topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 9:52 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 ... 76next
1301
General Software Discussion / Re: Make Firefox 3 load faster
« Last post by Paul Keith on March 31, 2009, 06:22 PM »
Out of curiosity how many tabs do you usually have open when you open Firefox?

Normally one (I built my own start page from which I navigate to my fav sites),  occasionally three to four (during the Add-ons update process), rarely eight to ten (when I need to invoke session restore).

I guess this tweak isn't for me. I normally open FirefoxPortable with 25+ tabs minimum.
1302
General Software Discussion / Re: Make Firefox 3 load faster
« Last post by Paul Keith on March 31, 2009, 07:19 AM »
I've found a way to make Firefox 3 or 2 lightning fast without compromising security or tweaking it in any way.  It loads in under 15 seconds everytime.  I've christened it Shaolin RAMming.  It takes RAM disking, which fodder uses, a step further.  I create a RAM disk big enough to load the entire portable app edition of Firefox 3 and have it load up automatically at start up, where it stays for the duration of my session.

I've tried all the RAMdisk apps I could find out there, and settled on this very easy to use little number:  Virtual Hard Drive Pro 2 from FarStone ($29.95 (US)).  After installing it, I followed the directions for creating a RAM disk.  In my case, I chose 200 MB (out of 1.5 GB RAM).  Next, I downloaded and installed the portable app edition of Firefox 3 into my RAMdisk.  Why portable?  Because it's self-contained, and therefore won't be dragged down by having its cache, profiles, add-ons, etc, placed in various other locations on my hard drive.  With Firefox 3 portable installed and configured with a 85 MB cache, it takes up about 170 MB of my 200 MB RAMdisk (leaving me a generous 25 to 30 MB of breathing room).

This RAMdisk application saves a disk image of your RAMdisk to any location you specify on whatever persistent storage medium you choose...automatically.  Using the same disk imaging technology which apps like Acronis and ShadowProtect use, Virtual Hard Drive Pro 2 can be configured to take disk images of the contents of your RAMdrive either at regular user-specified intervals or just once upon shutdown.  I chose the once upon shutdown option because I reboot my computer on a daily basis and don't mind losing a new bookmark or two if something goes wrong. 

Since Virtual Hard Drive Pro 2 allows me to specify where to save this disk image, I chose my USB drive.  In essence, I've completely bypassed my hard drive altogether.  The disk image of my RAMdisk is saved to my USB drive upon shutdown (automatically).  When I reboot, it is taken from my USB drive and reloaded into my RAMdisk (again, automatically).  This cycle repeats itself without user intervention every time I start up or shut down my computer.  I've been using this technique for about a year now without a single major disaster.  Once or twice, when my machine locked up, I lost the contents of my RAMdisk, but then I simply reloaded yesterday's image file (saved to my USB drive). I lost a new bookmark or two, maybe one new add-on.

My results: Firefox 3 loads in under 15 seconds, runs eerily silent (no hard drive access noise or slowdown), and since it bypasses my hard drive completely, it saves that much wear and tear.  All automatically.  If an outage occurs, I simply recreate the RAMdisk and reload the image file from my USB drive (I also make a backup copy of it elsewhere on my hard drive).  This technique works for any portable app, btw.  The amount of available system RAM on your machine is the only limit.

(My system: Pentium 4 2.8 GHz (HT), 1.5 GB RAM, Windows XP Home, 180 GB SATA HD.  Virtual Hard Drive 2 Pro (presently discounted down to $20 US): http://www.farstone....rtual-hard-drive.htm)

Out of curiosity how many tabs do you usually have open when you open Firefox?
1303
The Form Letter Machine / Re: Links to Reviews and Comments - Add yours!
« Last post by Paul Keith on March 31, 2009, 03:30 AM »
Thanks mouser. I can't think of any minor changes though. If anything I feel like most other programs should adapt the minimize to tray icon and preview/checkbox options of the program.

Everything about the program seems major. If there's one major minor thing I hoped you'll consider for this version before the next major rewrite is that maybe you can consider the idea of creating one or two backup everytime a new entry is added because right now, it's just too easy to click on the wrong tree for saving and by then, having a backup of a deleted tree is kinda futile.

