topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday June 24, 2025, 1:58 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 ... 106next
1276
Living Room / Re: website maker?
« Last post by JavaJones on May 21, 2010, 08:35 PM »
Doesn't .NET require a Microsoft-based server? Many web servers (especially the cheaper ones) are Linux-based and may not support it.

Personally I've found Joomla to be pretty easy to setup initially. Customization can be more messy, especially with the variable quality of different extensions/plugins/modules. But overall I find the system fairly functional. I know many people don't, but the same systems some of them recommend (e.g. Xoops), make absolutely no sense to me. Some even claim Drupal is a "more intuitive" system... Hah. Anyway the point is I think it's at least partly a matter of personal taste. For example some people find "node network"-based UI systems (e.g. http://1.bp.blogspot...articleLabNodeUI.PNG) to be highly intuitive, other people can't make head or tails of it. One thing is for sure about Joomla though - the automated installer is very easy to use.

One last thing I want to say is I don't think "if you want PHP, you want Joomla" is really great advice. There are a zillion PHP-based CMSs and Joomla, while admittedly one of the most popular, is not necessarily the best (or most intuitive). Some other good options to consider are Silverstripe and Concrete5, among many others (ModX, the aforementioned Xoops, Drupal, etc. etc.).

- Oshyan
1277
Well, that pigeonholes Wave's functionality pretty tightly then, and I thought Google had bigger ambitions for it (see all the widgets/apps/whatever you can embed in a Wave for example). But if all Wave is intended to do is replace email and IM, then I'm definitely not going to bother. It has some small efficiency gains over both, but also some drawbacks, and overall is not the solution I'm looking for to the issues of either IM or email. To each their own, of course.

- Oshyan
1278
On point 4, Wave is not just like a regular website. It's a collaborative tool for creating documents and discussion. So yes, I do kind of expect it to be exportable, if they want it to be useful for more than just casual discussion.

- Oshyan
1279
Living Room / Re: GPS Unit Recommendations?
« Last post by JavaJones on May 21, 2010, 08:05 PM »
In general I consider a cell phone GPS to be better than a stand-alone for several reasons (in no particular order).

1: Updated maps: Theoretically maps will always be more up-to-date because they're based on Internet resources that can be consistently updated by the companies maintaining them. Theoretically if you've just received an update for your GPS (buying a brand-new GPS does *not* guarantee you have the latest maps), you may have as up-to-date or even more up-to-date maps than those online, but practically speaking the Internet-based maps will usually be more accurate.

2: GPS signal strength augmented by cell tower triangulation: GPS signal aquisition and accuracy are generally about as good as an average stand-alone GPS. If they are slower, it is not by a significant amount. Additionally, they can use cell tower location assistance to get rough positioning before GPS signal is available.

3: Photo-based street view: With Google-based navigation (basically, an Android phone) you have the option of street-view, so you can see exactly what your turn should look like, etc. This potentially solves questionable accuracy of maps in many cases, although of course the street view may also be out of date.

4: Voice commands: With the latest Android-based Google Navigation, you can actually speak destinations and searches to your phone. Talk about hands free!

5: Free live traffic: Most cell phone GPS apps have live traffic and many can use this info to help re-route you around trafficky areas. Many GPSs now also include this feature, sometimes free or sometimes with a service fee. But most of the less expensive models don't have it, from what I've seen.

6: Theft issues, portability, and "always available": With a cell phone that has GPS built-in, it's easy (and actually the norm) to take it with you when you leave the car. This means no theft issues. Whereas even if your stand-alone GPS detaches from its car mount, most often you just stick it in the glove box, so if someone does break into your car, they can still take it. With a cell phone you also have the GPS and related functions with you at all time, without the inconvenience of carrying a separate device. It's already designed for ultimate pocketability. You can use the GPS easily on foot (or a bike, or public transit), even to the point of "augmented reality" (see Layar for a really cool example).

7: Updated Points of Interest: Relating to point 1 above, the points of interest will also always be up-to-date, and can have additional info that most GPSs wont, like links to Yelp reviews, etc. This can be especially helpful when you're in an unfamiliar area (as you often are when using GPS for navigation) and you want to find a good restaurant to go to, for example.

8: You generally have the option of changing the GPS software or using additional utilities to augment its capabilities. With Android, for example, there will be multiple GPS and navigation-related apps which you can choose from. Not only that but these apps will be updated over time. With a hardware GPS you will generally need to buy a new GPS unit to get the latest software.

9: More or less consistent update of new features over time. This is particularly true with Android, though whether you can upgrade to the latest OS version does depend on the age and manufacturer of your hardware, so choose wisely. But, assuming you have the right phone, you can go from Android 1.6 (starting OS for some of the older phones) all the way up to 2.1 and soon 2.2, without buying new hardware or paying a dime. Newer OS features include upgrades to voice control, better nav including bike routing, etc. Most new features are phone-centric, but GPS-related stuff also gets upgraded.

