topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 5:51 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 ... 264next
1126
"...  Having moved away from my favourite Firefox (which Mozilla seem to be killing off), I am using Slimjet, which is based on chrome.
I used to use Chrome Canary 64-bit (beta), but found it too invasive. I hope Slimjet is better..."

Have you tried browsers that claim they are enhanced version of Chrome or have security improved like Cent, Iridium, Inox, Advanced Chrome or ungoogled-chromium?
No, I've not tried any of those (yet), so thanks for the tips - though I used to use "plain" Chromium (overnight updates).
1127
DcUpdater / Re: DcUpdater - 1.31.01 - Apr 1, 2017 (my preferences)
« Last post by IainB on April 02, 2017, 06:00 PM »
@mouser: Where you say:
My apps should all still use it if it's installed, but I have definitely stopped "promoting" it, as I essentially gave all my apps the ability to CHECK for updates using code built into them (DcUpdater will download and run the installler).
So anyway, DcUpdater is not really needed anymore, and it does seem a bit overkill.
________________________
I appreciate what you say there, but I'm a fan of DCUpdater's, because it saves me some time/trouble.
I have long preferred to use DCUpdater to auto-manage updates (i.e., check for new version, download, install) for all DC apps., all in a single operation, rather than get each app to update itself on an ad hoc basis using DCUpdater. I regularly launch DCUpdater from a FARR button, and it does any update checks/installs in one fell swoop.
This necessitated a bit of careful organisation, initially, of the two files:
  • [Name of app].dcupdate
  • [Name of app].dcupdateredirect (contains the explicit path to the app. folder)
- but, once done, it's a breeze.    :Thmbsup:
By organisation, I mean there is a copy of both of the above files in each DC app. folder, and a copy of every [Name of app].dcupdateredirect in:
   C:\ProgramData\DonationCoder\DcUpdater\RedirectFiles

I keep all the apps. (including DCUpdater) in folders within a Plugins subfolder to FARR:
   C:\UTIL\Windows utilities\FindAndRunRobot\Plugins\

All the apps. have ConfigDir.ini files set with:
  • PORTABLE=TRUE
  • CONFIGDIR = .
- which all seems to work OK (most of the time).    :Thmbsup:

DCUpdater thus outputs useful/helpful/informative reports like this, when it runs, and it's very fast:    :Thmbsup:

03_736x586_DEE79FD4.png

03_728x628_9EB71461.png
1128
Digit: (digit.co) - an algorithmic savings manager.
A potentially seriously useful service. :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:
(FAQ copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
Frequently Asked Questions
https://digit.co/about/faq

How does Digit work?
Every day, Digit checks your spending habits and moves money from your checking account to your Digit account, if you can afford it. Easily withdraw your money any time.
 
What makes Digit different than a recurring bank savings transfer?
Digit automatically figures out when and how much is safe to save based on your lifestyle. Digit doesn't require you to figure out an arbitrary amount to transfer every month.

Is Digit safe?
Yes. Digit uses state-of-the-art security measures. Your personal information is anonymized, encrypted and securely stored. All funds held within Digit are FDIC insured up to a balance of $250,000.

Does Digit cost anything?
Digit is completely free. You will see "Hello Digit Inc" transactions in your checking account but these transactions are just transfers to and from Digit.

What are Savings Bonuses?
Make money for saving money! Every 3 months Digit will automatically pay you a Savings Bonus (currently 0.20% annually). No fine print, no account minimums. Just sit back and collect your bonuses.

What is the Digit no-overdraft guarantee?
We believe so strongly in our math and our ability to safely identify money you can afford to save that if we overdraft your account, we'll cover the fee, up to two times per customer.

Where is Digit currently available?
At this time, Digit supports over 2,500 banks and credit unions within the United States.

Does Digit have an app?
Yes, we have an iPhone app and an Android app.

Does Digit work with banks located outside the United States?
Unfortunately, Digit is U.S.-only right now. We have hopes to expand internationally in the future.

Do I need a savings account?
No. When you signup for Digit you get your own Digit account which will hold any Digit savings until withdrawn. Any funds held in your Digit account are FDIC insured up to a balance of $250,000.

How do I access my Digit savings?
You can withdraw your savings 24/7/365 and as many times as you want per month. You can access your Digit savings by messaging Digit 'Withdraw' whenever you'd like to move money to your checking account.

What should I do with my Digit savings?
Some of our users have started a fund for emergencies, splurged on a trip, or paid down debt. You can also move your savings to other accounts (for investments or retirement) as often as you wish.

