topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday December 19, 2025, 9:32 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 391 392 393 394 395 [396] 397 398 399 400 401 ... 470next
9876
Living Room / Re: Real code vs. Code in the movies
« Last post by 40hz on September 27, 2009, 01:11 AM »
There have been some terrible, terrible tech movies. Remember Sandra Bullock in "The Net" running around on the beach all Baywatch-style with her laptop?

Well...maybe it's just "a guy thing," but I'd rather look at Sandra Bullock than Kevin Mitnick - and technical accuracy be damned. ;D

Sandy or Kev? You be the judge:



bullock1.jpg   Mitnick1.jpg
9877
Living Room / Re: Life Imitates Art - DateCheck - run a background check on your date
« Last post by 40hz on September 27, 2009, 12:53 AM »
@ SKesselman & Cranioscopical - I'd love to see you two get into it in real time on an IRC channel.
It would be better than Letterman and Leno combined. (A lot less crude too, probably.) ;D :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:
9878
General Software Discussion / Re: Outsourcing web design
« Last post by 40hz on September 27, 2009, 12:45 AM »
I am perfectly capable of coding a website myself, but that is probably not where my real skill lies.

If that's the case, then maybe it's better to partner with (or hire) somebody whose real skill is in coding rather than trying to be a one-person shop. I don't know how it works in the UK, but where I live, most corporations are extremely skittish about trusting something as important as a web design project to a one-person operation. And that's because most will not risk the exposure of being "single sourced." Nor are such fears groundless. What would happen to their project if you happened to be run over by the proverbial lorry?

The only solo designers (ok, one actually) I know who managed to successfully market herself as a one-person business did so because she had a brilliant portfolio combined with a stellar reputation in the web design industry several years before she went off on her own.

But even with all that going for her, she still 'hedged' her bet. First, she made it a point to part with her employer on extremely friendly terms. That alone netted her a deal of assignments from her former employer, thereby reducing her exposure once she hung out her own sign. Secondly, she banked a significant amount of money prior to leaving her corporate crib. But these are probably discussion points best left for another day.

The real problem with outsourcing is that there is an inevitable loss of control during critical stages in the production cycle. If you're comfortable taking that risk - or you're fortunate enough to have someone you can completely trust to deliver to spec, on schedule, and on budget 100% of the time - then outsource away. Otherwise, weigh the risks. It's your reputation that will take the hit for any failures, cost overruns or delays on the part of your suppliers. My sister (who is a graphic designer) often reminds her staff that a design agency's reputation is based on everything that goes out its doors, regardless of who did the actual work.

Is outsourcing the HTML and CSS coding of one of my designs, a cost effective way for a web designer to prototype a website?

Yes, but again I'd suggest you do it by partnering with someone with the requisite coding skills rather than project shopping the work on the open market.

Please note there's also a lot more to webpage coding than simple XHTML and CSS. A good web coder will also be handling things like SEO and related e-commerce related technologies that go beyond what's needed for the the visual display of a webpage. Today, if you're seriously thinking of getting into web design for businesses, you'll need a lot more than graphic design skills to be competitive. In many respects, the e-commerce part of the equation is even more important than the website's design or 'internal' technology. What's the point of producing a beautiful and functional website if the world has trouble finding it?

Hope this was of some help.

Best luck in your new endeavor! :Thmbsup:



9879
Living Room / Re: The Pricelessware Scam (Alt.Comp.Freeware)
« Last post by 40hz on September 26, 2009, 03:12 PM »
I am sorry that you and others feel as if you are being dumped on when the intent is to expose what I would have thought, an international freeware licensing, copyright and intellectual property scam, be of great interest to DC.

I'm sorry, but that's a little disingenuous on your part.

If your intent was simply to bring this matter to our attention, you've already done so. A single post would have been sufficient for that. But apparently you seem to feel the need to try to provoke the membership into a debate which they obviously have no interest in getting into. Why you seem to feel that the DoCo community is somehow obligated to get involved with this issue is a puzzle. But to my way of looking at it, any comment about it from you, other than the first (which was allegedly made with no intent other than to bring it to our attention) is being driven by an agenda. The proper venue for that is the ACF forum. Not here.

On a related note, we're privileged to have an FBI agent in our family circle. He's been with the FBI since the early 70s, and currently holds the title of SAIC. If you know half as much about federal investigations as you imply you do, you should know what that means.

I ran your statements regarding "an ongoing Federal investigation" past him. He offered some comments which I'll summarize:

  • Neither the FBI or any other federal authority will  discuss or comment on any investigation they are conducting. It is their policy to not even publicly acknowledge such an investigation exists until such time as they begin seeking indictments in court, at which time it becomes a matter of public record.
     
