topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 5:04 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 54 55 56 ... 127next
1251
i wonder why no one has requested that before.. sure that's easy enough to do.
Because it shows that way on the popup already?  It only matters (to me) when using the main window.

though note that another way to look at your request is to say that you can just ignore the title field (and event hide it from display if you like), and just look at the excerpt field, which you can show in quick paste menu and show in the grid, etc.

so i'm happy to add it, but if you are desperate for it, might it be the case that you aren't sure how to have the excerpt column do the job you want it to do?
I hadn't noticed the "excerpt" field   :-[  I had to give myself a short refresher on how to reorder columns, too.  Putting "excerpt" as the first column, then "title," "created," and "data size" seems to work well for me.  The new title token %shortexcerpt% looks potentially useful, depending on set up.

By the way, I just looked at the CHS page again, and realised you can customize the layout.  I've not found it very easy, but, how do you "save layouts for easy switching," and is there a quick "panic button" way to get back to the default layout in case of screwing it up?
1252
Mouser, please, for text clips, is there any way to automatically name the clips according to the first line of clip text?  I've tried a few of the options (not all) and can't seem to find that one.

Thanks...
1253
No further news of the discounts and giveaways yet?
1254
General Software Discussion / Re: Software Hall of Fame
« Last post by rjbull on August 05, 2011, 03:27 PM »
I'd add Silver Xpress, FrontDoor and Portal of Power
I'd add BinkleyTerm, Squish, and GoldED  8)

+1 each for Vern Buerg's LIST and DESQview.  DV + QEMM + NDOS (Norton-ized version of 4DOS) was the most productive system I ever had.

Also: PC-Write, PC-File 5, Procomm Plus, Terminate, Visual Display Editor (VDE), XTree Pro, StereoShell, File Wizard, Horst Schaeffer's PBATS collection, Newkey, Early Bird, and many more...  [/end DOS nostalgia trip]

On Windows: Total Commander, Macro Express, PowerPro, EverNote, TED Notepad, Crimson Editor, NoteTab Pro, Magic Mail Monitor, TheBat!, MemPad, ArsClip, CHS, WebSite-Watcher, LinkStash, XPDF, BareGrepPro, Taskill, Hilitext, Kleptomania (now MIA), and others.
1255
I requested some small things like text modifiers (conver to rot13, hex, binary, etc.), also a way to set a tabs color, as well as a few more really small things.

CHS is damn great
And you could add some of the things you want to it as external applications, if they aren't built in already.
1256
I know that feature to use your editor to modify an edit box from an firefox plugin
and the multiple choice of editors from Total Commander, but this edit text anywhere is great.
I just try it with XYplorer run script dialog to have better edit features.

@AbteriX: Do you have a recent version of Channing's Listary as well?  If so, try loading Total Commander and XYplorer together, but with different active directories.  Next load a text editor and open its File Open dialog.  Then Alt-Tab between the File Open dialog and the two file managers - and watch how the File Open dialog changes  :)
1257
I haven't been able to find out anything about the second one you list, but the first one, KB2507938, has been on Windows Secrets' Install list since mid-July.  Hope that helps.
Does being on the Windows Secrets list mean they consider it in quarantine?  They're recommending you defer installation until it's status is clearer?

Turns out there's a thread on some of the same updates in the Windows Secrets forum - Latest batch of Vista updates failed to install.

Looks like I'm going to have to get to know Windows Secrets forums  :(
1258
I've been using version 1 for a while and it's completely replaced Firefox extension It's All Text!.  Look forward to the new features  :)
1259
I don't understand why you keep updating Vista, it is not being updated with new features or anything really important. If you security programs are good, you need not to update Vista at all.

I've been wondering myself, as I run Online Armor firewall with HIPS, and F-Prot AV. 

There's slightly more to the updates, as can be seen from the screenshot of what Vista thinks I should install.  E.g., IE 9.  I'm somewhat surprised by the update system, as I've already hidden a security update for PowerPoint 2007, that Vista had failed repeatedly to install.  That's probably because I don't have 2007 (that I know of...) as I have Office 2010.  Yet, Vista doesn't automatically mark SP1 for Office 2010.