This is also a bit useless but I just like having lite versions of even lite programs. It's my personal thing though because I don't use it as what it's meant to be used but as an outliner. I'd like the variable to be replaced by a mini-tree again so while you can't highlight the text, you can theoretically cut it to even small parts and maybe the option to go to that part like a bookmark for the notes. I'm thinking since it's just based on the larger tree, it will be just minor to remove the variable option and replace it with a smaller tree within the tree. It's just my totally un-educated guess though and it's really just a minor musing of someone who doesn't know how to program as proven with this minor change which is more preference: Maybe you can have it set so the UI can entirely be hidden in replacement of a small +/-/E on either the right or left side of the screen and the configuration be set to the hotkey to ctrl+p. Again, these are just distractions to the true desires I've read many want out of this program though so it's not really a priority and I do mean it when I can't think of minor things that can be changed at this point.

(+ being add new tree, - delete, E - edit configuration)
1304
The Form Letter Machine / Re: Links to Reviews and Comments - Add yours!
« Last post by Paul Keith on March 30, 2009, 10:21 PM »
Have to admire the beauty of this program, mouser. Even when I hate how it's so easy to overwrite a tree because of the saving mechanism or the quirky tree editing of the program or the lack of rtf and keyboard shortcuts, this is still a part of my core outlining tools and the only thing I can find that can replicate these checbox features are heavy mindmap apps like Freemind and PersonalBrain. (OneNote for example can only hide content underneath it if it's indented like an outline)
1305
General Software Discussion / Re: CintaNotes
« Last post by Paul Keith on March 30, 2009, 10:17 PM »
Yeah, I'm actually curious at the development of this thing but right now it's not there yet.
1306
General Software Discussion / Re: Make Firefox 3 load faster
« Last post by Paul Keith on March 30, 2009, 10:15 PM »
I'm really interested in the claims made by stoobee, AndyM, dantheman, and others about Firefox 3 loading in under 10 seconds.  Are you talking about the first time you start FF after you've booted up your computer?  It takes more than a minute on my computer (which admittedly is almost three years old.  The computer is running WinXP Pro, has a 3.20 GHz Pentium 4 processor, 1 GB RAM, and plenty of free space on the hard drive.)  Currently, I've got FF 3.0.8 with about 20 add-ons.  After the first time, FF tends to start up pretty quickly, but the first time is absurdly long, especially in comparison to Opera 9.64, which starts up in about 5 seconds even the first time I run it.  At times, Firefox is also pretty sluggish if I close it down and don't use it for an hour or so.  I've gotten so frustrated with it that I've thought about going back to Opera as my default browser, and just using Firefox when I can't use Opera (e.g., when using WebResearch).  I probably won't do that, since I'm loathe to give up AdBlock, FlashBlock, CookieCuller, and RoboForm (LastPass isn't nearly as good), but I'd love to find a way to make Firefox as responsive as Opera.

In the end you might have to resort to that. I actually found that Firefox's slow start up doesn't bother me if I'm in a more lightweight browser. Of course there's the problem of Firefox hogging the memory but ironically enough, I found since Opera with more tabs and Google with some tabs  still being much less sluggier than FF with those links inside it, I just treat FF like Adobe PDF Reader or some Java App.

Also, the more you deviate from Firefox the more you can trim down on add-ons and the like. Hell, I would even go overboard if it doesn't overwhelm you. Move some add-ons to Flock, some add-ons to Firefox, use Opera as your main browser, use Google as your 2nd lightweight browser (for AJAX sites) and use Maxthon for the third and K-meleon for the 4th. Then just use Flock and Firefox for heavy duty stuff.

I don't do this myself though but because I don't, my taboo firefox extension is so loaded, I can't open the full taboo view or else my 1gb ram system completely slows down beyond minutes.
1307
General Software Discussion / Re: eBook Reader alternate to Acrobat?
« Last post by Paul Keith on March 30, 2009, 10:06 PM »
No but even prior to the release of this app, there were many tricks in speeding up version 8 of Adobe:

http://www.techieque...der-fast-like-foxit/

http://lifehacker.co...-reader-8-263500.php

1308
General Software Discussion / Re: Ack! Adobe Confusion! Need to start anew!
« Last post by Paul Keith on March 30, 2009, 06:53 PM »
I second Revo.
1309
General Software Discussion / Re: eBook Reader alternate to Acrobat?
« Last post by Paul Keith on March 30, 2009, 06:40 PM »
The one thing to mention about Adobe Lite is that it *isn't* sanctioned by Adobe, but just someone that altered the installer (and doesn't say exactly what was altered).  Not something that I trust, personally...