Have other questions?
We are always here to answer them. Please visit the Help
_____________________________

See also: The startup had helped users save $75 million around this time last year.
1129
Clipboard Help+Spell / Re: Kapersky reports trojan in CH&S 2.41
« Last post by IainB on March 31, 2017, 10:26 PM »
Maintenance on the machine is becoming the primary purpose of the machine it seems.  Get your computing in using one hour per day because the other waking hours will be consumed maintaining the system.
____________________
Yes, and for a long time that seems to have increasingly been the case with each new release of Windows. We are all apparently being used as perpetual unpaid Beta testers for each release of the MS Windows OS - in fact we effectively pay for the privilege, in buying the licence.
Microsoft's task thus becomes to develop and release buggy pre-production software for Beta testing. A while back I was talking with a retired aeronautical engineer from McDonell-Douglas/Boeing who recalls how, in the old days, they used the Microsoft DOS OS and found bugs in it whilst using it to develop advanced computerised control systems for warplanes and commercial aircraft. Every time they found a bug, they would report it to MS, and would promptly get an updated (new) version of the OS, with the bug removed - "After a while doing this, it became pretty evident to us that we were acting as Bill Gates' unpaid outsourced development and testing team and that we had probably become indispensable to him."    :D

I don't recall that being a problem with Apple computers...so there's probably a price trade-off somewhere.
1130
Clipboard Help+Spell / Re: Kapersky reports trojan in CH&S 2.41
« Last post by IainB on March 31, 2017, 10:01 PM »
...While MSE is still my favorite, it's no angel. It FP'd on me a few weeks back on a copy of f0dder's FSekrit I'd been using for years on 5 different machines.
__________________

Oh yes, and MSE does occasionally give annoying false positives on stuff that one has had on one's PCs for years with no prior adverse report from MSE. The workaround is to tell MSE that that particular file is an Allowed item.
My experience is that MSE gives fewer false positives than most of the other AV packages I have used.
I had put that down to the MSE developers possibly doing a more thorough job of virus signature detection than the developers of other AV software.
All this "Oh noes! The sky is falling!" and running around frantically every time there's a false positive on a downloadable software is both unproductive and time-wasting, and it puts the onus on the developer to jump through bureaucratic hoops to lodge an appeal against the false (in error) AV verdict. What ruddy cheek!
No, the responsibility more correctly lies with the AV developer to ensure that they only release bug-free, tested AV products in the first place. That testing won't exactly be rocket science, and they should have a suitably-designed testing regime for it. It will therefore probably be  a semi-automated, defined process and one which will be operating in statistical control, so they will be able to distinguish between constant cause errors and special cause errors, and thus be able to predict the former with differing levels of confidence, and mitigate against those particular risks. That's kinda like Statistics 101. As I said, it "..won't exactly be rocket science".

If they don't take that responsibility, then they are effectively just distributing the AV software in a Beta state all the time, trusting to luck and expecting the users to do their testing for them "in production", as it were.
1131
I'm using Chrome. I see that Chrome have more  Extensions: Pinboard tools, Facebook notification, Google +1 button, Wisestamp, XMarks, ChromeToPaper, etc
________________________
-daitrongpham (March 30, 2017, 08:24 PM)

Having moved away from my favourite Firefox (which Mozilla seem to be killing off), I am using Slimjet, which is based on chrome.
I used to use Chrome Canary 64-bit (beta), but found it too invasive. I hope Slimjet is better...

There are indeed lots of Chrome extensions, but they are not all the same as the Firefox extensions, so I have not yet been able to entirely replace Firefox with Slimjet. That's why I was pleased to find the "behindtheoverlay" add-on in the Chrome Store.
1132
Thought this could be relevant: (cross-posted from separate discussion thread)
...Not sure how service vs software distinction is relevant here. All I meant is online is bigger risk and therefore online options are the poorer option unless your use case demands it...
...KeePass can have vulnerabilities but installed in a folder locally the chances of it being hacked is lower, not sure how that is debatable.
__________________________

Thankyou for that. Yes, that (emboldened) all seems to follow. Yet, despite the truth of the third emboldened clause and my having known that, I am still a LastPass user, and accepted the risks, thinking them to be miniscule.

That's probably about to change though. I have to face up to the fact that the apparent flaw/weakness identified in the software (binary component) of some versions of LastPass would not be of such concern nor present such a risk and be so susceptible/vulnerable to attack if said software was not necessarily keyed/tied into the LastPass Service component.
Bother! LastPass was so convenient too.
1133
Clipboard Help+Spell / Re: Kapersky reports trojan in CH&S 2.41
« Last post by IainB on March 30, 2017, 08:35 PM »
@mouser:
As I wrote here:
Storm in a teacup.
But an example of how Trend Micro and other so-called "AV" (Anti-Virus) companies have been deftly digging a hole for themselves with this nonsense, then obligingly filled it in on  top of themselves. Self-destructive and well-earned.
Meanwhile, Microsoft Defender (AKA MS Security Essentials) laughing all the way to the bank as businesses get the message...
_________________________

Could I suggest, that you, as a developer, could sidestep any future artificial dependency on these idiot AV false positives and forestall your having to go to them, literally cap-in-hand, to request that they please correct their mistakes. This would be by the simple expedient of releasing all future versions in files with a checksum (file hash) - e,g, using CRC32, MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256, etc.).

