topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday November 15, 2025, 2:52 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 ... 51next
1051
Living Room / Re: Ubuntu Linux Amazon Integration & EFF
« Last post by Tinman57 on November 02, 2012, 08:25 PM »
It's not so much that some distros feel the need to negotiate a "separate peace" and play Microsoft's game. The bigger problem is that it plays into Microsoft's long-term legal strategy. What Microsoft wants to do is establish that there is a de facto broad industry agreement that GNU/Linux infringes on Microsoft's IP without providing a court the chance to look too deeply into the allegation.

By getting major distros to individually cave to Redmond's arm twisting, Microsoft can make the case that a significant portion of the Linux world has already acknowledged Linux is infringing - else why did these sophisticated and knowledgeable developers feel it necessary to obtain software licenses from Microsoft in the first place?

Once a few more major distros have caved in - say maybe 10 or so of the top dozen  - Microsoft could then make the case (which would hold some water in a legal setting) that if Suse, RedHat, Fedora, Centos, and the Ubuntu family have all agreed to license from Microsoft there must be something to Microsoft's allegations that Linux is infringing. Especially since these distros employ some of the top coding talent - and who is better qualified to judge Microsoft's claim of infringement than these very same coders?

It's almost circular logic. But it plays well in court. Especially with a technically clueless judiciary and a moron jury.

I would like to see Microsoft attempt to prove its case in court. But Microsoft doesn't want to have to prove anything. (Likely because they can't.) Microsoft would much rather do a 'divide & conquer' in advance, and then have the cooperating distros turn Microsoft's assertions into a fiat accompli.

Pretty cute huh? :-\

  I never thought about it that way, but I do see your point.  Methinks Linux is bowing down to MS when they should be kicking them in the gnads.....
1052
I find something (ok...better make it many things) about that story extremely disturbing. Is it just me? :huh:

  Something VERY disturbing indeed.  There's NO coochie worth that much money.  NONE!!!
  Besides that, give me a woman with experience any day.  I want one that KNOWS what to do, not one that I have to train.  ;>
1053
Living Room / Re: Win 8 Patent Lawsuit
« Last post by Tinman57 on November 02, 2012, 07:31 PM »
The patents even use Microsoft's marketing term, "Tiles".  I just wonder how MS missed these patents and didn't get ahead of the issue long before releasing Win8.

  Goes way back to how MS stole code from CP/M.  MS seems to have made themselves from the hard work of others throughout their lifetime....
1054
Living Room / Re: Ubuntu Linux Amazon Integration & EFF
« Last post by Tinman57 on November 02, 2012, 07:16 PM »
I'm not sure whether or not legalizing marijuana is the solution to the problem here... Would it simply make you no longer care? Or would you get even more paranoid about the nastiness that is inevitable? I suppose moving to a different distribution solves that problem without the need to smoke a pound of pot. :)

  OR......  You can just change distribution and still smoke a pound of pot.....   >:D
1055
Developer's Corner / Re: FTC to give $50,000 for robocall solution
« Last post by Tinman57 on November 02, 2012, 07:07 PM »
The solution will involve serious privacy implications. Because an intelligent solution would be outright rejected. e.g. Limit on number of calls you can make, perhaps? Nobody needs to make a call every 10~15 seconds for prolonged periods.

  Except for perhaps, at home or office collection agencies, political advertisers, pollsters, real estate agents, tax-exempt marketers (Red Cross, ACS, ADA, etc etc etc).  As much as I'd like to see even these stopped, under the law they can still market legally and aren't affected by the DNC registry.....
1056
Living Room / Win 8 Patent Lawsuit
« Last post by Tinman57 on November 01, 2012, 08:24 PM »
Microsoft’s major new operating system release, Windows 8, is hit by a patent lawsuit. But don’t make the mistake of assuming this is just a patent troll trying to grub some candy.

http://www.zdnet.com...t-lawsuit-7000006713
1057
Developer's Corner / FTC to give $50,000 for robocall solution
« Last post by Tinman57 on November 01, 2012, 07:57 PM »
FTC Wants to Give You $50,000 to Stomp out Cellphone Robocalls

 Tired of unsolicited calls using up your cellphone minutes? Do you find yourself running short before the month is over due to them? Do you have what it takes to develop a technology that would prevent robocalls and thereby prevent these type of phone calls from disturbing the recipients? If so, the FTC Director of Consumer Protection believes that the winner could become a national hero with the additional incentive of $50,000 being offered by the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) for their efforts. Though the term national hero may be somewhat of an exaggeration, the problem of robocalling is for real. In fact, it continues to flourish despite regulations and legal attempts to stomp out the problem. However, one must know that there are exceptions to the rules, laws, and regulations -- such as the main one, which is designed to protect those individuals who actually opt-in to receive such solicitation. So, while the exceptions are few, telemarketers whose livelihood depends on making phone contact with the public as well as scam artists continue to bombard the public with unwanted calls -- some even disturbing us in the middle of the night.