True but that's also why it could be trustworthy enough. It's just basically an installer where the option to lighten it up has been tweaked for the user already as opposed to looking for instructions. As far as I know, no other tweak has been made to it so it's basically the same installer so it's as safe as the default installer. (meaning unsafe with javascript on)

In fact, it's one of the things I wanted other installers to do. It just can get annoying when you don't know how to tweak a program and no one gives you any visual cues. Also it's more practical that way.
1310
General Software Discussion / Re: eBook Reader alternate to Acrobat?
« Last post by Paul Keith on March 30, 2009, 10:28 AM »
For reading, Foxit is too barebones and quirky for me.

Just use Adobe Lite if you don't want to do the work in configuring Adobe Pro.
1311
Living Room / Re: The Longest Rant Ever
« Last post by Paul Keith on March 29, 2009, 10:53 PM »
Not really sure why though...

Jim

Paul - was that you?!?!   :P

Lol no. Even that was too repetitive for me. :p

I think it was just a joke message you have to type in to unsubcribe from a newsletter somewhere. (I didn't bother paying much attention to the link)
1312
Edit: It's also going to be long. Longer than any post I've written in this forum. That's why I'm asking you if you really want to read something like it.
hmm, if it's going to be the longest post you've done then it's not worth it. sorry to say that, nothing personal, of course. i'm just interested in the novel approaches people may have; if it requires having to understand a complex set of operations then i won't be interested. if you've any unusual little methods that are unique then they are probably worth revealing about.

i'm interested in the fun parts, the game parts, the daft parts. but only if it's brief.

Yeah, I thought so. It's really simple but to remove the headaches, I quadruple dump instead of David Allen's single dump/sometimes double dump so it's long. No single area works through separation though because it's a system. (or rather they're nothing special once you separate them)
1313
Nudone,

I might not disagree with the main point you are trying to make.. but i think one could also argue it in this way:

There is no magic "system" that is going to fix you and make you more organized.  Your problems may have deeper causes.
And maybe there is nothing that much better about one system over another.
But it's possible that in a search and exploration of new systems you might discover some deeper issues or leave yourself open to learning something about yourself that helps.

At least that's a more positive take on the search for an organizational system that suits you.

Hmm one could take an eclectic approach.  Personally I think most "systems" degenerate into dogma that crams reality into the mold with enough pressure to make it "fit" the system.  Better to steal one good gimmick/feature or two from each and chuck the rest. :)


The problem with this approach is it is precisely how semi-moderate planner type/productive people have hijacked the GTD concept.

They say "oh, the great thing about GTD is that you can take these many concepts" and while it's true to some extent, it's also true for most systems.

The bad side is that they rarely tell you what the end result of implementing GTD is. In fact more often than not, I've only heard David Allen say this is what GTD is when you completely do it. Sure, he's the creator of the system so he'll do that but these other people often don't even try.

What they'll often do is hide enough frustrations until some new hip trick software arrives or they discover some cool productivity trick that just complicates the process and is only good on the surface and then lo and behold. GTD is complicated and so to simplify things, try this.

This is how we got the horrible confusing thing that we should all just take bits off and create eclectic approach and productivity systems are a headache and hard to compare in the first place! Worse, often times, productivity writers won't try to set standards for fear of some people thinking their systems might be still flawed that rather than accept the criticism, they "encourage" the supporters and these supporters often end up defending them to the point that they rarely need to.

The problem of course is that everyone who doesn't buy the system or doesn't get the system is the victim because they're rarely guided into the system but instead the supporters create such a mish mash of their own eclectic approach plus the creator's productivity system that it trickles down to software design for these systems, it trickles down to confusion and headaches with these systems but worse, you can't properly compare the two systems validly because it has become like emacs vs. vim. Each side having so much eclectic plugins that you need to consider the plugins.

While this is bad for software, it at least isn't life altering for most people (just a headache to understand the right customization) With productivity systems though, it becomes a case where a productivity system is near impossible to criticize "as a system" (i.e. not some separate section) because then somebody would say, "oh you didn't try it with index cards" or "oh you didn't try it with this software" that even if you get past that, people will just say "oh you're not supposed to follow through and through and it's supposed to be eclectic" that in the end, if you didn't quit by then because of the confusion, you would have a headache until you just go "no more. They all don't work!" after having your entire mindset nearly destroyed.