I would also suggest that the user dump whatever time-wasting false-positive AV they are using, in favour of MS Security Essentials. As a consequence, there would probably be very few of these unproductive discussion threads active any more.
Problem solved?    :tellme:
1134
ProcessTamer / Re: Process Tamer - initial feedback v2.14.01 x64
« Last post by IainB on March 30, 2017, 01:58 PM »
My previous feedback was regarding x64 ProcessTamer v2.13.01 (per "About"), comprising:
  • ProcessTamerConfigurator.exe (is v2.13.1.0)
  • ProcessTamerTray.exe (is v2.0.10.1)

This latest version is x64 ProcessTamer v2.14.01 (per "About"), comprising:
ProcessTamerConfigurator.exe (is v2.14.1.0)
ProcessTamerTray.exe (is v2.0.14.1)

All seems to work fine - really well - as per my earlier notes/review for v2.13.01, but I shall report anything new that occurs.

I did have a few very odd problems earlier - after doing the test DPI change up to 125% and then back to 100% (because at 125% it was useless for my purposes).
Notes on these problems:
  • Though I had not made any changes to the sound system, the sound disappeared and Windows Audio service seemed to be stuck in "Stop pending". Could not be fixed and persisted across COLD re-boots of the system.
  • CHS (ClipboardHelp&Spell) persistently and frequently hung without error message and had to be terminated via ProcessHacker. Every time CHS was shut down like that, it would not restart (or would hang soon after restart) if PT (ProcessTamer) was running, so PT had to be closed first, then CHS restarted, then PT started. Rinse and repeat. I guess this was because I had set PT to force the CHS process HIGH, so PT had some residual hooks, or something, into that process. This fun also persisted across COLD re-boots of the system.
  • I fixed it all quite by chance after some trial-and-error. What eventually worked was uninstalling the sound card (which thought it was functioning properly), and doing a COLD re-boot. After re-boot, the sound card came up as present OK but was disabled and could not be enabled. It only worked normally after I did a second COLD re-boot. After that CHS also seemed to work fine and simultaneously with PT, as it should have and had done previously.

All that took a couple of hours (elapsed time) of mucking about, making me regret that I had ever tried changing the DPI settings in the first place. So be warned.    :down:

1135
@panzer:
BehindTheOverlay - One click to close any overlay on any website:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/behindtheoverlay/ljipkdpcjbmhkdjjmbbaggebcednbbme
_________________________
Ah, thankyou.    :Thmbsup:
I had been looking for something like that to replace a similar Firefox extension.
1136
LaunchBar Commander / Re: Trend Micro Officescan
« Last post by IainB on March 30, 2017, 05:15 AM »
Storm in a teacup.
But an example of how Trend Micro and other so-called "AV" (Anti-Virus) companies have been deftly digging a hole for themselves with this nonsense, then obligingly filled it in on  top of themselves. Self-destructive and well-earned.
Meanwhile, Microsoft Defender (AKA MS Security Essentials) laughing all the way to the bank as businesses get the message...
1137
...You should rather look up sites like mises. org (a lot of free books available), lewrockwell. com,  zerohedge. com and others sites, linked to Austrian economics.
She is probably taught of Keynesian economics and that is so messed up that I don't even know where to start...
___________________
She's only on micro-economics at the moment. I suspect you are right in that, for macro-economics they will probably get on to the Keynesian "school" of economics - which I was originally taught and which seems to have some irrational hypotheses. So, I already have her lined up for Mises, etc - thanks.
1138
...Not sure how service vs software distinction is relevant here. All I meant is online is bigger risk and therefore online options are the poorer option unless your use case demands it...
...KeePass can have vulnerabilities but installed in a folder locally the chances of it being hacked is lower, not sure how that is debatable.
__________________________

Thankyou for that. Yes, that (emboldened) all seems to follow. Yet, despite the truth of the third emboldened clause and my having known that, I am still a LastPass user, and accepted the risks, thinking them to be miniscule.