I've marked the two updates that I think gave me problems.  Suppose I ought to look for any reports from anyone else...
1260
Finished Programs / Re: when I download files.
« Last post by rjbull on July 27, 2011, 02:17 PM »
I use Listary Pro, but there are plenty of features in the free version, and a portable version is available.
1261
Living Room / Re: Are we allowed to avoid the "My Docs" mess in Win7?
« Last post by rjbull on July 27, 2011, 02:10 PM »
What does Listary pro give you that Listary doesn't?  I see the comparison, but I don't really understand the missing features.
Apologies for delayed reply.  Your query made me take another look at the comparison.  As I recall it, early versions of Listary restricted most of the dialog box extender features to the Pro version.  It looks like this has changed somewhat, and quite good ones are included in the free-for-personal-use version.  I'm still exploring the new features myself.  Select last opened file automatically means that when you reopen a File Open dialog, that last file will already be in the file box, same with last saved file.  Export list content to a CSV file means (obviously), make a directory listing.  But, given that Listary is free for personal use, and has a portable version as well as an install one, you might find it worth taking a look yourself...
1262
Living Room / Re: Are we allowed to avoid the "My Docs" mess in Win7?
« Last post by rjbull on July 24, 2011, 03:36 PM »
[edit] then I'm back looking for a dialogue extender for save/open. Ah well, just what I'm used to... [/edit]
Listary works well for me on Vista, but you really need the payware version, $19.95 lifetime license, for a dialog box extender.
1263
The story, continued:

Now having a working PC again, I tried Stoic Joker's idea of testing the updates one by one.  I got into a mess...  I uninstalled at least one update using Uninstall rather than going back to a restore point.  The same problems as before occurred, only now I didn't seem to have a restore point I could go back to, to correct things.  So I was left with having to restore a disk image.  This was heart-in-mouth, because I hadn't done it before, and because TeraByte Image for DOS (IFD) reported an error.  I had to say, just keep going, and eventually got things back as they were.  Of course now I'm worried that the error will come back to bite me.  IFD didn't say what kind of error.

I'm now left with a dilemma.  If I don't install (some of) the updates, I may have a security hole.  If I do install them, I have a high risk of Windows destroying itself.  Not a happy choice, is it?  If a similar disaster happens again, I might consider starting from scratch with a shrink-wrapped copy of Win7.  No guarantee of avoiding another Update from Hell, but the OS is generally said to be better, so may as well get that benefit.  But reinstalling all those programs and data would not be fun.

While the main laptop has been waiting attention, I got a quick look at the Web with my old Win98 laptop, but it's getting long in the tooth.  Or rather, the OS is.  I'd guess the hardware is still good for a while.  So I need to think about some kind of backup machine for e-mail and Web stuff, maybe a netbook or other cheap laptop.

I subscribed to the Windows Secrets newsletter.  I searched their archive but couldn't immediately see any comments on the updates I think might have been responsible.  I was disappointed that the first one didn't come as an e-mail newsletter rather than a link to a Web page, especially as it doesn't even contain a contents list or synopsis, other than the title.  I'd rather minimize the effort of checking the integrity of updates, something we should be able to take for granted.

Thanks for all the suggestions.  Wouldn't it be nice if we had computers that just worked...
1264
General Software Discussion / Windows Update disaster - recovery help, please!
« Last post by rjbull on July 18, 2011, 10:54 AM »
Windows Update disaster - recovery help, please!

I run Vista Home Premium, when it will let me.  It has automatic updates.  I get tired of the interminable disk-thrashing and resource usage of Windows updates, which mean I can barely use the laptop while they're downloading, but until recently things have worked properly afterwards.  Last week I was cursed with a toxic update. After rebooting, it wouldn't let me into my user account, saying that it couldn't start a Windows service.  It would, however, let me into the admin account, though without Internet access, again because it couldn't start a (different, I think) Windows service.  Oh, joy.  Lack of Internet access nowadays means no easy way to get help.

Symptoms:
Access violation at address 00723159 in module "oauie.exe."  Write of address 00000050.

WiFi said
Connection status: Unknown.  The dependency service or group failed to start.
Tried Diagnose > Windows Wireless Service is not running on this computer > Start Wireless Service > Windows cannot resolve this problem.  Please contact your network administrator or ISP.
Well, the admin is me.  It's my own machine.  This is Vista Home Premium, after all.

From the admin account, a bubble appeared from the tray:
Windows could not connect to the System Event Notification Service.  This problem prevents limited access users from logging on to the system.  As an administrative user, you can review the System Event Log for details about why the service did not respond.
Of course, being Windows, it doesn't tell you the exact name of the log, nor its location.
         

