topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday April 7, 2026, 2:20 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 504 505 506 507 508 [509] 510 511 512 513 514 ... 1515next
12701
Developer's Corner / Re: Video Tutorial: Creating Your First C# Application
« Last post by mouser on October 01, 2011, 06:57 PM »
Quite good -- might inspire someone who has never coded before to give it a try :up:
12702
To add or edit an alias you dont have to edit the file -- you just go to options and choose the Aliases/Group tab, and make sure you have selected at top "myaliases.alias".

From there you can see a list of all your custom aliases, right click for menu to add/edit/delete.

Does that make it easier?

But your "add aliasname" is not a bad idea either, i might add that.
12704
Thanks for sharing this 40hz!  :up:
12705
Find And Run Robot / Re: Font issue in settings dialog (dpi 96)
« Last post by mouser on September 30, 2011, 01:54 PM »
Now if there's an (easier) alternative, and you don't mind sharing...

Afraid not, DPI Aware manifest was what I was referring to.
12706
Find And Run Robot / Re: Font issue in settings dialog (dpi 96)
« Last post by mouser on September 30, 2011, 11:29 AM »
hi vemundha,

I've learned about an alternative way to handle large DPI and font sizes; let's talk again after my next release.

This large DPI stuff drives me crazy, I wish Microsoft had never implemented it.
12707
Find And Run Robot / Re: Filenames with a leading dot?
« Last post by mouser on September 30, 2011, 11:26 AM »
I will fix.
But any reason not to rename the file?
12708
Skwire Empire / Re: SFV Ninja (Simple File Verification application)
« Last post by mouser on September 30, 2011, 10:19 AM »
12709
General Software Discussion / Re: Firefox 7 is out
« Last post by mouser on September 30, 2011, 09:14 AM »
This is getting ridiculous.  >:( :down:
12710
Living Room / Re: Lady Geek -- Helping businesses sell technology to women
« Last post by mouser on September 29, 2011, 07:40 PM »
Cool.

I also like the blog GeekMom.
12711
fenix, can you redownload and see if it's fixed?
12712
that's a bug.  now i have to figure out why it's happening.
12713
Living Room / Re: Lady Geek -- Helping businesses sell technology to women
« Last post by mouser on September 29, 2011, 07:23 PM »
At first I thought this was one of those sites helping women get involved in technology.

On closer look it seems to be a big advert for a company trying to sell it's services advising companies how to market to women.  :down:

12714
General Software Discussion / Re: SubmitToTab - a Firefox add-on
« Last post by mouser on September 29, 2011, 05:00 PM »
I'm desperate for TabSubmit for FF7 -- help me kliu0x52, you're my only hope!
12715
Thanks guys, I'm going to push this out as an official release.  :up:
12716
The problem I was trying to solve with this new dual system is not so much one of income, but one of incomprehension and frustration (but a side effect of it is increased income).

Yep.  And I do think that addressing this issue is likely to yield real benefits all around; it's the one area where DC really can do better.  That's why I'm especially interested in hearing how you do with it!

I just think it's important to point out that perhaps the cleanest way to reconcile the differing arguments made by superboy and others -- is to acknowledge that it *IS* for all intents and purposes virtually impossible to get people to donate/pay if there is no tangible benefit to them for doing so.

But that there are a variety of ways to provide some minimal benefit which is sufficient to raise enough income to be satisfied by, while still making it possible and not overly difficult for everyone to use the software fully even if they can't/won't pay.

What's interesting about the open source route is the natural option, which has been used before, see for example XChat, to provide the source code for free, but charge for the compiled version.  This is an unusual option not available to non-open-source tools, because it in effect presents almost all potential users with a requirement that they purchase a license -- since they are not prepared to compile the source themselves, while still making it possible for anyone to get it for free IF they are willing to do a substantial amount of work.  [The only time this breaks down is when the software gets popular enough to fork or inspire someone to start publicizing a public compiled version -- but people's distrust might still make this unappealing].

In many ways this is the concept of "work equalization" I mentioned in my article on DonationCoder -- but much more extreme.  It says the program is free *IF* you are willing to do a huge amount of work which most people aren't.