http://www.lockergno...cellphone-robocalls/
1058
Living Room / Ubuntu Linux Amazon Integration & EFF
« Last post by Tinman57 on November 01, 2012, 07:46 PM »
Ubuntu Linux's Amazon integration gets a thumbs-down from the EFF
Online search results should be disabled by default, the advocacy group says.

http://www.pcworld.c...wn-from-the-eff.html
1059
Living Room / Re: You thought those cheap no-name USB/Phone charger were safe?
« Last post by Tinman57 on November 01, 2012, 06:57 PM »
It's not so much an issue of if they work or not.

It's that a lot of the cheaper chargers are made out of low grade hardware, and in the past there have even been isolated incidents of poorly designed clone units outright catching fire due to serious flaws resulting from cost cutting by the manufacturer.

  In other words, instead of using resistors and other electronic parts with a +- 1% variation, they use parts with +- 10% variations.  They're cheaper parts.
1060
Living Room / Re: Early Politicians
« Last post by Tinman57 on November 01, 2012, 06:53 PM »

Memorize these three short sentences in case you ever need them:

  • I do not consent to any searches.
  • I do not consent to being interviewed.
  • I wish to speak to an attorney.

Note: doing this this is even more important if you are innocent of what you're being charged with than if you're guilty.

  The real sad thing about that is it isn't against the law to talk as long as you aren't offending someone's religion, race, etc.  With the cops mentality, anything you say can piss them off and give them reason to either a) beat you about the face and neck, or b) bring up false charges (In other words, lie like the dogs they are....

  Another thing to note, it's against the law to make a false statement, written or verbal, to a police officer.  HOWEVER, it is perfectly legal for the cops to lie to you.  You will have cops tell you that they have an eye witness that you did something illegal in hopes that you will confess to get an lighter sentence.  DON'T FALL FOR THIS!  Remember, DON'T SAY ANYTHING EXCEPT "I WANT A LAWYER".
1061
Living Room / Re: Don't You Want to be "Safe"?
« Last post by Tinman57 on October 31, 2012, 08:50 PM »
Welcome to planet Earth, where every year is 1984! :P

Then the powers that be produced this:

http://news.cnet.com...urveillance-cameras/
Court OKs warrantless use of hidden surveillance cameras

In latest case to test how technological developments alter Americans' privacy, federal court sides with Justice Department on police use of concealed surveillance cameras on private property.
...
---------
The article goes on a red herring wailing about how "new" tech is vs citizen rights. Sorry, surveillance cameras are ... cameras. Cameras are the cutting edge news of 1920, though it would be hard to hide a couple of the early ones.

What has happened is that someone Sent A Memo that says "look how much fun we can have now!" For you math types out there, here's my analogy:

Divide by zero.
Now STFU about this "illegal operation crap." I SAID, Divide by Zero NOW or you are a terrorist!

And remember all that cool Founding Fathers stuff about "inalienable rights"? Sorry, rights are very very alienable. :(

Extra Credit: The Supreme Court is looking at cases about sending sniff dogs onto your private property to look for evidence to nail you with too.


  I live out in the middle of nowhere.  Dogs that come on my property are normally shot on site.... I have problems with feral dogs, coyotes that like to run my horses...  My AR15 has that "reach out and touch someone" effect.   >:D
1062
Living Room / Re: Early Politicians
« Last post by Tinman57 on October 31, 2012, 08:29 PM »
Hahahah~! ;D

Very cute!

Makes me wonder what the world would be like if people that actually knew what they were doing, e.g. machinists, truck drivers, farmers, engineers, programmers, physicists, doctors, etc., filled the positions that politicians try to. (One of the words that I really and truly loathe is "policy". The image above nicely explains why. :) )

  The election process is set up where only the rich or well connected can get elected.  If the common man was to get elected, he/she would most likely be like a rat in an unescapeable maze, lost in the legalese.  Lawyers have everything so encrypted with all the lagalese that no one can decipher it or discover the holes without being an expert in legalese.  Hiring a lawyer would be his/her only solution, and can anyone really trust a lawyer?   ;)  Lawyers are why our written laws are so screwed up to begin with.
  Only way I could see a regular ol' Joe (or Joan) ever being able to understand things as written would be to have it all re-written at a high-school level of understanding, and they ain't gonna let that happen.  They don't want the average guy to be able to understand the laws.  Knowledge is power, and knowing the holes can make you more money...
1063
Living Room / Early Politicians
« Last post by Tinman57 on October 30, 2012, 08:11 PM »
  And now it's official....