I didn't know what to do.  My first glum thought was to restore from a disk image, glum because I knew the image would be out of date, and I would lose things.  So I set out to back up as much data as possible to a removable drive, knowing most existing backups would be at least slightly out of date.  Windows UAC keeps accounts in sealed boxes, so even though I could load SynchBack Pro, it behaved as a new unregistered program and I couldn't quickly work out how if at all to pick up its configuration. Likewise with TheBat!, which was serious because that's my e-mail. I copied over all data files I could think of using Total Commander, which has a very nice directory synchronization feature. Windows doesn't make this easy because data seems scattered all over the place. Then I wanted to check what programs I'd installed since last disk image, so looked in Total Uninstall to see if it could make a simple list.  It can, but, I also found it had a menu entry, System restore. Ah-haaah... I'd forgotten that, never having had to use it before. So, with little to lose, I tried it, rolling back the latest update, and after rebooting, everything was back to normal.

My first act then was to get out the external drive and make a new disk image.  I found the last one I had was six months old, and my data backups were a month or two old as well.  Mea culpa...  Main point arising: take mouser's constantly reiterated advice to heart - BACKUP, BACKUP, BACKUP!

Now, a day later, the system has downloaded what are presumably the same poisonous updates, because it's done the same thing again. Once more I've had my time wasted on endless downloading, once more I've had to roll the system back, and I feel condemned to a Sisyphean treadmill of repeating the process.

Please can DC help with help on the following?

  • Can anyone please recommend a good disaster recovery pocket book?  Something small, to be consulted by fuming people in a hurry, maybe a compilation of trouble-shooting charts, not some massive and pricey tombstone?
  • How do I turn off automatic updates? 
  • If you're in an admin account, is there a way to run a program as if you were the user, so you get access to the user account's configuration settings and data? Sort of the inverse of elevating from user to admin?
  • Who can I complain to or warn?
  • And will they listen?
  • Given Microsoft's near-monopoly status, and the unimaginable amounts of money it makes, why aren't its products better?  <sigh>

More disk-thrashing...  must be downloading the Update from Hell again...
1265
you may be better off using something like File Hound to search through your PDFs.
I'm pretty sure Hound uses pdftotext too.  That probably means it ignores image files as being empty of text, which should at least make the search hands-off.
1266
EmEditor Core : Paid upgrades for licenses purchased on or after November 1, 2011
Posted by Yutaka on 6/27/2011 2:28:58 pm

Paid upgrades for licenses purchased on or after November 1, 2011

We have been providing free upgrades for EmEditor Professional from v4 through v10. We realize that this is a major benefit for users, and we thoroughly appreciate your participation and support. Unfortunately, due to the recent difficult economic climate, it has become impossible for us to continue offering free upgrades to all users.

Thus, in order to allow us to continue the development of EmEditor, for users who purchase new licenses on or after November 1, 2011, upgrades will be paid. We plan to keep the upgrade fee as low as possible.

Licenses purchased before November 1, 2011 will be the same as before. They are eligible to be upgraded for free as long as they are registered at the Emurasoft Customer Center. The date of purchase can be verified in your purchase history at the Emurasoft Customer Center.


Currently, EmEditor programs are separated into the trial and the full-version. Switching from the trial to the full version requires you to first uninstall the trial and then install the full-version. Beginning with v10.1.0, the trial will become the same as the full-version (as it was in v8 and earlier), and simply entering a registration key during the trial will switch the program to the full-version. We hope that this will make your use of EmEditor smoother and more intuitive. Thank you.


Deadline for product registration for free upgrades

The product registration for free upgrades from EmEditor Professional v8 or earlier that we offer at the Emurasoft Customer Center will end on October 31, 2011. In order to ensure smooth upgrades in the future, if you have a license for EmEditor Professional v8 or earlier, but have not registered your license for a free upgrade, please register your license at Emurasoft Customer Center for the upgrade before November 1, 2011. If you do not register your licenses, the future upgrade eligibility, whether free or paid, will be expire.
1267
ZTreeWin (ZTW) is *very* powerful and fast-to-use once you burn the single keystroke commands into your brain. This is one of several programs I have open all the time. Not free, but certainly worth every penny many times over.
I bought my license when they made a ridiculously cheap offer, $9.95 or something.  While XTree Pro was the first file manager I ever used, it's been so long that I've forgotten the hotkeys, which is probably why I use ZTW less than I might.

