topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 5:19 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 [50] 51 52 53 54 55 ... 89next
1226
General Software Discussion / Re: Minefield(Firefox) 3.7Pre seems to work
« Last post by Innuendo on December 18, 2009, 09:56 AM »
I've suggested a Stop Button on occasion but then I'm immediately classified as among the barbarians.  Weird!

That's why I never really took a shine to Opera. They programmed their browser to be weird and different than any other browser on the planet & even going extra-ordinary lengths to do so. And....they like it that way. No, thanks. Being different is fine, but intentionally crippling functionality to do so is not the right way to go about being different.
1227
General Software Discussion / Re: Minefield(Firefox) 3.7Pre seems to work
« Last post by Innuendo on December 17, 2009, 11:22 AM »
3.7 still not ready for Prime Time.  The descriptions on TV Guide site open a blank box.  Looks like I'm sticking with 3.6 Beta 2 for awhile.

Why not 3.6 Beta 4? Heck, even 3.6b6pre is available for download. I'm running that one right now. Too early to tell if it's bug-free enough for day-to-day use, though.

Version 3.7 just looks too alpha for me to try using yet.
1228
Hmm...  I thought pressing F3 in TC was View File? Is that a custom config? Or are there features that I don't know about?

Yep, F3 is View File & there are a few plugins available that will provide functionality to view movies. For the super-impatient there's also a plugin to play mp3s, flacs, apes, etc. as well. With a little time & effort spent there's not much that Total Commander can't do.
1229
If anyone runs into a free Windows player that plays BluRay discs please post.

I think if anyone were to come out with such a thing The Man would swoop down on them pretty fast. Licensing fees must be paid to Big Brother and all that, you know.
1230
General Software Discussion / Re: Eudora 8.0b7
« Last post by Innuendo on December 17, 2009, 11:05 AM »
Yet another thanks. I'll wait for the end of the trial period and make a decision then ...  :D

While you're trialing The Bat! make sure you trial AntiSpamSniper for The Bat! as well. I wrote a comprehensive mini-review on this forum you should probably read.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled topic....
1231
Living Room / Re: The Great Aussie Firewall to Go Ahead
« Last post by Innuendo on December 17, 2009, 10:57 AM »
I was under the impression that the scope of the Great Aussie Firewall included simply blocking specific domains/IPs. Am I mistaken? :O

Doesn't matter what it includes, Ehtyar. The standard operating procedure of politicians is to get something implemented ASAP that will offend the least amount of citizens. Then, once it is in place, they're free to make as many additions as they want later.

A great example of this is where I live a seatbelt law got passed a couple years ago, but it had to be put on a ballot to be voted on by the citizens of the state. During the campaigning for this new law it was repeatedly stated that no one would be pulled over for just a seatbelt violation. The new law would only affect those who had been pulled over for other reasons (accidents, DUIs, etc.). The law was passed by the citizenry....then six months later the law was amended (amendments to laws usually don't have to be put on a ballot) that people could be pulled over for just a seatbelt violation.

This kind of stuff happens everywhere. Sure, the Great Aussie Firewall may only block specific domains & IPs when it first goes into operation, but I bet it will have a whole slew of options that can be turned on at a moment's notice when the powers that be think the populace have their guard down.
1232
General Software Discussion / Re: Eudora 8.0b7
« Last post by Innuendo on December 16, 2009, 10:32 PM »
However I haven't managed to find out yet how (if?) to display unread folders in bold...

The Bat! displays unread folders & messages in bold by default. I'm not even sure if there's a way to turn that behavior off.

And for those who want to buy The Bat!...don't forget the discount link here in the forum will save you approx. 50%.
1233
General Software Discussion / Re: Eudora 8.0b7
« Last post by Innuendo on December 16, 2009, 10:30 PM »
Back in the day, I think Eudora was payware so I used Outlook Express.

Back in the day Eudora was indeed payware. $40 if I remember correctly.
1234
There's pretty much nothing that KMPlayer can't do.  But Light Alloy is significantly faster in starting up (double-click launch).

KMPlayer is just awesome. When i need fast nothing is faster than hitting F3 in Total Commander. :)
1235
Living Room / Re: The Great Aussie Firewall to Go Ahead
« Last post by Innuendo on December 16, 2009, 10:27 PM »
Yay for DHT!!

DHT is no match for stateful packet inspection. Better start looking for torrent sites that support encrypted/obfuscated connections/transfers.
1236
General Software Discussion / Re: syncing an ipod shuffle with wmp on vista
« Last post by Innuendo on December 16, 2009, 10:25 PM »
MediaMonkey will do it with a plugin. Foobar2000 will do it with a plugin as well.
1237
General Software Discussion / Re: Minefield(Firefox) 3.7Pre seems to work
« Last post by Innuendo on December 16, 2009, 10:01 AM »
Then for chuckles I used FEBE to just restore my GradientICool theme, and Bingo!!!

