topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday December 16, 2025, 5:15 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 ... 101next
1401
General Software Discussion / Re: Why I switched from Thunderbird to The Bat!
« Last post by Tuxman on October 18, 2012, 11:14 AM »
I see.  8)
1402
General Software Discussion / Re: Why I switched from Thunderbird to The Bat!
« Last post by Tuxman on October 18, 2012, 11:04 AM »
So why the tense of "I resisted"? :D
1403
General Software Discussion / Re: Why I switched from Thunderbird to The Bat!
« Last post by Tuxman on October 18, 2012, 10:45 AM »
Shoveling against the tide is important. I, for one, prefer "view as plain text" settings, so annoying spam does not look annoying at least.

Seriously, what is the advantage of using HTML Mails? Many people can't read them properly and HTML formatting adds no real value to mails.
1404
General Software Discussion / Re: Why I switched from Thunderbird to The Bat!
« Last post by Tuxman on October 18, 2012, 10:29 AM »
The Bat! can help you getting your PST illness under control by just not using PST files.  :P
1405
General Software Discussion / Re: Why I switched from Thunderbird to The Bat!
« Last post by Tuxman on October 18, 2012, 10:23 AM »
Heh. I went the other way.  From Pegasus to Thunderbird.
That's not the other way.

For a long time I resisted html in email.
Why don't you anymore?
There should be death penalty on HTML mails IMO. Annoying.
1406
General Software Discussion / Re: Why I switched from Thunderbird to The Bat!
« Last post by Tuxman on October 18, 2012, 10:12 AM »
Not necessarily different needs. When it comes to mail clients, you basically have the choice between full-featured groupware and simple IMAP/SMTP/POP3 management I'd always prefer the latter.

But it is good to know that I am not the only one here.  :Thmbsup:
1407
General Software Discussion / Why I switched from Thunderbird to The Bat!
« Last post by Tuxman on October 18, 2012, 10:00 AM »
Maybe anyone here cares. I usually would blog things like this, but as most of my regular readers stick to webmail services nowadays, I would receive a shitstorm and destructive comments at best. So I'll just put it into a BBS where no one would ever flame me. This here. :D

(Preliminary note: I mainly work with Windows. On other platforms I might probably come to a different conclusion.)

My first half-decent mail client was Mozilla Thunderbird version 0.something. (Early adopters, anyone?) Before they came up with it, I had been using Outlook Express and similar clients. I just did not really use e-mail back in the days. I was rather contented with Mozilla Thunderbird, it did what it should, it was free, it was convenient and it did not even stumble about my preference for weird server configurations. (Don't ask me why. I seem to have no luck with my chosen hosters.) Moreover it allowed my to use GnuPG and NNTP which went very well with my commitment to the German Pirate Party and similar occasions.

Then the problems began.

Suddenly Thunderbird turned out to be fractious about IMAP management. The faster update cycle bothered Enigmail so it broke every few weeks. Also the application felt quite sedate at times. Previously appreciated features - e.g. the possibility to show/hide e-mail headers dynamically - disappeared from the core application and had to be added via third-party extensions. The fact that now and then there were essential improvements among the changes, like the new user interface of Thunderbird 17, did not compensate that for me.

One fine day after Thunderbird 11 or something I accepted that a replacement was needed. However, to find a decent one proved to be very difficult. The first result, due to convenience reasons, was to drop web mail services off my list of potential replacements. I have to manage more than ten separate IMAP accounts by now - try to manage them per web mail clients. (And don't even dare to throw in Google Mail, that ads-partner-polluted piece of something. Aside from my sane paranoia about Google's evilness: I would really miss the convenience of a decent desktop mail client. Again: A certain number of IMAP accounts with very different configurations are soliciting my more or less regular attention.)

My list of requirements for a decent replacement was rather short: GnuPG 2 support and a threaded view (for my subscribed mailing lists) were quite the only needed features. NNTP was optional, I could as well use Opera, still Thunderbird, SeaMonkey or the like for that. (I don't know whether SeaMonkey can handle GnuPG 2 or not - on the other hand I never really was into the Mozilla Suite either. I considered it - and Opera - too hard to use because of the different moduses - mail, browser, ... - when I only need one.)

The choice (this is a good moment to remind you that I primarily use Windows) was appropriately complicated:

  • I generally like Pegasus Mail but it crashes reproducably - I had reported the issue, but AFAICS it has not been fixed for months. Also the handling needs getting used to for a while.
  • Outlook has an awful user interface. No-go: No support for OpenPGP/GnuPG available (or would it require obscure plug-ins or something?), so it's out.
  • Claws Mail seems to be something like Thunderbird in hideous clothes. Also it can't work with HTML mails. ;-) (Don't take this too seriously.)
The consequence was my union with a good old friend, enter The Bat!. It can do anything I need and had been developed continuously for years now. Using the trial version was - apart from initial weirdness about using CA certificates which are monitored internally by The Bat! - almost fun to me, GnuPG 2 works out of the box and the templating system (you can define complete templates for new e-mails, replies et al.) are for power mailers like me a must-have. You know you need it when you use it for the first time. :D

The Bat! was well worth the (reduced) ~ 20 € for a full-featured Professional license (valid until version 6.0.99). I also get a Voyager (portable The Bat!) with the license, the very helpful and kind German community is one more reason to like it. The developers (RITLabs, a Moldovan company) replies to bug reports quite fast and fixes severe bugs in one of the following beta versions if possible. Also included: Profile encryption, schedulable backups of the complete application with all accounts, import from Thunderbird.

