishes. I really appreciate all the kindness and support everyone has shown me. It's been an emotionally and physically difficult time and the support and good wishes I received from everyone really helped.

Most sincerely,
Kenneth P. Reeder
175
Living Room / Re: UK Government wants your crypto keys... by law.
« Last post by KenR on October 02, 2007, 04:22 PM »
These are some pretty shocking data. I just hope there will be a brighter futue.
Pages: prev1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 33next