topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 20, 2025, 9:47 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 ... 438next
976
I got a chuckle and a half out of this:



977
Oh good grief those reviews are funny!

Here are a couple more:

I make a living by hitting things with my Huge Ship. This book is absolutely DESTROYING my business! Please do not buy this!


I live near a park and frequently walk around the local area. Given the amount of dog mess that is on the pavements I thought this book would be the ideal read to stop me having to scrape my shoes on the grass before going home. It was only after it arrived that I looked closely at the title and realised it said 'How to Avoid Huge SHIPS'. A simple error that means I am still treading on massive examples of canine excrement. Having said that, I read the book anyway, and I'm pleased to say I'm not even having near misses with huge ships anymore. No sir, they aint getting anywhere near me!

978
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Renegade on November 29, 2014, 07:20 AM »
This is an interesting thread that goes over cracking with a lot of math.

http://www.reddit.co...mbers_letters_in_my/

No excerpts as it's a long thread, and they'd be almost meaningless.

Not a topic for novices, but those intermediate and advanced math/bitcoin/computing people will likely be entertained.
979
Living Room / Re: New square monitor (27" 1920x1920)
« Last post by Renegade on November 29, 2014, 05:08 AM »
I think these would be great for programming and I'd very much like to have a pair.
That's what they said about pyjamas!
-cranioscopical (November 29, 2014, 12:08 AM)

Until you realise that you can simply program naked and do less laundry...
980
Living Room / Re: Interview with Dread Pirate Robert's mother - Silk Road
« Last post by Renegade on November 29, 2014, 05:05 AM »
Another interview with Lyn Ulbricht by Nick Gillespie.



"I am fighting for my son," says Lyn Ulbricht, the mother of 30-year-old Ross Ulbricht, who faces life in prison as the alleged creator and operator of "Silk Road," an illicit online marketplace that was shut down by the feds last year. "But [this fight] is bigger than Ross, and I think one website is far less dangerous than the government trampling on our rule of law and the consitution."

Ulbricht sat down with Reason TV's Nick Gillespie to talk about why she believes the government's case against Ross broadly violates his constitutional rights and threatens online freedom.

For more on Ross Ulbricht and the government's case against Silk Road, read Brian Doherty's feature story in the December 2014 issue of Reason magazine, "How Buying Drugs Online Became Safe, Easy, and Boring:" http://goo.gl/eRjtJh

Unfortunately, he won't get a fair trial. The judge in his trial has stopped him from launching a defense. It's just a kangaroo court now.
981
Developer's Corner / Re: Visualization of Algorithms
« Last post by Renegade on November 28, 2014, 06:53 PM »
Nifty! Where did you find that?
982
Living Room / Re: Happy Thanksgiving to DonationCoder folks
« Last post by Renegade on November 28, 2014, 06:52 PM »
NSFW: This is a rather humourous take on Black Friday. Basically, they spew venom at the insanity of Black Friday and refuse to participate.

http://cardsagainsthumanity.com/

But click now, as it's seasonal. ;)
983
Living Room / Re: Watercolorbot - $300 watercolor painting printer
« Last post by Renegade on November 28, 2014, 05:38 PM »
^Yeah, and name it the Van Gogh model. :)

Leave out the razor in the kids' edition. :)
984
General Software Discussion / Re: Maze image stuff - what is it?
« Last post by Renegade on November 28, 2014, 05:27 PM »
They're called QR codes.
985
Living Room / Re: good Videos [short films] here :)
« Last post by Renegade on November 28, 2014, 09:06 AM »
Eerie and sad. Sun in the Nightime.

Interesting.

I wasn't really in the mood for it, so didn't enjoy it much. I need to be in the right frame of mind for those kinds of films.

986
http://syruptrap.ca/...re-covered-in-blood/

Situations where it’s okay to laugh when you’re covered in blood

1. You’re a newborn baby.

2. You’ve just delivered a newborn baby and everyone else has started laughing from pure joy.

3. You’re a bear and you’re great at being who you are.

4. You’re an actor working with a director who a) insists on using real pig’s blood during scenes involving blood and b) jokingly sprays people with blood between takes.