I'm not a proponent of GTD though nor do I claim to be an expert in productivity systems but it's pretty obvious to me that when you try to browse productivity blogs especially the popular ones, no one dares to criticize each other. It's usually the commentors and often only with side-glancing arguments. No in-depth discussions. It's also a crime many software supporters have. They used these software and suddenly the software can or they figure'd out a way to create @work, @home filters and checkboxes and tabs and they call it GTD and few call them out on it until something like a ThinkingRock comes and oh suddenly it's:

While many other task management applications have found ways to incorporate the ideas put forth by the Getting Things Done methodology that David Allen developed, it seems that very few have been built from the ground up as GTD applications. There are certainly a few web applications that can make that claim, but in terms of "offline" applications, the pickings are pretty slim.

Guess what happens after this? Will the supporters take this as a sign that something is amiss in the rest of software-dom? Nope. Instead criticism only trickles down to: "Oh, it's a Java app" or "Oh, I don't like having a flash drive with me". Again. Nothing on the actual system. It's like the kernel is connected to whatever application is open at the moment. Of course it all falls down like a house of cards. Even these eclectic people rarely hang up their productivity system to be looked at. Believe me, my system's eclectic too and I can tell you, it's not as easy as molding a system. I had went three versions of my molded system already because I eventually found out a flaw again and again so to say eclectic models are the best, then guess what, all these supposed original productivity systems are eclectic models too. If they all were perfect and meant for eclectic adaptation than these systems wouldn't have gotten away with any praise because then there would be no standards by which to judge them except for which becomes the best marketed system. Henceforth, productivity will never improve because instead of building upon the shoulders of better productivity systems, everyone's taking a piece out of the mona lisa and using it as sticky notes.
1314
Unfortunately nudone, I'm extremely un-productive so even though I have what I consider a system, it's not really good if it's only making me slightly more productive.

I will say though that I have had the same mental problems as app except I wasn't productive in the first place.

If you like to know still though, I could probably reserve some day tomorrow to write it and try to include images but it's really not something you could even say comes close to working.

Edit: It's also going to be long. Longer than any post I've written in this forum. That's why I'm asking you if you really want to read something like it.
1315
Unfortunately this isn't for me either. It's interesting though how kartal says Freemind is freeform when these two apps is basically the same thing.

You could even say Freemind is the MS Word where as TreeSheets is the Excel of the same model.
1316
One thing I also forgot to add is even though I wasn't here in the past GOE, I get the impression that you guys or many of you guys compared the systems on a whim.

I'm not claiming that this is the cause for distress but I think productivity systems should have a different way of comparison. Not that I found the perfect solution but in a way, it's also how I feel many notetaker and outliner comparisons are flawed.

Often times when we compare them, we don't have this big test project (that really needs to be done) to move around in each notetakers. Instead the ones I read often compare features, tasks, speed, etc.

I find at least with notetakers and softwares, it's possible to get away with this under the rationale that "no one person has the same needs".

With productivity systems though, when applied it either sinks into the neck of the tester like a vampire or it doesn't do anything at all. Then often times the guy recommending the system will say that you need to make a habit out of it first. Then they recommend random number of days first.

It's just an assumption. If I'm wrong, my mistake. I apologize.
1317
Post New Requests Here / Re: Digital Sticky Notes Outliner
« Last post by Paul Keith on March 27, 2009, 01:04 PM »
Lol, considering the amount of people here who use heavy duty outliners, I feel this is simple.
1318
General Software Discussion / Re: Rambooster. Junk?
« Last post by Paul Keith on March 26, 2009, 06:19 PM »
siouxdax, I'm using RAMPage but I'm not saying that's the best. I just use it to monitor when it's time to cut off on tabs.

http://www.jfitz.com/software/RAMpage/

Also the article is very easy for newbies to understand.
1319
Hmm... *images of app being a sweet gentle tough as hell lady* crashes

Anwyays, I disagree with both nudone and mouser's comments because it assumes all systems addresses one sort of category.

They may be called productivity systems but at their core, they're often very different in goal.

Mark Forster's guides for example are often reliant on people already having a list. Not just starting with one.