That's probably about to change though. I have to face up to the fact that the apparent flaw/weakness identified in the software (binary component) of some versions of LastPass would not be of such concern nor present such a risk and be so susceptible/vulnerable to attack if said software was not necessarily keyed/tied into the LastPass Service component.
Bother! LastPass was so convenient too.
1139
I use dummy anonymous forwarding email addresses (e.g. like Blur) to register on those sites that insist that you register before you can access whatever you find of interest there. I use the dummy email address where I do not wish to risk opening my personal mailbox ID to potential spam from such sites (they pretty much all do it, which is why they want your email address in the first place - it's a numbers game for them).

One of the organisations I subscribe to is FEE.org, which describes itself as:
Foundation for Economic Education
fee.org
The Foundation for Economic Education "is a non-political, non-profit, tax-exempt educational foundation" dedicated to the "economic, ethical and legal principles of a free society." FEE publishes books and hosts seminars and lectures.More at Wikipedia
Founder: Leonard E. Read
Type: Educational foundation, IRS 501(c)(3) tax exempt
Tax ID no.: 136006960
_____________________
So, today I got an email in my inbox addressed to one of my dummy email addresses, from FEE, and it had an item that looked like it could be an interesting article, and I carelessly clicked on the link without thinking. Normally I would have copied the URL from the link and truncated all the tracking stuff off first, and then gone to look at that article.
What happened then surprised and pleased me though - BAJ popped up this huge red warning screen - text copied below, but minus the actual link ID, just something similar:
STOP.    HOLD UP!
The site ahead contains Privacy.

Attackers currently on
http://fee.us13.list-manage.com/track/click?u=af44b8bfb54164e733a00a887&id=f0627f35bc&e=23fdfe0dcf
might attempt to install dangerous programs on your computer that steal or delete your information (for example, photos, passwords, messages, and credit cards).

Action taken because of the following filter
||list-manage.com/track/

Found in:
EasyPrivacy

How would you like to proceed?
_________________________

I followed the URL (minus the click-tracking) and was re-routed to this "About" at Mailchimp.com
______
   / ___M ]__
C{ ( o o )}
    {     ••
      \___
      ––––´


You probably found this page because one of our subscribers used MailChimp to send you an email campaign, and you traced a link in the email back here to investigate. MailChimp is an email-marketing service that serves more than 15 million companies of all shapes and sizes, from all over the world. We send more than 1 billion emails every day, and we help our customers comply with spam laws and best practices so they can get their campaigns into their subscribers' inboxes.

          __
|\/| _ .|/  |_ . _  _
|  |(_|||\__| )|||||_)
                   |
  Love What You Do
______________________________

I was surprised because, though I had read the blurb about BAJ before installing the chrome add-on, it had not sunk in that that BAJ would be able to monitor dodgy clicks like this from my emails. I was pleased that it did this, as it is very easy to be careless when clicking links, and sometimes that's all it takes to get a malware attack. I am therefore going to install this chrome add-on on all PCs I manage or help others with, as a matter of course.

By the way, before anyone jumps down my throat for subscribing to FEE, I do realise that, despite its self-declared "non-political" (ha-ha) status, FEE.org seems to have a decided political bias (seems to be anti-Trump or something from what I have seen so far) and, given its supposed emphasis on economics, it talks about political issues far too much and thereby contradicts itself - which is not a good look. Furthermore, given its stated emphasis on "educating" the young, I would see FEE.org as potentially having been cynically set up as a propaganda machine targeted at susceptible young minds for a particular brand of religio-political ideology ("catch 'em young", as the RC church used to put it). I don't know/care much who funds it, but "follow the money" might be interesting if I had the inclination (which I don't).

I subscribed to the website not because I particularly liked its religio-political bias (I couldn't care less, actually), but simply because I saw that some of its economic arguments looked interesting and I wanted to follow them up, because some of their lectures might be of use for my daughter (who is studying economics), and who is in their target audience age demographic. It's a bit like the parson's egg - "good in parts". She would be able to read/watch it and learn despite any political bias, as she starts from the premise that all teachers are to be regarded as potential idiots until they show themselves otherwise, and is learning to quietly spot an invalid/biased argument or propaganda item a mile off. So this would be good practice for her and she would be able to establish for herself whether the website might be able to contribute to her economics syllabus, regardless of any bias/noise in the signal. Let's face it, bias abounds in most human communication and affairs. (Interesting side reference here - BIAS.)

So BAJ looks like it will protect one from being quite so easily susceptible to evil click-tracking...    :Thmbsup:
...but you're on your own when it comes to protection from bias.    :D
(I actually consider that we should welcome bias in a communication anyway, because it tells one an awful lot about the level of objective content of the message and the rationale used in communicating it.)
1140
Living Room / File Encryption - now effectively outlawed in the US?
« Last post by IainB on March 28, 2017, 10:42 PM »
Disturbing report from Falkvinge.net:
With shock appeals ruling, the United States has effectively outlawed file encryption
(Copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
With shock appeals ruling, the United States has effectively outlawed file encryption

PRIVACY  UNITED STATES   POSTED ON MARCH 28, 2017 • UPDATED MARCH 21, 2017 • BY RICK FALKVINGE 68  3
 Digital key

An appeals court has denied the appeal of a person who is jailed indefinitely for refusing to decrypt files. The man has not been charged with anything, but was ordered to hand over the unencrypted contents on police assertion of what the contents were. When this can result in lifetime imprisonment under “contempt of court”, the United States has effectively outlawed file-level encryption – without even going through Congress.