5. You’re a very good MMA fighter.

6. You’ve just made the Iron Chef blooper reel.

7. You’re a butcher and a colleague has engaged with you in witty banter.

8. You deserved it.

9. It’s the 1300s.

987
Living Room / Re: Happy Thanksgiving to DonationCoder folks
« Last post by Renegade on November 27, 2014, 07:01 PM »
I wish, me and my Mrs just took a walk down the Sea Front and then came back through town and half the shops have people queuing up outside them for Black Friday Sales...Last I checked, we live in England...why the HELL do we have this crap now?  :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash:

Because the videos posted online afterwards are (un)funny! :)
988
Living Room / Re: Thoughts on "Piracy".
« Last post by Renegade on November 27, 2014, 06:58 PM »
BTW: the Obama administration probably has a job for you, gentlemen. They love the art of "nuancing" definitions as much as you do. :P ;)

Oh come on! It's all good fun!

The interesting thing is whether something is right/wrong or ethical/unethical or moral/immoral/amoral or something along those lines. That's the direction I'm trying to steer the conversation in.

And unfortunately that's where you lose me because those terms have close to zero meaning for me.


That's not a very common position to take, but I understand it.


You seem to have jumped on the side of the content providers ... me, I don't care.


Oh, that? No. I was merely trying to point out the absurdity of laws.


So my original reply to your Netflix post still stands except my remark about 'summary execution under DMCA' was wrong.

Don't be so quick to retract there about summary execution! :D It's just a few strokes of a pen away at any given time!



One of the problems with piracy/copying is that while a lot of people will certainly jump on it being wrong, nobody ever seems to be able to articulate why very well, or to address counterfactuals very well.

I'll leave off with a couple essays, both titled "Against Intellectual Property" for anyone that wants a more serious treatment of the topic:

https://mises.org/li...ellectual-property-0

It's rather long at 71 pages. No excerpts.

This one is rather short though:

https://www.uow.edu....rtin/pubs/95psa.html

There is a strong case for opposing intellectual property. There are a number of negative consequences of the ownership of information, such as retarding of innovation and exploitation of poor countries. Most of the usual arguments for intellectual property do not hold up under scrutiny. In particular, the metaphor of the marketplace of ideas provides no justification for ownership of ideas. The alternative to intellectual property is that intellectual products not be owned, as in the case of everyday language. Strategies against intellectual property include civil disobedience, promotion of non-owned information, and fostering of a more cooperative society.

But, I suppose I've played the Devil's Advocate enough, and it's about worn out now.


989
Living Room / Re: Thoughts on "Piracy".
« Last post by Renegade on November 27, 2014, 07:30 AM »
Let's keep the fun rolling~!(TM) ;D

Do I have you summed up right here?

"Legally purchased = not pirated"

No, I meant legally purchased as in all the middle men get their extortion while the artist gets a pittance.

You're trying to have your cake and eat it too.

If it's legal to purchase a copy in Aruba (or any of the others), then it's legal. We don't get to make up new laws for some country out of the blue -- that the job of our regional overlords! :D 8)

You're trying to impose legislation from another jurisdiction on that legal transaction, and then say it isn't legal.

This was the point of me pointing out the illegality of homosexuality in a few different countries.

By applying the exact same logic you used above, we can get to the conclusion that homosexuality is also illegal in Australia.

The example of the first peoples of Australia not being human until 1967 was to illustrate the temporal nature, as opposed to the geographical nature above.

My point here is to show that either you accept the geographical nature of law being right/wrong or you don't.

I'm also trying to point out the absurdity of some action X being ok here, but bad there.

I'm firmly in the camp of rejecting that right/wrong has any geographical boundaries, etc. etc.

If you accept that right/wrong isn't bound to geographical areas, then you cannot accept that X is both right and wrong depending on where you are standing/sitting.

