topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday September 19, 2026, 10:30 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 371 372 373 374 375 [376] 377 378 379 380 381 ... 404next
9376
Living Room / Re: Pirate vs. Paying Customer illustrated
« Last post by wraith808 on March 13, 2010, 10:13 AM »
Interesting OpEd article on the UbiSoft debacle -  http://bit.ly/clZtRB
Why do you use bit.ly instead of direct links? please stop it.

Why stop it?  What's the big deal?  As scancode said, I got it because I post to here and twitter and my blog... it makes it easier.  So what's your argument against, and I'll consider it.
9377
Living Room / Re: Pirate vs. Paying Customer illustrated
« Last post by wraith808 on March 12, 2010, 12:41 PM »
Interesting OpEd article on the UbiSoft debacle -  http://bit.ly/clZtRB
9378
Living Room / Re: When you make your 100'th Post
« Last post by wraith808 on March 12, 2010, 12:36 PM »
No wonder he's the devil's advocate in so many discussions... :)
9379
Living Room / Re: When you make your 100'th Post
« Last post by wraith808 on March 12, 2010, 10:07 AM »
For F0dder

fodder6666.png
9380
Living Room / Re: Ars Technica on the problem with adblocking
« Last post by wraith808 on March 12, 2010, 10:04 AM »
I was under the impression that you also get revenue just for displaying the ads? Might get more from a click-throug, though.

Larger sites get revenue for views.  And post #6666? LOL :)
9381
Living Room / Re: Ars Technica on the problem with adblocking
« Last post by wraith808 on March 12, 2010, 12:17 AM »
But wait, if the ad never loads and is blocked from starting, how am I consuming their bandwidth? Effectively all I'm loading is text and a header file. No matter the site or its subject, content is king. Always will be. Like modern DVDs (pirate vs. paying customer), if you're going to frustrate my consumption of your content with ads, then -- for me -- your content is not worth reading.

I think they mean the bandwidth from the content of the site- not the ads, i.e. the text and header file.  And though that may be small individually, collectively that can be a large amount.  Not arguing one side or the other- just pointing that out.  And I don't think they'd have a problem with the people who choose not to read the content because of the ads, just those that block the ads and still consume the content.
9382
Living Room / Re: Ars Technica on the problem with adblocking
« Last post by wraith808 on March 11, 2010, 02:10 PM »
Well, you're better than like 90% of users out there (including me) :)
9383
Living Room / Re: Ars Technica on the problem with adblocking
« Last post by wraith808 on March 11, 2010, 12:30 PM »
^ And it could also be the realization that you don't have the technical know-how to take on the task.  Linux is a technological achievement, and I don't think that most people say that it isn't.  However, something can be a technical achievement and a stepping stone, rather than a technical achievement and a final destination.  And truthfully, I don't think that Linux is a viable final destination, and most people don't take that into account when looking at it as a feasible wide-spread consumer level OS.  It's technically impressive, but it doesn't have to be a viable alternative...
9384
Living Room / Re: Stephen's Weekly Tech News - Edition 4
« Last post by wraith808 on March 11, 2010, 10:59 AM »
Apparently Tay Zonday (the chocolate rain guy) is an acquired taste for some people... he's even on iTunes!  It still looks weird to me the way he ducks away from the mic, even with him explaining it!
9385
Living Room / Re: Ars Technica on the problem with adblocking
« Last post by wraith808 on March 11, 2010, 08:33 AM »
I will gladly put a no filtering entry in any ad removal program I use for sites that I truly enjoy and have TASTEFUL ads. Betanews is an example of a site with tasteless ads. After removing their ads, the pages become so much more readable, less lengthy, and overall easier to work with.

But most people are too lazy to do this- it's an all-in or all-out way of doing things (I have to admit, I'm one of the lazy).  Things such as ad revenue become a big deal when you're doing something full-time, and not just as a hobby, just as content is a big deal when you're doing something full-time, and not just as a hobby.  There are some hobbyists that approach (and in some cases surpass) the level of professional blogs- but if their RL was threatened by the time taken doing the hobby, which would take precedence?

I'll stop blocking ads when the following conditions are met:

Do you selectively unblock sites that meet these requirements?  Or does *everyone* have to meet your requirements before you unblock anyone?

And to the micropayment idea, I quote this comment on the slashdot article:
The issue I have with the concept of many content providers going to a 'micropayment' subscription is that for the user, eventually, all the micropayments for the stuff they want to read ends up being one big MACROpayment.

I've got enough monthly payments to deal with between car payments, car insurance, rent, phone bill, internet, and so forth. I don't want to and am not going to add a bunch of $.99 micropayments on top of everything else.

$.05 an article? Micropayment? How many articles have you read on the internet today? How many this month? Let's see... in the past hour or so I read...

$.05 1-Article MMO-Champion.com
$.10 2-Articles WoW.com
$.10 2-Articles Slashdot.org
$.10 2-Articles ArsTechnica.com
$.10 2-Articles Cracked.com
$.05 1-Article NYTimes.com
$.05 1-Article NewsoftheWeird.com

Ok... that works out to $.55 in an hour. Let's say 3 hours on the internet per day or 21 hours per week... $11.55 a week multiplied by 4 to get per month... $46.20... multiplied by 12 for the yearly cost... $554.40. $554.40 a year on micropayments!!!

So... tell me again... are you willing to make micropayments for every article you read on the internet?

Also, if many websites go to a micropayment model users will get sick of having to enter their credit card or paypal account every time they want to read something. Someone like Rupert Murdoch will come along and offer a whole bunch of this content for one payment instead of a ton of little payments.

It'll be a reintroduction to an AOL type experience where everything the average user would look at would be through the filter of one giant corporation.

