Recent Posts126
Living Room / Re: Peer Review and the Scientific Process
« Last post by barney on October 22, 2013, 03:25 PM »there are many abuses in practice-xtabber (October 22, 2013, 12:58 PM)
And that was my attempted point. While I'm aware of the [stricter] meaning of the term, I seldom [when actually published] see it in action. The petty jealousies of academia far surpass anything to be found in the commercial [real?] world, and ofttimes colour committee judgements. At the end of the day, that formal process devolved to the personal judgements of the adjudicators, not all of whom are impartial and non-judgemental. Same thing applies to the corporate world, although the motivations there [usually] tend to be a bit more clear. Been, unfortunately, involved in both worlds, but when I discovered that my compatriots did not try as hard [as me] to clear their thoughts of possible prejudices and biases, and since I had neither the resource(s) nor the power to enforce such, I relegated the process to my mental scrapheap, where it has remained for the last decade or so. Still read 'em, when available, but no longer place any credence in 'em.
support issue(s). Someone makes a request, and it's usually fulfilled within a day or two (2). Sometimes longer, but very seldom. I've not dealt with any other software, of any kind, with that kind of developer response. (Sure, it may exist - but I haven't been exposed to it 
.) As long as DC and 
.
.
.
.