Last week, a US Appeals Court ruled against the person now detained for almost 18 months for refusing to decrypt a hard drive. The man has not been charged with anything, but authorities assert that the drive contains child pornography, and they want to charge him for it. As this is a toxic subject that easily spins off into threads of its own, for the sake of argument here and for sticking to the 10,000-foot principles, let’s say the authorities instead claim there are documents showing tax evasion on the drive. The principles would be the same.

Authorities are justifying the continued detention of this person – this uncharged person – with two arguments that are seemingly contradictory: First, they say they already know in detail what documents are on the drive, so the person’s guilt is a “foregone conclusion”, and second, they refuse to charge him until they have said documents decrypted. This does not make sense: either they have enough evidence to charge, in which case they should, or they don’t have enough evidence, in which case there’s also not enough evidence to claim with this kind of certainty there are illegal documents on the drive.

In any case, this loss in the Appeals Court effectively means that file- and volume-level encryption is now illegal in the United States.

Without going through Congress, without public debate, without anything, the fuzzy “contempt of court” has been used to outlaw encryption of files. When authorities can jail you indefinitely – indefinitely! – for encrypting files out of their reach, the net effect of this is that file level encryption has been outlawed.

So were there illegal documents on the drive? We don’t know. That’s the whole point. But we do know that you can be sent to prison on a mere assertion of what’s on your drive, without even a charge – effectively for life, even worse than the UK law which will jail you for up to five years for refusing to decrypt and which at least has some semblance of due process.

The point here isn’t that the man “was probably a monster”. The point is that the authorities claimed that there was something on his encrypted drive, and used that assertion as justification to send him to prison for life (unless he complies), with no charges filed. There’s absolutely nothing saying the same US authorities won’t claim the same thing about your drive tomorrow. Falsely, most likely. The point is that, with this ruling, it doesn’t matter.

Syndicated Article
This article has previously appeared at Private Internet Access.

It looks like the report might be correct. File encryption has effectively been outlawed - just like that.
I didn't think that a judicial system could do that.
1141
Living Room / Re: Arizona sunsets
« Last post by IainB on March 28, 2017, 10:32 PM »
Does it have to be the sun setting? Here's the moon setting, also at RMNP:
Nice.
I get the distinct feeling that I have seen that exact same shot somewhere before.
1142
Living Room / Re: Arizona sunsets
« Last post by IainB on March 28, 2017, 10:30 PM »
Which do you like better: the panorama or the single picture?

I like them both the same.
1143
@mouser:
It's interesting to hear your thoughts on this stuff.  You are fighting an uphill battle in trying to keep your text dpi setting to just 100% and yet hoping to be able to customize the font settings in each individual application.
_____________________
Ah, sorry, I am not "...hoping to be able to customize the font settings in each individual application". I think it's a PITA. I would love it if the DPI settings change helped, but it doesn't (QED). So far, the only alternative that actually usefully works seems to be the path that I have followed - the PITA path. You don't seem to see that, from what you write above and later: "...biting the bullet to get used to the windows > 100% text size may be the way to go, despite it's imperfections.".(?)

Nor do I have a "...desire to completely customize the font settings". as you suggest. Quite the opposite. It's a tedious PITA.
What I do have is a mandatory requirement to be able to easily and rapidly read the screen displays from the apps I use. So I am just using the available, sometimes kludgy, workarounds to be able to maintain  that.

From my understanding, those aren't "imperfections" anyway, they would seem to be serious design flaws that Microsoft has been and is presumably still trying to rectify. One of the biggest design flaws was the Windows 8 OS/GUI fiasco, and they fixed that to a greater extent with Windows 10 (which isn't bad at all, all things considered). This screen display problem would seem to be something of an embedded hangover from that fiasco. Apple computer displays suffer no such problems (never have really), so it's not like it's a technical constraint for the technology available.
Therefore, the correct term would seem to be "design flaw".
At the moment MS seems to have fenced that problem to some extent and not declared a solution path. I feel sure they'll get there eventually.

Meanwhile, when they recommend (as they do) that the DPI setting be left at 100% for my laptop display, I'll heed their advice. I suspect that they probably know better than I what they are talking about there.