Yep... Micropayments is exactly where the big corporations would like us to go.

Pretty insightful on the monies paid...
9386
Living Room / Re: Pirate vs. Paying Customer illustrated
« Last post by wraith808 on March 10, 2010, 01:34 PM »
4. I don't like companies such as steam, who offer single-player, offline only games, yet FORCE you to be online while playing.  They also (I don't know about the latest version of steam, I now refuse to ever own it again) punish you for losing internet connection.  What I mean by this, is, if you unexpectedly lose your connection for any reason, while steam is in ONLINE mode, you CANNOT get to your games.  You have to be ONLINE to turn the damn thing to OFFLINE.
-Stephen66515 (March 10, 2010, 11:35 AM)

This isn't true.  As long as the game was not in the middle of updating when you lost your connection, you can always go offline.  If it's in the middle of downloading, you don't have the information downloaded to allow offline use.
9387
Living Room / Re: Google does no evil; kills reMail
« Last post by wraith808 on March 09, 2010, 09:57 AM »
;D  nice use of sarcasm there  :Thmbsup:
9388
I hope anon will keep on banging the DRM servers :)

There's apparently a new attack going on...
9389
Living Room / Re: Google does no evil; kills reMail
« Last post by wraith808 on March 09, 2010, 07:28 AM »
That's probably the reason they hired the developers?  And they didn't kill it- they open sourced it.
9390
UbiSoft lied about the reason for DRM Servers being down...
http://bit.ly/aKEbCg

This gets better and better...
9391
Living Room / Re: Pirate vs. Paying Customer illustrated
« Last post by wraith808 on March 08, 2010, 12:02 PM »
UbiSoft lied about DRM Servers - http://bit.ly/aKEbCg
9392
Living Room / Re: Pirate vs. Paying Customer illustrated
« Last post by wraith808 on March 07, 2010, 10:32 PM »
Classic!  Ubisoft's DRM servers went down- making AC2 unplayable for many *paying* customers!

http://bit.ly/bNSXE5
9393
Living Room / Re: Google does no evil; kills reMail
« Last post by wraith808 on March 07, 2010, 10:22 AM »
Google does no evil: Open Sources reMail  :P

http://bit.ly/b3yUgH
9394
Living Room / Re: Da Vinci is my hero (or villain as the case may be)
« Last post by wraith808 on March 07, 2010, 09:57 AM »
Now *that* is power! :)
9395
Living Room / Da Vinci is my hero (or villain as the case may be)
« Last post by wraith808 on March 06, 2010, 09:20 AM »
9 Inventions that Prove Leonardo da Vinci Was a Supervillain

http://bit.ly/cdK1So
9396
This weekend's deal: score the king of the fighters,  Street Fighter IV, for 50% off, from  2:00 A.M. PST on Friday, March 5 until 5:00 P.M. PST on Monday, March 8. It's the latest installment in one of the greatest franchises of all time, and you can pick it up at a great price, so act now!

http://bit.ly/dx376T
9397
Living Room / Re: Stephen's Weekly Tech News - Edition 3
« Last post by wraith808 on March 05, 2010, 10:23 AM »
RE: The Awful Anti-Pirate System That Will Probably Work

Ubisoft's notorious "uncrackable" unfair game DRM falls in less than 24h
http://www.boingboin...fts-notorious-u.html
 :-\

Well, I personally agree with Tycho over at PA... nobody wins on this one, and it just leans towards the death of PC gaming. :(  I don't see why they don't just see that it's not pirate or purchase.  Most pirates wouldn't have purchased anyway, and most purchasers are going to purchase anyway.  The only way this changes is if the publisher's contract with the purchaser is unreasonable (i.e. publish crap, and I'm not going to pay, make me inconvenienced and I'm not going to pay, make a crappy port and I'm not going to pay, etc).  But for some reason this is beyond some publishers.  I wonder what their response is going to be.

EDIT: Didn't have to wait too long: http://kotaku.com/54...ks-drm-piracy-claims
9398
Developer's Corner / Re: Using Cloud Database in a Desktop application
« Last post by wraith808 on March 05, 2010, 08:18 AM »
There are many hosts that offer MS SQL Server as a database option- many of them are configured so that the DBMS cannot talk to the outside world, but only to local host.  The reason for this is that in the case that there's a vulnerability in SQL Server, the bad guys still can't get to it.  But even in those cases, as long as you have a non-shared solution, they will configure it as you ask- but IMO this is a bad decision.  The better way architecturally to do this IME is to have a webservice that talks to the DBMS, and access the web service from your application.
9399
Living Room / Re: What annoys you to no end?
« Last post by wraith808 on March 04, 2010, 12:17 PM »
I just can't stand having to send out that canned response + threat to people I know and generally like.

Oooh... maybe you should post it if it's so effective so that we can use it?
9400
Living Room / Re: Antivirus companies support virus writers?
« Last post by wraith808 on March 04, 2010, 09:04 AM »
"Drive-by" a really cute buzzword loved by paranoid people since it means WHATEVER amount of common sense you have, you can still be screwed! = BUY a sucurity package, you MUST. Almost entirely BS...

Scary in it's coincidence, but I almost got screwed by a drive-by this morning.  AVG saved me from it... so I don't know about that BS claim.  It was my first time running afoul of a virus in a long time, and I hate to think what would have happened had I browsed to the site on my desktop that doesn't have AV software installed...
Use firefox, keep it up to date, its usually fixed for exploits sooner than any use of exploit appears in the wild (which is also sooner than antivirus responds). Geez.


I *am* using firefox, and it *is* up to date, and my OS is patched for every known exploit that I know of.  I think that's an assumption fail.
Pages: prev1 ... 371 372 373 374 375 [376] 377 378 379 380 381 ... 404next