Maybe a reminder about the XTree Fan Page is in order here.

But then again, picking a file manager is kind of like picking a text editor; - product devotion can border on: religious.
Oh, dear.  Then I'm a heretic in at least three religions... not including editors!
1268
Screenshot Captor / Re: Initial Recommendations
« Last post by rjbull on July 07, 2011, 03:57 PM »
all settings for all of my programs are saved in an ini file (i loathe the registry), the only thing i don't remember is if in Vista what directory it saves it too..
When I was at work, part of my backup strategy was to run a batch file that ran an archiver, Info-Zip or 7zip, or RAR, that started from the top of the HD and archived up copies of all new/changed INI (and similar) files, using the archiver's options to include child directories and save paths, so the files were automatically saved complete with their full paths.  The archive was put in a directory that was routinely copied to the network and and/or other backup destinations.  While this worked well with DOS or WinXP, it might be more of a problem now because of access permissions through UAC.
1269
Living Room / Re: More ammunition why patents are EVIL
« Last post by rjbull on July 07, 2011, 03:44 PM »
Then again Big Pharma are notoriously evil. Their own records demonstrate that they are disgusting liers.
I have heard this before, and have no reason to plead their case.

How can anyone have faith in a system that is so blatantly abused?
By ensuring the system isn't abused?  Isn't that part of what governments are supposed to be for?  That is, I don't think the fundamental problem is having a patent system, it's lackadaisical enforcement and any abuse.

When it comes to medicine, one has to wonder just how genuine the "we want to help people" thing is. [...] But that's an extension from patents to the market, and how things can go horribly wrong in the process there.
Capitalism is very successful in making rich people richer, but almost completely blind to the needs of the sick, most especially if they're poor.
1270
Living Room / Re: More ammunition why patents are EVIL
« Last post by rjbull on July 06, 2011, 08:23 AM »
With the proviso that my experience was related to the ink industry, and people here may be thinking too much of US practice/malpractice, and of software patents:

#1: "Open source" the patent review process. Anyone can submit a patent and once submitted they have first chance at being granted one, but like any patent their application must be reviewed for prior art, uniqueness of the invention, etc. This should be judged by the population at large, not by a relatively few patent evaluators who couldn't possibly individually have the education necessary to properly evaluate evey patent.
It already is, at least in Europe/UK.  That is, as soon as an application is made, anyone can inspect the details.  When I was at work, we used to take Derwent patent bulletins which listed both applications and granted patents in most countries of the world.  I've been to libraries to read the originals, though nowadays you'd just download and read a PDF.  The Japanese Patent Office even has a quite good (if slow) on-the-fly translation system.

90% of patents would probably be thrown out within a week, either because there is significant prior art out there (nothing is better at finding prior art than "the crowd"), or because the invention is obvious and can be demonstrated to be so.
The usual phrase is "obvious to those skilled in the art", i.e. it doesn't have to be obvious to the man in the street as long as it's obvious to people in the industry.

#2: Incentivize the *application* of patented ideas. Or, to look at it another way, discourage or penalize those who patent something and don't actually implement it in a product or service.
I believe that UK law expects the holder to "work the patent."

#4: Patent term reform. [...]I think anything more than 2 or 3 years of market *exclusivity* is unnecessary. If you figure the development of very complex technology may take 3 or 4 years to bring to market, and then add on 2-3 years for sales exclusivity, then perhaps 6-8 years makes more sense. I'd be OK seeing 10.
Big Pharma would be very unhappy with that.  They would contend that the cost of developing and fully testing a new drug is so enormous that they absolutely must have a long term to recover their investment.
1271
Living Room / Re: The law is for YOUR protection. Honest!
« Last post by rjbull on June 30, 2011, 03:30 PM »
You gave me an idea just now - let's request a patent on filing trivial or otherwise cumbersome patents. There's got to be a limit to the amount of fancy wording that one can come up with to describe a trivial single-sentence action.
There's a patent assigned to IBM that runs into three volumes...  don't know how they got that many words or ideas into it.  Often, though, in the ink formulation patents I saw most of, a lot of the space is given over to example formulations.
1272
Living Room / Re: The law is for YOUR protection. Honest!
« Last post by rjbull on June 30, 2011, 03:27 PM »
Patent laws should have a sanity clause that allows anyone to challenge a patent on the grounds that it is patently bonkers.
-Carol Haynes (June 28, 2011, 05:39 AM)
I think UK patents are already supposed to be for practical, workable devices.  Perpetual motion machines are definitely banned.