Of course The Bat! is mainly a mailing application. No NNTP, no RSS, only a rudimentary calendar without cloud synchronization. - Anyway, if you are a power user of RSS and/or calendars, you probably already use (like me) dedicated solutions. Compared to FeedDemon/RSSOwl and Rainlendar, Thunderbird's provided functions are sort of a joke.

As a side note here's some screenshot after having moved all mail accounts from Thunderbird into The Bat!:



Je ne regrette rien.

You are kindly allowed to make fun of me now.
1408
General Software Discussion / Re: Does the browser Opera suck?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 14, 2012, 10:52 AM »
Bah. piracy!
1409
General Software Discussion / Re: Does the browser Opera suck?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 14, 2012, 04:35 AM »
Very enthralling answer. Your deep insight has inspired me.
Great. :)

See, Opera has serious rendering issues, but instead of fixing them they add more bloat. P2P, chat, e-mail, a web server (srsly?!)...
1410
General Software Discussion / Re: Does the browser Opera suck?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 13, 2012, 02:36 AM »
Does the browser Opera suck?
Yes.
1411
Now that's intuitive...

Thanks.
1412
General Software Discussion / Re: ringtones: a history?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 04, 2012, 05:22 AM »
I have never bought a ringtone. Why should I? Even if I can't find a free one, my recent phones supported MP3 files.
1413
+1 for PDF XChange. Although I like the non-bloat of Sumatra PDF (and dislike the bright yellow default screen which makes me blind for a second every time I start it), PDF XChange is the only PDF viewer I have tried which allows me to perform basic editing tasks without bloat.
1414
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 03, 2012, 05:27 AM »
"Does anyone here use Bitcoins?"

I use them, but no one spends some to me. A pity, I really would love to buy drugs off the Silk Road.
1415
Living Room / Re: What web sites would deserve more attention?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 01, 2012, 01:06 PM »
No problem. ;)
1416
Living Room / Re: What web sites would deserve more attention?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 01, 2012, 11:38 AM »
You actually did.

A good website? Deserving more attention? Mine aside?
Uhm. What about http://www.bonkersworld.net/ or smth?
1417
Living Room / Re: What web sites would deserve more attention?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 01, 2012, 11:33 AM »
Um...Canonical makes software for Linux...Microsoft makes software for Windows?
Precisely. So what is the point of the fact that Microsoft only provides free software for their own environment? So does everyone else.

Out of curiosity, are you going someplace with any of this - or is this just the usual game of devil's advocate you're playing?
 :)
I just wanted to show why bashing Microsoft while praising "FOSS" companies is plain wrong.
1418
Living Room / Re: What web sites would deserve more attention?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 01, 2012, 11:26 AM »
Audacity is not a Canonical software.
1419
Living Room / Re: What web sites would deserve more attention?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 01, 2012, 11:21 AM »
Which runs on their proprietary "not free" operating system. ;)
Oh, I'd guess Microsoft has Powerpoint Viewer for Mac or something.
"Proprietary" as a knock-out? Well, bye Linux then, too, huh?
1420
Living Room / Re: What web sites would deserve more attention?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 01, 2012, 11:18 AM »
"Free" software from MS is only for software that supports one of their platforms in one way or another.

So?

Is there any free Canonical software for Windows?

Just asking.
1421
Living Room / Re: What web sites would deserve more attention?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 01, 2012, 11:07 AM »
Because "free" is the one word Microsoft doesn't ever want to see regularly paired with the word 'software' - no matter who is doing the pairing.
Depends. Microsoft has a lot of free software available.
1422
Living Room / Re: What web sites would deserve more attention?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 01, 2012, 08:08 AM »
With Microsoft making Windows more and more closed
Huh? Where/why/what?
1423
Living Room / Re: What web sites would deserve more attention?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 01, 2012, 03:13 AM »
What web sites would deserve a bit of free promotion? If you know a perfect candidate, please leave a reply here or on my blog http://www.rw-designer.com/entry/883
So you seem to think yours does?  :P
1424
General Software Discussion / Re: Wicked Cool Unusual Features in Software
« Last post by Tuxman on September 26, 2012, 05:55 AM »
Oh, it can. There are several orgmode plug-ins and Emacs keybindings available. It only lacks a web browser.
1425
General Software Discussion / Re: Wicked Cool Unusual Features in Software
« Last post by Tuxman on September 25, 2012, 05:00 PM »
Vim can tweet.  8)
Pages: prev1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 ... 101next