Where you say:
As an aside -- one thing to be aware of when testing the windows high dpi (>100%) text settings is to make sure you reboot or logout afterwards, otherwise things are very glitchy until you do.
- Yes, thanks. I did mention that "I had logged off/on again" after making the changes.
1144
@mouser:
The new version should incorporate my fixes for high-DPI displays which should make for nice big clear fonts on a machine where you have text size set to larger than 100%, which presumably is what you are running?
______________________________
In response: No, that is not the case for me. I am usually using a 15" laptop display at DPI 100%.
I don't wish to appear rude, but the very fact that you asked the question like that might indicate that you don't perceive what I am on about - as though in a state of cognitive blindness - despite all my going on about visual perception and the ergonomics of the GUI.

To see things from my perspective on this issue, one probably needs to have made some effort to study and understand the theory and extensive research related to psychological visual perceptual issues and ergonomics in analogue and digital displays, but especially (in this case) regarding GUIs on computer/digital displays of different types. This would assist in the comprehension of what the perceptual and ergonomic issues probably are.

This ideally would include at least a cursory study of optics and the different effects of differing eye problems on human eyesight and perception. Until one does that, one's paradigm might well be stuck in the "Yeah, adjusting the DPI will fix it" frame of mind, because that will be one's currently preferred perception of reality for such matters (and why not?).

Of course, it's always possible that I "just don't get it" about the DPI, I suppose, but at least I have repeatedly tried to vary the DPI settings and that was shown to be pretty useless (see below).

Because I have had to study those things above, I tend to see that many of the perception and ergonomic issues relate to things including such as, for example:
  • Depth of field of lenses in the eye or spectacles.
  • Focal length of lenses.
  • The effect of viewing natural (reflected) light versus viewing a light source, at different frequencies, on the eyes and the human nervous system.
  • The effect of different types of ambient light on the perception of information on a display screen.
  • Perceptual disorganisation caused by the use of certain contrasting colours in combination and at varying brightness levels, the effect of which can be amplified by optics - certain eyesight (lens) aberrations.
  • The effect of the colour (temperature) of light on the human nervous system (e.g., hence the use of f.lux).
  • The use of lines to emphasis boundaries between one coloured area/object and other neighboring objects (e.g., a background).
  • The use of deep (non-pastel) colours to emphasise boundaries.
  • The objective to enable max/optimum speed of perception and comprehension of text in the mind of the reader/viewer (for speed/efficiency).
  • The deliberate use of text fonts that research has shown can enable max/optimum speed of perception and comprehension of text in the mind of the reader/viewer.
    ______________________

I know that you have been focused on and put a lot of work into getting your apps to respond nicely to changed DPI settings, but from my perspective, ergonomically, changing the DPI setting is likely to be worse than useless.
I don't use/change the DPI setting - it stays at 100% (which is "recommended").
One can see why it's recommended if one does change the DPI setting. For example, as a test, I just now changed it to 125% (125% was the only alternative setting that the system allowed me to do). It was a constipated process. I had to do it using the CursorRight key  because dragging the slider didn't work as the setting just kept snapping back to 100%.
Having made that change and after I had logged off/on again, the visual effect of the changed DPI setting (125%) was grotesquely apparent and about as subtle and ergonomically useful as hitting the display with a brick - so one can see why it's recommended that it be left at 100%.    >:(

Furthermore, changing the DPI expunges all/any customised system Settings for text settings (see example below), and resets them to default. So, after going back to DPI 100%, one has to tediously, manually set them to one's preferences again.

Interesting point:
  • Experience of experimentation with these settings leads one to the discovery that they would seem to be far more useful than one might at first have thought.
  • They seem to be far superior to and more flexible and make much better (more efficient) use of the display "real estate" area than messing with the DPI, which latter should evidently be left well enough alone for laptop displays (QED) - unless one absolutely has to change them as a last resort for some reason.

For interest, here is a copy of my notes on the system settings pane that I refer to above:

29_527x465_5CD92078.png

It seems to me that, at the moment, the "best" solution to fix the problem of excessively miniscule fonts in these configuration panes would seem to be to change the mode of the pane so that the user can either (say):
  • (a) adjust the fonts and colours of the pane (which could do the job quite nicely, just like in the CHS GUI), or
  • (b) (as a provisional workaround) zoom the pane in/out, with the zoom level being remembered for when that pane is next opened by that user.
1145
Living Room / Re: Anyone know german?
« Last post by IainB on March 28, 2017, 12:42 AM »
@Tuxman:
Congratulations! On the first puzzle, you passed the pedantic test that I would apply.
You are thus half-way to being cordially invited - as a probationary member - to join TASOP - The Anonymous Society of Pedants (formerly The Society of Pedants; formerly The Pedants' Society; formerly The Pedant's Society; formerly The Pedants Society), and of which I am currently the Anonymous Chairman (so please don't refer to me by name as it may be a different person tomorrow as the role is randomly rotated, anonymously, amongst members).

