14101
Site/Forum Features / Re: Shortcomings of DC and How to Improve
« Last post by mouser on March 03, 2011, 12:08 PM »Since i think there is some general agreement that we have structural features we want to address (software repository, some more group-editable wiki like pages, clearer organization of content), i think it probably makes sense to agree that giving the site an aesthetic face lift is at the very bottom of the list of priorities. Personally i'm fine with the basic look of the site, though i'm not against a face lift.
So no change just for the sake of change -- we don't have the time for such stuff.
BUT i think perhaps most of the suggestions of improving the look and feel of the site should be taken in the spirit of: *ASSUMING* we are going to move to a proper CMS for the site and the look will change anyway, here is how the look could be improved.
So I think if we can all agree to that basic framing of the issue:
So no change just for the sake of change -- we don't have the time for such stuff.
BUT i think perhaps most of the suggestions of improving the look and feel of the site should be taken in the spirit of: *ASSUMING* we are going to move to a proper CMS for the site and the look will change anyway, here is how the look could be improved.
So I think if we can all agree to that basic framing of the issue:
- Focus on specific areas of functionality improvement that the site needs,
- In the process of discussing possible solutions, think about how a CMS or other restructuring might give the site a facelift (almost as a side effect), and how changes in organization and aesthetics might make the site easier to navigate.

Recent Posts