Now, if someone does accept that X is both right and wrong depending on where you are standing/sitting, then it necessarily follows that piracy/copying can be done in a "right" way, e.g. through proxies, etc.


Remember the Russian site that wasn't paying royalties but was selling music? People bought there.

You seem to be trying to tie payment to whether or not something is piracy. "Paid = not pirated?"

No, I don't tie payment to legal.  Paying for heroine doesn't make it legal does it?

I wouldn't tie payment to it either. It's a silly idea. Just clarifying there.

As for heroine, again, the legality of it has nothing to do with the right/wrong of it. But, let's skip that. I made that point in "C" above. (Heroine is just processed flowers, and not significantly different than marijuana in that aspect.) The point is C was the same as A - right/wrong/legal/illegal with respect to geography.


And that's what I want to eliminate - any kind of "legal" argument as to whether or not copying is illegal. Legal arguments are just silly, which I think I've shown above.

Yes, but your definition of legal is twisted, mine encompasses the whole transaction not just the handing over of money.

Here's where we really do agree:

1) Whether it is paid for or not doesn't matter.

So, that's progress.

I've tried to divorce the right/wrong of the matter from the legal/illegal of the matter by pointing out absurdities.

I'm not sure if you're on board there. You seem to want to use the arbitrary legal definitions that we live under. But the entire discussion of country ABC is rather boring as many DCers are from all over the world. Imposing a legal system on whether or not piracy/copying is right/wrong doesn't seem like a productive avenue to go down.


Yes, but your definition of legal is twisted, mine encompasses the whole transaction not just the handing over of money.

And yes - I did twist what "legal" is because there is no clear sense of what it is. Gay in Nigeria? Die. Die because you're gay in San Francisco? Crime. Aboriginal in Australia in 1950? Not human. Aboriginal in 2014? Human.

Whether or not something is legal is completely uninteresting. The interesting thing is whether something is right/wrong or ethical/unethical or moral/immoral/amoral or something along those lines. That's the direction I'm trying to steer the conversation in.

My above banter is just to try to lay the "legal" aspect to rest and be done with it as not useful.


And I'm still sure I could get a trebuchet to throw a flaming rock 30km ... so duck  :P


Running for cover the moment I click POST! ;D

Theft is a case where the thief deprives the victim, of something.
Copyright infringement does not necessarily lead to deprivation.

Great points!  :Thmbsup:

990
Living Room / Re: Thoughts on "Piracy".
« Last post by Renegade on November 27, 2014, 04:20 AM »
EDIT: Actually I think I just painted myself into a corner there ... I'm going to shutup now  :-[

Hahahaha~! ;D 8)

Actually, yeah... you did. But that's a good thing. :)

You're going to run into problems whenever you start talking about laws and governments and jurisdictions or any of that.

No, but if they buy the legally available DVD while in Aruba and then take it home, that's not piracy.

But you can legally buy DVDs for which no royalty has been paid.

So, you're divorcing the payment of royalties there from whether or not it's piracy.

Do I have you summed up right here?

"Legally purchased = not pirated"


If they buy it online while in Australia, that's not piracy either.

Remember the Russian site that wasn't paying royalties but was selling music? People bought there.

You seem to be trying to tie payment to whether or not something is piracy. "Paid = not pirated?"


And while I think of it, if I'm in a country where it's legally available for download online, buy it and download it - you're saying I should hand it in when I get to the airport?

Side Note: I nearly ended myself up in prison when I first landed in Australia because I had some simple, innocuous items in my checked baggage that I'd entirely forgotten about.


Are you going to leave anything behind in Australia, that you have legally bought, that is regionally restricted to Australia when you leave the country?
I don't think so.

You're right. I wouldn't and I won't. But I can't think of anything that I have that is restricted to Australia... Still... I wouldn't care if it was.


I'll go out on a really thin limb here:

Piracy is theft, pretty simple and pretty much illegal everywhere - your non-copyright countries included.  Whether or not it's enforced is another matter.


YES!!! THANK YOU!!!

That's what I wanted to tease out of the conversation here.

