topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 6, 2025, 1:57 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10next
101
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: Batch Editor for URL and LNK Properties
« Last post by ConstanceJill on October 25, 2018, 07:00 AM »
Alright, the following batch file should scan for all .lnk files in the folder where it's called from, and change them to run maximized, if they're currently set to run in a normal window (NOT if they're set to run minimized, however).

It requires shortcut.exe, to be downloaded from http://www.optimumx.com/downloads.html

@ECHO OFF
where shortcut.exe >NUL
IF ERRORLEVEL 1 GOTO error

for /f "delims=" %%# in ('dir /s /b *.lnk') do (
ECHO * Querying shortcut file : "%%#"
shortcut.exe /A:Q /F:"%%#" | findstr /C:"RunStyle=1" >NUL
IF NOT ERRORLEVEL 1 (
ECHO - This shortcut is set to run in a normal window.
ECHO Modifying it to run in maximized window mode.
shortcut /A:E /F:"%%#" /R:3
) ELSE (
ECHO - This shortcut is NOT set to run in a normal window, not touching it.
)
)
ECHO ---
GOTO end


:error
ECHO -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ECHO ERROR :
ECHO.
ECHO It looks like shortcut.exe was not found.
ECHO You need to download it from http://www.optimumx.com/downloads.html#Shortcut ,
ECHO and place shortcut.exe either in the folder from where you'll call this batch,
ECHO or in a folder that's referenced in your PATH environment variable.
ECHO.
GOTO end

:end
ECHO Done, press any key to close this window.
PAUSE>NUL
102
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: Batch Editor for URL and LNK Properties
« Last post by ConstanceJill on October 24, 2018, 06:07 AM »
Yes: do you think you'll need to use that several times with different options, or is it for a one time job?

If the latter, can you tell specifically what you want to change ? For example "change all shortcuts which are set to run minimized so they run in a normal window", or "replace « some_string » with « other_string » for all the shortcut that contain it in the target field" ?
103
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: Batch Editor for URL and LNK Properties
« Last post by ConstanceJill on October 23, 2018, 08:47 AM »
Yeah, we'd need to know a little more about what OP is trying to do.

Maybe it can be automated with a batch file and Shortcut.exe from http://www.optimumx....nloads.html#Shortcut ?
104
Thanks, I'll give it a try :)
105
I might be able to work with something like that (except that I don't have Photoshop). If there's a way to replace the colour of "isolated" pixels (that is, those that don't have any of the same colour right next to them) with that of the ones surrounding it, it would certainly greatly improve the overall quality — even if the text isn't perfectly readable, it would probably look much less ugly with less pixel noise.

Anyway, there is no rush, as I realised that the procedure didn't require nearly as many screenshots considering the target audience, and could avoid using most of the worst ones.
106
Hi again.

I suppose learning to use some image manipulation program would probably be the easiest solution to that problem.
107
Huh, OK… since I don't know how to properly manipulate a photo to obtain the result that I'd want (which is of course why I ask for an automated program to do so in my place), I suppose I'll provide photos of various text mode programs running in a virtual machine and also provide screenshots, as those would be as close as possible to the result I'd like, though of course I can't expect the output of the program to look nearly as sharp as the actual screenshots. Not sure how much help it will be, but I've attached an archive: the JPG files are photos while PNG ones are screenshots

Also, the actual photos I'd end up working with may have several of the following "features":
- lower resolution (maybe 1/4 or 1/5 that of mines)
- bad lighting
- rectangles may look even more like trapezes (I purposefully tilted the camera angle a bit sometimes to recreate the effect on the photos)
- a different aspect ratio
- moiré pattern

Again, I obviously don't except the result to be perfect, it should mostly be recognizable, preferably readable by a human, and lightweight.
108
Hello there .o/

Intro (to skip, go to the next bold text)
One of my colleagues has been working lately on making and documenting a procedure to automatically install an OS on a specific model of computer using SCCM.

While his process works fine, his documentation looks awful, mostly due to the quality of his pictures, which he made by taking photos of the screen with a phone while performing the procedure :(

I can easily take better quality pictures of most of the process by performing it in a virtual machine, however as far as I know, I can't have the VM's BIOS be identical to that of our real hardware (?)

I've already tried to decrease the color depth of his photos to 16 or 256 with IrfanView, with or without dithering, but the results always look pretty bad :/

Another option would be for me to re-type *everything* that appears on the screen and maybe add ANSI escape codes for color, but that would be very time consuming and could cause adding typos...

And this is why I would like … End of Intro
… a program that would take a picture, and decrease the color depth of each pixel to the nearest one that specifically exists in the palette that text mode DOS/Windows console can use (see color /? from the command line if needed).

I've seen that there is a program here: https://www.codeproj...520306/ASCII-Imaging which does something kind of similar, however from what I understand, there would be a few issues with trying to use that one for my needs:
- it would most likely try to replace every colored area with characters of its own choice
- it "works best" with 80 pixels wide pictures, which would obviously would make the pictures I want to "convert" unreadable, at 1 only pixel per character

Does someone know of such a program? Or does one of you want to give a try to making it?
109
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 10 Announced
« Last post by ConstanceJill on June 27, 2018, 06:32 AM »
Incidentally: Anyone have a link to Windows 7 Ultimate x64 ISO with SP1?