By the way, the first puzzle/answer combo was provided on a BBC World Service panel game some years ago (I think it was "Does the team think?", or something like that), and I noted it down as I found it amusing, though not entirely correct. However, because it was not entirely correct, I considered that it would make an ideal test of the first of the two primary criteria necessary for invitation - as a probationary member - to the membership of TASOP.
Those two criteria are:
  • (a) the demonstration of pedantry and
  • (b) the demonstration of good general knowledge or the capacity to expand one's general knowledge in order to understand something.

Failure to meet either or both of these criteria means a failure to be invited to TASOP as a probationary member. Probationary membership is by invitation only. Following acceptance of the invitation, probationary members may enter into full membership, but only after acceptance by majority vote by the full members, following the successful conclusion of at least three debates that all probationary members have to take part in to gain entry and which demonstrates each probationary member's ability to satisfactorily meet the two criteria (above) to a consistently sustainable level. There is no honorary membership status. Full members who are not or do not wish to be actively involved in TASOP may retire or be retired from active membership with the status of Fellows of TASOP and are free to subsequently return to full active membership later, if they so wish and can find the time/energy to be actively involved.

On the second puzzle (sourced from the very same BBC program as was the first puzzle), you unfortunately failed to demonstrate both good general knowledge and the capacity to expand one's general knowledge in order to understand something.
Regrettably, I am therefore unable to extend a cordial invitation to you to join TASOP as a probationary member. Better luck next time, if there is a next time.
1146
Living Room / Useful MS Office 2016 self-training/learning resources.
« Last post by IainB on March 27, 2017, 08:48 PM »
I'm often in the position of needing some help with using an MS Office product, but I don't usually have anyone to quickly ask for assistance, so I have to rely on my own devices and what is available on the Internet.
The Help files/hyperlinks are quite good, but it's not easy to find really useful pointers when you need some ad-hoc guidelines or training in the use of an MS Office product, and it's not really feasible to expect be able to remember all of the functions that one has used anyway in an MS Office product, even for experienced users - there is so much to learn/know.

So, after reading this post: Free Basic Training For MS Office 2016 Users, I went and took a look at: Office training roadmaps

I downloaded the roadmaps (.PDF file) - there are 6 in all:
  • poster_access-web.pdf
  • poster_excel_web.pdf
  • poster_officeBasics_web.pdf
  • poster_outlook_web.pdf
  • poster_PPT_web.pdf
  • poster_word_web.pdf
       
 - and took a look at the Access one - which is an area where I am relatively ignorant.

I found the Access roadmap very handy, as one could visually scan it and decide where one needed to jump in and take a look and then go straight to that hyperlink. It's a bit like having an external mind-map or index to a Wiki on MS Office 2016.

This is potentially very useful. A nice job by Microsoft!    :Thmbsup:

So, for all those other MS Office 2016 users out there, I thought this might be of some help/use, though YMMV, of course.
1147
Living Room / Re: Anyone know german?
« Last post by IainB on March 27, 2017, 08:16 PM »
anyone know german?
Nein.

Reminds me of the puzzle: What is the question, the answer to which is "9W"?

- to which, the correct question to ask is:
   Herr Vagner, is your surname spelt with a "V"?    :D
__________________________________

...and another puzzle: What is the question, the answer to which is "Doctor Livingstone I presume"?

- to which, the correct question to ask is:
   What is your full name please, Doctor Presume?     :D

Ah, I slay me.
1148
Find And Run Robot / Re: Exporting FARR result list using snagit TXT mode
« Last post by IainB on March 27, 2017, 08:00 PM »
@mouser:
It depends whether the UI control is simple windows base control (like a common simple listview), or a more complicated custom control like a grid (FARR, CHS).

Ah, I see. Thanks for the explanation.    :Thmbsup:
1149
ProcessTamer / Re: Process Tamer - Feedback/Mini-Review v2.13.01 x64
« Last post by IainB on March 27, 2017, 07:28 PM »
Whilst I have not given PT an exhaustive test, I have given it a pretty good look-over, and this is me reporting back with my experiences and a sort of "Mini-Review" regarding ProcessTamer v2.13.01 (per "About"), comprising:
  • ProcessTamerConfigurator.exe (is v2.13.1.0)
  • ProcessTamerTray.exe (is v2.0.10.1)
    _______________________
OS is Windows 10-64 Pro: Build 14393.rs1 release inmarket.170303-1614
NB: This is a relatively cursory summary, so my apologies in advance for any mistakes I may have made or important points overlooked (let me know and I can correct them).