  • The only way someone could genuinely claim a federal investigation was being conducted would be if he were contacted by the federal authorities - either as a witness (in which case he would also be requested not to discuss the interview since it could jeopardize the investigation if word got out) - or if he were contacted and put on notice that he was a "subject of interest" (i.e. potential suspect) in the investigation - in which case his attorney would likely caution him to say nothing.

Draw what conclusions you will from that.

Which brings us to...

Now run along and scam again another day.
This kind of remark (and others of yours) represent a discourtesy that is unwelcome here. If you cannot make a rational point without invective then it reflects poorly on you. I suspect that I might not be alone in this feeling, and ask you to think twice before making your responses in future. Alas, 'think before you type' never has been my own strong point, but it is a guiding principle that is worth bearing in mind.

Thank you once again Mr. C. My sentiments exactly - except you stated them much more concisely and elegantly than I would have.


I think everyone has had their say now, and clearly this is something that people feel strongly about on both sides -- but i do think it's been hashed out as much as can be done from over here in the land of DonationCoder and we can should back to our regularly scheduled stuff now..

Agree.

And since that's the case, maybe now might be a good time to think about locking this thread?

Just a thought. ;)

9880
Living Room / Re: I've said it before - they're out to get you!
« Last post by 40hz on September 25, 2009, 01:17 PM »
Blah!

The banal and paranoid blathering of your obvious dog owners, is...well...banal and paranoid.



Nonsense! I own three cats and I still stand by what I said. ;D

The little girl character (Sadako) who appears in the "cursed video" sequences in Ringu was moderately disturbing. Had she been a cat however, she would have been utterly terrifying.

Litterbox.jpg

(With full apologies to Hideo Nakata, director of the movie Ringu.)
9881
Living Room / Life Imitates Art - DateCheck - run a background check on your date
« Last post by 40hz on September 25, 2009, 12:46 PM »
Some of you might have seen a throwaway comedy from the 80s called Amazon Women on the Moon.

As a comedy, it wasn't all that great. But one of the vignettes, a segment usually referred to as the "Two Forms of ID" skit became quite famous. The sketch revolves around a guy showing up to pick of his blind date for the evening.

2FormsofIDPlease.jpg

Everything seems to be going quite well for him until she asks him (sweetly) if she could see two forms of ID...

2FormsofIDPlease2.jpg

Here's the clip in case you missed the movie:

http://www.youtube.c...from=PL&index=48

After you've had your chuckle (or not), you might be interested to know such a service actually exists. It's called Date Check and it's offered by a company called Intelius. Now, thanks to advances in technology, you don't need two forms of ID - or really much of anything beyond a name, or an e-mail address, to run a background check on somebody. And you're also no longer tethered to a terminal in your home because this service can be accessed anywhere via your iPhone. Android and Blackberry support is also in the works.

Date Check

Today's dating scene is tough to navigate, which is why Intelius developed DateCheck, a free mobile app that deciphers fact from fiction in the palm of your hand. Simply enter a name, phone number or email address and instantly get accurate and comprehensive results. With features like Sleaze Detector, Compatibility, Net Worth, Interests and Living Situation you can be in the know on the go. "Look up before you hook up."

Info and video link:
http://www.intelius....m/mobile?trackit=188

I'm sure many more products and services like this are on the way - complete with all the privacy issues and opportunities for abuse that inevitably tag along with products like these.

Whether you're intrigued, disgusted, amused, stunned, or possibly even thinking about signing up - it's a whole new world out there.

On second thought, scratch that. It's just more of the same - except for the web access part.  :-\





9882
Living Room / Re: The Pricelessware Scam (Alt.Comp.Freeware)
« Last post by 40hz on September 24, 2009, 10:37 PM »

I don't think it's just this forum, I actually suspect that the protagonists are just trying to extend their field of operations. 

ACF used to be quite good, there was no spam, everyone was (generally) pretty courteous, and the focus was on sharing information (like here).  Sadly those days appear to be long gone...

All the more reason not to let said refugees attempt to make ACF's problems DC's problems.


9883
Living Room / Re: The Pricelessware Scam (Alt.Comp.Freeware)
« Last post by 40hz on September 24, 2009, 10:25 PM »
Or is this all some big secret plot to push me into finally building that site I was joking about?



ROTFLMAO!!!

