9526
...they are bastards for it nontheless...-Gothi[c] (September 07, 2010, 05:22 AM)
Melbourne. It's raining.
Overhead it's overcast.
North? Clear skies.
South? Clear skies.
East. Clear skies.
West. Overcast.
Just very odd. And it's always like that. 4 seasons in a day.
Anyone get bizarre weather?-Renegade (September 06, 2010, 12:04 AM)
Come to think of it...was that not a (rather famous) song?-Shades (September 06, 2010, 07:45 PM)
Melbourne. It's raining.-Renegade (September 06, 2010, 12:04 AM)
huh? aren't you in korea?
and (in case you're wondering) it's a damn fine day here in Brisbane...-Target (September 06, 2010, 01:03 AM)
http://www.auctionsniper.com
It's worked miracles for my percentage of bids won, and also, though I pay for the bid, I end up getting it for a lot less than I would have if I'd ended up in a bidding war. And you only pay if you win... and it's a small amount. I sound like a paid endorsement, but I'm not LOL-wraith808 (September 05, 2010, 10:46 PM)
aaaaaaaaargh.
someone has just bought it before me. i give up.-nudone (September 02, 2010, 07:24 AM)
Does anyone know anything more about this?-cyberdiva (August 29, 2010, 08:35 PM)
Yup. There's only one install DVD no matter what version you put on. That may be a big reason why Ultimate doesn't take up 100 GB. They had to trim it down so Home Premium purchasers wouldn't squawk.-MilesAhead (August 28, 2010, 02:46 PM)
I'm kinda dubious about a hardware resolution (save, perhaps, for hardware allowing a new delivery method). That is what currently exists, and any hardware solution to this would be naught more than an extension of existing broadcast technology.
True innovation - and Smart TV may be such, I don't know - is going to be software technology related, whether a new application or a new delivery method or, mayhap, a new display method. But it's going to have to take into consideration existing technology trends - laptops, desktops, tablets, smart phones - as well as make some effort toward predictions of technology to come (imagine a tablet laying on a table - or your lap - with a holographic display transmitted above it, for instance).
I suspect there'll always be a place for a flat-panel home television, but if the TV folk are going to advance, they're going to have to concentrate on software and delivery thereunto. Yeah, a Star-Trek-like holodeck in your living room would be nice, but I want to catch that same holographic effect on my laptop for the noon news break, perhaps for the State of the Union address. Oh, yeah ... I'd like to have that without eye fatigue or damage that some of the current 3D efforts are predicted to provide.
-barney (August 26, 2010, 11:27 PM)
I am a patent lawyer, but I'm not your patent lawyer. If I were, you'd know better.
The patent shown in the OP does not cover all dual-screen e-readers. The title of a patent does not define the rights of its owner. The abstract doesn't either. The drawings don't either.
There is no good reason to penalize inventors (be they individuals, small companies, or large companies) who do not have the resources to market their inventions. Nor to call them names.
Patents and parts of patents that cover (actually cover, not "are misinterpreted by ignorant people and tech media personalities to cover") prior art are already invalid. So:
- Talking about patenting breathing does not advance any legitimate discussion.
- Table-thumping about evil and despicableness sure appears foolish when the opinion is based on (at best) misinformation.
- Talking about forcing losing patent owners to (perhaps in the judge or jury's discretion) pay the accused infringer's attorney fees might actually address the problem.
If you don't know, ask. Don't be a windbag.
</rant>-MSchantz (August 19, 2010, 10:22 AM)
Talking about patenting breathing does not advance any legitimate discussion.-MSchantz (August 19, 2010, 10:22 AM)