10: Sophisticated Internet-based Point of Interest and other searches: You can search for nearby points of interest of all types using name, type of destination, and a lot more. While some GPSs also include good PoI databases and search functionality, the actual searches are sometimes cumbersome. On recent Android phones these searches can also leverage voice recognition. For example, speak the name of a restaurant you want to get to and it will find the location, then you can ask for directions.

As you can see I'm pretty sold on the idea of a GPS-enabled phone. Do I have one yet? Sadly, no. Well, I do, but the GPS doesn't work on my current carrier (Credo). So why, you ask, am I such an advocate for it if I don't have one yet? Well, I've spent a lot of time researching it in preparation for my own GPS purchase, during which I heavily considered the stand-alone vs. cell phone option. I ultimately decided to buy a good Android-based phone and switch carriers, in large part due to the great GPS features I listed above. I'm basically just waiting for a 1Ghz Android phone with the right features to come out on Verizon and I'll snatch it up. I almost bought a Droid when it came out. I'm taking a big road trip (8 weeks) in August around the US and I expect it to be very useful. :)

Addressing the screen size issue, it really depends on what phone you have. The Droid, for example, has a 3.7" (wide) screen. The average stand-alone GPS is 3.5-4.5", though granted they're not widescreen so there's more actual screen space even for the 3.5" model. But the difference is not huge in many cases. You can of course get very nice, large-screen GPS units (though the price generally goes up quickly).

As for battery, a stand-alone GPS will definitely last longer without power. But for the most common GPS use case, in a car, you will generally have both the stand-alone and cell phone based system plugged in (why wouldn't you?) so the point is largely moot IMO.

Now I will grant that some of the points above are possible and true for certain GPS units, though often times at greater expense (or you make some other sacrifice, e.g. bulk). However most people have cell phones already, so if you have the opportunity to upgrade to one that supports good GPS features, it may be a better value overall than buying a stand-alone unit.

The big caveat for this is that you need a cell phone data plan to really make all this work well. Some carriers also charge additional for their proprietary GPS software/service, though this is on the decline with great free options like Google Navication.

If you don't already have a cell phone and/or don't want one (or don't want to pay for a data plan), then the stand-alone option makes more sense and is cheaper in the long run.

All this being said, I don't know how true any of this is for Australia. In the US a cell-phone based GPS really makes the most sense IMO, particularly Android-based. Elsewhere, you'd have to get personal experiences from people who live in those locations.

- Oshyan
1280
Living Room / Re: GPS Unit Recommendations?
« Last post by JavaJones on May 21, 2010, 12:52 AM »
I've used iPhone and Android mapping apps and they're awesome. Android in particular. However they're web-based, at least the ones I used, so you'd need cell service. I don't know if there are any downloadable stand-alone (offline-capable) GPS apps for either phone, but if so that would be ideal.

- Oshyan
1281
Funny, I just had a discussion about Wave at work due to it now being available to Apps customers. My comments in that email discussion were the same as here basically, and we decided against recommending it as a solution for project management, though we'll be allowing users to test it out and see if they like it. But personally I'm still waiting for a compelling use case for anyone but really savvy, high-tech users.

- Oshyan
1282
Living Room / Re: What annoys you to no end?
« Last post by JavaJones on May 18, 2010, 02:53 PM »
I'm going to trump you both, I'm annoyed by InstallSheild *and* by company-name-in-start-menu/app-install-location-folder. Simultaneously! Even though I (now) know that this is due to a default option in Installshield (which only increases my annoyance with it, but I assure you I was annoyed with it prior :D).

So there! ;)

- Oshyan
1283
Living Room / Re: How to build website for article repository?
« Last post by JavaJones on May 18, 2010, 02:45 PM »
Yeah, Wordpress was the first thing that came to my mind too. It sounds like exactly what you need, which is a rarity when considering systems for website building purposes. :D

- Oshyan
1284
Living Room / Re: Google Search
« Last post by JavaJones on May 17, 2010, 11:42 PM »
That's what I figured. When I said "how difficult it would be to implement" I really meant how much of a negative impact it would have. I know from a technical standpoint the actual search function for case sensitivity is not complex, but doing it against their huge database of site content, yes it might have an impact in search performance. Of course if it was only available through the Advanced interface that would cut down a lot on its use.

- Oshyan
1285
Living Room / Re: Google Search
« Last post by JavaJones on May 17, 2010, 02:40 PM »
Yeah I've run afoul of this before. Not sure how difficult it would be for them to implement it though, so I'm not too annoyed about it. If I find out it would be fairly easy and they just don't do it for simplicity's sake I will be mad though. ;)

- Oshyan
1286
Living Room / Re: The Story of Conficker
« Last post by JavaJones on May 16, 2010, 09:17 PM »
The solution is obvious, and is mentioned in the article: build an anti-worm worm. Ok, so there are legal issues to do it (and distribute it in the US). So just make good friends with someone in a "wild west" country where it's not a problem and hey, bob's your uncle!

- Oshyan
1287
I don't see CMSs as a necessity for me but for clients and friends they're a must. That's where a lot of my interest lies. Unfortunately that can make it more difficult to evaluate them because the needs are diverse and I don't know them in full until I ask someone to check out a product. But that just adds to the fun, right? ;)

- Oshyan
1288
Living Room / Re: Drunk History Videos
« Last post by JavaJones on May 13, 2010, 06:46 PM »
Oh yes, I came across these recently-ish and they're pretty fantastic overall. Some better than others of course. But pretty much all worth a viewing.