Early_Politician-sm.jpg
1064
General Software Discussion / Re: overcome compatibility issues
« Last post by Tinman57 on October 30, 2012, 08:04 PM »
hello!

I have a printer that doesnt support winxp 64bit

is there a way to make it work in my winxp 64bit pc?

maybe some virtual OS or something???

thanks!

  Have you looked at the HP website to see if they have the right drivers?  If they don't, then you may want to visit http://www.driverguide.com/ or http://downloads.zdn...t.com/category/2014/
1065
Living Room / Re: Data Breach Lawsuits
« Last post by Tinman57 on October 29, 2012, 07:39 PM »
  Well, if the gov't won't take actions to stop these companies that horde our personal data in substandard, unsafe way, then I'm glad someone is attempting to hold them accountable.  Seems they want it both ways, they want all of our personal info AND don't want to be held accountable for their handling/storage of this data.  I say if they have to pay through the nose every time their lax security allows a data breach, then they will start taking better care of our information.
1066
Living Room / Re: Don't You Want to be "Safe"?
« Last post by Tinman57 on October 28, 2012, 08:44 PM »
Police need new internet surveillance tools, say chiefs
Bill C-30 would give police access to internet communications without a warrant

  What, Canada trying to keep up with the U.S. with police state laws?  All this time I thought Canada was better than that..... :(
1067
Living Room / Data Breach Lawsuits
« Last post by Tinman57 on October 28, 2012, 08:30 PM »
Attorneys Warn of Increased Risk of Big Data Breach Lawsuits
Two attorneys for a prominent law firm warn that courts are starting to look more favorably on class-action lawsuits brought by data breach victims, who historically have had trouble proving actual damages from the thefts.

http://threatpost.co...each-lawsuits-102512
1068
Living Room / Re: You like science fiction, don't you? Of course you do!
« Last post by Tinman57 on October 27, 2012, 08:43 PM »
...Do you want to know the address of the site (and the moral ambiguities of and viral dangers of it's offerings)...?
Yes please - the URL would do fine. Ta.
I am always interested in looking at websites offering books to download.If it looks like a dodgy site, then I won't usually access it beyond the initial exploration.


Project Gutenberg offers over 40,000 free ebooks: choose among free epub books, free kindle books, download them or read them online.

We carry high quality ebooks: All our ebooks were previously published by bona fide publishers. We digitized and diligently proofread them with the help of thousands of volunteers.

No fee or registration is required, but if you find Project Gutenberg useful, we kindly ask you to donate a small amount so we can buy and digitize more books. Other ways to help include digitizing more books, recording audio books, or reporting errors.

Over 100,000 free ebooks are available through our Partners, Affiliates and Resources.

http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Main_Page
1069
Living Room / Re: Raising the Bar on Awesomeness - LMGTFY
« Last post by Tinman57 on October 27, 2012, 08:35 PM »
Saw this through a Pirate Bay FB post. And it just bloody rocks!

http://lmgtfy.com/

Got some retard who can't figure out how to look for an answer? THIS is just a way cool way to send a small message. :P

For example:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=frackin%27+reserve

The animation is just fantastic! :D

And gotta love the "Was that so hard?" ;D

  I know, that makes me so peeved when someone asks me to google something for them and send a response.  Like GoOgle don't work on their browser or something.  Just pure laziness....
1070
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: WinPatrol Plus @ $0.99 on January 29th
« Last post by Tinman57 on October 26, 2012, 08:39 PM »
Hi,

Even though the deadline is technically passed, the sale (up to 2 per person) is active as of a few minutes ago.  I wasn't even sure what is my existing license (from 2009, they are lifetime) in terms of numbers of puters, transferable, etc.  I think this makes me in good stead if I install on secondary puters, or maybe a gift to a friend, or maybe a donation to a fine software, or something.

Incidentally, I have become a big fan of WinPatrol + Chameleon Startup Manager.  I consider the 2 as complementary.