Allen's guides IMO is more on getting it and then literally zoom zoom zooming your brain to emptiness. (but his followers rarely address that because they rarely get to that stage)

Thinking like Leonardo (the book) IMO is more on how to come as close to a modern Leonardo so it adds drawing basics and food to it.

Steve Pavlina IMO is more on the actual specific experiences he has rather than selling a productivity system.

Those are just a few examples. I'm not saying all these productivity systems are perfect and you just don't get it but to assume that someone who's moderately on top and have time to compare is the audience...it just seems amiss.

Most people who follow these people even rarely compare productivity systems. In fact few people ever successfully mold two exact productivity system, at least not that I have heard of it. Instead what you often find is people saying they "molded" it to their needs and then keeping that system away from people or just mentioning the tools they use or the textbook encyclopedia definition rather than the context behind the system like some of these more developed ones. In fact that's how these productivity system seem to often overlap. There's often a key similarity at the beginning that branches off to some person saying, ok: "This is how I did it."
1320
This is old and too short to be useful but I thought I'd add this as a footnote for the future GOE if it ever happens:

Personally I feel that the "you need self-discipline to do this system" has always been a flaw of the actual system. I find that the actual effective parts of systems don't require self-discipline at all and the ones that do, you can be trained at a work or school for that and self-discipline is actually more counter-productive except for someone who does buy into that concept and hence their motivation can be found in achieving that concept rather than on being self-disciplined.

Btw to answer the topic, I would say to look for it in other people. If you can't find it in your current environment, chances are your surroundings suck. (No offense to the people you know.) It's the whole "you need a purpose" thing all over again. Self-discipline doesn't help you define a purpose. Productivity systems does. So if you rationalize that self-discipline is required to adapt a system then the specific system is flawed right then and there for asking you to be productive rather than making you productive. It's like a person selling you a gold ferrarri but only if you can find oil in the Sahara desert first. Sorry, no deal.
1321
Nice! I was looking for something like this for a long time.

Hopefully this could substitute the idea of IGoogle/Netvibes Sticky Notes in an offline format.
1322
For a less productivity, more focused on political awareness argument that counters allen's arguments above, see Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman.
1323
Dunno about that, really. I don't find Vista to be very CPU-draining, and x4500HD is (more than!) enough for running Aero pleasantly. The only thing a bit on the low end is the RAM, but that isn't a problem either - I'd even say it's a non-issue for people who aren't going to run anything heavy. I do appreciate 2GB in my laptop, but then again that's used for Eclipse, VS2008, SQL Server 2005 et cetera - a bit more than casual web browsing and some text editing ;)

Yes, but then you're starting to define the user now rather than optimize it for the user.

Navigating folder hierarchy, opening text files, and using filemanager "find in files" to look for a topic is easier than HtmlHelp? O_o

As for RTFM, that's really not something I'd expect being helpful for newbie on linux. The documentation there is often pretty bad, and definitely written with power users programmers in mind.

Yes, it is actually. I find the right folder hierarchy is much easier for a new OS user to grasp than oh ok, tree-lines, small fonts, possible bad documentation that goes on and on, constant searches. It's like a test of willingness to grasp an OS and even though Linux's documentation is bad, if you've got a newbie that's willing to go through hell, than they can still gleam something from it.

That's the problem though. They don't. They just want to find stuff. At their pace and at their time. That's why find in files doesn't matter. It's like a real world book. The average person doesn't highlight books, they read books.

All you really need is a good fast basic finder like Everything (if you're on Windows) and that's it. Even better if they can quickly grasp the concept of launchers like FARR/Launchy/Gnome Do + RocketDock or whatever dock is used. (Gnome has a cool drawer panel applet though and Tomboy is good for Table of Contents)

Here's an example:

I have in my desktop a folder called Weekly Review and underneath it a folder called Personal Information Manager of Text and underneath it a folder called Tweaks and underneath it a folder called Browser and there contains titles/headers of instructions I found over the internet.

Seems like a lot of click for a power user but to me it isn't. Why? Terminology may be iffy but it works for me because I often don't use help files to read stuff. I often am in a help file to find a snippet of well...help. That's what most newbie users often use help for anyways. Anything more complicated...hello irc or forums and just ask.

1) if you need to run windows programs on linux, you have failed and might as well run windows.
2) newbies won't be installing the OS themselves.
3) limited user account on XP or Vista (with UAC love), windows' own firewall enabled, and "virus what me worry?". If tomos adds a free AV and firefox w/adblockplus to the mix, even better.