There should also be a 'public good' clause that says no patent can be granted where it will infringe on public welfare - and that should include all bio-patents which to me are the very worst of all the patent stupidity foisted on the world by a barmy US system!
Then you have to define "public welfare."  After all, a patent is disclosing somebody's idea, putting that knowledge in the public domain, and eventually (typically 17-20 years) reaching a state where it can be used by anyone without payment.  That in itself might be considered for the public good.
1273
Living Room / Re: The law is for YOUR protection. Honest!
« Last post by rjbull on June 27, 2011, 04:32 PM »
An earlier argument of mine from a lost thread applies - get the Alan Turing Estate to patent the Turing machine and since it is mathematically provable that ALL computers and algorithms are functionally equivalent to a Turning machine no one else would be allowed any patent for any technological 'breakthrough' as it would be covered under the Turning patent.
-Carol Haynes (June 27, 2011, 04:12 PM)
They can't.  If it's been published, and is therefore out in the public domain, it can't be retrospectively patented.

It would also go some way to compensate him for the hideously nasty way he was treated by the UK government.
Bit late...
1274
Living Room / Re: The law is for YOUR protection. Honest!
« Last post by rjbull on June 27, 2011, 04:03 PM »
large companies with the financial and legal resources to work the system have started claiming overly broad patents and then using this legal toehold to stifle / subdue competition.
They're entitled to a broad patent - if they have truly invented a broad something.  A rise in over-broad patents sounds like another case of patent office failure.

Now imagine you are an inventor who wants to avoid this scenario. What is your due diligence? An exhaustive patent search of any patent that might potentially cover the technology you're thinking of inventing? Better be a rich guy to start with. And once your search is done, you may find that any device you create (or part of any device you create) could conceivably be described by one or more existing patents. So you give up and switch to gardening, which stifles innovation - the exact opposite of the system's original intent.
It's not quite as bad as that, though I know what you mean.  Most of the major patent offices now allow free access to their sites, but it's a tedious business to search them.  You're better off using World Patent Index and/or INPADOC on Dialog or another host system, or Delphion Online, cheaper if a little less good.  But, I maintain that most patents are in fact issued to big companies, and they should have the resources to searches as exhaustive as necessary.  That sounds tough on the small man, but it's a big complicated world now.  In fact, quite simple searches are often all that's necessary to make a yes/no decision on further work.

What's really needed is a more stringent definition of what's patentable. [...] Maybe they should go back to the old system and require an actual, physical implementation of the invention in order to be eligible for the patent.
I think some patent offices have, or at least had, another requirement to keep a patent in force: you had to "work the invention," i.e., you had to make and sell a product based on it.  If you didn't, presumably the invention reverted to the public domain.
1275
Living Room / Re: The law is for YOUR protection. Honest!
« Last post by rjbull on June 27, 2011, 03:46 PM »
another truth is that they all claim to have invented things they never did - and usually the little people who did the hard work in the first place either get screwed or paid money to shut up.
-Carol Haynes (June 26, 2011, 04:31 PM)
As Jimdoria notes, some companies have been awarded patents even where there was prior art, or where the invention was obvious to those skilled in the art.  But that's a failure of the patent office, not necessarily of the legislation itself, and my impression was that the U.S. Patent Office was the worst culprit.  That seems to mean a need for higher-quality staff, more staff, more training, and more moral fibre to stand up to clever presentation.  At times I also wondered if national chauvinism played a part - if it isn't American, it isn't an invention, and who in the homeland cares about those damn foreigners anyway. :(

To me the perfect illustration of this distortion of legal intent is the companies trying to make trademarks out of normal everyday English and then having the audacity to sue people for daring to use that language themselves!
I too find this action arrogant and unacceptable.  It isn't covered by patent law, though, and (in the UK at least) trademark/trade name law is a lot more lax.

It still doesn't negate my argument that the current patents and trademark systems are not there to protect anyone but rather to allow the wealthy and powerful to abuse smaller companies and individuals with impunity.
In my limited experience of a small corner of manufacturing industry, I feel that's greatly overstating the case...  Is this in danger of becoming a case where urban myths and conspiracy theories are trumping dispassionate argument?
Pages: prev1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 54 55 56 ... 127next