Is it the Gradient iCool (Blue) theme by chance? There's a severe bug in v1.1.0 and before of that theme that prevents it from working with Firefox 3.6 & Tab Mix Plus. The world is waiting for v1.1.1 to be released which is supposed to fix that bug.
1238
Living Room / Re: Windows media center - Disable delete file option?
« Last post by Innuendo on December 16, 2009, 09:58 AM »
Yeah, that is the same one I came across :( It says to set permissions, etc but it still does not work as I would intend.

Why not the simple approach of setting the Read-Only attribute on the file(s)? Surely that would work.
1239
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 7 — first impressions
« Last post by Innuendo on December 15, 2009, 10:29 AM »
It is the standard approach of ACDSystems - if you report bugs they will always 'be fixed in the next version'.

Was just getting ready to post that. This has been their policy ever since the beginning. Although during the v4-v7 stretch they were particularly bad about it. It took an act of God to get a vX.01 release.
1240
Living Room / Re: The Great Aussie Firewall to Go Ahead
« Last post by Innuendo on December 15, 2009, 10:27 AM »
F@#$&^$ S!@%H%$#+!!!!!!!!!

Took the words right out of my mouth. This scheme smacks of computer-illiterate politicians of the 1990s providing a knee-jerk reaction to dangers on 'the intertubes'. I'd have thought government would be more technologically more enlightened in 2009.
1241
General Software Discussion / Re: Any XP users switching to Windows 7 yet?
« Last post by Innuendo on December 15, 2009, 10:22 AM »
If you have the drivers to do it (right now, I still can't get any of my old printers working, and my Realtek audio driver front end is no-where near as functional as it was in XP), I highly suggest you do.

Printers can be difficult to get going, especially if they have an HP badge on the front of them. As for your Realtek audio make sure you are running the latest drivers from their site. I have a *lot* of gripes about Realtek, but the frequency of updates for their audio chipsets isn't one of them. They release new drivers quite frequently.
1242
Living Room / Re: Win7 Bug - New windows/notifications do not get focus
« Last post by Innuendo on December 15, 2009, 10:17 AM »
Not often enough for it to be an issue, and I'm writing all the time. If you touch-type, you see when a box pops up. Maybe people should be installing fewer "helpful" applications that end with -gator or -buddy? :)

Or AV apps? Or firewall apps? Or low disk-space messages? Or low batteries on your wireless mouse? Or....the list goes on and on and on.

This feature was already present in XP, where you have an option to disable it (i.e. let windows steal focus). Has it been further "improved" in 7? Has it changed?

Yes, MS provided an option to disable focus-stealing in XP. Then application developers started coding around this setting so their apps would still steal focus no matter what the setting had been set to do. Microsoft had enough of wayward software developers not playing by the rules, and rightfully so, and started playing hard ball. I applaud the measure myself.

It's potentially dangerous too, because you may miss notifications that are important (or interesting to you), as they will be obscured by other windows.

No...the taskbar still flashes like a Christmas tree. If you miss notifications by not being able to see that then kindly get thee to an optometrist.

And it's a source of unending grief for users and coders who *want* a focus-stealing popup in some legitimate scenarios (e.g. when you press a hotkey to bring an application to foreground).

That example does not apply here as that is not focus-stealing. Focus-stealing is an app throwing a popup in the user's face without the user's direction to do so. All your hot-keys will still work.

Users who've had problems with this should have taken the issue with application authors, instead of prodding MS to further hobble the OS.

No. The software authors should have followed established programming conventions and rules as set forth by Microsoft. This, IMHO, is a well-deserved newspaper smacked squarely on the guilty authors' noses.

It seems to me that Josh is describing something a little different though - you click to start/open a window/application, and it opens but does not receive focus. That would be unbelievably brain-dead, e.g. start Word, then you still have to click it before you can start typing. Not the same as pop-up dialogs from already running apps. Thankfully I haven't observed it on my wife's installation of 7. Josh, could you please confirm?

When I open an app it will receive focus once it's opened. The only time it doesn't is when I open an app and then I switch focus to an already opened app. Windows is smart enough to see that I want to work with the already opened app right now & will open the new app in the background. Opening an app & not switching focus should open the new app with the focus on it. Any other behavior may be due to a non-Windows 7 compliant program on the computer or maybe buggy video card drivers.
1243
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 7 — first impressions
« Last post by Innuendo on December 14, 2009, 06:47 PM »
It's not everyone, but check their forum to see that it's a lot. Just in case you didn't see this:

Like I said, I am not doubting you at all. As a matter of fact, the official word from the ACD Systems reps in the forums is that ACDSee 2009 isn't Windows 7 certified. However, they are saying that its problems are limited to having trouble with Libraries & large DPI settings.