9884
Living Room / Re: The Pricelessware Scam (Alt.Comp.Freeware)
« Last post by 40hz on September 24, 2009, 09:48 PM »
What the link and the group have in common is it is overrun with frauds, thieves, felons (like Bear Bottoms) scammers and Ari Silversteinn types.

Getting repetitious...

And the overall lack of civility doesn't fit in too well with how things get done here.



9885
I was wondering if something like razorCMS might be closer in basic functionality to what you're looking for? It's a flat-file CMS. http://razorcms.co.uk/

Or alternatively ezPublish, which is a lot more complex but also much more sophisticated. http://ez.no/ezpublish
9886
General Software Discussion / Re: dell laptop, vista won't activate
« Last post by 40hz on September 24, 2009, 04:56 PM »
Never hurts to ask. Worst they can do is say no ...

@Innuendo - Oh I'm not knocking it. You're absolutely right.  It's even happened for me*. :Thmbsup:

Just never with Dell. :-\

---

* In the past, IBM, Microsoft, Gigabyte Technology, and Compaq (prior to the 'merge' with HP) were particularly good at dealing with customer satisfaction issues that way.


9887
General Software Discussion / Re: dell laptop, vista won't activate
« Last post by 40hz on September 24, 2009, 03:36 PM »
Wonder if you could talk Dell into upgrading you to a Dell OEM Win 7 disc for all the trouble you have had with Vista.

small evil kitty.jpg

Hey Mr. Dell..we got a live one on the phone! You won't believe what he just asked us to do!!!
9888
OK, lets call it a bot or an intelligent agent then! ;D

Question: wouldn't you still need to cache the pages it constructs for performance reasons? Or at least update a database somewhere along the line?

Otherwise, if the CMS were being driven by this beastie, wouldn't every page request result in the spider having to transverse the entire (or a significant portion) of the directory structure each time someone browsed to a different page? Wouldn't you still need to to have the agent update a database of some sort with what it finds in the directory tree? Possibly even cache the actual pages for performance reasons and only update them if it detects changes.

True it could be an old fashioned 'flat' or even 'hierarchical' as opposed to 'relational' database (which is overkill for about half the applications that incorporate one*) but I can't see how you can not use some sort of database query to dole out the actual page requests.





9889
Living Room / Re: How to host you Windows 7 house party... wtf?
« Last post by 40hz on September 24, 2009, 02:58 PM »
I think you underestimate Microsoft's capabilities. They don't need an Apple mole. They're perfectly capable of destroying themselves without any assistance from 3rd parties.

Speaking of which...

Am I the only person here that would dearly love to see somebody smack Justin Long across the back of the head with one of those 17 inch MacBook Pros?

9890
... I'd be interested in something a little more scriptable and that working by analyzing different files in a directory tree that might have all kind of extra information to guide how the site is constructed and what menus are shown.

@Mouser - Are you envisioning something similar to a web crawler? Something that spiders down through a directory tree and abstracts and formats what it finds into a series of webpages? That's what it almost sounds like.



9891
Living Room / Re: How to host you Windows 7 house party... wtf?
« Last post by 40hz on September 24, 2009, 02:20 PM »
Sounds like the geek equivalent of a home lingerie show. :P

9892
Living Room / Re: Show us a photo of your mutt or other creatures..
« Last post by 40hz on September 24, 2009, 02:17 PM »
Even one week after that bad day I have very hard feelings several times a day and dark thoughts. Every thing and place that recalls my dog is hurting. It helped a little bit that I collected all of Cliffs pictures and movies in a digital photoframe that´s always in sight and to visit his grave every day. I never could imagine that I can get so brutal sad after losing my dog.

The only thing to do for that is give it some time.

There's two dogs in particular I've lost that still cause a twinge of sadness every time I think of them. And I think of both of them at least once a day. And despite the fact they've been gone for several years now, losing them never really did stop hurting.

But oddly enough, over time, this same hurt acquired a paradoxically joyous overtone. Go figure. I guess it's something like the "good ache" you get when you exercise. It hurts, but it's also good for you.

Hang in there! :)



9893
Living Room / Re: The Pricelessware Scam (Alt.Comp.Freeware)
« Last post by 40hz on September 24, 2009, 01:58 PM »
* now 40hz sits back with his second beer and thinks: Here we go again... ;D


how can you call it a language?

FWIW I sometimes feel that way about American English. ;)

9894
Living Room / Re: The Pricelessware Scam (Alt.Comp.Freeware)
« Last post by 40hz on September 23, 2009, 10:44 PM »
Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

Now may we wrap it up?  :)
9895
Living Room / Re: I've said it before - they're out to get you!
« Last post by 40hz on September 23, 2009, 10:35 PM »
omg. that's quite alarming. like something out of a Japanese horror film.

