I have to ask why Tables are so "fundamental"? One thing that annoys me to no end, as an IT guy AND a printer, is people using the wrong tool for the job just because they are comfortable in that environment. Now I know you are willing to stretch, but many are not. TABLES ARE BAD,BAD,BAD! (In Word). Word is meant to be a word processor, not a spreadsheet. If you are just formatting a report, that is one thing, that is what tab stops are for, but if you want form filled tables, then it is really the wrong tool. Microsoft adds these features because of requests, but that doesn't mean they SHOULD be added. Excel is designed around tables and should be used for that purpose. I only miss the Binder tool Microsoft used to have that allowed you to combine pages from tools like Word and Excel into a single manuscript.</rant>
Now back to the original program....
Why would you need tables in your Word document?
-steeladept
interesting, but what makes them so bad?
I have no qualifications here, I'm just an interested observer, but I'm not aware of any reason not use tables in a document (aside from the potential stability issues referred to above).
Tables are a well understood means of segregating and organising content, and most people will find them logical/natural to read. They are not spreadsheets (I suspect anyone trying to use one like that will work that out pretty quickly)
Provided they are used sensibly and in context they're a useful tool (same as tabs, and bulleting, and, and, and...)
FYI, the OP is producing a large procedural document, so I don't believe there is any form filling involved