Yeah sure, linux has come a long way and the recent distros are relatively friendly, as long as you only need to do bog-standard stuff. I wager that, knowing their needs, I could put my mother or grandmother on linux - partially because they don't need much stuff, and more importantly because I'm familiar enough with linux to troubleshoot. But I'd still go for Windows, because it's less hassle and there's a lot more people with windows experience to help out.

Considering that tomos says he doesn't have linux experience at all, I'd say the choice is a no-brainer.

No. What he said was he fears he might get called. Do you really expect any newbie to not call him anyways when Windows start running slow because they failed to keep updating their antiviruses?

If you need to run applications on windows, it doesn't mean you don't also run applications on Linux. That's just flawed thinking for a power user to assume that of a newbie. Some of the user-friendliest free applications are easier to set up on Linux as long as a person doesn't have a pre-defined expectation from an old Windows way of working.

For ex.

Tomboy is still the most user friendly wiki for a casual user.
BasKet Notepads, among the most user friendly mindmapping outliners for any OS.
PCMan File Manger, one of the most casual file managers for any casual user who just wants to browse folders.

Newbies might not install the OS themselves but I guarantee you, they will be calling you lots of times when Windows get hit bad with viruses. Linux is also bad there but that's why I prefer Mint. Because of it's original problem of having to disable updates in Celena because users using Cassandra updated badly, they have an improved upgrade manager that's more user friendly than even Windows Updates to a newbie user.

Also it's just bad pedagogy to not teach a person how to reformat because they will constantly call you back on it. In Windows, it's easy but in Linux, it's really easy.

As for what to worry? How about not regularly updating antiviruses? How about using IE? How about a failed Windows updates again? How about not having a separate user folder? How about not having a LiveCD?

Linux might not be perfect but it has beat Windows on many things. Oh and if you're going to annoy a newbie with LUA, won't it be better to introduce them to Linux's sudo anyways? It's basically the same manner of learning anyway except in the future newbies would less likely find ways to disable LUA out of frustration.
1324
General Software Discussion / Re: another mind/logic mapping tool
« Last post by Paul Keith on March 25, 2009, 06:06 PM »
Unfortunately no, Argumentative was one of the first mapping tools I found I wanted to use when I was looking to drop Freemind and I was optimistic about it until the flaw of the model showed itself.

It isn't that the program is bad per se but it's model is bad. It uses an old but popular model of separating one topic to two sides, pros and cons and pretty much that. The model is bad for the same reason Freemind is bad as a mindmapping tool, it doesn't really work well for right brained types to be limited to a structure and left-brained types would prefer outlines.

In fact, I dare you to try using this program alone and then comparing it with making a rico cluster on paper and then outlining the items and then transferring it in outline form to the PC. You'll often get better results with the latter everytime and if you can get better results with that, you can pretty much substitute Argumentative for any outliner/Freemind/MindManager tools.

Arguments are simply too sporadic to be limited in two columns especially wicked problems.

I will say though that I'm extremely biased to Compendium and I have often recommended that in many posts here that it might be shilling. Unfortunately by omitting that name, I also realize that someone can dig up a past many posts of mine mentioning that program and can use my avoidance of it's mention as an attempt to be secretly biased against this program.
1325
Not sure I understand you here. Didn't I say you can have them both installed? I do, as a matter of fact. While I use only Scrapbook+ now, I keep Scrapbook on board so it'll be auto-updated, prompting me to check out what's happening to Scrapbook. So far there have been only fixes to bugs I haven't seen in SB+ (lucky or SB+ fixed them already). But if they diverge someday, I'll reevaluate.

Oh, I meant when they are both activated. I was assuming you had one clicked as disabled in the Firefox Add-ons menu.

Again I'm not sure I understand. If you don't want to use Wired-Marker for "live" pages, then don't. You don't need a tweak to achieve that. And yet I don't see the point of using Wired-Marker to highlight things in pages captured by Scrapbook, which has its own handy highlight tools. But, if you insist, then of course you can do that. Wired-Marker can be used on anything you load into Firefox (e.g., your own html pages), as long as the URL (path for local file) stays the same.

Well I haven't installed it so I wouldn't know. I just thought it seems to have a handy searchable highlight function that Scrapbook's highlight doesn't have.
Pages: prev1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 ... 76next