Part of whether this is appealing comes down to whether you are more interested in open source or insuring that everyone can use the software for free without too much effort even if they don't want to donate.

Just some random thoughts.
12717
hsoft, to be fair to superboy's point, if you have this:
The initial popup simply mentions fairware, but otherwise is a standard shareware "you can try it for free, but until you buy it, there are limitations"

then we may be back on the shareware turf where we have people paying because they have to in order to use the software.

so i'm not sure it's fair to say that this is evidence that people pay even if they they don't feel like they need to.



I think it may be fairer to say that there is a continuum:
  • On one side is the shareware approach where to really fully use the software people have to pay a fixed amount.  This model does fine.
  • On the other side is absolutely pure-as-driven-snow freeware, which has no limits, no requirements to get a license key, not even a nag or text saying they should donate.  This model seems to almost never get any financial support -- except in the most unusual cases.

And then somewhere in between are the more intriguing models, whose space we don't understand fully.  That's where DonationCoder and Fairware are trying to find a home.

And the interesting question is what does this space look like? Are there significantly better ways to do things that end up with everyone happier?
12718
Screenshot Captor / Re: guidelines for region selection
« Last post by mouser on September 29, 2011, 08:49 AM »
Implemented in latest beta -- will be in next release.
12719
Anyone who has downloaded prior to this message please redownload -- seems I forgot to pack in the manifest with the last build -- not a big deal but you might as well get latest version.
12720
Changes:
v2.102.01 - Sep 29, 2011
  • [BugFix] Fixed a rare problem that was causing truncated full screen screenshots (and enlarged region capture previews) on some users with Windows7 and large fonts [thanks steveorg!].
  • [BugFix] Changing some options in Highlight object (circle vs box) were sometimes not being accepted immediately [thanks xcopy!]
  • [MinorImprovement]  Better automatic-sized thumbnail panel on Windows Vista/7 themes.
  • [MinorFeature] Added link in help menu to visit page of screencast videos for the program.
  • [BugFix] Selected Region grab was sometimes not showing region size hint.
  • [MinorImprovement]  Selected region capture now shows full screen sized crosshairs at cursor.
  • [MinorImprovement]  Selected region capture was capturing one pixel margin too much on left and top.
  • [MinorImprovement]  You can now press spacebar and let go of left mouse during region grab to free the cursor to change grab start location.
12721
Find And Run Robot / Re: ClickOnce applications
« Last post by mouser on September 29, 2011, 07:41 AM »
Thanks for the report jibz!
12722
Screenshot Captor / Re: Missing size tooltip on secondary monitor
« Last post by mouser on September 28, 2011, 11:41 PM »
This is fixed and will be in next update.
12723
Screenshot Captor / Re: Improving Region Select Capture Mode
« Last post by mouser on September 28, 2011, 01:38 PM »
I've put up the latest beta at:
https://www.donation...nshotCaptorSetup.exe

Just so we have a starting point -- this beta includes new crosshairs already.
12724
Screenshot Captor / Improving Region Select Capture Mode
« Last post by mouser on September 28, 2011, 12:51 PM »
I'm on record as much preferring to do a full screen grab and then cropping from within the program, but I know a lot of people prefer to use the "Grab Selected Region" mode which shows a crawling-ants rectangular border that you use to select a rectangular region to capture.

Over time people have requested improvements to the selected-region capture operation.

So I'm trying to decide what kind of improvements I can make to it now, without going overboard.

I'd like to hear from people who actually use this capture mode -- and what they think would make life easier for them.

Some suggestions in the past have been:
  • Show a crosshairs line from top to bottom and left to right of entire screen where cursor is.
  • Dim outside the selected region.
12725
Screenshot Captor / Re: Auto-split while autoscrolling
« Last post by mouser on September 28, 2011, 12:46 PM »
This is actually a nice idea. I'll try to add it.  Well I don't know about stopping at a certain element, but it should be possible to have an autoscroll capture mode that captured a new image for each page of scrolling, rather than stitching them together automatically.
Pages: prev1 ... 504 505 506 507 508 [509] 510 511 512 513 514 ... 1515next