The consequence of rejecting that (the opposite of what you said) is that, just for example:

A) It's not ok to kill homosexuals in Australian, but "those faggots" in Yemen, Iran, Iraq, Mauritania, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, and Sudan deserve to die.

B) By some kind of magic, aboriginals in Australia became "human" instead of "flora and fauna" in 1967 with the stroke of a pen.

C) Certain plants and flowers are magically "ok" in Colorado, but will land you in prison in California.

The insanity is obvious.

The principle is that whether or not something is right/wrong/criminal is not dependent on any law or any government or any jursidiction.

Laws *can* reflect what is right or wrong, but they cannot dictate what is right or wrong.
 

However, if I can legally acquire anything, anywhere on this planet that's not illegal to own/use within Australian law then, broadly speaking, as far as Australian law is concerned I can own and use it.


And that's what I want to eliminate - any kind of "legal" argument as to whether or not copying is illegal. Legal arguments are just silly, which I think I've shown above.

 
991
Living Room / Re: Thoughts on "Piracy".
« Last post by Renegade on November 26, 2014, 10:48 PM »
Actually, I don't believe the answer is that clear cut.  Broadly speaking, in Australia if you can find a product cheaper anywhere in the world and you can get it to Australia to use then that's OK as far as the governing body in Australia is concerned, which is the ACCC

<puts on & sharpens horns while twirling black & red trident />

Ok. Sure. I'm cool with that.

The products are available for $0.00 at EZTV, The Pirate Bay, and a plethora of other places.

 8)

Their check-out process is super fast & easy too! 5 stars for customer service!

What you would be violating would be Netflix' and their distributors Terms & Conditions.

And thus also violating the copyright under which they are licensed. There is still a copyright violation there, even if there's some fancy-dancy, mumbo-jumbo, legalese layer of abstraction. The copyright is still violated because the copyright license is issued conditionally, and by violating the T&C, you're also violating the copyright conditions it is based upon.

That's not piracy, that's bypassing regional restrictions

So... are you trying to say that whether or not something is pirated depends on the laws of the country? ;)

http://www.freeandle.../resources/copyright

Countries with no known copyright law: Afghanistan, Anguilla, Aruba, the Cayman Islands, Eritrea, the Marshall Islands, Nauru, San Marino, São Tomé, Turkmenistan, and Vanuatu.

So, if somebody downloads a movie from The Pirate Bay, while at home, it's piracy, but if they go on vacation to Aruba and download the same movie, then it's not piracy?

A given, specific action X cannot not be X simply because somebody wrote a few words on a piece of paper.

e.g. If I eat a piece of toast, can someone undo my eating of that toast with a piece of paper?

...which is probably summary execution under DMCA.

I would at least hope that they'd get a kangaroo court trial! 8)

992
Living Room / Re: Movies or films you've seen lately
« Last post by Renegade on November 26, 2014, 10:14 PM »
Must have Witch Hunt (1994) in amongst your old VHS tapes also  :)

Detective Philip Lovecraft lives in Los Angeles in the 1950s when an ambitious Senator is holding hearings, on Magic. Magic is the new influence in Tinsel Town. Lovecraft is unique in that he is the only one who refuses to use magic in his work. Shortly after he is hired, he finds his client, Kim Hudson, accused of the murder of her husband, a film executive. Philip uses the tallents of a local witch, Kropotkin, to explain what is happening only to see her accused of the murder and sentenced to be burnt at the stake.

AND!!! It has Dennis Hopper!

He could probably take the worst script in existence and turn it into cult classic masterpiece. Solo. I have yet to see him not be utterly brilliant in any role he's ever played.

993
Living Room / Re: Thoughts on "Piracy".
« Last post by Renegade on November 26, 2014, 06:44 PM »
Here's a fun real-world example of "piracy/not piracy" for people to chew on...

In Australia, films and movies come out significantly later than elsewhere.

So, many people in Australia get a VPN account, then get a Netflix account (or similar) in an area where movies and TV shows are available.

Is this piracy?

I believe that the answer is obvious:

Yes. It is piracy.