I had previously more or less given up on earlier versions of PT that I had trialled because, though they worked to some extent, they simply didn't always work too well. That is, PT didn't always do what it was supposed to do. This made them "unreliable" for my purposes, so I would generally prefer not to use them until they were improved.
However, this latest 64-bit incarnation of PT seems to work beautifully.    :Thmbsup:

By that, I mean really well:    :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:
  • It works well for the purposes intended.
  • It works just as well for 32-bit or 64-bit processes (so far, without fail).
  • It happily deals with and kills persistently-recurring superfluous system overhead annoyances that may be forced on the users and that are not necessarily needed all the time, and which keep reinstating themselves - e.g., such as GoogleCrashHandler.exe, DropboxUpdate.exe, SkypeHost.exe
  • It seems to do exactly what it should do (was designed to do) and as documented in the Help file.
  • It is easy to use with the relatively intuitive GUI provided - which also seems rather well-designed for the purposes intended.

Especially nifty/useful features:
  • CPU Measuerment Smoothing sliding scale.
  • PT Toggle: Double-clicking the PT icon in the Systray is a toggle to enable/disable PT. This also seems to be the quickest way to immediately control the application and (say) stop it from killing stuff that you might not want it to do just yet, but for which you have not yet had time to change the Configure pane. The user has to be quick though, as PT may be even quicker!    :D
    _______________________
The latter point also indicates that a new option is probably required: Start-up PT in quiescent (Inactive) mode.

Would be useful to include:
  • Start-up PT in quiescent (Inactive) mode - start-up option needed, as above.
  • Restart specified processes at timed/periodic intervals - e.g., useful with misbehaving/unstable/runaway processes including, for example RuntimeBroker.exe, SynTPEnh.exe, SynTPHelper.exe.
  • Configuration saves: (For some reason, I thought this functionality was included, but I couldn't find it.) The ability to save different PT configurations as named Configuration Files, so that the user can select a particular configuration that is specifically better-suited to whatever the user is wanting to do with the computer in that particular session - e.g., (say) clear out superfluous system overheads prior to gaming.
    _______________________

Needs improvement:
The only criticism I could make is as per my comment above:
The only shortcoming seems to be that the PT Configure pane suffers - in common with most other @mouser apps -  from the excessively minuscule and apparently 1-pixel thick character font, making it difficult to read without magnification or specs of some sort (for those with imperfect vision).
To put this into perspective: In the scheme of things, not having a more legible Configure pane is not a showstopper. The requirement for an ergonomically visually better GUI is, in terms of priority:
  • probably Priority "C" (Nice-to-have) for most ordinary-sighted folk, and
  • only becomes Priority "B" (Highly-desirable) for folk who need to wear reading glasses, and
  • would probably only become Priority "A" (Mandatory) for people with much worse eyesight problems.
    _______________________

Bit of a digression:
The reasoning behind why I persist in my crusade pushing for visual and ergonomic improvement in computer GUI design:
Spoiler
  • Having learned from the development in military/scientific applications, I have tended to focus on visual and ergonomic improvement as a mandatory requirement and design objective in the GUI of computer programs that I have been responsible for developing (either as a developer or as a project manager). Suitable visual and ergonomic design of these programs was usually specified in the requirements for the contracts for development, and was the subject of end-user acceptance-testing prior to production release and final payment of contract.

  • The fact that my eyesight needs the help of reading glasses is compounded by my having a couple of physical eye problems, one of which is a form of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (which may be genetic/inherited or may stem from damage after being exposed to high-UV sunlight and having severe snow-blindness in my teens). The effect is that the quality of my eyesight varies throughout the day and in differing kinds of ambient light.

  • All this has made me acutely aware of the reasoning for the above objective - i.e., functional efficiency of use of computer programs can be seriously inhibited/impeded by poor visual and ergonomic design of the GUI. The designer needs to aim to meet the eyesight and physical requirements of all potential users of the GUI, in most typical working conditions/environments - e.g., the operator may be sat in a brightly-lit office, or in the dimly-lit inside of a military tank. Again, from experience, many/most developers would seem to be blissfully unaware of whatever the visual or other ergonomic requirements of the users might be, with the result that they may unwittingly inflict on the users a sometimes punishingly difficult/unpleasant ergonomic interface and leaving users with little or no option to ameliorate the severity of that interface to better match their peculiar requirements. A classic example of this could arguably be the widely-used MS Office 2016 product (which is otherwise an excellent product).

_______________________
1150
Living Room / Re: Anyone know german?
« Last post by IainB on March 26, 2017, 06:39 PM »
I'd suggest you copy and paste the text into Google Translate...    :)
Pages: prev1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 ... 264next