- Oshyan
1289
Hey, SnippetMaster looks brilliant! I've been looking for something like this. Thanks for the link Bill. :)

- Oshyan
1290
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Pledge: Mouser App
« Last post by JavaJones on May 13, 2010, 01:01 AM »
Tease! :D

- Oshyan
1291
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Pledge: CFX
« Last post by JavaJones on May 13, 2010, 12:52 AM »
Ooo, our first pledge! Sounds intriguing. :D

- Oshyan
1292
Living Room / Re: Identity Theft OFFLINE - Get ready to be VERY scared
« Last post by JavaJones on May 13, 2010, 12:50 AM »
I heard about this recently too (maybe on Slashdot?). Not that surprising, but definitely worrying. Not so much for what *I've* done with copiers as what others do with my info on *their* copiers. I trust myself to be diligent. ;) This is generally not a problem for home machines btw. Your $100 All-in-one printer/copier/scanner isn't going to justify having a HD on it. But when you see features like "store and print later", that's when you need to worry.

One interesting thing I thought of is that many businesses simply lease their copying equipment. Most of the time their local IT staff isn't even *allowed* to mess with the hardware or software or it voids the support terms of the lease. All well and good. But one wonders if these copier leasing companies are savvy to this and are wiping machine's HDs when they go to another company, or are sent for recycling. Probably not. :( Definitely something to inquire about if you're ever in the position to lease a copier!

- Oshyan
1293
Don't forget it can import image maps, too (targeting the MW imagemap plugin). Of course not many people use image maps these days I suppose... :D

- Oshyan
1294
Yes, a very interesting report (at 93 pages it's "not as detailed as usual", I'm afraid to read some of their other stuff!). As one commenter on Betanews regarding the same report said, it focuses on app UIs, many of which are 3rd party, so it's not solely about the iPad *as Apple designed it* (and the iPad UI itself), but still very interesting commentary.

- Oshyan
1295
General Software Discussion / Re: Powerpoint sucks - what to use instead?
« Last post by JavaJones on May 11, 2010, 04:43 PM »
I assume you mean XSL-FO. It's an interesting system, but it would be a whole new system to learn, and I don't really see the advantage over CSS and HTML really (for my purposes). It does support some fancier stuff like text orientation and whatnot, but explicitly want to avoid most fancy formatting.

Still, a cool tech to know about, and I appreciate the suggestion. :)

- Oshyan
1296
That sounds like a royal pain. I don't doubt you may be right that "keeping formatting and content creation completely separate" is the "correct" way to do it, I wonder in this instance what exactly is gained? I've had the "pleasure" of trying to move/copy styles from one document to another in Office and it's not fun.

- Oshyan
1297
Altiris appears to be part of Symantec now, and I'm not sure the same product name exists anymore. Do you know what it would be called now?

- Oshyan
1298
General Software Discussion / Re: Powerpoint sucks - what to use instead?
« Last post by JavaJones on May 11, 2010, 01:09 PM »
Ah, thanks for that info about template creation. This doesn't work quite as I was hoping however. There is a template selection for an individual slide layout that you get whenever you create a new slide ("two columns", "title", "caption", "blank", etc.). I want to be able to edit *those* so that new ones can appear in that prompt. I doubt Google allows that though, it seems like a rather hard-coded function.

I agree that HTML + CSS is probably the best approach. So now the trick is finding a good authoring tool for my users. :D

- Oshyan
1299
Knowing now that you already have the majority of your content, and it is (presumably) largely unformatted, I think you're actually in a pretty good position. You can look through the doc as a whole, determine what styling elements are needed, then create them and use them exclusively. As others have said, don't ever use any custom styling just by manually changing font sizes or anything - always use defined and saved styles - and you should be in good shape. The trick of course is creating all those styles in the first place. Editing header and other stand-alone(ish) styles is fairly painless, but creating full bullet list indentation format sets is tedious. However you shouldn't need to do that more than once or twice, after which you can just use that formatting throughout the document, and it should end up less painless than doing it all manually as you go through.

IMHO a wiki is probably the most efficient way to create and maintain tech docs.

And you'll never know how much it pains me to say that.  ;D

Now If someone could just come up with a good way to convert a wiki into a decently formatted printed manual (with good typography) I'd feel far less of that pain.

I have recently come to the same conclusion, with a similar level of "pain" involved in the realization. ;) The lack of a *good* print output option is very frustrating. Surely this is a hole in the market just waiting to be filled...

- Oshyan
1300
I could see something like a mini-virtual machine system where every app runs in its own "light" vm and you just backup the vm's regularly. In other words the vm encapsulates the app's memory, so it's aware of the memory extent and provides a mechanism for state saving of that data. Another way to think of it is a per-app hibernate function, but without the hibernation (just the state saving). ;)

- Oshyan
Pages: prev1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 ... 106next