And yeah...their solution is probably going to be to just shovel out ACDSee Photo Manager 2010 and ignore 2009's problems. :(
1244
Living Room / Re: Win7 Bug - New windows/notifications do not get focus
« Last post by Innuendo on December 14, 2009, 06:43 PM »
The only issue I am having currently is that new windows popping up, I.E. clicking a folder on the desktop, do not open with focus at times. They appear behind other windows.

Has anyone encountered this and know of a workaround?

Not only is there no work-around, but this is billed as a new feature of Windows 7. Microsoft has listened to the mass complaints of new windows & dialog boxes stealing focus from apps (How many times have you been on a roll in MS Word or similar typing your heart out & then looked up at the screen and something stole Word's window focus and half of what you typed was lost?) and this is the solution.

Now you can work with your apps without fear of anything stealing its focus freeing you to deal with intrusive dialog boxes in your own time on your terms.

Sorry you hate the new way of doing things, Josh, but MS has gotten quite a few compliments on finally implementing this new behavior.
1245
if your time is worth anything it would long ago have been cheaper to simply purchase that $20 license, wouldn't it.

Sometimes it's not about the money, but rather the challenge.

For the curious, another developer that does the "free for Russian speaking users" thing is Westbyte. For the non-Russian speaking populace they have a download manager called Internet Download Accelerator which is shareware. However, if you speak Russian they have a download manager available called Download Master which is the exact same program, but has a hard-coded Russian interface. Download Master is freeware.
1246
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 7 — first impressions
« Last post by Innuendo on December 13, 2009, 11:06 AM »
You might be on to something there - I usually install to D:\Program Files when an installer gives the option and I am not plagued by UAC prompts either.

When Vista was released a lot of older games wouldn't work unless you installed them somewhere other than C:\Program Files.

(The following is not addressed to Carol, but just general discussion to carry on the thread)

I'm sure the state of development that UAC is in now is not the end of the road. There'll be enhancements and tweaks going forward. I'm sure MS is just easing everyone into this kind of OS security, developers and users alike. I wouldn't be surprised if one day MS released an OS where UAC could not be adjusted or turned off.

People pining for the days of how things worked in XP and before just need to get over it. Running as super-admin/root all the time is never a good idea under any circumstances. Before someone pipes up and tries to point one out...the answer is no. You're wrong. What you think might be a valid circumstance is just software that needs to be re-written to do things the right way.

Fifteen years from now we'll all be looking back at how quaint XP was for running users as root all the time much like we look back at Windows 3.1 and think how quaint it was.
1247
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 7 — first impressions
« Last post by Innuendo on December 13, 2009, 10:57 AM »
And then there are some developers who are apparently trying but it simply isn't working. I use - or use to use up till a few days ago - ACDSee Photo Manager 2009. Worked fine on XP and Vista, but won't work for many on Windows 7.

I'm not doubting your words. However, I have personal knowledge of 8 installs of ACDSee Photo Manager 2009 on Windows 7-based computers & laptops of varying ages and none of them have anything to report other than smooth sailing.

This problem must be a very tricky one indeed to track down. I'd be lost without my ACDSee. I started using it way back in the v2.x days and the ACDSee way of doing things is too ingrained in my being to ever switch picture viewers. Every attempt to check out others results in me missing the ACDSee workflow.
1248
General Software Discussion / Re: Minefield(Firefox) 3.7Pre seems to work
« Last post by Innuendo on December 13, 2009, 10:46 AM »
Have you tried installing the Add-on Compatibility Reporter, Miles?
1249
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: New Release: Disk Space Fan Pro
« Last post by Innuendo on December 11, 2009, 11:13 AM »
Free is good. And it looks useful which make it even better.

Email sent!
1250
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 7 — first impressions
« Last post by Innuendo on December 11, 2009, 11:11 AM »
It just occurred to me why some people are having such battles with UAC while I have none. It may be that I have removed one of UAC's most annoying traits when launching apps. In the world of UAC the C: drive, and especially the C:\Program Files\ directory, are sacred areas of the hard drive as far as UAC is concerned and it's more hyper-vigilant monitoring your C: drive (and C:\Program Files and C:\Windows) than it is when monitoring other drives and directories.

I've always (even back in the days of Windows 95) installed everything to D:\Program Files. Tons of programs that will throw up a UAC prompt when installed to C:\Program Files won't utter a peep when installed to a different hard drive.

Pages: prev1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 [50] 51 52 53 54 55 ... 89next