Recent Posts
I simply tell my tailor whenever I go in, "I need three suits, and I want to be the best dressed person in the room. Show me what I should get." He never disappoints.-Renegade (July 03, 2011, 04:38 PM)
I am having this weird thing in Opera at the moment where the "delete" from shopping cart in amazon doesnt work. Needless to say it is annoyingI just change quantity to 0 & update. Always did that anyway, because I'm more often changing 2 to 1, having added a 2nd by mistake.-iphigenie (July 04, 2011, 05:39 AM)
ending by the end of tomorrow,
after that you can only get a normal license, not a lifetime.-Curt (June 28, 2011, 02:20 PM)
The Sony NEX-3 seems to have the best image quality/ high iso performance of any non-SLR camera, matching some SLRs which have much bigger sensors ... Also there's not much choice in lenses till next year. I guess that's why it's selling so cheaply..-tomos (July 01, 2011, 04:23 AM)
So basically everything he said doesn't apply to me. I'm not wasting my life if I don't have an SSD.Well, seems to me you will probably be wasting some of it if you don't have one-Deozaan (June 18, 2011, 06:00 AM)
; rather depends on how much of your life you have to spend to earn the money to buy & fit one & what else you would do with any time saved.Those of you who have made the jump - did you tweak windows so that the often written folders (cache, virtual memory files, temp folders, user folder) are on another drive or did you just install as normal?I shifted these. As much to save the space as the write limitation.-iphigenie (June 14, 2011, 05:45 AM)
The main reason I didn't respond to suggest Surfulater is that the O.P. seemed to be looking for something that would work well with Opera. Surfulater used to be able to do so, thanks to some instructions in Surfulater's old forum. However, as far as I can tell, those instructions no longer work with Opera 11.11 (the current version). According to some messages in the Opera forum, the problem began with Opera 11.01. It's a pity, because Surfulater is a terrific (though admittedly rather pricey) program.I remember being interested in Surfulater before I bought UR (I seem to remember reports of UR capturing web pages more accurately) and have kept half an eye on it since. Never enough to buy it even on BdJ days. And I do already have quite a lot of ways of doing this, so there has to be a compelling reason to acquire another. Always open to compelling reasons though. Working with Opera might be one; although I cope OK with using other browsers when I'm acquiring info, it would be much more convenient to always do it in the one I am using.-cyberdiva (June 07, 2011, 07:47 AM)
For instance, after dropping an indeterminate number of clips, every drop becomes one (1) particular clip. Only thing I've found to cure that is to kill, then restart, URP. But it shouldn't be happening, and it's likely something else running is interfering. However, I can't afford the time to hunt that particular needle - it's a big haystackCompletely agree..
-barney (June 07, 2011, 07:14 PM)
Even though they are selected in the View | Choose Columns (?) menu window. That is, both Web site and URL are selected, but neither shows in the item attributes window.-barney (June 07, 2011, 06:14 AM)
And for some reason, the UR folk apparently don't believe that, even with screen shots. I don't doubt that the product is good, but it simply does not perform as advertised on my system. My next step, when time allows, is to deinstall, reinstall, see if something went awry in the original install. That seems more and more likely, as new [non] events occur
.
-barney (June 07, 2011, 06:14 AM)
249$ vs. 249€ (<= that currently equals to 363$).European retail prices usually include VAT. That's a 20% extra, if it is included here. Any indication whether it is or not?
That's more than 100$ difference!-phitsc (June 07, 2011, 02:23 AM)
To make that a bit more clear, a list of URLs is intrinsically worthless, since there's no indication what that URL references until you click on it. Sorry if I misunderstand, but I've had that result. Oh, yeah, it's also difficult, if not impossible, to edit the note attached to that URL.-barney (June 06, 2011, 09:20 PM)
The biggest problem I have is getting the URL of stuff I've imported from the Web-barney (June 06, 2011, 05:09 PM)
Which version are you using? Does it have the "Univqersal Clipper," and if so, does that work with FF5?V4. No universal clipper for this one as far as I can see. I could use an old version, but I don't often use FF anyway. Pretty sure they will have a clipper working with it soon. Could also stick to v4 of FF but not really any point since I don't use it.-rjbull (June 05, 2011, 10:37 AM)
I have DOpus viewer as default programme for all images, but can it be the case that I dont have to, in order for the viewer to be the default image viewer from within dopus?
Will experiment. I suspect a Catch22 situation but may well be wrong. ~ note to self: must stop having negative expectations ;-)-tomos (June 01, 2011, 02:41 AM)
you're looking at images in the viewer and you see one you want to open in your image editor - you have to take note of the name, go back to the main window, find the file. A simple open [current image in viewer] in external app, or even just copy filepath would solve this.-tomos (May 31, 2011, 03:21 PM)
Problems zooming into images - on my machine I often cant get over 200%, I have no problem with the same images in other viewers. I have yet to report this officially (but it was reported in the forum in 2009).Checked this too. No problems going up to 800% with any of the images I tried.-tomos (May 31, 2011, 03:21 PM)
Also problems with one bit Tiffs only showing as an enlarged thumbnail. Again, yet to be reported officially but reported in the Dopus forum here.Haven't checked this.-tomos (May 31, 2011, 03:21 PM)
Has it to do with the feverish passion, or the irrationality that led to it?-Renegade (May 22, 2011, 06:10 PM)
Maybe it's the "image-processing and interpretation" part of the brain. You know, from looking at pictures and images and processing them into some kind of meaning.-Deozaan (May 22, 2011, 03:47 PM)
A team of neuroscientists studied Brooks’ brain while undergoing an MRI scan, to see how it reacted to images of Apple products and (heaven forbid) non-Apple products.Image processing areas would, of course, have been triggered by both Apple & non-Apple products, so that cannot be what they were looking at. There have been quite a few fMRI studies on religion.
According to the neuroscientists, the scan revealed that there were marked differences in Brooks’ reactions to the different products.