I'm fine with that just so long as this cat doesn't appear right after I watched some abstract creepy footage off a videocassette.

eeeek.gif

9896
Living Room / Re: The Pricelessware Scam (Alt.Comp.Freeware)
« Last post by 40hz on September 23, 2009, 05:59 PM »
** 40hz sits down next to f0dder, passes him a beer, and says: "Is this a rerun?" **
9897
General Software Discussion / Re: Need help in installing RSSOwl
« Last post by 40hz on September 23, 2009, 01:28 PM »
Thanks 40hz.

JavaRa removed the old version, j2re1.4.2_13 & its related files and RSSOwl installer worked fine.

Bingo! Glad it worked out for you. :Thmbsup:

9898
General Software Discussion / Re: Need help in installing RSSOwl
« Last post by 40hz on September 23, 2009, 01:05 PM »
I suspect RSSOwl's installer has a problem with the installed version of the JRE, and is ignoring the Java 6 update  Not every Java update replaces the JRE that got installed with the SDK.

Try downloading a copy of JavaRa from http://raproducts.org. First have it check for (and install) any updates. Once that's finished, have it remove any older versions of Java. That should clear up the problem.


JavaRa is a simple tool that does a simple job: it removes old and redundant versions of the Java Runtime Environment (JRE). Simply select "Check for Updates" or "Remove Older Version" to begin. JavaRa is free under the GNU GPL version two.

If that doesn't work, you could try uninstalling all your Java instals and updates manually using Revo. Then download and install a fresh copy of the JRE from here:

https://cds.sun.com/...PR@CDS-CDS_Developer

If you do actually need the full SDK, you can also get that from Sun's website.



9899
General Software Discussion / Re: Complaint: BitDefender Internet Security
« Last post by 40hz on September 22, 2009, 04:02 PM »
Hey 40hz - also sounds like Avira is not doing the job you hired it to do..... false positives... annoying.... low detection rate...
I admire you patience - I would have uninstalled it and write a complaint somewhere if I were you... :)

Nah. As a scanner and base level AV it's the best as far as I'm concerned. It's only the behavioral part that I felt needed more work. We've done some in-house testing (AVG, Avast, McAfee, Symantec, NOD32) and Avira always seems to do best overall.

I've also been told by one of the techs I work with that Avira has pretty much ironed out those problems with the latest edition. So when I get a chance, I'll probably disable TF and run with just Avira for a while and see if that works. Like you, I'm not too keen on having any more services running in the background than I absolutely need.

 :Thmbsup:
9900
General Software Discussion / Re: Complaint: BitDefender Internet Security
« Last post by 40hz on September 22, 2009, 03:49 PM »
I'm a little confused about your statements as well, 40hz. Threatfire is a heuristics-based product as it does not use signatures. Why do you use it if you dislike heuristics-based tools?

Sorry for the confusion. I should have qualified my earlier comment. I was actually referring to Avira's AHeAD heuristic mechanism, which generates far too many false positives as far as I'm concerned. The only time I could live with it on was if I set the 'sensitivity' so low that it hardly ever triggered.

Which brings us to ThreatFire. From my understanding, ThreatFire employs a hybrid approach. It does monitor behavior, but it also uses a signature database to identify and automatically lock out the most high risk threats. For lesser known threats, it offers you options for what to do. For anything truly odd that it has no information on, it issues a warning and a threat rating, and also presents you with options for next action.

I don't know if this signature check is what drastically cuts down on the number of false positives. But for whatever reason, ThreatFire does catch things that used to get through Avira. Prior to ThreatFire, I could usually count on at least one or two pieces of malware showing up on my machine after a few signature updates and a full system scan. So apparently the low setting on the heuristic scanner wasn't cutting it. But if I went and put AHeAD's setting on 'medium,' it would be constantly complaining about something. It was just too annoying after a while. Hence my mix & match approach.

Once I had ThreatFire, I put Avira's setting back down to low as a test. TF routinely caught things that were getting through. If I bopped Avira's setting back up to medium, Avira would then catch the same things TF did. But it would also return a pile of false positives that TF ignored. That's when I decided to disable Avira's heuristic and rely on TF for that layer of security.

Since I've adopted this mix & match approach, I've come up absolutely clean on every scan I've performed since.

So I guess the best answer is that I am currently using TF because it (despite all my biases  ;)) seems to work, and does so without annoying me. ;D

Pages: prev1 ... 391 392 393 394 395 [396] 397 398 399 400 401 ... 470next