If you can get a clean ISO of any Windows 7 x64 with SP1 in the right language, you should be able to install the Ultimate edition¹ from it by removing/disabling the ei.cfg file from the iso file.
There's a dedicated tool for that so you don't need to have a specialized .iso editor (most of which aren't free AFAIK).

¹ : or any other, from Starter to Ultimate, provided that you have a valid serial for it
110
Nice! I've been using the command line version of SetACL in a script, SetACL Studio looks very cool.
Thanks for letting us know :]
111
Find And Run Robot / Re: font issue- font is blocky
« Last post by ConstanceJill on June 25, 2018, 06:19 AM »
Hello there.
Subtle, but very clear to me.
It would probably be clearer to us too if you had used PNG instead of JPG to save the picture ;)
112
Developer's Corner / Re: Delphi / Windows 7 / ColorFonts like Emoji
« Last post by ConstanceJill on June 20, 2018, 06:31 AM »
So my question is: How does FireFox render a Font while Delphi cant (or Browsers Opera/IE)
That would be because webpages can provide the font by hosting it somewhere and giving the path to download it from via .css : see https://www.w3school...r_font-face_rule.asp

Now there probably is a way to embed the font in your application too, as I remember there was a way to do it for graphic modes with Turbo Pascal back then.
113
Living Room / Re: Beware of punycode phishing attempts
« Last post by ConstanceJill on June 19, 2018, 07:15 AM »
And this is why Firefox should have "network.IDN_show_punycode" set to true as default.
114
I just "instinctively" thought PNG was very likely to be better for webpages because from my own (admittedly subjective) experience, I found that most web pages produce both lighter and better quality pictures being saved as PNG, unless the contents of the page includes a significant portion made of pictures (especially if those are already in JPEG), and thus it seemed only natural to question the choice of JPG.

For now we only know that OP encounters some kind of issue when posting PNG pictures to forums working with vBulletin, which seems to be the only reason —although I guess it may be a fair enough one, if the issue is too bothersome and can't be fixed— why he favors JPG.
115
png is larger in many cases.
It heavily depends on the type of picture you have. JPEG is mostly better for photos while PNG is better for pictures with much higher contrast, such as most webpages that do not include photos as their main contents.

I just tested with this thread's page as it was displayed on my computer before I posted, and got a 449 KB .PNG file on one side, and a 1.2 MB .jpg file on the other side.
Trying to save to JPEG that same picture (starting from the lighter, lossless version) with enough compression so that it goes below 450 KB (using IrfanView, either with the RIOT plug-in and specifying a size, or without the RIOT plug-in but by trying various possible values for the quality slider) produced pictures with lots of artefacts around the text, which is really ugly.

Also, the PNG file I obtained can be quickly optimized to become even smaller, still without quality loss, with programs such as PngOptimizer : I got it down to 372 KB.

Pearl Crescent Page Save is Firefox 57 (Quantum) and I use lower Firefoxes like 52.
-Steven Avery (June 13, 2018, 05:46 AM)
Only the version called Page Saver WE (for WebExtensions) requires 57+, while this one is for earlier versions.
116
N.A.N.Y. 2016 / Re: Freezing on >help >about
« Last post by ConstanceJill on June 12, 2018, 03:38 PM »
Huh which program, exactly?
117
I've used Pearl Crescent Page Saver Basic for a while, it allows both PNG and JPEG.

Also, I second the question: why jpg ? PNG offers lossless quality and may even produce lighter files (depending on the contents on the page).
118
Hmm I'm not sure I understand (the paper looks way too complex for me to even try reading it) so I'll probably say something stupid, but… if the "single parameter" can be as precise/long as we want it to be then,  yeah, of course, you can describe any bitmap picture with a single parameter (which would happen to be the whole file's binary contents written as a single number) ?_?
119
What if there's a person hidden behind the target?
120
N.A.N.Y. 2014 / Re: NANY 2014 Release - Spews
« Last post by ConstanceJill on May 09, 2018, 03:20 AM »
Thank you! :]
121
N.A.N.Y. 2014 / Re: NANY 2014 Release - Spews
« Last post by ConstanceJill on May 07, 2018, 03:02 PM »
Hi there .o/

Trying out this new "Fill (by width)" option got me thinking that it would be nice to, either :
- automatically refresh the current wallpaper when the user changes that (wallpaper position) setting
or
- add a manual refresh button/hotkey (without having to go to the next wallpaper, then back to previous)

Also, perhaps adding (an option to) automatically refresh the current wallpaper when the desktop's resolution changes, provided of course that none of the excluded processes is running.
122
Thank you :]
123
Yeah, it's OK :)

By the way there's a very minor issue: while the tooltip which appears when hovering the mouse over a button does show the command as it will be ran (removing whitespace at the beginning and end), the one that appears in the status bar does not.
124
Yes, that would be the idea: only ignore those at the beginning and end, since those are likely to be introduced by mistake when copying and pasting.
Thanks a lot!

Edit: now that I think a bit more about it, I can't quite see any reason not to ignore whitespace as long as it's only at the beginning and end of the variable string but... anyway, it's still good to have the option, I guess :D
125
Hey there .o/

I've been thinking about a possible improvement : since having spaces in the variable field can prevent some commands from working (but not always, and one might even want to add parameters that way), how about adding a checkbox option in the add/edit button window for that button to automatically "remove" spaces from the variable string before passing it to the command?

Note: then it would be nice if the tooltip that shows the command preview and status of the "run confirmation" also stated about that.
Pages: prev1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10next