You see, there are copyright and licensing agreements in different areas. The local providers in Australia do not have the rights to distribute a lot of content.

By getting a VPN and foreign Netflix account, these people are circumventing the jurisdiction of Australia, the laws, and they are stealing from the local providers.

You see, there's an opportunity cost there. Were the people merely to wait a year or so until the proper licensing could be negotiated, those local providers would then be able to sell/rent that content to people in Australia.

But noooo! Instead people get that content when it hasn't been properly licensed for their region. This is immoral. It is theft. It is piracy.

I say we keelhaul 'em all!  8)

994
Or, they could hire crappier programmers for cheaper, fire the expensive ones, save $8,000 a month, and not care about the $400.

Ok, uh, yeah... I'm gonna be right over there by the... <RUNS! />

That was pretty interesting though.
995
Living Room / Re: good Videos [short films] here :)
« Last post by Renegade on November 26, 2014, 06:39 AM »
If you're into music, numbers, geometry, and funky stuff, you'll find this very interesting. Part 2 has some of the coolest stuff.

* FAIR WARNING: Some people may enjoy this more after smoking a bowl. :)

The Cosmic 432 & The Musical Conspiracy

1)


2)


996
Living Room / Re: Interesting "stuff"
« Last post by Renegade on November 26, 2014, 05:59 AM »
Cymatics in 440 Hz and 432 Hz tunings.



997
Living Room / Re: Movies or films you've seen lately
« Last post by Renegade on November 26, 2014, 05:58 AM »
Oooo! That looks good!
998
Living Room / Re: Recommend some music videos to me!
« Last post by Renegade on November 25, 2014, 09:39 PM »
I think that I'd get a fair number of people agreeing with me if I said this is about the coolest music video ever produced:



999
Developer's Corner / Re: New EU VAT rules change the game for digital businesses
« Last post by Renegade on November 25, 2014, 07:59 PM »
There is currently a push to internationalize the reach of taxation. The whole thing flies under the black flag of "catching tax cheats".

Here's one clip:

http://www.euronews....-eyes-tax-crackdown/

One of the key topics that heads and governments will discuss is how to crack down on tax avoidance and tax evasion.

Jean-Claude Juncker will represent the European Commission at an awkward moment.

A series of leaked documents show that major multinationals took advantage of Luxembourg’s lax fiscal rules to trim their own tax bills.

Juncker was the prime minister of the Grand Duchy for 18 years until last year.

Speeches he gave during his tenure indicate that he led the charge in tempting the likes of Amazon and Apple to set up shop there.

World leaders are expected to endorse an OECD plan to ensure company profits are taxed where they are generated.

Euronews’ Efi Koutsokosta spoke with Pascal Saint-Amans, the OECD’s director of tax, who is at the summit on Australia’s east coast.

Here's a list of companies doing business in Luxembourg:

http://www.businessi...eal-database-2014-11

It's long, so I'm skipping a quote.

The EU is trying to project power beyond it's borders, which is pretty sketchy to say the least.

There was a case in Canada where a fellow refused to collect taxes at his business. Of course he was taken to court, but he won. He claimed that forcing him to collect taxes on behalf of the government was forced labour, and the judge agreed.

So, in at least 1 common law country there is precedent for refusing to collect taxes.

I tried to find the reference again, but I can't manage to find it after almost a half hour. I remember that the case was near Ottawa, though I forget the name of the town.

1000
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Renegade on November 25, 2014, 06:27 PM »
^Really? I don't even own a gun. Nor do I have any desire to use one. ;D

I didn't mean to imply that you'd have a rifle in your hands. It was an allusion to the 4th box of liberty. You simply reminded me of that.

And to people who think it cannot work -- in one of Antonopoulos's videos he talks about politicians already accepting bribes in bitcoin and this being the start of the end so-to-speak (do you remember which vid that was Ren?).

He's probably said it a few times in a few different ways. He mentioned politicians taking bitcoin campaign contributions on Monday.

Pages: prev1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 ... 438next