Steven
 
-Steven Avery (April 18, 2012, 12:39 PM)
  That's another great thing about Bill's software, it's lifetime.  In fact, I'm thinking about making a donation to him for all the updates over all the years I've used it...
1071
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: WinPatrol Plus @ $0.99 on January 29th
« Last post by Tinman57 on October 26, 2012, 08:36 PM »
As a WinPatrol Plus user, sent author support questions over a month ago, twice, and still haven't heard back.  In contrast, I ask Mouser a question about ScreenshotCaptor and it's answered five minutes later.   
-Midnight Rambler (April 17, 2012, 10:18 AM)
  Wow, that's pretty strange.  Normally Bill is Johnny-on-the-spot with support emails.  But considering how busy he must be with this new 99 cent thing going on......
  I've been using WinPatrol Pro for years and years and have found both the software and the support top-notch.....
1072
Living Room / Re: Don't You Want to be "Safe"?
« Last post by Tinman57 on October 26, 2012, 08:23 PM »
It just gets crazier. The SOPA... thread is getting a little full, so I'll file this one under "things your govt is doing to make you feel nice and free that all is well."

First the Slashdot story link:
http://yro.slashdot....ls-for-watching-dvds
Feds Continue To Consider Linux Users Criminals For Watching DVDs

-----

"An anonymous reader sent in a link to an article in Wired about the latest DMCA loophole hearing.

Bad news: the federal government rejected requests that would make console modding and breaking DRM on DVDs to watch them legal. So, you dirty GNU/Linux hippies using libdvdcss better watch out: "Librarian of Congress James Billington and Register of Copyrights Maria Pallante rejected the two most-sought-after items on the docket, game-console modding and DVD cracking for personal use and 'space shifting.'

*Congress plays no role in the outcome*. (Extra emphasis mine, why it's different from the other thread.)

The regulators said that the controls were necessary to prevent software piracy and differentiated gaming consoles from smart phones, which legally can be jailbroken. ... On the plus side, the regulators re-authorized jailbreaking of mobile phones. On the downside, they denied it for tablets, saying an 'ebook reading device might be considered a tablet, as might a handheld video game device.'"

So you can jailbreak a phone, but if it's 1" larger and considered a "tablet" you are breaking the law."

----------------

So I think the appropriate reaction is the set of characters at the top of the keyboard.

  And every time I hear some SOB yelling "America is #1" I just want to slap them...  There used to be a time, but it's not now.....
1073
  The reason the courts stated that corporations are people are because even a fortune 500 company isn't a single entity, it's made up of tens to hundreds of people that are investors and expect the company that they invested in to make as much money as possible.  Trying to bring down the fortune 500's would involve thousands of individual investors, which is a fight that the gov't don't want.  Not to mention that these fortune 500's pay in (read that as pay off) to the gov't.  It would be like shooting your boss, no boss, no paycheck.....
  The only way we are ever going to get out of this mess is with lobbying reform, and our paid and bought politicians aren't going to cut their own throats.....
1074
Found Deals and Discounts / GOM Media Player Free
« Last post by Tinman57 on October 25, 2012, 07:29 PM »
  Came across this today, sounds like a real nice program.....

Review: GOM Media Player (Free) plays just about anything

GOM Media Player can play back almost any audio or video file, and looks good doing so. This free player is well worth a look.

http://www.pcworld.c...-about-anything.html
1075

I actually have on my desk a genuine innovation, the prototype of a device I came up with a few years back that is currently undergoing a gradual R&D process whenever I can spare time and money to tinker with it more. My employer already signed off, all rights to this invention belong to me alone.

The current test type is focused on what was originally intended to be a proof of concept model, which it more than achieved successfully.

Since then I've been attempting to actually make it function properly, which would make the rights to this design worth a fortune.

But a law like this? In order to mass produce this device once the design is corrected, I would have to buy raw materials from which to make them. Those raw materials would be processed into components and assembled.

Except I would then have to sell those materials again as part of the finished product.

Hey wait you can't do that

Oh look at that. It is no longer possible to sell ANYTHING at all unless you gathered the raw materials with your own hands, because at some point along the line goods would have had to exchange hands more than once.

This law would actually be beyond unreal- it would mean a COMPLETE national economic shutdown because not only could you not sell things you bought from someone else, but you couldn't manufacture your own without having access to your own supplies of raw materials.

Even the brass that is trying to push this law wouldn't be immune to it's consequences. Apple would have to buy oil wells from which to refine plastic, and their own chipmaking facilities to make their own hardware. They wouldn't be allowed to sell their products if they contained materials that were bought from someone else, or used somebody else's designs in any way.

Amazing, I almost want to see this happen now.


Yeah, you know how that works.  First they come up with some total bs law with all kinds of loopholes, then argue about how to fix it to make it work for the next 2 years before they finally agree on how to amend it all, and of course will wind up totally screwing that up as well.
Pages: prev1 ... 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 ... 51next